Polish electoral space aft er 2001 against the background of rivalry between the two main actors of the political scene
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2023-0015Keywords
voting preferences, geographic polarisation, localised entrenchment, spatial analysis, PolandAbstract
Th e aim of the paper is to specify the main patterns – and identify the basic determinants – of the formation of the Polish electoral space aft er 2001, with particular emphasis on factors of a geographical nature, against the background of the rivalry between the two main actors of the political scene, i.e., Civic Platform (Platforma Obywatelska, PO) and Law and Justice (Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, PiS). Using spatial econometric tools, it was found that the PO–PiS oligopoly on the Polish political party market results in increasing spatial clustering and geographical polarisation of voters of both parties in the form of urban–rural heterogeneity and east–west divergence. Th ese phenomena are explained by processes of alignment and convergence of individuals' views according to the logic of localised entrenchment of dominant opinions and consolidation of preferences within historically shaped regional arrangements according to the path dependency principle.
References
Agnew, J. (1996). Mapping politics: how context counts in electoral geography. Political Geography, 15(2): 129–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(95)00076-3.
Anselin, L. & Rey, S.J. (2014). Modern spatial econometrics in practice: A guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL. GeoDa Press LLC.
Bartkowski, J. (2003). Tradycja i polityka: Wpływ tradycji kulturowych polskich regionów na współczesne zachowania społeczne i polityczne (Tradition and politics: The influence of the cultural traditions of Polish regions on contemporary social and political behaviour – in Polish). Warszawa: Żak.
Churski, P., Konecka-Szydłowska, B., Herodowicz, T. & Perdał, R. (2020). Does history matter? Development differences in Poland. In J. Bański (Ed.). Dilemmas of Regional and Local Development, 185–205, London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429433863.
Grabowski, W. (2019). Determinants of voting results in Poland in the 2015 parliamentary elections. Analysis of spatial differences. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 52(4): 331–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2019.10.006.
Jackson, J.E. (2005). A User’s Guide to Principal Components. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Jaskiernia, J. (2017). The development of the Polish party system: A perspective of the parliamentary elections results. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 46(2): 227–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2017214.
Johnston, R., Jones, K., Sarker, R., Propper, K., Burgess, S. & Bolsterb, A. (2004). Party support and the neighbourhood effect: spatial polarisation of the British electorate, 1991–2001. Political Geography, 23(4): 367–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.12.008.
Katchanovski, I. (2006). Cleft countries: Regional political divisions and cultures in post-Soviet Ukraine and Moldova. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag.
Kavetskyy, I. (2010). Przestrzeń wyborcza Polski i Ukrainy: Ujęcie porównawcze (Electoral space of Poland and Ukraine: A comparative perspective – in Polish). Szczecin: WNUS.
Kowalski, M. (2003) Polaryzacja zachowań wyborczych w Polsce jako rezultat cywilizacyjnego rozdarcia kraju (Polarisation of electoral behaviour in Poland as a result of civilisational fragmentation of the country – in Polish). In: M. Kowalski (Ed.). Przestrzeń wyborcza Polski, 11-48. Warszawa: IGiPZ PAN.
Lasoń, A. & Torój, A. (2019). Anti-liberal, anti-establishment or constituency-driven? Spatial econometric analysis of polish parliamentary election results in 2015. European Spatial Research and Policy, 26(2): 199–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.26.2.10.
Marcinkiewicz, K. (2018). The economy or an urban–rural divide? Explaining spatial patterns of voting behaviour in Poland. East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures, 32(4): 693–719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325417739955.
Martin, R. & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4): 395–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012.
Matykowski, R. (2018). Koncepcje i metody w polskich badaniach przestrzenno-elektoralnych (Concepts and methods in Polish spatial electoral research – in Polish). Studia KPZK PAN, 183: 149–171.
Rykiel, Z. (2011). Polish electoral geography and its methods. Przestrzeń Społeczna (Social Space - in Polish), 1(1): 17–48.
Sarigil, Z. (2015). Showing the path to path dependence: the habitual path. European Political Science Review, 7(2): 221–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000198.
Wielgosz, Ł. (2019). Wojna polsko-polska. Zarządzanie oligopolem politycznym przez Platformę Obywatelską oraz Prawo i Sprawiedliwość w latach 2001–2015 (The Polish-Polish War. Management of the political oligopoly by Civic Platform and Law and Justice in 2001-2015 – in Polish). Katowice: WUŚ.
Wing, I.S. & Walker, J.L. (2010). The geographic dimensions of electoral polarization in the 2004 U.S. presidential vote. In A. Páez, J. Gallo, R.N. Buliung, & S. Dall'erba (Eds.). Progress in Spatial Analysis: Methods and Applications, 253–285, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03326-1_13.
Zarycki, T. (2000). Politics in the periphery: Political cleavages in Poland interpreted in their historical and international context. Europe-Asia Studies, 52(5), 851–873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713663091.
Zarycki, T. (2015) The electoral geography of Poland: between stable spatial structures and their changing interpretations. Erdkunde, 69(2): 107–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2015.02.02.
Zarycki, T. (2002). Region jako kontekst zachowań politycznych (Region as a context for political behaviour – in Polish). Warszawa: Scholar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Igor Kavetskyy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.Stats
Number of views and downloads: 666
Number of citations: 0
