Spatial adequacy of afforestation in Poland: do afforestation needs and environmental preferences matter?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2024-0012Keywords
afforestation preferencies index (API), non-forest land, use land, natural predispositions, PolandAbstract
The article concerns the afforestation of agricultural land, especially soils of low quality classes with little suitability for agriculture. The assumption was made that in order to effectively implement afforestation and optimize spatial structures, these lands should be analyzed from the point of view of environmental and spatial conditions (including the quality of the land and its suitability for field crops, cohesion of the forest ecosystem, the presence of naturally valuable areas), according to the potential of a given area. Land that is ineffective in cultivation and does not improve the cohesion of the ecosystem should be treated as preferred for afforestation. The assessment of the spatial adequacy (optimization) of afforestation in the context of afforestation needs and predispositions was carried out for Poland in terms of municipalities using the spatial autocorrelation model and methods. The research results indicate the need to strengthen the effectiveness of solutions that take into account the endogenous potential of municipalities.
References
Aldieri, L. & Concetto, P.V. (2018). Green Economy and Sustainable Development: The Economic Impact of Innovation on Employment. Sustainability, 10: 3541. DOI: https://doi:10.3390/su10103541.
Anderson, L.G & Seijo, J.C. (2010). Bioeconomics of fisheries management. Publ.JohnWiley&Sons.
Arbolino, R., Carlucci, F., Cirà, A., Ioppolo, G. & Yigitcanlar, T. (2017). Efficiency of the EU regulation on greenhouse gas emissions in Italy: The hierarchical cluster analysis approach. Ecological Indicicator, 81: 115–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.053.
Arbolino, R., De Simone, L., Carlucci, F., Yigitcanlar, T. & Ioppolo, G. (2018). Towards a sustainable industrial ecology: Implementation of a novel approach in the performance evaluation of Italian regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178: 220-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.183.
Aszalós, R., Ceulemans, R. J., Glatzel, G., Hanewinkel, M., Kakaras, E., Kotiaho, J., ... & Norton, M. (2017). Multi-functionality and sustainability in the European Union's forests (No. 32). European Academies Science Advisory Council (EASAC).
Bàrberi, P., Burgio, G., Dinelli, G., Moonen, A.C., Otto, S., Vazzana, C. & Zanin, G. (2010). Functional biodiversity in the agricultural landscape: Relationships between weed sand arthropod fauna. Weed Research, 50: 388–401.
Bàrberi, P. (2015). Functional biodiversity in organic systems: the way forward? Sustainable Agriculture Research, 4: 26–31.
Bateman, I. & Balmford, B. (2018). Public funding for public goods: A post-Brexit perspective on principles for agricultural policy. Land Use Policy, 79: 293–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.022.
Biczkowski, M. & Głaz, M. (2012). Zalesienia gruntów rolnych jako element planowania i kształtowania rozwoju przestrzeni wiejskiej (Afforestation of agricultural area as an element of planning and development of rural space - in Polish). Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, 29: 209–230.
Biczkowski, M. (2018). Instrumenty Wspólnej Polityki Rolnej jako czynnik wspierający rozwój obszarów wiejskich (Instruments of the Common Agricultural Policy as a factor supporting the development of rural areas – in Polish). Toruń: Wyd. Nauk. UMK.
Birch, K., Levidow, L. & Papaioannou, T. (2010). Sustainable capital? The neoliberalization of nature and knowledge in the European “knowledge-basedbio-economy”. Sustainability, 2(9): 2898–2918. DOI: https://doi:10.3390/su2092898.
Bowers, J. (2005). Instrument choice for sustainable development: an application to the forestry sector. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(1): 97–107.
Cumming, G.S., Cumming, D.H.M. & Redman, C.L. (2006). Scale Mismatch esin Social-Ecological Systems: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions. Ecology and Society, 11(1): 14. Available at: https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art14/.
Czapiewski, K.Ł., Niewęgłowska, G. & Stolbova, M. (2008). Obszary o niekorzystnym gospodarowaniu w rolnictwie. Stan obecny i wnioski na przyszłość (Areas with unfavorable agricultural management. Current state and conclusions for the future – in Polish). Warszawa: IERiGŻ-PIB.
Desjeux, Y., Dupraz, P., Latruffe, L., Maigne, E. & Cahuzac, E. (2014). Evaluating the impact of rural development measures on farm labour use: a spatial approach. European Association of Agricultural Economists, 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.182817.
Dupraz, P. & Rainelli, P. (2004). Institutional approaches to sustain rural landscapes in France. In Sustaining Agriculture and the Rural Environment; Governance, Policy and Multifunctionality. In: Brouwer, F. (Ed.) Sustaining Agriculture and the Rural Environment. Governance, Policy and Multifunctionality, 162–182 Northampton: Edward Elgar Publ. Available at: https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/sustaining-agriculture-and-the-rural-environment-9781843762560.html.
Elands, B.H.M. & Wiersum, K.F. (2001). Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of socio-political discourses. Forest Policy and Economics, 3: 5–16.
ETP. (2011). The European Bioeconomy in 2030. Delivering Sustainable Growth by Addressing the Grand Societal Challenges, The White Paper. Available at: http://www.becoteps.org.
Europa Bio. (2011). The Bioeconomy for Europe: Innovating for Sustainability. Available at: https://eurocalendar.eu/.
European Commission, Directorate General for Agriculture. (1997). Situation and Outlook: Rural Developments; A CAP 2000 Working Document. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
European Commission, EC. (2005). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Reporting on the implementation of the EU Forestry Strategy. COM_COM(2005)008410/03/2005.
European Commission, EC. (2012). EC, European Commission, 2012. Innovating for Sustainable Growth: a bioeconomy for Europe COM (2012). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/official-strategy_en.pdf.
European Commission, EC. (2013). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the committee of the regions A new EU Forest Strategy: for forests and the forest-based sector, COM(2013) 659 final.
European Commission, EC. (2019). The European Green Deal. Brussels, 11.12.2019. COM(2019) 640 final. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_1&format=PDF (Accessed: November 2020).
European Commission, EC. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, COM/2020/380 final.
European Commission, EC. (2021). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions., EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 (Nowa Strategia Leśna UE 2030), COM/2021/572 final.
FAO. (2020). Global Forest Resources Assessment (GFRA) 2020: Main report. Rome. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9825en.
Farrell, E.P., Fuhrer, E., Ryan, D., Andersson, F., Huttl, R. & Piussi, P. (2000). European forest ecosystems: building the future on the legacy of the past. Forest Ecology and Management, 132: 5–20.
Fonder, W. (2002). Organizacyjne i ekonomiczne aspekty zwiększania lesistości w Polsce (Organizational and economic aspects of increasing forest cover in Poland – in Polish). Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych, 3: 41–50.
Frueh-Mueller, A., Krippes, Ch., Hotes, S., Breuer, L., Koellner, T. & Wolters, V. (2018). Spatial correlation of agri-environmental measures with high levels of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 84: 364–370.
Fruh-Muller, A., Bach, M., Breuer, L., Hotes, S., Koellner, T., Krippes, Ch. & Wolters, V. (2019). The use of agri-environmental measures to address environmental pressuresin Germany: spatial mismatches and options for improvement. Land Use Policy, 84: 347–362.
Getis, A. & Ord, J.K. (1992a). The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics. Geographical Analisys, 24/3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x.
Getis, A. & Ord, J.K. (1992b). The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics. Geographical Analisys, 24/3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x.
Giovanopoulou, E., Nastis, S.A & Papanagiotou, E. (2011). Modeling farmer participation in agri-environmental nitratepollution reducing schemes. Ecological Economics, 70(11): 2175–2180. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.022.
Gluck, P., Oesten, G., Schanz, H. & Volz, K.R. (Eds.), (1999). Formulation and Implementation of National Forest Programmes. Vol. I: Theoretical Aspects. EFI Proceedings, 30. European Forest Institute, Joensuu.
Gorzelak, A. (Eds.) (1999). Zalesianie terenów porolnych (Afforestation of former agricultural land – in Polish). Warszawa: IBL.
Grajewski, R. & Schmidt, T.G. (2015). Agrarum welt maßnahmen in Deutschland: Förderung inden ländlichen Entwicklungs programmenim Jahr 2013 (Agri-environmental measures in Germany: funding in rural development programs in 2013 – in German). Thünen Working Paper 44. Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut.
Grzywacz, A. (2002). Problemy zalesień w wielofunkcyjnym rozwoju obszarów wiejskich. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych, 3: 5–18.
Hanley, N., Banerjee, S., Lennox, G.D. & Armsworth, P.R. (2012). How should we in centivize private landowners to ‘produce’ more biodiversity? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28: 93–113.
Jezierska-Thöle, A. & Biczkowski, M. (2018). Impact of EU funds on current status and prospects of organic farming in Poland. Proceedings International Conference "Economic Science for Rural Development", Jelgava, Latvia, 9-11 may 2018, A. Auzina (Ed.), Economic Sciences for Rural Development, 47: 123–131. doi: 10.22616/esrd.2018.014.
Jezierska-Thöle, A., Rudnicki, R., Wiśniewski, Ł., Gwiaździńska-Goraj, M. & Biczkowski, M. (2021). The Agri-Environment-Climate Measure as an Element of the Bioeconomy in Poland A Spatial Study. Agriculture, 11: 110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020110.
Kaliszewski, A., Młynarski, W. & Gołos, P. (2016). Czynniki ograniczające realizację zalesień gruntów porolnych w Polsce w świetle badań ankietowych (Factors limiting the implementation of afforestation of former agricultural land in Poland in the light of surveys – in Polish. Sylwan, 160(10): 846−854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2015141.
Kassioumis, K., Papageorgiou, K., Christodoulou, A., Blioumis, V., Stamou, N. & Karameris, A. (2004). Rural development by afforestation in predominantly agricultural areas: issues and challenges from two areas in Greece. Forest Policy and Economics, 6(5): 483-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00079-5.
Kennedy, J.J., Dombeck, M.P. & Koch, N.E. (1998). Values, beliefs and management of public forests in the Western world at the close of the twentieth century. Unasylva, 49: 16–26.
Kennedy, J.J. & Koch, N.E. (2004). Viewing and managing natural resources as human-ecosystem relationships. Forest Policy and Economics, 6(5): 497–504.
Kleijn, D., Berendse, F., Smit, R. & Gilissen, N. (2001). Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature, 413(6857): 723–725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35099540.
Kleijn, D. & Sutherland, W.J. (2003). How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? Journal of Applied Ecology, 40: 947–969.
Kleijn, D., Berendse, F., Smit, R., Gilissen, N., Smit, J., Brak, B. & Groeneveld, R. (2004). Ecological Effectiveness of Agri-Environment Schemes in Different Agricultural Landscape sin The Netherlands. Conservation Biology, 8(3): 775–786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00550.x.
Klepacka, A. (2020). Agricultural land afforestation implemented under the rural development programme in Poland between 2007-2013 and 2014-2020. Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu, 22(1). DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.9132.
Kowalska, A. & Bieniek, M. (2022). Meeting the European green deal objective of expanding organic farming. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(3): 607–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.021.
KPZL - Krajowy Program Zwiększania Lesistości. KPZL. (2003). Warszawa: Ministerstwo Środowiska.
Kwiecień, R., Zając, S., Gołos, P., Kaliszewski, A., Michna, W., Piotrowska, M., Ryszkowski, L., Ślązek, M., Świętojański, A. & Zegar, J. (2002). Modyfikacja krajowego programu zwiększania lesistości. Warszawa: IBL.
Lakner, S., Zinngrebe, Y. & Koemle, D. (2020). Combining management plans and payments chemes for targeted grassland conservation with in the Habitats Directive in Saxony, Eastern Germany. Land Use Policy, 97: 104642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104642.
Liro, A. (Eds.). (1998). Strategia wdrażania krajowej sieci ekologicznej ECONET-Polska (Strategy for the implementation of the national ecological network ECONET-Poland – in Polish). IUCN.
Lonkiewicz, B. (1990). Perspektywy zwiększenia lesistości Polski w świetle planu przestrzennego zagospodarowania kraju (Prospects for increasing Poland's forest cover in light of the country's spatial management plan – in Polish). Sylwan, 134: 3-12.
Lonkiewicz, B. (1996). Problemy lesistosci w planowaniu regionalnym (Problems of forestry in regional planning – in Polish). Prace Instytutu Badawczego Leśnictwa. Seria B, 27: 67-88.
Łukaszewicz, J. & Mikułowski, M. (2002). Problemy zalesiania nieefektywnych gruntów rolnych (Problems of afforestation of inefficient agricultural land – in Polish). Inżynieria Ekologiczna, 6: 31–37.
Łupiński, W. (2006). Problem optymalizacji zalesień gruntów rolnych a zakres informacji dostępnych w ewidencji gruntów. In: Diagnoza i kierunki rozwoju katastru nieruchomości widziane z perspektywy użytkowników (Diagnosis and development directions of the real estate cadastre as seen from the users' perspective – in Polish). Materiały XII Konferencji Naukowo-Technicznej, Kalisz.
Maruszczak, H. (1950). Stan i zmiany lesistości województwa lubelskiego w latach 1830-1930 (State and changes of forest cover of Lublin Voivodeship in the years 1830-1930 – in Polish). Annales UMCS w Lublinie, Seria VB, 5.
Matzdorf, B., Kaiser, T. & Rohner, M.S. (2008). Developing biodiversity indicator to design efficient agri-environmental schemes for extensively used grassland. Ecological Indicators, 8(3): 256–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.02.002.
Michna, W. (1998). Racjonalizacja wykorzystania gleb marginalnych (Rationalization of the use of marginal soils – in Polish). Raport końcowy IERiGŻ, 11: 187.
Mijatovic, D., Van Oudenhoven, F., Eyzaguirre, P. & Hodgkins, T. (2013). The role of agricultural biodiversity in streng the ningre silience to climate change: towards an analytical framework. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 11(2): 95–107.
Nabuurs, G.J., Paivinen, R. & Schanz, H. (2001). Sustainable management regimes for Europe’s forests - a projection with EFISCEN until 2050. Forest Policy and Economics, 3: 155–173.
Obmiński, Z. (1977). Ekologia lasu (Forest ecology – in Polish). Warszawa: PWN.
Ogryzek, M. (2015). Afforestation in Rural Development Programme and its role in changing land use structure. Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific Conference Rural Development. A. Raupeliene (Ed.), Kowno. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15544/RD.2015.048.
Ord, J.K. & Getis, A. (1995). Local Spatial Autocorrelation Statistics: Distributional Issues and an Application. Geographical Analisys, 27/4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x.
Partyka, T. (1973). Wstępna prognoza użytkowania ziemi z punktu widzenia leśnictwa i ochrony środowiska naturalnego (Preliminary prediction of land use from the point of view of forestry and environmental protection – in Polish). Sylwan, 117(03).
Partyka T. (1978). Sprawozdanie z działalności Polskiego Towarzystwa Leśnego za okres czerwiec 1976 r. - wrzesień 1977 r. (Report on the activities of the Polish Forestry Society for the period June 1976. - September 1977. – in Polish). Sylwan, 122(07).
Partyka, T., Suwara, Е. & Szymański, B. (1981). Tendencje wzrostu lesistości oraz przemian w układzie podstawowych funkcji lasu (Trends in forest cover growth and changes in the pattern of basic forest functions – in Polish). Materiały na sesję naukową „Lasy i Drewno u progu XXI wieku”. PTL, OZLP Olsztyn-Stare Jabłonki.
Pe'er, G., Dicks, L.V., Visconti, P., Arlettaz, R., Báldi, A., Benton, T.G., ... & Scott, A.V. (2014). EU agricultural reform fails on biodiversity. Science, 344(6188): 1090-1092. DOI: doi.org/10.1126/science.1253425.
Pelosi, C., Goulard, M. & Balent, G. (2010). The spatial scale mismatch between ecological processes and agricultural management: Do difficulties come from under lying the or etical frameworks? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 139(4): 455–462. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.09.004.
Polna, M. (2006). Zalesienia gruntów rolnych i nieużytków w Polsce – dynamika i znaczenie środowiskowe (Afforestation of agricultural land and wasteland in Poland - dynamics and environmental significance – in Polish). In: Rozwój regionalny i wielofunkcyjny obszarów wiejskich. Acta Agraria et Silvestaria, 46/1: 195–204.
Polna, M. (2018). Rola zalesień gruntów rolnych wykonanych w ramach PROW 2004−2006 w rozwoju obszarów wiejskich w Polsce ( The role of afforestation of agricultural land carried out under RDP 2004-2006 in the development of rural areas in Poland _ in Polish. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 44: 75−85.
Puchniarski, T.H. (2000). Krajowy program zwiększania lesistości. Poradnik od A do Z (National forest cover enhancement program. Handbook from A to Z - in Polish). Warszawa: PWRiL. pp. 223.
Racine, J.B. & Reymond, H. (1977). Quantitative Analysis in Geography. Warsaw: PWN.
Ratajczak, E. (2013). Rolnictwo i leśnictwo w świetle koncepcji biogospodarki (Agriculture and forestry in light of the bioeconomy concept - in Polish). Proceedings of the IX Kongres Ekonomistów Polskich, Roczniki Naukowe SERiA. Available at: http://kongres.pte.pl/kongres/publikacje-kongresowe.html (Accessed: 18 December 2022).
Rocznik Statystyczny Leśnictwa (RSL). (2020). Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
Rudnicki, R., Wiśniewski, Ł. & Biczkowski, M. (2021). A Spatial Typography of Environmentally Friendly Common Agricultural Policy Support Relevant to European Green Deal Objectives. Land, 10(10): 1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10101092.
Rudnicki, R., Biczkowski, M., Wiśniewski, Ł., Wiśniewski, P., Bielski, S. & Marks-Bielska, R. (2023). Towards green agriculture and sustainable development: pro-environmental activity of farms under the Common Agricultural Policy. Energies, 16/4: 1−23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041770.
Scheper, J., Holzschuh, A., Kuussaari, M., Potts, S.G., Rundlöf, M., Smith, H.G. & Kleijn, D. (2013). Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri-environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss–ameta-analysis (eng). Ecology Letters, 16(7): 912–920.
Schmidtner, E., Lippert, C., Engler, B., Haring, A.M., Aurbacher, J. & Dabbert, S. (2012). Spatial distribution of organic farming in Germany: does neighbourhood matter? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 39(4): 661–683.
Siddi, M. (2020). The European Green Deal. Assessing its current state and future implementation. Finnish Institute of International Affairs Working Paper, (2020/114). Available at: https://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/the-european-green-deal.
Siuta, J. (1974). Kształtowanie przyrodniczych warunków rolnictwa w Polsce (Shaping the natural conditions of agriculture in Poland - in Polish). Warszawa: PWN.
Siuta, J., Zielińska, A., Makowiecki, K. & Sroka, L. (1980). Potrzeby dolesień w gminach stan 1980 r., mapa Polski (Reforestation needs in municipalities state 1980, map of Poland - in Polish). Warszawa: Instytut Ochrony Środowiska.
Siuta, J. (1996). Ekologiczno-produkcyjne wymogi zalesiania nieefektywnych gruntów rolnych (Ecological and productive requirements of afforestation of inefficient agricultural land – in Polish). Prace IBL, ser. B, 27: 6–19.
Siuta, J. (2002). Ekologiczna zasadność zalesiania nieefektywnych gruntów rolnych (Ecological validity of afforestation of inefficient agricultural land – in Polish). Postępy Nauk Rolniczych, 3/2002.
Siuta, J. & Żukowski, B. (2017). Porównanie struktury przestrzennej potrzeby dolesienia gmin w roku 1980 w Polsce z lesistością w roku 2016 (Comparison of the spatial structure of the need for reforestation of municipalities in 1980 in Poland with forest cover in 2016 – in Polish). Inżynieria Ekologiczna, 18(5): 40–57.
Skłodowski, J. (2005). Zooindykacyjna ocena różnych sposobów przygotowania gleby przy zalesieniach gruntów porolnych (Zooindicative evaluation of different soil preparation methods in afforestation of former agricultural land – in Polish). Sylwan, 11: 3–12.
Skłodowski, P. & Bielska, A. (2009). Właściwości i urodzajność gleb Polski – podstawą kształtowania relacji rolno-środowiskowych (Properties and fertility of Polish soils - the basis for the formation of agro-environmental relations – in Polish). Water-Environment-Rural Areas, 9/4(28): 203–214.
Smykała, J. (1990). Historia, rozmiar i rozmieszczenia zalesień gruntów porolnych w latach 1945-1987 (History, size and distribution of afforestation of post-agricultural land in 1945-1987 – in Polish). Sylwan, (3-12): 1–7.
Sulewski, P. (2018). Uwarunkowania, zakres i ekonomiczne skutki zalesień gruntów marginalnych w gospodarstwach rolnych w Polsce (Determinants, scope and economic impact of afforestation of marginal land on farms in Poland – in Polish). Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej, 1(354): 149–169.
Strzelecki, W. & Sobczak, R. (1972). Zalesianie nieużytków i gruntów trudnych do odnawiania (Afforestation of wasteland and land difficult to restore – in Polish). Warszawa: PWRiL.
Strzemski, M. (1961). Przemiany środowiska geograficznego Polski jako tła przyrodniczego rozwoju rolnictwa na ziemiach polskich od początków trzeciego tysiąclecia p.n.e. do naszych czasów (Changes in the geographical environment of Poland as a natural background for the development of agriculture in the Polish lands from the beginning of the third millennium BC to the present day – in Polish). Kwart. HKM, 9(3): 334–349.
Tałałaj, Z. (2002). Metoda wydzielania gruntów rolnych pod zalesianie w terenach górskich i górzystych (Method of separating agricultural land for afforestation in mountainous and mountainous areas – in Polish). Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych, 487: 353–360.
Treasury, H.M. (2018). The Green Book: Central Government Guidance on Appraisaland Evaluation. London, availableat.
Ustawa z dnia 28 września 1991 r. o lasach. Dz.U. 1991 nr 101 poz. 444.
Ustawa z dnia 8 czerwca 2001 r. o przeznaczeniu gruntów rolnych do zalesiania (Dz.U. Nr 73, poz. 764).
Węgorek, T. (2008). Biologiczne metody zmniejszania zagrożenia gleb erozją wodną (fitomelioracje) (Biological methods of reducing the risk of water erosion of soils (phytomelioration) – in Polish). Studia i raporty IUNG-PIB, 10: 123–148.
Wiśniewski, Ł., Biczkowski, M. & Rudnicki, R. (2021). Natural potential versus rationality of allocation of Common Agriculture Policy funds dedicated for supporting organic farming development: assessment of spatial suitability: the case of Poland. Ecological Indicators, 130: 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108039.
Wiśniewski, P. (2015). Przeciwerozyjna funkcja lasów glebochronnych (Anti-erosion function of soil-protective forests – in Polish). Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
Wiśniewski, P. & Marks-Bielska, R. (2022). Znaczenie realizacji Europejskiego Zielonego Ładu dla polskiej wsi i rolnictwa (The importance of the implementation of the European Green Deal for the Polish countryside and agriculture – in Polish). In: J. Wilkin, A. Hałasiewicz A. (Eds.). Polska wieś 2022: raport o stanie wsi. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Wiśniewski, P. & Wojtasik, M. (2012). Glebochronna funkcja lasów a zalesienia porolne na przykładzie Nadleśnictwa Szubin (Soil-protective function of forests and post-agricultural afforestation on the example of Szubin Forest District – in Polish). Polish Journal of Agronomy, 11: 81–88.
Whittingham, M.J. (2011). The future of agri-environment schemes: biodiversity gains and ecosystem service delivery? Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(3): 509–513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01987.x.
Wood, S.A., Karp, D.S., DeClerck, F., Kremen, C., Naeem, S. & Palm, C.A. (2015). Functional traits in agriculture: agri-biodiversity and ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(9): 531–539.
Wysocka-Fijorek, E., Gil, W. & Gołos, P. (2020). Realizacja zalesień w latach 2001-2018 w różnych regionach Polski. Sylwan, 164(9): 726–735.
Wójcik, J., Balawejder, M. & Leń, P. (2014). Grunty marginalne, propozycje sposobów ich zagospodarowania w pracach scaleniowych w powiecie brzozowskim (Marginal land, proposals for ways to manage it in consolidation work in Brześć district – in Polish). Infrastructure and ecology of rural areas, 2/2: 399–410.
Yirenkyi-Boateng, S. (2001). Rural afforestation programmes for sustainable rural development: How realist conceptualisation can help. Development Southern Africa, 18/3: 327–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350120070008.
Zając, S. & Kwiecień, R. (2002). Główne kierunki modyfikacji Krajowego Programu Zwiększania Lesistości (The main directions of modification of the National Program for increasing forest cover – in Polish). Postępy Nauk Rolniczych, 3: 51–61.
Zimmermann, A. & Britz, W. (2016). European farms’ participation in agri-environmental measures. Land Use Policy, 50: 214–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.019.
Żmija, D. (2014). Zrównoważony rozwój rolnictwa i obszarów wiejskich w Polsce (Sustainable development of agriculture and rural areas in Poland – in Polish). Studia Ekonomiczne, 166: 149–158.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mirosław Biczkowski, Łukasz Wiśniewski, Roman Rudnicki, Paweł Wiśniewski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.Stats
Number of views and downloads: 366
Number of citations: 0
