Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

ESG evaluation in Chinese cities: system development and empirical evidence from the Four Municipalities
  • Home
  • /
  • ESG evaluation in Chinese cities: system development and empirical evidence from the Four Municipalities
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. No. 73 (2026): September /
  4. Articles

ESG evaluation in Chinese cities: system development and empirical evidence from the Four Municipalities

Authors

  • Tongxin Li Shanghai Polytechnic University, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanghai, China
  • Hao Yuan Shanghai Polytechnic University, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanghai, China
  • Jue Dai Shanghai Polytechnic University, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanghai, China
  • Xing Li Shanghai Polytechnic University, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanghai, China
  • Le Liu Shanghai Polytechnic University, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanghai, China
  • Shenzu Shi Shanghai Polytechnic University, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanghai, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2026-0029

Keywords

urban ESG (Environmental–Social–Governance), Chinese cities, evaluation system, Four Municipalities, digital governance apacity

Abstract

Driven by global sustainability imperatives, urban ESG (Environmental–Social–Governance) evaluation has gained theoretical and practical urgency. This study introduces an “n+1” framework tailored to Chinese municipalities, integrating international standards and local context through 21 indicators across environmental, social and governance dimensions. Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process-Entropy Weight Method to data from Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Chongqing, we find Shanghai leads in overall ESG performance, followed by Beijing, Chongqing and Tianjin. Among the indicators, the Government Online Transparency Index stands out as a key driver within the governance pillar, highlighting the importance of transparency-oriented digital governance in advancing urban sustainability within the four municipalities. Regional ESG profiles diverge markedly, reflecting uneven development and uneven capacities for governance. We propose policy recommendations to strengthen ESG governance and inter-city coordination. These insights advance both the theory and practice of urban sustainability governance across the evaluated municipalities.

References

Ameen, R.F.M., & Mourshed, M. (2019). Urban sustainability assessment framework development: The ranking and weighting of sustainability indicators using analytic hierarchy process. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44: 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.020

Beck, D. (2022). The ESSGG proposition for stakeholder-oriented urban management performance: A theoretical perspective. Revista De Gestao Ambiental E Sustentabilidade-Geas, 12(1): e23099. https://doi.org/10.5585/geas.v12i1.23099

Cohen, M. (2017). A Systematic Review of Urban Sustainability Assessment Literature. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(11): 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112048

Dong, Z.F., Jia, Z., Ji, Y.Q., Li, J.D., Wang, Q., & Li, X.L. (2024). The thoughts and pathway for establishment of esg system under the strategy background of building a beautiful China. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 16(4): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2024.04.005

Du, K., & Tian L. (2016). The Implementation Framework and Content of the City Strategic Planning: Implication from the London Implementation Plan. Urban Planning International, 31(4): 90–96. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.5583.tu.20150811.1132.001

Elmqvist, T., Andersson, E., Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., Olsson, P., Gaffney, O., Takeuchi, K., & Folke, C. (2019). Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nature Sustainability, 2(4): 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1

Gao, J. (2025). The characteristics and challenges of Shanghai’s urban esg development under the guidance of sustainable development goals (SDGs). Urbanism and Architecture, 22(1): 93–97, 102. https://doi.org/10.19892/j.cnki.csjz.2025.01.21

Guo, X., Fang, C., Mu, X., & Chen, D. (2022). Coupling and coordination analysis of urbanization and ecosystem service value in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Ecological Indicators, 137: 108782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108782

Halla, P., Merino-Saum, A., & Binder, C.R. (2022). How to link sustainability assessments with local governance?-Connecting indicators to institutions and controversies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 93: 106741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106741

Hiremath, R.B., Balachandra, P., Kumar, B., Bansode, S.S., & Murali, J. (2013). Indicator-based urban sustainability—A review. Energy for Sustainable Development, 17(6): 555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2013.08.004

Hu, L., Li, A., Kuang, Y., & Lin, T. (2025). Advancing urban sustainability assessment: A novel DEA-based framework for multidimensional analysis in Chinese cities. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 12(1): 1145. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05445-z

Huang, S.Z. (2021). Three theoretical pillars underpinning ESG. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 19: 3–10. https://doi.org/10.19641/j.cnki.42-1290/f.2021.19.001

Jing, Z., & Wang, J. (2020). Sustainable development evaluation of the society-economy-environment in a resource-based city of China:A complex network approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263: 121510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121510

Li, C., & Li, J. (2017). Assessing urban sustainability using a multi-scale, theme-based indicator framework: A case study of the yangtze River Delta region, china. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(11): 2072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112072

Li, W., & Yi, P. (2020). Assessment of city sustainability—Coupling coordinated development among economy, society and environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120453

Liu, X.X., & Cao, C.Z. (2024). Theoretical Logic and Practical Paths for ESG Empowering New Quality Productive Forces. Research on Economics and Management, 45(11): 3–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.jg.2024.07.001

Lowe, M., Bell, S., Briggs, J., McMillan, E., Morley, M., Grenfell, M., Sweeting, D., Whitten, A., & Jordan, N. (2024). A research-based, practice-relevant urban resilience framework for local government. Local Environment, 29(7): 886–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2318571

Michalina, D., Mederly, P., Diefenbacher, H., & Held, B. (2021). Sustainable urban development: A review of urban sustainability indicator frameworks. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(16): 9348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169348

Ribeiro, P.J.G., & Pena Jardim Gonçalves, L.A. (2019). Urban resilience: A conceptual framework. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50: 101625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625

Sgambati, S., & Gargiulo, C. (2022). The evolution of urban competitiveness studies over the past 30 years. A bibliometric analysis. Cities, 128: 103811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103811

Shang, T.C., Gao, B.B., Li, X.P., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Urban Land Intensive Utilization Evaluation Based on AHP and Entropy Method. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (Social Sciences Edition): 11(6): 6–9. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD2009&filename=DKJB200906003

Sharifi, A., Allam, Z., Bibri, S.E., & Khavarian-Garmsir, A.R. (2024). Smart cities and sustainable development goals (SDGs): A systematic literature review of co-benefits and trade-offs. Cities, 146: 104659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104659

Sharifi, A., Khavarian-Garmsir, A.R., Allam, Z., & Asadzadeh, A. (2023). Progress and prospects in planning: A bibliometric review of literature in Urban Studies and Regional and Urban Planning, 1956-2022. Progress in Planning, 173: 100740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2023.100740

Tian, W.R., Xu, Y. L., & Huang, Y. (2020). Comparative analysis of ahp and entropy weight method in urban street landscape evaluation. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science Edition): 45(9): 147–153. https://doi.org/10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2020.09.022

Tsinghua University. (2023). Research on the ESG Rating System of Local Governments in China. https://thusdg.tsinghua.edu.cn/zhongguodifangzhengfuESGpingjizhibiaotixiyanjiubaogao2023.pdf

Xiao, H.J. (2024). Deconstruction and Reconstruction: Rethinking ESG. Jinan Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences): 46(5): 84–107. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/44.1285.C.20240507.1718.002

Xu, X., Gao, J., Zhang, Z., & Fu, J. (2019). An assessment of Chinese pathways to implement the UN sustainable development Goal-11 (SDG-11) – A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13): 2288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132288

Yao, Y. & Luo, Y. (2019). The Evaluation System of Modern City Development and “One City One Policy”. Planners, 35(4): 45–50. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDLAST2019&filename=GHSI201904008

Yang, L., Zhou, X., Gu, X., & Liang, Y. (2023). Impact mechanism of ecosystem services on resident well-being under sustainable development goals: A case study of the Shanghai metropolitan area. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 103: 107262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107262

Yang, Z. (2002). Inspiring of enterprise strategy to urban development strategy. Urban Development Studies, 3: 29–35. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD2002&filename=CSFY200203006

Yin, H., Xiao, R., Fei, X., Zhang, Z., Gao, Z., Wan, Y., Tan, W., Jiang, X., Cao, W., & Guo, Y. (2023). Analyzing “economy-society-environment” sustainability from the perspective of urban spatial structure: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. Sustainable Cities and Society, 96: 104691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104691

Wang, Z., Zhang, H.Z., & Huang, B.R. (2021). Effective governance perspective: Modern cities build a green, low-carbon and circular economic system—based on Shenzhen’s practical exploration and the survey research of government and enterprise. Contemporary Economic Management, 43(3): 63–71. https://doi.org/10.13253/j.cnki.ddjjgl.2021.03.009

Wu, T., & Ma, Y. (2023). New Changes of China's Urban Construction and Modernization of Governance Capacity. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 8: 5–13. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13253/j.cnki.ddjjgl.2021.03.009

Zhang, B.H., Qiu, C.G., & Wu, H.F. (2023).China Urban ESG Governance Evaluation System. Beijing: China Financial Press.

Zhang, K., Jin, Y., Li, D., Wang, S., & Liu, W. (2024). Spatiotemporal variation and evolutionary analysis of the coupling coordination between urban social-economic development and ecological environments in the Yangtze River Delta cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 111: 105561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105561

Zheng, G. (2016). Research on urban strategic plan-ning with the perspective of urban governance. Urban Planning Forum, 5: 42–45. https://doi.org/10.16361/j.upf.201605006

Zheng, S.H., & Wang, H. (2024). Evolution, logic, and implementation of ESG. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 26(4): 124–138. https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2024.04.009

Zhou, H.X. (2022). Wang Yao: Building a China-Specific ESG discourse framework. Sci-tech Finance Monthly, 6: 19–22. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDLAST2022&filename=KJJR202206006

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-09-18

How to Cite

1.
LI, Tongxin, YUAN, Hao, DAI, Jue, LI, Xing, LIU, Le and SHI, Shenzu. ESG evaluation in Chinese cities: system development and empirical evidence from the Four Municipalities. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series. Online. 18 September 2026. No. 73, pp. 117-131. [Accessed 20 October 2026]. DOI 10.12775/bgss-2026-0029.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

No. 73 (2026): September

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Tongxin Li, Hao Yuan, Jue Dai, Xing Li, Le Liu, Shenzu Shi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 137
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

urban ESG (Environmental–Social–Governance), Chinese cities, evaluation system, Four Municipalities, digital governance apacity
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop