Preferences of public space users towards trees and other forms of greenery in Lublin's old town

Authors

  • Ewa Trzaskowska
  • Joanna Renda
  • Paweł Adamiec Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
  • Agnieszka Kułak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2023-0023

Keywords

geography, planning & development, greenery, public spaces, Lublin, Poland

Abstract

Currently, the functions of the historical parts of cities are more and more oriented towards the visitors rather than residents. The high density of cultural heritage objects attracts tourists for whom restaurants and shops are created. Therefore, the management and planning of the historic parts of cities has become an increasing challenge. At the same time, activities aimed at improving the quality of life in the city centre, including the most built-up historical parts, require the introduction of greenery (Kowarik, 2019). In order for such spaces to be effective, we require a greater understanding of user preferences. The aim was to define preferences regarding the presence and use of various forms of greenery and their acceptance in the space of the old town. We also asked a question about the functions of the greenery. The study was conducted using an online survey in Lublin, Poland. The method of virtual development of 4 public spaces presenting various forms of greenery in a built environment was used. It was found that the presence of green elements and their form are very important. Trees in particular have a strong influence on preferences, suggesting that they deserve more attention in historical spaces in cities. Flower beds, plants in pots are accepted. The results show that the current level of development is unsatisfactory, and the respondents point out the need to introduce more greenery. Respondents' preferences related to greenery forms depend mainly on gender and age. Especially women and younger age groups preferred spaces with aesthetically attractive elements, such as flowering herbaceous plants in pots. Most of the respondents declared the use of space as places of rest and recreation, and indicated the climatic, ecological and aesthetic functions as important factors in assessing historical spaces in cities. The results should be taken into account by specialists in urban design in historical spaces subject to revitalization.

References

Ameen, R., Mourshed, M. & Li, H. (2015). A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 55: 110-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.07.006.

Arnberger, A., Eder, R. (2015). Are urban visitors’ general preferences for green-spaces similar to their preferences when seeking stress relief. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(4): 872-882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.005.

Arnberger, A., Eder, R. (2011). The influence of age on recreational trail preferences of urban green-space visitors: a discrete choice experiment with digitally calibrated images. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54: 891-908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.539875.

Baycan, T., Nijkamp, P. (2009). Planning and Management of Urban Green Spaces in Europe: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 135(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:1(1).

Baur, J.W.R., Tynon, J.F. (2010). Small-scale urban nature parks: why should we care? Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32: 195–200.

Benčat F., Supuka J. (1988). Rola roślinności i gleby w kształtowaniu i ochronie estetycznych i rekreacyjnych walorów krajobrazu (The role of vegetation and soil in shaping and protecting the aesthetic and recreational qualities of the landscape - in Polish). In: Olaczek, R., Zasoby glebowe i roślinne – użytkowanie, zagrożenie, ochrona. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne (Eds.), Warszawa, 275-288.

bip.lublin.eu, 2020. Lublin, demographic data, Available at: https://bip.lublin.eu/informacja-publiczna/dane-demograficzne/dane-demograficzne-stan-na-dzien-31-07-2020r-,65,22886,2.html (Accessed 04 February 2023).

Bowler, D.E., Buyung-Ali, L., Knight, T.M. & Pullin, A.S. (2010). Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(3): 147-155. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006.

Braçe, O., Garrido-Cumbrera, M. & Correa-Fernández, J. (2021). Gender differences in the perceptions of green spaces characteristics. Social Science Quarterly, 102: 2640-2648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13074.

Camacho-Cervantes, M., Schondube, J.E., Castillo, A. & MacGregor-Fors, I. (2014). How do people perceive urban trees? Assessing likes and dislikes in relation to the trees of a city. Urban Ecosystems, 17: 761-773. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0343-6.

Campagnaro, T., Vecchiato, D., Arnberger, A., Celegato, R., Re, R., Rizzetto, R., Semenzato, P., Sitzia, T., Tempesta, T. & Dina, C. (2020). General, stress relief and perceived safety preferences for green spaces in the historic city of Padua (Italy). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 52: 126695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126695.

Carrus, G., Scopelliti, M., Panno, A., Lafortezza, R., Colangelo, G., Pirchio, S., Ferrini, F., Salbitano, F., Agrimi, M., Portoghesi, L., Semenzato, P. & Sanesi, G. (2017). A different way to stay in touch with “urban nature”: the perceived restorative qualities of botanical gardens. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00914.

Cegielska, A, Piotrowski, P. & Kukulska-Kozieł, A. (2022). Urban Green Spaces: how geospatial information can help identify diversity. A case study from eastern Lesser Poland. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 58(58): 7-29. DOI: http://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2022-0031.

Colley, K., Brown, C. & Montarzino, A. (2015). Workplace settings and wellbeing: Greenspace use and views contribute to employee wellbeing at pen-urban business sites. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138: 32-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.004.

Dilley, J., Wolf, K.L. (2013). Homeowner interactions with residential trees in urban areas. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 39(6): 267-277.

Dondina, O., Orioloi, V., Lorenza, L.M. & Bani, L. (2018). Ecological network design from occurrence data by simulating species perception of the landscape. Landscape Ecology, 33(2): 275-287.

Ebenberger, M., Arnberger, A. (2019). Exploring visual preferences for structural attributes of urban forest stands for restoration and heat relief. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.011.

Fijałkowski, D., Kseniak, M. (1982). Parki wiejskie Lubelszczyzny: stan, ochrona i rewaloryzacja biocenotyczna (Parki wiejskie Lubelszczyzny: stan, ochrona i rewaloryzacja biocenotyczna- in Polish). PWN Press, Warszawa.

Flannigan, J. 2005. An evaluation of residents’ attitudes to street trees in southwest England, Arboricultural Journal, 28(4): 219-241.

Forrest, M., Konijnendijk, C. (2005). Trees in Parks and Open Spaces. Urban Forests and Trees, 30-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27684-x_5.

Freino, H. (2012). Rekonstrukcja miasta. Co to oznacza? (Reconstruction of the city. What does it mean? - in Polish). Przestrzeń i Forma, 17: 339-366.

Gawarecki, H. (1974). O dawnym Lublinie. Szkice z przeszłości miasta (About old Lublin. Sketches from the city's past - in Polish). Wydawnictwo Lubelskie. Lublin.

Gerstenberg, T., Hofmann, M. (2016). Perception and preference of trees: A psychological contribution to tree species selection in urban areas. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 15: 103-111.

Grey, G.W., Deneke, F.J. (1978). Urban Forestry. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N.E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J., Bai, X. & Briggs, J.M. (2008). Global Change and the Ecology of Cities. Science, 319(5864): 756-760.

Gwedla, N. & Shackleton, C.M. (2019). Perceptions and preferences for urban trees across multiple socio-economic contexts in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning, 225-234.

Haaren, C. von, (2020). Landscape planning facing the challenge of the development of cultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(2): 73-80.

Hartig, T., Kahn, P.H. Jr. (2016). Living in cities, naturally. Science, 20;352(6288): 938-40.

Hartig, T., Evans, G.W., Jamner, L.D., Davis, D.S. & Garling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23: 109–123.

Hofmann, M., Gerstenberg, T. & Gillner, S. (2017). Predicting tree preferences from visible tree characteristics. European Journal of Forest Research, 136(3): 421-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10432-017-1042-7.

Hofmann, M., Westermann, J.R., Kowarik, I., Meer, E. & van der (2012). Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11: 303-312.

Ignatieva, M., Stewart, G.H. & Meurk, C. (2011). Planning and design of ecological networks in urban areas. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 7(1): 17-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-010-0143-y.

James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M.D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J., Elmqvist, T., Frith, M., Gordon, C., Greening, K.L., Handley, J., Haworth, S., Kazmierczak, A.E., Johnston, M., Korpela, K., Moretti, M., Niemel, J., Pauleit, S., Roe, M.H., Sadler, J.P. & Ward Thompson, C. (2009). Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8: 65–75.

Jamiołkowska, J. (1981). Stare Miasto w Lublinie - plan rewaloryzacji (Old Town in Lublin - plan for revaluation- in Polish). Ochrona Zabytków, 34/3-4 (134-135): 142-154.

Jarzębowski, J. (1981), Rewaloryzacja Starego Miasta w Lublinie z perspektywy dziesięciu lat (Revitalization of the Old Town in Lublin from the perspective of ten years.- in Polish). Ochrona Zabytków, 34/3-4 (134-135), 155-160.

Jim, C.Y. (2004). Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities. Cities, 21(4): 311–320.

Kabisch, N., Haase, D. (2014). Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122: 129-139.

Kaplan, R. (2007). Employees’ reactions to nearby nature at their workplace: The wild and the tame. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82: 17–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.012.

Kjellgren, A., Buhrkall, H. (2010). A comparison of the restorative effect of a natural environment with that of a simulated natural environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4): 464–472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.011.

Kociuba, D. (2018). Rozwój przestrzenny Lublina od średniowiecza do współczesności (Spatial development of Lublin from the Middle Ages to the present day- in Polish). In: Lublin. Historia, społeczeństwo, gospodarka. Wydawnictwo UMCS (Eds.), Lublin, 21-40.

Kowarik, I. (2019). “Green Belt Berlin”: Establishing a greenway where the Berlin Wall once stood by integrating ecological, social and cultural approaches. Landscape and Urban Planning, 184: 12-22.

Laing, R., Davies, A.M., Miller, D., Conniff, A., Scott, S. & Morrice, J. (2009). The Application of Visual Environmental Economics in the Study of Public Preference and Urban Greenspace. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36: 355-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b33140.

Lindal, P., Hartig, T. (2015). Effects of urban street vegetation on judgments of restoration likelihood. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(2): 200-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.001.

Liu, X., Tvinnereim, E., Grimsrud, K.M., Lindhjem, H., Velle, L.G., Saure, H.I. & Hanna Lee, H. (2021). Explaining landscape preference heterogeneity using machine learning-based survey analysis. Landscape Research, 46(3): 417-434. DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2020.1867713.

Lohr, V. & Pearson-Mims, C. (2006). Responses to Scenes with Spreading, Rounded, and Conical Tree Forms. Environment and Behavior, 38: 667-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506287355.

Madureira, H., Nunes, F., Oliveira, J.V. & Madureira, T. (2018). Preferences for urban green space characteristics: A comparative study in three Portuguese cities. Environments, 5: 23.

Mizgajski, A., Trzaskowska, E., Dubis, L., Zajączkowski, D. & Borysiak, J. (2021). The spatial distribution of tree populations and its policy drivers in medieval areas of cities. Case studies from east-central Europe. Research Square. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-244992/v1.

McPherson, E.G., Simpson, J.R., Xiao, Q. & Wu, C. (2011). Million trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99: 40-50.

Molnarova, K., Sklenicka, P., Stiborek, J., Svobodova, K., Salek, M. & Elizabeth Brabec, E. (2012). Visual preferences for wind turbines: Location, numbers and respondent characteristics. Applied Energy, 92: 269-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.001.

Morgenroth, J., Ostberg, J., Konijnendijk, Bosch, C. van den, Nielsen, A.B., Hauer, R., Sjddotoman, H., Chen, W. & Jansson, M. (2016). Urban Tree Diversity & Taking Stock and Looking Ahead. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 15: 1-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.003.

Murzyn, M.A. (2006). Kazimierz. Środkowoeuropejskie doświadczenie rewitalizacji (Kazimierz. The Central European experience of revitalization- in Polish). Międzynarodowe Centrum Kultur, Kraków.

Nerantzia, J., Tzortzi, G. & Zafiriadis, K. (2006). The impact of park trees on microclimate in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems, 9(3): 195-209.

Pincetl, S. (2010). Implementing Municipal Tree Planting: Los Angeles Million-Tree Initiative. Environmental Management, Springer, 45(2): 227–238.

Przesmycka, N. (2012). Lublin – przeobrażenia urbanistyczne 1815-1939 (Lublin - urban transformations 1815-1939- in Polish). Politechnika Lubelska, Lublin.

Pudelska, K., Mirosław, A. (2011). Zabytkowe ogrody klasztorne we współczesnym Lublinie (Historic monastery gardens in modern Lublin- in Polish). Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych – OL PAN, 81-91.

Rudl, A., Machar, I., Uradnicek, L., Praus, L. & Pechanec, V. (2019). Young urban trees as important structures in the cultural heritage of cities – a case study from Prague. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 7(3): 14-23.

Sang, Å.O., Knez, I., Gunnarsson B. & Hedblom, M. (2016). The Effects of Naturalness, Gender, and age on how Urban Green Space is Perceived and Used. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 18: 268–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.008.

Sćbř, A., Borzan, Z., Ducatillion, C., Hatzistathis, A., Lagerström, T., Supuka, J., ..., Slycken, J. van (2005). The selection of plant materials for street trees park trees and urban woodland. In: Konijnendijk, C.C., Nilsson, K., Randrup, T.B.,Schipperijn, J. (Eds.), Urban Forests and Trees. Springer, Berlin, 257–280.

Schroeder, H.J., Flannigan, J. & Coles, R. (2006). Residents´ attitudes toward street trees in the U.K. and U.S. communities. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 32(5): 236-246.

Starczewski, T., Rogatka, K. & Kowalski, M. (2022).Evaluation of revitalisation projects in Poland using the Maslin Multi-Dimensional Matrix: heading towards green & social revitalisation. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 55(55): 123-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2022-0009.

Strohbach, M.W., Haase, D. (2012). Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig, Germany: Analysis of patterns in a European city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(1): 95–104. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.001.

Strumse, E. (1996). Demographic differences in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(1): 17-31.

Summit, J., Sommer, R. (1999). Further Studies of Preferred Tree Shapes. Environment and Behavior, 31: 550-576.

Svobodova, K., Sklenicka, P., Molnarova, K. & Šálek, M. (2012). Visual preferences for physical attributes of mining and post-mining landscapes with respect to the sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. Ecological Engineering, 43: 34-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.08.007.

Szczygieł, R. (2017). Lokacja Lublina na prawie magdeburskim i jego dzieje w XIV i XV wieku. Wybrane problemy (The location of Lublin under the Magdeburg Law and its history in the 14th and 15th centuries. Selected problems - in Polish). In: Lublin 700 lat dziejów miasta. Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna im. H. Łopacińskiego Lublin (Eds.), 39-60.

Szymańska, D. (2007). Urbanizacja na świecie (Urbanization in the world - in Polish). Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Szymańska, D., Lewandowska, A., Rogatka, K. (2015). Temporal trend of green areas in Poland between 2004 and 2012. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 14(4): 1009-1016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.09.008.

Tempesta, T., Vecchiato, D. (2015). Testing the difference between experts' and lay people's landscape preferences. Aestimum, 66: 1-41.

Todorova, A., Asakawa, S. & Aikoh, T. (2004). Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69: 403-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.11.001.

Trzaskowska, E. (2013). Period changes of synanthropic vegetation as economic transformation in Lublin. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Formatio Circumiectus, 12(1): 137-146.

Turner, W.R., Nakamura, T. & Dinetti, M., (2004). Global Urbanization and the Separation of Humans from Nature. BioScience, 54(6): 585–590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0585:GUATSO]2.0.CO;2.

Tveit, M. (2008). Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups. Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 2882-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.021.

Tyrväinen, L., Pauleit, S. & Seeland, K. (2005). Benefits and Uses of Urban Forests and Trees. Urban Forests and Trees, 81-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27684-x_5.

Ustawa o ochronie przyrody z 16.04.2004 r. (Dz.U z 2004 r. nr 92, poz. 880 z późn. zmianami). Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20040920880/T/D20040880L.pdf.

Velarde, Ma.D., Fry, G. & Tveit, M. (2007). Health Effects of Viewing Landscapes – Landscape Types in Environmental Psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4): 199-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001.

Wang, R., Zhao, J. (2017). Demographic groups’ differences in visual preference for vegetated landscapes in urban green space. Sustainable Cities and Society, 28: 350-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.10.010.

Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner, M.J., Hu, Y. & Xu, X. (2019). Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41: 6-13.

Yu, K. (1995). Cultural variations in landscape preference: Comparisons among Chinese sub-groups and western design experts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32(2): 107-126.

Zhao, J., Xu, W. & Li, R. (2017). Visual preference of trees: The effects of tree attributes and seasons. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 25: 19-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.04.015.

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Downloads

Published

2023-09-12

How to Cite

1.
TRZASKOWSKA, Ewa, RENDA , Joanna, ADAMIEC, Paweł and KUŁAK, Agnieszka. Preferences of public space users towards trees and other forms of greenery in Lublin’s old town. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series. Online. 12 September 2023. No. 61, pp. 19-35. [Accessed 26 January 2025]. DOI 10.12775/bgss-2023-0023.

Issue

No. 61 (2023): September

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Ewa Trzaskowska, Joanna Renda , Paweł Adamiec, Agnieszka Kułak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 491
Number of citations: 0