Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Consumer value systems and insights into sustainable food behaviour across generational cohorts
  • Home
  • /
  • Consumer value systems and insights into sustainable food behaviour across generational cohorts
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. No. 74 (2026): December (early view) /
  4. Articles

Consumer value systems and insights into sustainable food behaviour across generational cohorts

Authors

  • Renata Nestorowicz Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7510-3747
  • Adrian Lubowiecki–Vikuk Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9672-9514
  • Doris Antczak Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1443-7855
  • Sylwia Majcher Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0457-7301
  • Marja Bajak Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4769-7696

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2026-0034

Keywords

consumer behaviour, sustainable dietary behaviour, Generation X, Millennials, Generation Z, generational cohort theory, Poland

Abstract

This article aims to determine the hierarchy of consumers’ values belonging to three generational cohorts (X, Y, Z) and examine the strength of the link between the value system and sustainable eating habits. A quantitative survey utilising the CAWI technique was conducted among a representative sample of Polish Internet users aged 18–59 (N = 639). The empirical results indicate that societal security represents the primary value priority for Gen X and Gen Y, whereas benevolence-dependability holds the highest importance for Gen Z. Furthermore, sustainable food behaviours (meat reduction and food waste avoidance) exhibit stronger correlations with core value systems in younger generations than in Gen X, where routine and economic pragmatism dominate. Given that gender acts as a vital intragenerational differentiator, value-based marketing communications promoting sustainability should be highly tailored to these demographic variations.

References

Abrahamse, W. (2020). How to effectively encourage sustainable food choices: A mini-review of available evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 11: 589674. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589674

Ammann, J., Arbenz, A., Mack, G., Nemecek, T., & El Benni, N. (2023). A review on policy instruments for sustainable food consumption. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 36: 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.01.012

Balázsné, M., Kovács, I., Balázs, B., & Beke, J. (2022). Health and environment conscious consumer attitudes: Generation Z segment personas according to the LOHAS model. Social Sciences, 1(7): 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11070269

Begho, T., & Liu, S. (2024). Does social proof and herd behaviour drive food choices of consumers?. British Food Journal, 126(3): 1050-1064. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2023-0676

Belz, F.M., Peattie, K., & Onel, N. (2025). Sustainability Marketing: A Global Perspective. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Braciníková, V., & Matušínská, K. (2020). Clustering of Millennials by brand perceptions in relation to demographic factors. Central European Business Review, 9(5): 63-80. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.253

Carrington, M.J., Neville, B.A., & Whitwell, G.J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1): 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1086/209191

Caliskan, C., Dedeoğlu, B.B., Sabbağ, Ç., Yılmaz, G., & Okumus, B. (2025). Analyzing Gen Z’s perspectives on anticipated food crises and food behaviors: the significance of a sustainability-oriented mindset. British Food Journal, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2025-0220

Casalegno, C., Candelo, E., & Santoro, G. (2022). Exploring the antecedents of green and sustainable purchase behaviour: A comparison among different generations. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5): 1007-1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21637

Chen, S., & Lamberti, L. (2015). Entering the dragon’s nest: Exploring Chinese upper-class consumers’ perception of luxury. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 18(1): 4-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-01-2013-0002

Cicia, G., Furno, M., & Del Giudice, T. (2021). Do consumers’ values and attitudes affect food retailer choice? Evidence from a national survey on farmers’ market in Germany. Agricultural and Food Economics, 9(1): 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-020-00172-2

Cieciuch, J., & Schwartz, S.H. (2012). The number of distinct basic values and their structure assessed by PVQ-40. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(3): 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.655817

Cieciuch, J., & Schwartz S.H. (2018). Pomiar wartości w kołowym modelu Schwartza. In: Gasiul, H. (ed.), Metody badania emocji i motywacji. Warszawa: Difin.

Davari, D., Nosrati, S., & Kim, S. (2024). Do cultural and individual values influence sustainable tourism and pro-environmental behavior? Focusing on Chinese millennials. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 41(4): 559-577. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2024.2309180

Dąbrowski, L.S., Środa-Murawska, S., Smoliński, P., & Biegańska, J. (2022). Rural–urban divide: Generation Z and pro-environmental behaviour. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(23): 16111. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316111

de Pelsmacker, P. (2025). Generational cohort theory research: the good, the bad and the ugly. International Journal of Advertising, 44(6): 1148-1170. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2025.2522011

Dimitrova, T., & Ilieva, I. (2023). Consumption behaviour towards branded functional beverages among Gen Z in post-COVID-19 times: Exploring antecedents and mediators. Behavioral Sciences, 13(8): 670. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13080670

Doan, M.H., Drossel, A.-L., & Sassen, R. (2025). Sustainable food consumption behaviors of generations Y and Z: A comparison study. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 17: 100272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100272

Duffy, B. (2021). The Generation Myth: Why When You’re Born Matters Less Than You Think. New York: Basic Books.

Eastman, J.K., & Liu, J. (2012). The impact of generational cohorts on status consumption: An exploratory look at generational cohort and demographics on status consumption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(2): 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211206348

Gadomska-Lila, K. (2020). Value systems of various generations. Human Resource Management, 133(2): 27-40. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.0731

Gardiner, S., Grace, D., & King, C. (2013). Challenging the use of generational segmentation through understanding self-identity. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 31(6): 639-653. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-06-2012-0062

Garia-Fodor, M., & Csiszárik-Kocsír, Á. (2018). The validity of value-based consumer behavioral models in the financial consciousness of the Z generation. Online Journal Modelling the New Europe, 27: 107-131. https://doi.org/10.24193/OJMNE.2018.27.05

Gauthier, C., Fornerino, M., Werle, C. O. C., Jolibert, A., Lee, M. S., & Sego, T. (2020). Social and personal values in advertising: Evidence from food advertising in South Korea. International Studies of Management & Organization, 50(2): 174-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2020.1758422

Glińska-Neweś, A., Brzustewicz, P., Escher, I., Fu, Y., & Singh, A. (2025). Does participation in CSA affect consciousness and sustainable behavior of consumers? The evidence from a longitudinal study. Food Quality and Preference, 127: 105467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105467

GUS (2022). Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland 2022. www.stat.gov.pl

GUS (2023). National Population and Housing Census 2021. Population. Size and demographic-social structure in the light of the 2021 Census results.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Issock, P.B.I., Mpinganjira, M., & Roberts-Lombard, M. (2023). Beyond sustainable consumption practices: Linking organic food consumption to hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Appetite, 188: 106633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106633

Ivanova, O., Flores-Zamora, J., Khelladi, I., & Ivanaj, S. (2018). The generational cohort effect in the context of responsible consumption. Management Decision, 57(5): 1162-1183. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-12-2016-0915

Jasrotia, S.S., Darda, P., & Pandey, S. (2023). Changing values of millennials and centennials towards responsible consumption and sustainable society. Society and Business Review, 18(2): 244-263. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-01-2022-0013

Jerzyk, E., Wanat, T., Rogala, A., & Nestorowicz, R. (2026). Behavioural drivers of internet of things adoption in food consumption. British Food Journal, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-10-2025-1358

Kim, U., Triandis, H.C., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S.C., & Yoon, G. (Eds.). (2002). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Kim, Y., & Choi, S.M. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE. Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1): 592-599.

Ladhari, R., Gonthier, J., & Lajante, M. (2019). Generation Y and online fashion shopping: Orientations and profiles. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 48: 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.02.003

Leijen, I., van Herk, H., & Bardi, A. (2022). Individual and generational value change in an adult population, a 12-year longitudinal panel study. Scientific Reports, 12: 17844. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22862-1

Leiserowitz, A., Kates, R.W., & Parris, T.M. (2006). Sustainability values, attitudes, and behaviors: A review of multinational and global trends. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31: 413-444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102505.133552

Lemanowicz, M., Wanat, T., Jasiulewicz, A., Waśkowski, Z., Jarka, S., & Biernat-Jarka, A. (2025). Environmental concerns, financial sacrifice, and motivation as predictors of Gen Z sustainable behaviour. Economics and Environment, 94(3): 988. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2025.94.3.988

Makowska, M., Boguszewski, R., & Hrehorowicz, A. (2024). Generational differences in food choices and consumer behaviors in the context of sustainable development. Foods, 13(4): 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13040521

Manley, A., Seock, Y., & Shin, J. (2023). Exploring the perceptions and motivations of Gen Z and Millennials toward sustainable clothing. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 51(4): 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12475

Marian, L., Chrysochou, P., Krystallis, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2014). The role of price as a product attribute in the organic food context: An exploration based on actual purchase data. Food Quality and Preference, 37: 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.05.001

Mason, M.C., Oduro, S., Umar, R.M., & Zamparo, G. (2023). Effect of consumption values on consumer behavior: A meta-analysis. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 41(7): 923-944. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-03-2023-0100

Mróz, B., & Grabiwoda, B. (2025). Generation Z: the new mobile consumers. Empirical evidence from Poland. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 21(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEPEE.2025.145412

Parment, A. (2013). Generation Y vs. Baby Boomers: Shopping behavior, buyer involvement and implications for retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(2): 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.12.001

Pennington-Gray, L., Fridgen, J.D., & Stynes, D. (2003). Cohort segmentation: An application to tourism. Leisure Sciences, 25(4): 341-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/714044495

Piscitelli, A., & D’Uggento, A.M. (2022). Do young people really engage in sustainable behaviors in their lifestyles? Social Indicators Research, 163(3): 1467-1485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02955-0

Polskie Standardy Jakości Realizacji Badań Rynku i Opinii Społecznej. (2023). PKJPA. Accessed: https://www.pkjpa.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/PKJPA_Standardy_12062023.pdf (Accessed: 8 April 2024).

Probst, E., & Atkinson, S. (2025). Generational Marketing: Breaking free from stereotypes. Ipsos.

Prochaska, J.O., & Velicer, W.F. (1997). The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1): 38-48. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1

Reisch, L.A., Sunstein, C.R., Andor, M.A., Doebbe, F.C., Meier, J., & Haddaway, N.R. (2021). Mitigating climate change via food consumption and food waste: A systematic map of behavioral interventions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279: 123717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123717

Robichaud, Z., & Yu, H. (2022). Do young consumers care about ethical consumption? Modelling Gen Z’s purchase intention towards fair trade coffee. British Food Journal, 124(9): 2740-2760. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2021-0536

Rogala, A., Sanak-Kosmowska, K., & Bajak, M. (2025). Using value-based marketing messages to promote sustainable consumer behaviour on the food market. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series, 2025(239): 503-525. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2025.239.26

Rudolph, C.W., Rauvola, R.S., Costanza, D.P., & Zacher, H. (2021). Generations and generational differences: Debunking myths in organizational science and practice and paving new paths forward. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36, 945-967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09715-2

Savin, P.-S., Rusu, G., Miu, C.-M., Ciocodeica, D.-F., & Kasem, E.I.F.T. (2024). Generational Perspectives on Sustainable Consumption: Exploring Consumer Behaviour of Millennials and Generation Z. In: Dima, A.M. Badarinza C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Economics and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24818/ICESS/2024/038

Schwartz, S.H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1): 11-23. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116

Shulhina, L., & Dąbrowska, A. (2022). A systems approach to the development of educational standards for fostering personal values. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, 43(1): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.2478/minib-2022-0001

Snyder, H., Veflen, N., van Riel, A.C.R., Kristensson, P., & Mehta, M. (2025). Beyond generations: An extended lifespan approach to service segmentation. Journal of Services Marketing, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-08-2025-0539

Strauss, A., & Howe, N. (2000). Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage Books.

Swim, J.K., Gillis, A. & Hamaty, K.J. (2020). Gender bending and gender conformity: The social consequences of engaging in feminine and masculine pro-environmental behaviors. Sex Roles, 82, 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01061-9

Szymańska, D., Biegańska, J. & Gil, A. (2009). Rural areas in Poland in the context of changes in population age structure in 1996, 2001 and 2006. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 12: 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1515/v10089-009-0006-1

Szymańska, M. (2024). Ceny żywności ekologicznej są o 30% wyższe od konwencjonalnych. Ale czy rynek będzie rósł? (Organic food prices are 30% higher than those of conventional food. But will the market continue to grow? – in Polish) Tygodnik Poradnik Rolniczy. Available at: https://www.tygodnik-rolniczy.pl/pieniadze/ceny-zywnosci-ekologicznej-sa-o-30-wyzsze-od-konwencjonalnych-ale-czy-rynek-bedzie-rosl-2515937

Táborecká, J., Rajic, T., Turčínková, J., Sedej, T., & Ozeliene, D. (2025). Environmental concerns vs. sustainable clothes purchases among various generations of females in CEE countries. Economics & Sociology, 18(1): 116-131. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2025/18-1/6

Tangsupwattana, W., & Liu, X. (2018). Effect of emotional experience on symbolic consumption in Generation Y consumers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(5): 514-527. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2017-0316

Vauclair, C.M., Hanke, K., Fischer, R., & Fontaine, J.R. (2014). The structure of human values at the culture level: A meta-analytical study of value definitions, measurement, and dimensions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(5): 771-789. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110396864

Vergura, D.T., Zerbini, C., Luceri, B., & Palladino, R. (2023). Investigating sustainable consumption behaviors: A bibliometric analysis. British Food Journal, 125(13): 253-276. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2022-0491

Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64(3): 542-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.007

Walia, S.K., Tiwari, P., Choudhary, P., & Mandic, A. (2025). Does Gen Z’s responsible tourism intentions impact ecologically conscious consumer behavior? Investigating the moderating role of sustainable intelligence in eighteen national parks in India. Tourism Planning & Development, 22(5): 731-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2025.2544848

Wiedmann, K.-P., Behrens, S., Klarmann, C., & Hennigs, N. (2014). Customer value perception: Cross-generational preferences for wine. British Food Journal, 116(7): 1128-1142. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2013-0027

Wyrwa, J., Barska, A., Jędrzejczak-Gas, J., & Kononowicz, K. (2023). Sustainable consumption in the behavior of young consumers. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 12(3): 349. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n3p349

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-10-28

How to Cite

1.
NESTOROWICZ, Renata, LUBOWIECKI–VIKUK, Adrian, ANTCZAK, Doris, MAJCHER, Sylwia and BAJAK, Marja. Consumer value systems and insights into sustainable food behaviour across generational cohorts. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series. Online. 28 October 2026. No. 74, pp. 31-47. [Accessed 28 October 2026]. DOI 10.12775/bgss-2026-0034.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

No. 74 (2026): December (early view)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Renata Nestorowicz, Adrian Lubowiecki–Vikuk, Doris Antczak, Sylwia Majcher, Marja Bajak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 34
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

consumer behaviour, sustainable dietary behaviour, Generation X, Millennials, Generation Z, generational cohort theory, Poland
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop