Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Russia’s role in the official peace process in South Ossetia
  • Home
  • /
  • Russia’s role in the official peace process in South Ossetia
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. No. 23 (2014): March /
  4. Articles

Russia’s role in the official peace process in South Ossetia

Authors

  • Tomáš Hoch University of Ostrava, Faculty of Science, Department of Human Geography and Regional Development, Chittussiho 10, 710 00 Ostrava
  • Emil Souleimanov Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Russian and East European Studies, U Kříže 8, 158 00 Praha 5 – Jinonice
  • Tomáš Baranec The Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development, Tsereteli Ave 72, 0154 Tbilisi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/bog-2014-0004

Keywords

South Ossetia, Russia, Georgia, de facto states, unrecognised states

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyse the role of Russia in the transformation of the Georgian-Ossetian conflict and analyse this important period in the history of the Caucasus, where Georgia and its secessionist region of South Ossetia have been trying to find a peaceful solution to their post-war situation. Major milestones of the official peace process are set in the context of Russian-Georgian relations. We then proceed to the analysis of the internal changes within the Russian Federation at the turn of the millennium and try to find a connection between this internal transformation of Russia and the transformation of the conflict in South Ossetia. The most important factors behind the more assertive approach by the Russian Federation towards Georgia in the last decade are considered: internal centralisation of power and economic growth of the Russian Federation, the reinforcement of the importance of the South Caucasus as part of the geopolitical discourse within the Russian Federation, the deterioration in Russian-Georgian relations, and the suppression of the fear of the spill-over effect since the end of Second Chechen War.

References

Agreement on Principles of Settlement of the Georgian- Ossetian Conflict, available from: http://rrc.ge/law/xels_1992_06_24_e.htm?lawid=368&lng_3=en Annual Report 2000 on OSCE Activities, Vienna: OSCE Secretariat, 24. 11. 2000, available from: http://www.osce.org/secretariat/14527?download=true

Azar, E. and Burton, J., 1986: International Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Benediktov, I., 2004: Saakashvili vstupil na tropu vojny (Saakashvili entered on the road of war - in Russian). In: Izvestija, 12. 7. 2004.

CEDR 7.10.2005. Central Eurasia: Daily Report, CEDR, Oct 7, Doc. No. CEP- 15001.

Clinton, W., 1998: A national security strategy for a new century, Washington, DC: The White House, available from: http://clinton2.nara.gov/WH/EOP/NSC/html/documents/nssr.pdf Civil Georgia 30.1.2003. Nino Burjanadze: Normalization with Russia Number One Priority, available from: http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=3094

Civil Georgia 17. 8. 2004. Government Comes under Fire from Opposition over South Ossetia, available from: http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=7859

Civil Georgia 21.9.2005. Peace Process Endangered as Civilians Shelled in S. Ossetia, available from: http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=10794

Civil Georgia 12. 8. 2008. Russia Endorses Six-Point Plan, available from: http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=19069

Cooper, W.H., 2009: Russia’s Economic Performance and Policies and Their Implications for the United States, CRS Report Service.

Coppieters, B., Kovziridze, T., and Leonardy, U., 2003: Federalization of Foreign Relations: Discussing Alternatives for the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict, Caspian Studies Program, Working Paper 2.

Cornell, S., 2001: Small nations and Great powers: A Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict in the Caucasus, London: Courzon Press.

Davidson, W. and Montville, J., 1981: Foreign policy according to Freud. In: Foreign Policy, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 145-157.

Demetriou S., 2002: Politics From The Barrel of a Gun: Small Arms Proliferation and Conflict in the Republic of Georgia (1989-2001). In: Small Arms Survey Occasional Paper No.6, pp. 9-10, available from: http:// www.smallarmssurvey.org/fileadmin/docs/B-Occasional-papers/SAS-OP06-Georgia.pdf

Devdariani, J., 2005: Georgia and Russia: the troubled road to accommodation. In: Coppieters, B. and Legvold, R. editors, Statehood and security: Georgia after the Rose revolution, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Dzutsev, V., 2012: Moscow Strives to Diminish Its Foreign Protectorates to the Level of the Russian Regions, In: Eurasia Daily Monitor 23.3.2012.

Echo of Moscow 20.7.2006 (Echo Moskvy - in Russian), Interviju s gostem radiostancii Echo Moskvy S. Lavrovem (Interview with the guest of radio station “Echo of Moscow” - S. Lavrov), available from: http://echo.msk.ru/programs/exit/44947/ Eurasia.net 1.6.2004. Georgia uses carrot and stick approach with South Ossetia, available from: http:// www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/46a484f71e.html Expert 4.4.2005, Interview with Dmitry Medvedev, available from: http://www.kremlin.ru/text/publications/2005/04/86307.shtml Fall, S.B., 2006: Conflict in the South Caucasus. In: Asian Affairs, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 198-209.

Galtung, J., 1996: Peace By Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization, London: Sage Publications.

Georgian Law on Occupied Territories, available from: http://www.diaspora.gov.ge/files/faili/GoGWarRep-Ch8/GoGWarRepCh8.Att212a.doc

Georgia Times 21.10.2011, Russia reduces financial assistance to Abkhazia and South Ossetia, available from: http://www.georgiatimes.info/en/news/66182.html

Georgia Times 23.7.2012, Ossetian Opposition has Forgotten its Heroes? available from: http://www.georgiatimes.info/en/articles/78407.html

Government of Georgia (2008): Interview with Heidi Tagliavini, available from: http://georgiaupdate.gov.ge/ru/tagliavini/15c7ac9f9e93192bc30fbeaecc87c70b/d47fb18b456b1f8392cb799b18529463/0aa8ac4e066be250bb5cd2f9e49b5fa5

Gruska, U., 2005: Separatismus in Georgien. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen friedlicher Konfliktregelung am Beispiel Abchasien (Separatism in Georgia. Possibilities and limits of peaceful conflict resolution in Abkhazia - in German), working paper No. 1., University of Hamburg - IPW, 38.

Hoch, T., 2010: The Limits of Humanitarian Aid and Development Cooperation in War-torn Separatist Regions: A Case Study of Abkhazia. In: Beyond Globalisation: Exploring the Limits of Globalisation in the Regional Context. Ostrava: University of Ostrava, pp. 139-145.

Hoch, T., 2011: EU Strategy towards Post-Soviet De Facto States. In: Contemporary European Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 69-85.

ICG Europe Report No. 159. Georgia: Avoiding War in South Ossetia. 26 November 2004, available from: http://www.crisisgroup.org~/media/Files/europe/159_georgia_avoiding_war_in_south_ossetia.pdf

ICG Europe Report No. 205. South Ossetia: The Burden of Recognition. 7. June 2010, available from: http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/europe/caucasus/georgia/205-south-ossetia-the-burden-of-recognition.aspx

Kleveman, L., 2003: The New Great Game, New York: Grove Press.

Kolossov, M. and O’Loughlin, J., 1998: Pseudo-states as harbingers of a post-modern geopolitics : The Example of the Trans-Dniester Moldovan Republic. In: Newman, D. editor, Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity, London: Frank Cass, pp. 151-176.

Kolossov, V. and O’Loughlin, J., 2011: After the Wars in the South Caucasus State of Georgia: Economic Insecurities and Migration in the ‘De Facto’ States of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. In: Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 631-654. DOI: 10.2747/1539-7216.52.5.1 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.52.5.1

Kolsto, P., 2006: The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States. In: Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 723-740. DOI: 10.1177/00223433060681 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00223433060681

Kopeček, V., 2010: Russian geopolitical perceptions and imaginations of the South Caucasus. In: Mácha, P. and Kopeček, V. editors, Beyond Globalisation: Exploring the Limits of Globalisation in the Regional Context, Ostrava: University of Ostrava, pp. 99-105.

Lough, J., 1993: Defining Russia’s relations with neighbouring states, RFE Research Report.

Lynch, D., 2006: Why Georgia Matters, Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.

Malcolm N. and Pravda A., 1996: Democratization and Russian Foreign Policy. In: International Affairs, Vol. 72, No.3, available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2625556

New York Times 12.9.2002. Putin Warns Georgia to Root Out Chechen Rebels Within Its Borders or Face Attacks, available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/12/us/vigilance-memory-russia-putin-warns-georgia-root-chechen-rebels-withinits.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm

News.ru, 31. 7. 2004. Mid RF vystupil protiv predlozheniju rozshirit mandat misii OBSE v Gruzii (Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs made the proposal to extend the mandate of the OSCE Mission in Georgia - in Russian), available from: http://newsru.com/russia/31jul2004/mid.html

Nichol, J., 2008: Russia-Georgia Conflict in South Ossetia: Context and Implications for U.S. Interests, Washington D.C.: Congressional research service.

Norling N., 2007: Gazprom’s Monopoly and Nabucco’s Potentials: Strategic Decesions for Europe, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program SAIS.

Pegg, S., 1998: International Society and the De Facto State, Aldershot: Ashgate.

Popescu, N., 2006: Outsourcing de facto statehood, CEPS Policy Brief No. 109.

Putin, V., Annual address to the Federal Assembly, 25 April 2005, Moscow, available from: http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/04/25/2031_type70029type82912_87086.shtml

Putin, V., Annual address to the Federal Assembly, 26 May 2004, Moscow, available from: http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2004/05/26/1309_type70029_71650.shtml

Regnum.ru 20.9.2005. Fotoreportazh s prazdnestv, posvjascennych dniu nezavisimosti Juzhnoy Osetii (Photo report from a celebrations of the Day of the independence of South Ossetia - in Russian), available from: http://www.regnum.ru/news/515563.html

Regnum.ru 13.11.2006. Za nezavisimost Juzhnoy Osetii -99%. (For the independence of South Ossetia - 99% - in Russian), available from: http://pda.regnum.ru/news/737823.html

Reimann, C., 2005: Assessing the State-of-the-Art in Conflict Management: Reflections from a Theoretical Perspective, Berlin: Berghof Research Centre for Constructive Conflict Management.

Ria Novosti 11.7.2004. South Ossetia: any incident to get violence under control, warns Lavrov, available from: http://en.beta.rian.ru/onlinenews/20040711/39764833.html

Roeder, P., 1997: From hierarchy to hegemony: the post- Soviet security complex. In: Lake, D. and Morgan, P. editors, Regional orders: building security in a new world, University Park: Penn State Press.

Socor, V., 2002: The Russia squeeze on Georgia. In: Russia and Eurasia Review, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 6-8.

Socor, V., 2006: Georgian Parliament Calls for Replacing Russian Peacekeepers with International Police Contingent. In: Eurasia Daily Monitor 20.7.2006.

South Ossetian Joint Control Commission Official Site, 1996: Memorandum o merakh po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti i ukrepleniyu vzaimnogo doveriya mezhdu storonami gruzino-osetinskogo konflikta (Memorandum on Measures to Guarantee Security and strengthen mutual trust between the parties in the Georgian-Ossetian Conflict - in Russian), May 16, 1996, available from: http://sojcc.ru/soglashenia/96.html

Stake, R.E., 1995: The Art of case study research, London: Sage.

The Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation 2000: Federation of American Scientists (FAS), available from: http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/doctrine/econcept.htm

The Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation 2008: President of Russia official web portal, available from: http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/docs/2008/07/204750.shtml

Tsiklauri, M., 2012: Two Journalists and One Human Rights Defender in Vladikavkaz Penitentiary, Media. ge 16. 1. 2012, available from: http://www.media.ge/en/portal/news/44500/

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2014-02-18

How to Cite

1.
HOCH, Tomáš, SOULEIMANOV, Emil and BARANEC, Tomáš. Russia’s role in the official peace process in South Ossetia. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series. Online. 18 February 2014. No. 23, p. 53–71. [Accessed 5 July 2025]. DOI 10.1515/bog-2014-0004.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

No. 23 (2014): March

Section

Articles

License

Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 999
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

South Ossetia, Russia, Georgia, de facto states, unrecognised states
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop