Eurostat methodology applied to the characterization of rural and urban Brazilian spaces

Authors

  • Gustavo Basto Braga Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Economia Rural, Avenida Purdue, s/nº, Campus Universitário, Edifício Edson Potsch Magalhães, 36570.900 – Viçosa – MG – BR, Minas Gerais http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5276-2686
  • Ana Louise de Carvalho Fiúza Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Economia Rural, Avenida Purdue, s/nº, Campus Universitário, Edifício Edson Potsch Magalhães, 36570.900 – Viçosa – MG – BR, Minas Gerais
  • Paula Cristina Remoaldo Universidade do Minho, Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Departamento de Geografia, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2018-0036

Keywords

rurality, urbanity, Eurostat, rural definition, urban definition

Abstract

The Brazilian official statistics show that the country is mainly urban, while authors including Veiga (2002) and Miranda and Silva (2013) present a more rural Brazil. The absence of a uniform way to define the rural areas in Brazil has led to diffused data about rural Brazil’s size. Therefore, are Brazilian regions predominantly urban, rural or intermediate? This paper applies the rural definition methodologies from Eurostat/European Union to the municipalities of Brazil. The results show the predominance of the intermediary category in Brazilian territory, while the population mostly lives in urban areas. However, due to methodological characteristics, this paper reinforces the necessity of developing other methodologies which would be able to identify rurality and urbanity, considering socioeconomic dimensions.

References

Bengs, C., and Schmidt-Thomé, K. 2006: Urban-rural relations in Europe. In: EPSON Final Report, 482.

Biegańska, J. 2013: Rural areas in Poland from a demographic perspective. In: Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 20(20), 7–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2013-0008

Braga, G. B., Remoaldo, P. C., and Fiúza, A. L. de C. 2015: Rurality Index: A View Over The State-Of-Art Network. In: Overarching Issues of the European Area. Bucharest: Milena Press.

Braga, G. B., Remoaldo, P. C., and Fiúza, A. L. de C. 2016: A methodology for definition of rural spaces: an implementation in Brazil. In: Ciência Rural, 46(2), 375–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150464

Brauer, R., and Dymitrow, M. 2014: Quality of life in rural areas: A topic for the Rural Development policy? In: Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 25(25), 25–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2014-0028

Brezzi, M., Dijkstra, L., and Ruiz, V. 2011: OECD Extended Regional Typology: The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions. In: OECD Regional Development Working Papers, (6), 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kg6z83tw7f4-en

Cavaco, C. 2004: Desafios do desenvolvimento rural: notas de leitura. In: Finisterra: Revista Portuguesa de Geografia, 6.

Cloke, P. J. 1977: An index of rurality for England and Wales. In: Regional Studies, 11(1), 31–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09595237700185041

Cloke, P., and Edwards, G. 1986: Rurality in England and Wales 1981: A replication of the 1971 index. In: Regional Studies, 20(4), 289–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09595238600185271

Cloke, P., and Milbourne, P. 1992: Deprivation and Lifestyles in Rural Wales. - II. In: Rurality and the Cultural Dimension, 8(4), 359–371.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(92)90050-G

Cloke, P. 2006: Conceptualizing rurality. Handbook of rural studies, 18-28.

Cloke, P. 2013. Rurality. Introducing human geographies. P.J. Cloke et al., eds. Routledge. 720–737.

Coca, J. R., Valero Matas, J. A., Torres Cubeiro, M., Casado Neira, D., and León Guerrero, M. M. 2012: Theoretical Reflection About a Fuzzy Definition of the Rural. In: Sociología Y Tecnociencia, 1(2012), 44–54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2119899

Deák, C., and Schiffer, S. T. R. 1999: O processo de urbanização no Brasil. EdUSP.

Diniz, F. 1996: Um índice de ruralidade para as NUTS do Alto Trás-os-Montes E Douro. In: 5o Congreso Desarrollo Rural pp. 903–916: Ávila.

Endlich, Â. M. 2010: Perspectivas sobre o urbano e o rural. In M. E. B. Sposito and A. M. Whitacker (Eds.), In: Cidade e Campo: relações e contradições entre urbano e rural. pp. 11–31: São Paulo: Expressão Popular.

Figueiredo, E. 2012: Rural Matters – Significados do rural em Portugal: entre as representações sociais, os consumos e as estratégias de desenvolvimento. In: Actas do IX Colóquio Ibérico de Estudos Rurais – (I)Mobilidades e (Des)Envolvimentos: o Rural desafiado, Vol. 78, pp. 68–78: Lisboa: CEG/IGOT.

Halfacree, K. H. 1993: Locality and social representation: Space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. In: Journal of Rural Studies, 9(1), 23–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(93)90003-3

Humphreys, J. S. 1998: Delimiting “rural”: implications of an agreed “rurality” index for healthcare planning and resource allocation. In: The Australian Journal of Rural Health, 6(4), 212–6.

IBGE. 2013: Malha de setor censitário urbano digital do Brasil 2010. Brasília: IBGE.

IBGE. 2013: Microdados do Universo do Censo 2010. Brasília: IBGE.

IBGE. 2013: Resultados do Censo 2010 agregados por setor censitário. Brasília: IBGE.

IBGE. 2013: Sítio oficial do Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, at: http://www.ibge.gov.br, DoA:21.03.2015

Instituto Nacional de Estatistica. 2014: Tipologia de áreas urbanas (TIPAU). Lisboa: INE.

Kageyama, A. 2004: Desenvolvimento rural: conceito e medida. In: Cadernos de Ciência and Tecnologia, 21(3), 379–408.

Kageyama, Â. 2008: Desenvolvimento rural: Conceitos e aplicação ao Caso Brasileiro. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS.

Li, Y., Long, H., and Liu, Y. 2015: Spatio-temporal pattern of China’s rural development: A rurality index perspective. In: Journal of Rural Studies, 38(March 2016), 12–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.01.004

Malinen, P. 1995: Rural area typologies in Finland. In: LEADER workshop “Typology of European rural areas.” Luxembourg: European Union.

Mazorra, A. P., and Hoggart, K. 2002: Lo rural, ¿ hechos, discursos o representaciones?: una perspectiva geográfica de un debate clásico. In: Información Comercial Española, ICE: Revista de Economía, (803), 61–72.

Mills, B. 1988: Why the Search for a Definition of Rurality may be a Fool’s Errand’. In: POPFEST Online Journal, (1)2, 1-9.

Minnesota Population Centre. 2013: Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, International: Version 6.2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Miranda, C., and Silva, H. 2013: Concepções da Ruralidade Contemporânea: as singularidades brasileiras. Brasília: IICA.

Nagy, O. 2009: The rural space: Typology and classification. Studia universitatis. In: Seria Ştiinţe Inginereşti Şi Agro-Turism, (4), 142–154.

OECD. 1994: Creating rural indicators for shaping territorial policy. Paris: OECD.

OECD. 2010: Oecd regional typology. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. 2013: Rural-Urban Partnerships: An Integrated Approach to Economic Development. Paris: OECD Publishing.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264204812-en

OECD. 2009: Regional typology: Updated statistics. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. 2013: OECD Regions at a Glance 2013. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/reg_glance-2013-en

OECD. 2013: OECD Territorial Reviews: Brazil 2013. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264123229-en

Öğdül, H. G. 2010: Urban and Rural Definitions in Regional Context: A Case Study on Turkey. In: European Planning Studies, 18(9), 1519–1541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2010.492589

Schlesinger, J. 2013: Agriculture along the urban-rural continuum: A GIS-based analysis of spatio-temporal dynamics in two medium-sized African cities. In: Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität.

Schmitt, B., and Goffette-Nagot, F. 2000: Définir l’espace rural ? De la difficulté d’une définition conceptuelle à la nécessité d’une délimitation statistique. In: Économie Rurale, 257(1), 42–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.2000.5180

Veiga, J. E. da. 2002: Cidades imaginárias: o Brasil é menos urbano do que se calcula. São Paulo: Autores associados.

Veiga, J. E. da. 2004: The Rural Dimension of Brasil. In: Estudos Sociedade E Agricultura, 12(1), 71–94.

Waldorf, B. 2007: What is rural and what is urban in Indiana. In: Purdue Centre for Regional Development Report.

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Downloads

Published

2018-12-21

How to Cite

1.
BRAGA, Gustavo Basto, DE CARVALHO FIÚZA, Ana Louise and REMOALDO, Paula Cristina. Eurostat methodology applied to the characterization of rural and urban Brazilian spaces. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series. Online. 21 December 2018. No. 42, pp. 151-162. [Accessed 22 February 2025]. DOI 10.2478/bog-2018-0036.

Issue

No. 42 (2018): December

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 431
Number of citations: 2