Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Determinants and problems of well-being of farming population in Poland and local social innovations in rural areas
  • Home
  • /
  • Determinants and problems of well-being of farming population in Poland and local social innovations in rural areas
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. No. 67 (2025): March /
  4. Articles

Determinants and problems of well-being of farming population in Poland and local social innovations in rural areas

Authors

  • Michał Dudek
  • Agata Mróz Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development of the Polish Academy of Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4665-482X
  • Elwira Wilczyńska Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development of the Polish Academy of Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9736-4764
  • Łukasz Komorowski Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development of the Polish Academy of Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9287-719X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2025-0008

Keywords

well-being, farming population, farms & farmers, determinants of well-being, social innovation

Abstract

The article aims to identify the determinants of well-being of the farming population in Poland. The paper also presents ways to improve the quality of life of farmers through social innovations implemented in Tuchola county and in five municipalities of Hajnówka and Białystok counties. The study was primarily based on a literature review and research materials mainly from individual in-depth interviews and focus group interviews conducted with farmers and key informants. Initial research revealed several specific determinants affecting farmers’ well-being; subsequent analysis enabled them to be grouped into four broad categories: spatial and temporal access to health and social services; access to internet and digital solutions; farm succession; and levels of trust and cooperation. Finally, each specific determinant was then mapped to the components of well-being (physical, mental, social) that it impacted most directly. In-depth analysis showed that social innovations related to diversifying farmer’ activities, integrating them with the local community, and offering mobile social and healthcare services were solutions that positively influence farmers’ well-being.

References

Barcaccia, B., Esposito, G., Matarese, M., Bertolaso, M., Elvira, M. & Marinis, M.G.D. (2013). Defining Quality of Life: A Wild-Goose Chase? Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(1): 185–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v9i1.484.

Bednarek, M. & Dmochowska-Dudek, K. (2016). The NIMBY syndrome in rural areas in Poland: determinants and specificities of conflicts around the location of unwanted investments (in Polish), Prace Geograficzne nr 255, Stanisław Leszczycki Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Polish Academy of Sciences.

Bernard, J. (2018). Rural Quality of Life – Poverty, Satisfaction and Opportunity Deprivation in Different Types of Rural Territories. European Countryside, 10(2): 191–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2018-0012.

Bieńkuńska, A. & Piasecki, T. (eds.). (2018). Quality of life and social capital in Poland: Results of the Social Cohesion Survey 2018 (in Polish), Central Statistical Office, Warsaw.

Bielińska, K. (2023). From equal access to health equity. Village and Agriculture, 4(197): 63–75. doi: 10.53098/wir042022/04.

Bubińska, J., Marcinkowski, J. & Kaczmarek, T. (2007). Evaluation of the effectiveness of a therapeutic rehabilitation programme for farmers at a selected Farmers’ Rehabilitation Centre (in Polish). Orzecznictwo Lekarskie, 4(2): 49–63.

Bunge, M. (1975). What is a quality of life indicator? Social Indicators Research, 2: 65–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300471.

CBOS, (2022). Social trust (in Polish). CBOS Communiqué 37/2022. Public Opinion Research Centre, Warsaw.

Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., Danigelis, N.L., Dickinson, J., Elliott, C., Farley, J., Gayer, D.E., Glenn, L.M., Hudspeth, T., Mahoney, D., McCahill, L., McIntosh, B., Reed, B., Rizvi, S.A.T., Rizzo, D.M., Simpatico, T. & Snapp, R. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61(2): 267–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.023.

Chmielewska, B. (2016). Disparities in the quality of life of rural and urban populations and policies to reduce them (in Polish). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 450: 103–113.

Courtney, P., Powell, J., Kubinakova & K. Baker, C. (2023). Social Return on Investment (SROI) Findings – Synthesis Report. Deliverable no D.4.2./WP4. Available at: https://farmwell-h2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/FARMWELL_D4.2_Final-December-2023.pdf (Accessed: 30 September 2024).

Courtney, P., Powell, J., Kubinakova, K. & Baker, C. (2023b). Social Return on Investment (SROI) Guide. Deliverable no D.4.1./WP4. Available at: https://farmwell-h2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/FARMWELL_D4.1_December-2023.pdf.

Courtney, P. & Powell, J. (2020). Evaluating Innovation in European Rural Development Programmes: Application of the Social Return on Investment (SROI) Method, Sustainability, 12(7): 2657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072657.

Courtney, P. (2014). The local food programme: a social return on investment approach. Final report to the Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts. Technical Report. Local Food.

Czarnecki, A., Dudek, M., Mróz, A., Wilczyńska, E., Komorowski, Ł. Kamiński, R., Kaszkowiak, A. & Bielińska, A. (2023). Farmwell Improving farmers’ well-being through social innovation. Report. Deliverable no D.3.3./WP3. Available at: https://farmwell-h2020.eu/partner-countries/poland/ (Accessed: 30 September 2024).

Czarnecki, A., Dudek, M., Kamiński, R., Komorowski, Ł., Stanny, M. & Wilczyńska, E. (2021). Mapping report on challenges. Poland. Farmwell. Improving Farmers’ Wellbeing through Social Innovation. Available at: https://farmwell-h2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/D-2.3_POLAND.pdf (Accessed: 30 September 2024).

Dudek, M. & Rosa, A. (2023). Ageing of employees in Poland compared to other European Union countries: agricultural workers vs. other occupations. Annals PAAAE, 25(4): 49–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.0235.

Domański, H. (2018). Trust in people and the political system (in Polish), In: P.B. Sztabiński, F. Sztabiński, F. (eds.), Results of the European Social Survey 2002–2016/17 (in Polish), Institute of Philosophy and Sociology PAN, Warsaw.

Ekielski, A., Walczak, J., Skudlarski, J., Pomianek, B., Zeyland, J. & Hryhorowicz, M. (eds.). (2023). Precision and intelligent agriculture – status and prospects for implementation (in Polish), Publishing House Scholar, Warsaw.

Fałkowski, J. & Ciaian, P. (2016). Factors Supporting the Development of Producer Organizations and their Impacts in the Light of Ongoing Changes in Food Supply Chains; EUR 27929 EN; doi:10.2791/21346.

Farmwell (2020). Farmwell – improving farmers’ well-being through social innovations, Technical Proposal, Horizon 2020 programme.

Ferriss, A.L. (2004). The quality of life concept in sociology. The American Sociologist, 35(3): 37–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-004-1016-3.

Florek-Łuszczki, M. (2023). Psychosocial and health consequences of rural ageing (in Polish). In: P. Łysoń, P (ed.). Consequences of demographic change for agricultural development (in Polish), Materials from the 3rd Demographic Congress). Part 16, The Government Population Council Warsaw.

Folder (2023). The care farm as a place of empowerment for people with intellectual disabilities (in Polish). Minikowo. Available at: http://www.opieka.kpodr.pl/pl/folder-o-modelu/ (Accessed: 26 October 2023).

Gorzelak, G. (2009). Facts and myths of regional development (in Polish). Studia regionalne i lokalne, 10(36): 5–27.

Grabowski, P. (2023). Illness and death are different in the countryside (in Polish). Medycyna Paliatywna, 15(1), 37–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2023.130022.

Hadyński, J. (2014). Diversification of the quality of life in rural areas of the European Union (in Polish). Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 2(32): 69–77.

Halamska, M. (2008). Rural social capital: an attempt at reconstruction. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 57, 81–104.

Halamska, M. (2008). Farmers’ organisations: an unsentimental balance sheet (in Polish). In M. Halamska (ed.), Rural non-governmental organisations, IRWiR PAN Publishing House, Warszawa.

Klepacki, B. (2020). Precision farming as an element of the 4.0 industry economy. Annals PAAAE, 22(3): DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.308224.

Knight, A. & McNaught, A. (eds.). (2011). Understanding well-being: An Introduction for Students and Practitioners of Health and Social Care. Banbury, Lantern Publishing.

Komorowski, Ł. (2024). Digitalisation as a Challenge for Smart Villages: The Case of Poland. Agriculture, 14: 2270. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122270.

Lorencowicz, E. (2018). Digital Farming – digital management, Annals PAAAE, 20(4). doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.2952.

Lesiewicz, J. (ed.) (2023). Care farms as a place of people with intellectual disabilities (in Polish), Kujawsko-Pomorskie Agricultural Advisory Centre, Minikowo.

Michalska, S., Zwęglińska-Gałecka, D. & Halamska, M. (2024). To give what is really needed. Research report, IRWiR PAN Publishing House, Warsaw, DOI 10.53098/978-83-89900-79-1.

Milczarek-Andrzejewska, D. (2016). The issue of power in economics – on the example of the agri-food sector in Poland (in Polish). IRWiR PAN Publishing House, Warsaw.

NIK (2018). Availability of publicly funded gynaecology and obstetrics services in rural areas (in Polish). Available at: https://www.nik.gov.pl/aktualnosci/wiejska-droga-do-ginekologa.html (Accessed: 30 September 2024).

NIK (2019). Provision of palliative and hospice care (in Polish). Available at: https://www.nik.gov.pl/plik/id,21371,vp,24011.pdf (Accessed: 30 September 2024).

Paraguassu, E.C. & de Cardenas, A.M.C. (2023). Promoting quality of life and sustainability. Periódicos Brasil. Pesquisa Científica, 2(1): 14–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36557/pbpc.v2i1.18.

Phills, J. (2009). Rediscovering Social Innovation. The Fieldstone Foundation, San Diego Grantmakers, 7–8. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8387/6f6bafdcd11e0fc16c26364d3cfc826af2a3.pdf (Accessed: 04 November 2023).

Ranking gmin (2019). UKE Ranking of municipalities 2019. Available at: https://mapbook.uke.gov.pl/ (Accessed: 13 April 2021).

Sampson, R.J. (2003). The Neighborhood Context of Well-Being. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46(3): 53–S64.

Stanny, M., Rosner A. & Komorowski, Ł. (2023). Socio-economic development of rural areas in Poland. Phase IV. A decade of socio-economic change (in Polish), EFRWP, IRWIR PAN, Warsaw. DOI: 10.53098/MROW.2720-376X.

Stanny, M. & Strzelecki, P. (2020). Rural population (in Polish). In: J. Wilkin, A. Hałasiewicz A. (eds.) Polish countryside 2020. Report on the state of the countryside (in Polish), Scholar Publishing: Warsaw.

Stanny, M., Rosner, A. & Komorowski, Ł. (2018). Socio-economic development of rural areas in Poland. Phase III. Socio-economic structures, their spatial differentiation and dynamics. EFRWP, IRWiR PAN, Warsaw.

Statistics Poland (2022). Employed, unemployed and economically inactive (BAEL preliminary results) in the fourth quarter of 2021 (in Polish). Available at: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rynek-pracy/pracujacy-bezrobotni-bierni-zawodowo-wg-bael/pracujacy-bezrobotni-i-bierni-zawodowo-wyniki-wstepne-bael-w-czwartym-kwartale-2021-r-,12,50.html (Accessed: 08 November 2023).

Statistics Poland (2022b). Household budgets in 2021 (in Polish). Available at: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/warunki-zycia/dochody-wydatki-i-warunki-zycia-ludnosci/budzety-gospodarstw-domowych-w-2021-roku,9,17.html (Accessed: 08 November 2023).

Statistics Poland (2022c). The extent of economic poverty in Poland in 2021. Available at https://stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5487/14/9/1/zasieg_ubostwa_ekonomicznego_w_polsce_w_2021_roku.pdf (Accessed: 30 September 2024).

Statistics Poland (2020). Information Society in Poland in 2020. Warsaw-Szczecin: Central Statistical Office.

Szewczyk, H. (2012). Agricultural occupational and paraprofessional diseases (in Polish). Village and Agriculture, 156(3): 97–112, DOI: https://doi.org/10.53098/wir.2012.3.156/06.

Szymczak, V. (2016). Mistrust and passivity in Polish society: A sociological analysis (in Polish). In: Szymczyk J. (ed.), Social trust: Theory – ideas – practice (in Polish), Oficyna Naukowa, Warsaw.

Śleszyński, P. (2023). External and internal determinants of rural development in Poland: Lessons for regional and local planning, Village and Agriculture, 2(203): 17–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53098/wir.2024.2.203/01.

Teleon, A. & Włoszczak-Szubzda, A. (2018). Public health services in the area of metal health on behalf of rural and urban Polish inhabitants. Medycyna Ogólna i Nauki o Zdrowiu, 24(4): 205–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26444/monz/100374.

Wiedeszal-Bazyl, M. (2008). Job insecurity as a source of stress (in Polish). Bezpieczeństwo Pracy, 7–8: 20–23.

Wrzochalska, A. (2006). Living standards of rural families one year after accession to the European Union (in Polish). The Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics-National Research Institute, Warsaw.

Zajda, K. (2022). Implementation of social innovation by rural NGOs and local action groups (in Polish), University of Lodz Publishing House.

Zegar, J.S. (2020). The perspectives of family farms – continued (in Polish). Problems of Agricultural Economics, 2(363): 73–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/111997.

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Downloads

  • XML
  • PDF

Published

2025-03-25

How to Cite

1.
DUDEK, Michał, MRÓZ, Agata, WILCZYŃSKA, Elwira and KOMOROWSKI, Łukasz. Determinants and problems of well-being of farming population in Poland and local social innovations in rural areas. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series. Online. 25 March 2025. No. 67, pp. 129-145. [Accessed 12 November 2025]. DOI 10.12775/bgss-2025-0008.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

No. 67 (2025): March

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Michał Dudek, Agata Mróz, Elwira Wilczyńska, Łukasz Komorowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 604
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

well-being, farming population, farms & farmers, determinants of well-being, social innovation
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop