Innovations in daily commuting - what types of solutions are competitive? European case study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2024-0019Keywords
functional urban areas, urban studies, geography, planning & development, travel behaviour, economic development, clustering methodAbstract
Innovations drive dynamic changes in daily commuting especially in functional urban areas (FUAs), where transport systems are developed. Innovative solutions are being tested in FUAs, and they not only pose an alternative to conventional transport systems, but can also revolutionize daily commuting in cities. The main aim was to classify the innovation drivers identified in literature and to determine their impact on travel behaviour (TB) in FUAs with a use of expert survey. The following research hypothesis was examined: the level of innovation utilization in daily commuting and its impact on TB is similar in countries with similar levels of economic development. The survey results were processed to (1) create a ranking of innovations in TB in European OECD countries and (2) group countries based on similarity in prioritizing innovations influencing TB, using Ward hierarchical clustering method. As a result, innovative factors were comprehensively identified and classified in six categories.
References
Abduljabbar, R.L., Liyanage, S. & Dia, H. (2021). The role of micro-mobility in shaping sustainable cities: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92: 102734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102734.
Abdullah, M., Dias, C., Muley, D. & Shahin, M. (2020). Exploring the impacts of COVID-19 on travel behavior and mode preferences. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 8: 100255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100255.
Almlöf, E., Rubensson, I., Cebecauer, M. & Jenelius, E. (2020). Who Is Still Travelling by Public Transport during COVID-19? Socioeconomic Factors Explaining Travel Behaviour in Stockholm Based on Smart Card Data (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 3689091). Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3689091.
Andersson, A., Winslott Hiselius, L. & Adell, E. (2018). Promoting sustainable travel behaviour through the use of smartphone applications: A review and development of a conceptual model. Travel Behaviour and Society, 11: 52–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2017.12.008.
Avatefipour, O. & Sadry, F. (2018). Traffic Management System Using IoT Technology - A Comparative Review, in: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology (EIT). Presented at the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology (EIT), 1041–1047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EIT.2018.8500246.
Awad-Núñez, S., Julio, R., Gomez, J., Moya-Gómez, B. & González, J.S. (2021). Post-COVID-19 travel behaviour patterns: impact on the willingness to pay of users of public transport and shared mobility services in Spain. European Transport Research Review, 13: 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00476-4.
Ayton, P., Murray, S. & Hampton, J.A. (2019). Terrorism, Dread Risk and Bicycle Accidents. Judgment and Decision Making, 14: 280–287.
Barajas, J.M. (2021). Chapter One - The roots of racialized travel behavior. In: Pereira, R.H.M., Boisjoly, G. (Eds.), Advances in Transport Policy and Planning, Social Issues in Transport Planning. Academic Press, 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2021.06.007.
Baran, M. & Kłos, M. (2014). Pokolenie Y - prawdy i mity w kontekście zarządzania pokoleniami (Generation Y - truths and myths in the context of generational management – in Polish). Marketing i Rynek, 5: 923-929.
Bartosiewicz, B. & Pielesiak, I. (2019). Spatial patterns of travel behaviour in Poland. Travel Behaviour and Society, 15: 113–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.01.004.
Becker, H., Ciari, F. & Axhausen, K.W. (2018). Measuring the car ownership impact of free-floating car-sharing – A case study in Basel, Switzerland. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65: 51–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.08.003.
Begg, D. (2016). The impact of congestion on bus passengers. Greener Journeys.
Bieliński, T. & Ważna, A. (2020). Electric Scooter Sharing and Bike Sharing User Behaviour and Characteristics. Sustainability, 12: 9640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229640.
Blitz, A. & Lanzendorf, M. (2020). Mobility design as a means of promoting non-motorised travel behaviour? A literature review of concepts and findings on design functions. Journal of Transport Geography, 87: 102778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102778.
Bohatkiewicz, J. (2014). Ochrona przed hałasem komunikacyjnym w obszarach miejskich w programach ochrony środowiska przed hałasem (Protection from traffic noise in urban areas in environmental noise protection programs – in Polish). Budownictwo i Architektura, 13: 75–82.
Buehler, R. (2010). Transport Policies, Automobile Use, and Sustainable Transport: A Comparison of Germany and the United States. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 30: 76–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X10366302.
Campisi, T., Garau, C., Ignaccolo, M., Coni, M., Canale, A., Inturri, G. & Torrisi, V. (2021). A New Vision on Smart and Resilient Urban Mobility in the Aftermath of the Pandemic: Key Factors on European Transport Policies. In: Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021: 21st International Conference, Cagliari, Italy, September 13–16, Proceedings, Part X. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87016-4_43.
Campisi, T., Tesoriere, G., Trouva, M., Papas, T. & Basbas, S. (2022). Impact of Teleworking on Travel Behaviour During the COVID-19 Era: The Case Of Sicily, Italy. Transportation Research Procedia, New scenarios for safe mobility in urban areas Proceedings of the XXV International Conference Living and Walking in Cities (LWC 2021), September 9-10, 2021, Brescia, Italy 60, 251–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.033.
Cavadas, J. & Antunes, A.P. (2019). Optimization-based study of the location of park-and-ride facilities. Transportation Planning and Technology, 42: 201–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2019.1576380.
Clark, B., Chatterjee, K. & Melia, S. (2016). Changes to commute mode: The role of life events, spatial context and environmental attitude. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 89: 89–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.05.005.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions: Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy – putting European transport on track for the future. (2020). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0789 (Accessed: 17 December 2023).
Crijns, H., Cauberghe, V. & Hudders, L. (2017). Terrorism threat in Belgium: The resilience of Belgian citizens and the protection of governmental reputation by means of communication. Public Relations Review, 43: 219–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.10.006.
Davis, A.W., Polydoropoulou, A., Stathopoulos, A., Farooq, B., Bhat, C.R., Antoniou, C., Zhang, J., Goulias, K.G., Mohammadian, K., Kamargianni, M., Mokhtarian, P.L., Pendyala, R.M. & Shiftan, Y. (2020). Chapter 32 - Workshop summary and research themes. In: Goulias, K.G., Davis, A.W. (Eds.), Mapping the Travel Behavior Genome, Elsevier, 635–673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817340-4.00032-2.
de Nazelle, A., Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., Antó, J.M., Brauer, M., Briggs, D., Braun-Fahrlander, C., Cavill, N., Cooper, A.R., Desqueyroux, H., Fruin, S., Hoek, G., Panis, L.I., Janssen, N., Jerrett, M., Joffe, M., Andersen, Z.J., van Kempen, E., Kingham, S., Kubesch, N., Leyden, K.M., Marshall, J.D., Matamala, J., Mellios, G., Mendez, M., Nassif, H., Ogilvie, D., Peiró, R., Pérez, K., Rabl, A., Ragettli, M., Rodríguez, D., Rojas, D., Ruiz, P., Sallis, J.F., Terwoert, J., Toussaint, J.-F., Tuomisto, J., Zuurbier, M. & Lebret, E. (2011). Improving health through policies that promote active travel: A review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environment International, 37: 766–777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.003.
Dijkstra, L., Poelman, H. & Veneri, P. (2019). The EU-OECD definition of a functional urban area. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/d58cb34d-en.
Dorbritz, R., Lüthi, M., Weidmann, U. & Nash, A. (2009). Effects of Onboard Ticket Sales on Public Transport Reliability. Transportation Research Record, 2110: 112–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2110-14.
Duarte, F. & Ratti, C. (2018). The Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Cities: A Review. Journal of Urban Technology, 25: 3–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1493883.
Dudzińska, M., Gross, M., Dawidowicz, A. & Wolny-Kucińska, A. (2023). The Influence of Changing Socioeconomic Conditions in Europe on the Prioritisation of Risks in Travel Behaviour: A Case Study. Sustainability, 15: 16518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316518.
Duran-Rodas, D., Villeneuve, D., Pereira, F.C. & Wulfhorst, G. (2020). How fair is the allocation of bike-sharing infrastructure? Framework for a qualitative and quantitative spatial fairness assessment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 140: 299–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.08.007.
Dyrhauge, H. (2022). Transport and infrastructure: Toward sustainable mobility. In Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics. Routledge.
Echaniz, E., Cordera, R., Rodriguez, A., Nogués, S., Coppola, P. & dell’Olio, L. (2022). Spatial and temporal variation of user satisfaction in public transport systems. Transport Policy, 117: 88–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.01.003.
Elliott, M.A., Armitage, C.J. & Baughan, C.J. (2003). Drivers’ compliance with speed limits: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 964–972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.964.
European Fund for Sustainable Development Plus (EFSD+) - European Commission. (2023). Available at: https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/funding-and-technical-assistance/funding-instruments/european-fund-sustainable-development-plus-efsd_en (Accessed: 17 December 2023).
European Green Deal - Consilium. (2023). Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/green-deal/ (Accessed: 17 December 2023).
Farahmand, Z.H., Gkiotsalitis, K. & Geurs, K.T. (2021). Mobility-as-a-Service as a transport demand management tool: A case study among employees in the Netherlands. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9: 1615–1629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.09.001.
Farewell to FUTÁR, Hello BudapestGO! (2022). Available at: https://bkk.hu/en/news/2022/02/farewell-to-futar-hello-budapestgo.7308/ (Accessed: 18 December 2023).
Ferenchak, N.N. & Rowangould, G. (2020). ABQ Streets: Creating Alternative Residential Street Designs (supporting dataset).
Friman, M., Lättman, K. & Olsson, L.E. (2020). Public Transport Quality, Safety, and Perceived Accessibility. Sustainability, 12: 3563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093563.
Garcia i Sierra, M. (2014). Travel behaviour and environmental-transport policy: Theory and empirical studies. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
García-Palomares, J.C., Gutiérrez, J. & Latorre, M. (2012). Optimizing the location of stations in bike-sharing programs: A GIS approach. Applied Geography, 35: 235–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.07.002.
Girod, B., van Vuuren, D.P. & de Vries, B. (2013). Influence of travel behavior on global CO2 emissions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 50: 183–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.046.
Guler, D. & Yomralioglu, T. (2020). Suitable location selection for the electric vehicle fast charging station with AHP and fuzzy AHP methods using GIS. Annals of GIS, 26: 169–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2020.1737226.
Guo, C., Yang, J. & Yang, L. (2018). Planning of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure for Urban Areas with Tight Land Supply. Energies, 11: 2314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092314.
Hamidi, Z. & Zhao, C. (2020). Shaping sustainable travel behaviour: Attitude, skills, and access all matter. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 88: 102566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102566.
Hancock, P.A., Nourbakhsh, I. & Stewart, J. (2019). On the future of transportation in an era of automated and autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116: 7684–7691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805770115.
Heinen, E. & Buehler, R. (2019). Bicycle parking: a systematic review of scientific literature on parking behaviour, parking preferences, and their influence on cycling and travel behaviour. Transport Reviews, 39: 630–656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1590477.
Hoen, A. & Koetse, M.J. (2014). A choice experiment on alternative fuel vehicle preferences of private car owners in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 61: 199–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.008.
Hollanders, H., Es-Sadki, N., Nicklas, M., Hsia, M. & Rantcheva, A. (2021). European innovation scoreboard.
Hong, J.-P., Kim, B.-Y. & Oh, S.-H. (2020). The Perceived-experiential Value and Service Quality of Auto Maintenance and Repair Service. Journal of Distribution Science, 18: 59–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.1.202001.59.
Hörcher, D., Graham, D.J. & Anderson, R.J. (2018). The Economic Inefficiency of Travel Passes Under Crowding Externalities and Endogenous Capacity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 52: 1–22.
Huang, Y. & Kockelman, K.M. (2020). Electric vehicle charging station locations: Elastic demand, station congestion, and network equilibrium. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 78: 102179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.008.
Huang, Z., Loo, B.P.Y. & Axhausen, K.W. (2023). Travel behaviour changes under Work-from-home (WFH) arrangements during COVID-19. Travel Behaviour and Society, 30: 202–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.09.006.
Inforegio - Latvia’s new electric passenger trains to contribute to cleaner transport. (2022). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/projects/Latvia/latvia-s-new-electric-passenger-trains-to-contribute-to-cleaner-transport (Accessed: 10 December 2023).
Intelligent transport systems - European Commission. (2023). Available at: https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/intelligent-transport-systems_en (Accessed: 17 December 2023).
Invernizzi, G., Ruprecht, A., Mazza, R., De Marco, C., Močnik, G., Sioutas, C. & Westerdahl, D. (2011). Measurement of black carbon concentration as an indicator of air quality benefits of traffic restriction policies within the ecopass zone in Milan, Italy. Atmospheric Environment, 45: 3522–3527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.008.
Jakubauskas, G. (2006). Improvement of urban passenger transport ticketing systems by deploying intelligent transport systems. Transport, 21: 252–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2006.9638075.
Javid, M.A., Saif Al-Khatri, H., Said Al-Abri, S., Ali, N., Chaiyasarn, K. & Joyklad, P. (2022). Travelers’ Perceptions on Significance of Travel Time Saving Attributes in Travel Behavior: A Case Study in Oman. Infrastructures, 7: 78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7060078.
Jiang, F., Cacchiani, V. & Toth, P. (2017). Train timetabling by skip-stop planning in highly congested lines. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 104: 149–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.06.018.
Kopeć, K. & Wojtowicz, B. (2021). Woonerf jako idea projektowania ulic zorientowana na poprawę jakości życia w mieście (Woonerf as a street design idea focused on improving the quality of life in the city – in Polish). Środowisko Mieszkaniowe, 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.21.021.14961.
Kubala, C. & Kulpa, T. (2015). Analiza wpływu rozszerzenia strefy płatnego parkowania w Krakowie na zachowania kierowców (Analysis of the impact of extending the paid parking zone in Krakow on drivers' behavior – in Polish). Zeszyty Naukowo-Techniczne Stowarzyszenia Inżynierów i Techników Komunikacji w Krakowie. Seria: Materiały Konferencyjne, 1: 105.
Kumar, P. (2021). Climate Change and Cities: Challenges Ahead. Front. Sustain. Cities, 3: 645613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.645613.
Kumar, P., Debele, S.E., Sahani, J., Rawat, N., Marti-Cardona, B., Alfieri, S.M., Basu, B., Basu, A.S., Bowyer, P., Charizopoulos, N., Gallotti, G., Jaakko, J., Leo, L.S., Loupis, M., Menenti, M., Mickovski, S.B., Mun, S.-J., Gonzalez-Ollauri, A., Pfeiffer, J., Pilla, F., Pröll, J., Rutzinger, M., Santo, M.A., Sannigrahi, S., Spyrou, C., Tuomenvirta, H. & Zieher, T. (2021). Nature-based solutions efficiency evaluation against natural hazards: Modelling methods, advantages and limitations. Science of The Total Environment, 784: 147058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147058.
Kwiatkowski, M. (2018). Bike-sharing-boom – rozwój nowych form zrównoważonego transportu w Polsce na przykładzie roweru publicznego (Bike-sharing-boom - development of new forms of sustainable transport in Poland on the example of public bicycle – in Polish). Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 21: 60–69.
Lazarus, J., Pourquier, J.C., Feng, F., Hammel, H. & Shaheen, S. (2020). Micromobility evolution and expansion: Understanding how docked and dockless bikesharing models complement and compete – A case study of San Francisco. Journal of Transport Geography, 84: 102620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102620.
Lenz, B. & Fraedrich, E. (2016). New Mobility Concepts and Autonomous Driving: The Potential for Change. In: Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B., Winner, H. (Eds.), Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal and Social Aspects. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 173–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_9.
Liljamo, T., Liimatainen, H., Pöllänen, M. & Utriainen, R. (2020). People’s current mobility costs and willingness to pay for Mobility as a Service offerings. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 136: 99–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.03.034.
Loo, B.P.Y. & Wang, B. (2018). Factors associated with home-based e-working and e-shopping in Nanjing, China. Transportation, 45: 365–384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9792-0.
Makino, H., Tamada, K., Sakai, K. & Kamijo, S. (2018). Solutions for urban traffic issues by ITS technologies. IATSS Research, 42: 49–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2018.05.003.
Mavlutova, I., Atstaja, D., Grasis, J., Kuzmina, J., Uvarova, I. & Roga, D. (2023). Urban Transportation Concept and Sustainable Urban Mobility in Smart Cities: A Review. Energies, 16: 3585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083585.
McCarthy, L., Delbosc, A., Currie, G. & Molloy, A. (2017). Factors influencing travel mode choice among families with young children (aged 0–4): a review of the literature. Transport Reviews 37: 767–781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1354942.
Meland, S. (1995). Generalized and advanced urban debiting innovations. The gaudi project. 3. Trondheim toll ring. Traffic Engineering & Control, 36.
Merz, B., Kuhlicke, C., Kunz, M., Pittore, M., Babeyko, A., Bresch, D.N., Domeisen, D.I.V., Feser, F., Koszalka, I., Kreibich, H., Pantillon, F., Parolai, S., Pinto, J.G., Punge, H.J., Rivalta, E., Schröter, K., Strehlow, K., Weisse, R. & Wurpts, A. (2020). Impact Forecasting to Support Emergency Management of Natural Hazards. Reviews of Geophysics, 58: e2020RG000704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000704.
Möhner, M. (2018). Driving ban for diesel-powered vehicles in major cities: an appropriate penalty for exceeding the limit value for nitrogen dioxide? International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 91: 373–376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1297-4.
Moran, M.E., Laa, B. & Emberger, G. (2020). Six scooter operators, six maps: Spatial coverage and regulation of micromobility in Vienna, Austria. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8: 658–671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.03.001.
Mounce, R. & Nelson, J.D. (2019). On the potential for one-way electric vehicle car-sharing in future mobility systems. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 120: 17–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.003.
Mouratidis, K., Ettema, D. & Næss, P. (2019). Urban form, travel behavior, and travel satisfaction. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 129: 306–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.002.
Naess, P. (2006). Urban Structure Matters: Residential Location, Car Dependence and Travel Behaviour. Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099186.
New features and faster operation on BudapestGO. (2022). Available at: https://bkk.hu/en/news/2022/10/new-features-and-faster-operation-on-budapestgo.8171/ (Accessed: 18 December 2023).
New Mobility Congress. (2023). PSPA - Polish Alternative Fuels Association. Available at: https://pspa.com.pl/events/new-mobility-congress/?lang=en (Accessed: 17 December 2023).
Nguyen-Phuoc, D.Q., Currie, G., De Gruyter, C. & Young, W. (2018). How do public transport users adjust their travel behaviour if public transport ceases? A qualitative study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 54: 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.009.
Nilsson, M. & Küller, R. (2000). Travel behaviour and environmental concern. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 5: 211–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00034-6.
Norwood, P., Eberth, B., Farrar, S., Anable, J. & Ludbrook, A. (2014). Active travel intervention and physical activity behaviour: An evaluation. Social Science & Medicine, 113: 50–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.003.
OECD. (2019). Functional urban areas in OECD countries.
OECD. (2013). Definition of Functional Urban Areas (FUA) for the OECD metropolitan database.
Oeschger, G., Carroll, P. & Caulfield, B. (2020). Micromobility and public transport integration: The current state of knowledge. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 89: 102628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102628.
Paukert, S.M., Guay, R.P. & Kim, Y.J. (2021). Perceptions of HR: an analysis of millennial and postmillennial insights. Organization Management Journal, 18: 36–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OMJ-01-2020-0861.
Pazhuhan, M., Soltani, A., Ghadami, M., Shahraki, S.Z. & Salvati, L. (2022). Environmentally friendly behaviors and commuting patterns among tertiary students: the case of University of Tehran, Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24: 7435–7454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02266-x.
Połom, M., Tarkowski, M., Puzdrakiewicz, K. & Dopierała, Ł. (2020). Is It Possible to Develop Electromobility in Urban Passenger Shipping in Post-Communist Countries? Evidence from Gdańsk, Poland. Energies, 13: 6362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13236362.
Potter, S., Harrison, S. & Kreft, P. (2021). The Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Impact-Based Severe Weather Warning Systems: Perspectives of Weather, Flood, and Emergency Management Personnel. Weather, Climate, and Society, 13: 303–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0110.1.
Rafiq, R., McNally, M.G., Sarwar Uddin, Y. & Ahmed, T. (2022). Impact of working from home on activity-travel behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An aggregate structural analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 159: 35–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.003.
Reimers, A.K., Marzi, I., Beck, F., Engels, E., Renninger, D., Buttazzoni, A., Krieger, C. & Demetriou, Y. (2022). Active travel behaviour in the family environment: protocol for the mixed-methods cross-sectional ARRIVE study. BMJ Open, 12: e056383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056383.
Rodrigue, J.P. (2020). The geography of transport systems. Routledge.
Schimohr, K. & Scheiner, J. (2021). Spatial and temporal analysis of bike-sharing use in Cologne taking into account a public transit disruption. Journal of Transport Geography, 92: 103017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103017.
Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., Chan, N. & Bansal, A. (2020). Chapter 13 - Sharing strategies: carsharing, shared micromobility (bikesharing and scooter sharing), transportation network companies, microtransit, and other innovative mobility modes. In: Deakin, E. (Ed.), Transportation, Land Use, and Environmental Planning. Elsevier, 237–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815167-9.00013-X.
Sierpiński, G. (2012). Zachowania komunikacyjne osób podróżujących a wybór środka transportu w mieście (Travelers' transportation behavior vs. mode choice in the city – in Polish). Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej, 84: 93-106.
Sierpiński, G., Staniek, M. & Celiński, I. (2015). New methods for pro-ecological travel behavior learning. In ICERI2015 Proceedings, 6926-6933. IATED.
Sobral, T., Galvão, T. & Borges, J. (2019). Visualization of Urban Mobility Data from Intelligent Transportation Systems. Sensors, 19: 332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020332.
Soriguera, F. & Jiménez-Meroño, E. (2020). A continuous approximation model for the optimal design of public bike-sharing systems. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52: 101826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101826.
Soza-Parra, J., Raveau, S., Muñoz, J.C. & Cats, O. (2019). The underlying effect of public transport reliability on users’ satisfaction. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 126: 83–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.06.004.
Spink, T., Duncan, I., Lawrance, A. & Todd, A. (2014). Transport infrastructure drainage: condition appraisal and remedial treatment. CIRIA, London, 2, 391-412.
Stappers, N.E.H., Van Kann, D.H.H., Ettema, D., De Vries, N.K. & Kremers, S.P.J. (2018). The effect of infrastructural changes in the built environment on physical activity, active transportation and sedentary behavior – A systematic review. Health & Place, 53: 135–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.08.002.
Statistics – Eurostat. (2023). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tec00114/default/table?lang=en (Accessed: 18 December 2023).
Stępniak, M., Pritchard, J.P., Geurs, K.T. & Goliszek, S. (2019). The impact of temporal resolution on public transport accessibility measurement: Review and case study in Poland. Journal of Transport Geography, 75: 8–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.01.007.
Taczanowski, J., Kołoś, A., Gwosdz, K., Domański, B. & Guzik, R. (2018). The development of low-emission public urban transport in Poland. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 41: 79–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2018-0027.
Tang, Z., Naphade, M., Liu, M.-Y., Yang, X., Birchfield, S., Wang, S., Kumar, R., Anastasiu, D. & Hwang, J.-N. (2019). CityFlow: A City-Scale Benchmark for Multi-Target Multi-Camera Vehicle Tracking and Re-Identification. Presented at the Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 8797–8806.
Thao, V.T. & Ohnmacht, T. (2020). The impact of the built environment on travel behavior: The Swiss experience based on two National Travel Surveys. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Urban Transport, 36: 100386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2019.100386.
The Clean Vehicles Directive | European Alternative Fuels Observatory. (2019). Available at: https://alternative-fuels-observatory.ec.europa.eu/policymakers-and-public-authorities/clean-vehicles-directive (Accessed: 17 December 2023).
Topp, H. & Pharoah, T. (1994). Car-free city centres. Transportation, 21: 231–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099212.
Turoń, K. & Sierpiński, G. (2018). Selected solutions of environmentally- friendly urban transport systems. Economic and Environmental Studies, 18: 1381–1396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25167/ees.2018.48.11.
Turoń, K., Sierpiński, G. & Tóth, J. (2020). Support for Pro-ecological Solutions in Smart Cities with the Use of Travel Databases – a Case Study Based on a Bike-Sharing System in Budapest. In: Sierpiński, G. (Ed.), Smart and Green Solutions for Transport Systems, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 225–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35543-2_18.
Turrentine, T.S. & Kurani, K.S. (2007). Car buyers and fuel economy? Energy Policy, 35: 1213–1223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.005.
United Nations. (2020). Human Development Report 2020, Human Development Reports. United Nations.
Van Acker, V. & Witlox, F. (2009). Why land use patterns affect travel behaviour (or not). Toward a “state-of-the-art” conceptual framework and an appropriate modelling technique. Belgeo. Revue belge de géographie, (1): 5-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.8777.
van Wee, B. (2019). Land Use Policy, Travel Behavior, and Health, in: Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Khreis, H. (Eds.), Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning: A Framework. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 253–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9_13.
Vasileiadis, I. & Nalmpantis, D. (2019). Development of a Methodology, Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), to Choose Between Full Pedestrianization and Traffic Calming Area (Woonerf Zone Type). In: Nathanail, E.G., Karakikes, I.D. (Eds.), Data Analytics: Paving the Way to Sustainable Urban Mobility, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 315–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02305-8_38.
Wolny, A. (2019). Are suburban commuters confined to private transport? A case study of a medium-sized functional urban area (FUA) in Poland. Cities, 92, 82–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.013.
Yap, M. & Cats, O. (2021). Taking the path less travelled: Valuation of denied boarding in crowded public transport systems. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 147: 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.02.007.
Zhang, J., Wang, D.Z.W. & Meng, M. (2018). Which service is better on a linear travel corridor: Park & ride or on-demand public bus? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118: 803–818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.003.
Zhang, L., Ma, H., Sun, J., Song, W., Zheng, P. & Xue, S. (2013). Dynamic generating algorithm on path selection and optimisation in travel planning. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 48: 203–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2013.056916.
ZIT: Plan zrównoważonej mobilności dla MOF Olsztyna 2030+ (2022). Available at: https://zit.olsztyn.eu/plan-zrownowazonej-mobilnosci-dla-mof-olsztyna-2030.html (Accessed: 17 December 2023).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ada Wolny - Kucińska, Małgorzata Dudzińska, Agnieszka Dawidowicz, Marta Gross
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.Stats
Number of views and downloads: 189
Number of citations: 0
