Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Tacit knowledge of places. Experiences from the post-agrarian countryside
  • Home
  • /
  • Tacit knowledge of places. Experiences from the post-agrarian countryside
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. No. 63 (2024): March /
  4. Articles

Tacit knowledge of places. Experiences from the post-agrarian countryside

Authors

  • Paulina Tobiasz-Lis University of Lodz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2739-1406
  • Marcin Wójcik University of Lodz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5236-5381

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2024-0001

Keywords

geography, planning & development, tacit knowledge of place, countryside & rurality, post-agrarian communities, Poland

Abstract

This article is framed by a broader discussion on the new meanings conferred by rural areas, and the construction of rurality recently undertaken by human geographers. The aim of the research presented here has been to identify perceptions of the countryside in Poland, at a time when a fundamental transition from agrarian to post-agrarian communities has already taken place. After a brief
review of the literature and a presentation of the contemporary conditions of rural development in Poland, the paper presents the results of the study conducted in 22 pre-selected villages in Poland. The social research involved semi-structured interviews and freehand sketches exemplifying tacit knowledge about these places, i.e. the symbolic meaning attributed by people to their living spaces. Results of this research show that uncovering this knowledge generates a variety of information useful in interpreting contemporary rurality as shaped by dynamic change in Poland’s economy and social life.

Author Biographies

Paulina Tobiasz-Lis, University of Lodz

PhD, Assistant Professor at the Department of Regional and Human Geography of the University of Lodz, geographer, and spatial planning specialist. During recent years her main research were focused on socio-spatial changes of urban and rural areas and their perceptions. She’s participated in Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe projects: RELOCAL – Resituating the Local in Cohesion and Territorial Development; DESIRA – Digitization: Economic and Social Impacts in Rural Areas; AgriDataValue - Smart Farm and Agri-environmental Big Data Value; ESPON 2020 project: PROFECY - ‘Processes, Features and Cycles of Inner Peripheries in Europe’ and projects under the National Science Center Funding Scheme, Poland, including one focused on representations of rural areas in Poland.

Marcin Wójcik, University of Lodz

Full Professor at the Department of Regional and Human Geography of the University of Lodz, geographer. He specializes in human geography, specially of rural areas and regional studies. Prof. Wójcik is a Head of the Rural Study Group in the Polish Geographical Society and a member of the steering committee of International Geographical Union Commission on Sustainable Rural Systems. He’s participated in Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe projects: RELOCAL – Resituating the Local in Cohesion and Territorial Development; DESIRA – Digitization: Economic and Social Impacts in Rural Areas; AgriDataValue - Smart Farm and Agri-environmental Big Data Value; ESPON 2020 project: PROFECY - ‘Processes, Features and Cycles of Inner Peripheries in Europe’ and projects under the National Science Center Funding Scheme, Poland, including one focused on representations of rural areas in Poland.

References

Babbie, E. (2007). Badania społeczne w praktyce (The Practice of Social Research - in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Banini, T. & Ilovan, O-R. (2021). Introduction: dealing with territorial/place identity representations. In T. Banini & O-R. Ilovan (Eds.), Representing Place and Territorial Identities in Europe, 1-19, Springer.

Bański, J. (2016). Identyfikacja i wykorzystanie zasobów lokalnych w budowaniu przewagi konkurencyjnej – przykład regionu lubelskiego (Identification and use of local resources in building a competitive advantage; on the example of the Lublin region - in Polish). Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, 44: 7-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7163/SOW.44.1.

Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28: 31–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa.

Bodnár, G. (2013). Endogenous Development: Role of Territorial Capital in Rural Areas. In I. Lengyel & Z. Vas (Eds.), Regional Growth, Competitiveness and Development, 13-25, University of Szeged.

Boschma, R.A. & Lambooy, J.G. (1999). Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9: 411-429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001910050089.

Ching, B. & Creed, B.W. (Eds.). (1996). Knowing Your Place: Rural Identity and Cultural Hierarchy. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203379462.

Cloke, P. (1993). On ‘problems and solutions. The reproduction of problems for rural communities in Britain during the 1980s. Journal of Rural Studies, 9: 113–121.

Cloke, P., Doel, M., Matless, D., Phillips, M. & Thrift, N. (1994). Writing the Rural: Five Cultural Geographies. Paul Chapman Publishing.

Cloke, P. (1997). Country backwater to virtual village? Rural studies and the ‘cultural turn’. Journal of Rural Studies, 13(4): 367–376.

Drucker, P.F. (1994). Post-Capitalist Society. Routledge.

Eicher, C.K. & Staatz, J.M. (Eds.) (1998). International Agricultural Development. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Eliade, M. (1970). Sacrum, mit, historia. PIW.

Ferrari, M., Bocci, G.E., Lepisto, E., Cavallero, P. & Rombai, L. (2019). Territories and Landscapes: Place Identity, Quality of Life and Psychological Well-Being in Rural Areas. In A. Bianco, P. Conigliaro & M. Gnaldi (Eds.). Italian Studies on Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research Series, 77. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06022-0_19.

Florida, R. (2004). The Rise of the Creative Class. And how it’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life, Basic Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3552294.

Gertler M.S. (2003). Tacit Knowledge and the Economic Geography of Context, or the Undefinable Tacitness of Being (There). Journal of Economic Geography, 3: 75–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.75.

Gieseking, J.J. (2013). Where we go from here: The mental sketch mapping method and its analytic components. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(9): 712-724.

Gregory, D. (1994). Geographical Imaginations. Oxford: Blackwell.

Guile, D. (2001). Education and the Economy: Rethinking the Question of Learning for the ‘Knowledge’ Era. Futures, 33: 469-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00091-4.

Halamska, M. (2020). Continuity and Change. Rural Poland 1918-2018. Searching for Sources of the Present. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

Halfacree, K. (1993). Locality and social representation: space, discourse, and alternative definitions of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 9: 23–37.

Halfacree, K. (2004). Rethinking “Rurality”, In T. Champion & H. Graeme (eds.). New forms of Urbanization: Beyond the Urban-Rural Dichotomy, 285-306, Burlington: Ashgate.

Halfacree, K. (2006). Rural space: Constructing three-fold architecture, In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P. Mooney (Eds.). Handbook of Rural Studies, 44-62, London: Sage.

Halfacree, K. (2007). Trial by space for a ‘radical rural’: Introducing alternative localities, representations and lives. Journal of Rural Studies, 23: 125–141.

Hayami, Y.V. & Ruttan, W. (1985). Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. The Johns Hopkins Press.

Hilpert, U. (2006). Knowledge in the Region: Development Based on Tradition, Culture and Change. European Planning Studies, 14(5): 581–599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500500213.

Holloway, L. & Kneafsey, M. (Eds.) (2014). Geographies of Rural Cultures and Societies. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315254487.

Hopkins, J. (1998). Signs of the post-rural: marketing myths of a symbolic countryside. Geografiska Annaler, 80B (2): 65–81.

Gorączko, M. & Gorączko, A. (2015). Vernacular architecture and traditional rural landscape in new socio-economic realities - a case study from Central Poland. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 30(30): 43-58. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bog-2015-0034.

Howells, J.R.L. (2002). Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography. Urban Studies, 39: 871-884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220128354.

Kitchin, R. & Dodge, M. (2007). Rethinking maps. Progress in Human Geography, 31(3): 331-344.

Kowalewski, M. (2007). Jakie miasto widać na widokówce? (What city can be seen on the postcard?- in Polish). In M. Krajewski (ed.). Wizualność miasta. Wytwarzanie miejskiej ikonosfery. Seria Badania Interdyscyplinarne, 10, UAM.

Ladd, F.C. (1970). Black youths view their environment: neighbourhood maps. Environment and Behaviour, 2: 74-99.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lundvall, B.Å. (1996). The Social Dimension of The Learning Economy. Aalborg University.

Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.

Marsden, T. (1999). Rural Futures: The Consumption Countryside and its Regulation. Sociologia Ruralis, 39(4): 501-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00121.

Massey, D. (1996). A global sense of place. In S. Daniels, R. Lee (Eds.). Exploring Human Geography. A Reader. Arnold.

Melucci, A. (1998). Social movements and the democratisation of everyday life. In J. Keane (Ed.) Civil Society and the State, Verso.

Murdoch, J. & Pratt, A.C. (1993). Rural studies: modernism, postmodernism and the ‘post-rural’.Journal of Rural Studies, 9: 411–27.

Niczyporuk, D. (2002). Czas i przestrzeń w światopoglądzie mieszkańców wsi (Time and space in the worldview of rural residents - in Polish). Wydaw. Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.

Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating-Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.

Peritz, A. & Carr, L.M. (2021). Iron men on wooden boats: connection and isolation between local culture and the sea in Coastal Donegal. In T. Banini, O-R. Ilovan, Representing Place and Territorial Identities in Europe, 235-249, Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66766-5_16.

Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge.

Rockenbauch, T. & Sakdapolrak, P. (2017). Social networks and the resilience of rural communities in the Global South: a critical review and conceptual reflections. Ecology and Society, 22 (1): 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09009-220110.

Shields, R. (2005). Lefebvre, love and struggle: Spatial dialectics. Routledge.

Sippel, S. & Visser, R.O. (2021). Introduction to symposium ‘Reimagining land: materiality, affect and the uneven trajectories of land transformation’. Agriculture and Human Values, 38: 271–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10152-3.

Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real and Imagined Places. Verso.

Soja, E. (1999). Thirdspace: Experiencing the Scope of the Geographical Imagination, In Human Geography Today, Polity Press, 260-278.

Storper M. & Venables, A.J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-Face Contact and the Urban Economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4: 351-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027.

Szulc, H. (2002). Atlas Historyczny Wsi w Polsce (Historical atlas of villages in Poland - in Polish). Polska Akademia Nauk, Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN.

Szymańska, D. (2009). Geografia osadnictwa (Settlement geography) (first edition) Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Szymańska, D. (2013). Geografia osadnictwa (Settlement geography - in Polsih) (second edition), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Tessier, L., Bijttebier, J., Marchand, F. & Baret, P.V. (2021). Cognitive mapping, Flemish beef farmers’ perspectives and farm functioning: a critical methodological reflection. Agriculture and Human Values, 38: 1003–1019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10207-z.

Tobiasz-Lis, P. & Wójcik, M. (2021). The Village as a Place of…”. Anchoring the Territorial Identity of the Countryside. Examples from Poland. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning, Special Issue, 7: 67-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/JSSPSI.2021.7.05.

Törnqvist, G. (2004). Creativity in Time and Space. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 86: 227-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00165.x.

Urry, J. (1995). Restructuring the rural, In J. Urry (Ed.). Consuming Places, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203202920.

Wartmann, F., Ross, M. & Purves, S. (2017). What’s (Not) on the Map: Landscape Features from Participatory Sketch Mapping Differ from Local Categories Used in Language. Land, 6(79): 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land6040079.

Wheler, R. (2014). Mining memories in a rural community: Landscape, temporality and place identity. Journal of Rural Studies, 36: 22-32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.005

Woods, M. (2006), Redefining the ‘rural question’: The new ‘politics of the rural’ and social policy. Social Policy and Administration, 40(6): 579–595.

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2024-03-01

How to Cite

1.
TOBIASZ-LIS, Paulina and WÓJCIK, Marcin. Tacit knowledge of places. Experiences from the post-agrarian countryside. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series. Online. 1 March 2024. No. 63. [Accessed 28 June 2025]. DOI 10.12775/bgss-2024-0001.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

No. 63 (2024): March

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Paulina Tobiasz-Lis, Marcin Wójcik

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 567
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

geography, planning & development, tacit knowledge of place, countryside & rurality, post-agrarian communities, Poland
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop