Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Contested volumetric space: floor area uplift policy in Jakarta
  • Home
  • /
  • Contested volumetric space: floor area uplift policy in Jakarta
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. No. 56 (2022): June /
  4. Articles

Contested volumetric space: floor area uplift policy in Jakarta

Authors

  • Suryono Herlambang Universitas Tarumanagara
  • Wahyu Astuti Universitas Tarumanagara
  • Regina Suryadjaja Universitas Tarumanagara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2022-0015

Keywords

Floor-Area Uplift (FAU) , volumetric urbanism, Jakarta

Abstract

This paper illustrates how the extraction of land value into volumetric spaces (subterranean spaces, elevated infrastructures and high-rise buildings) is rendered possible through accumulation strategies embedded in spatial planning in Jakarta. In doing so, it carefully delves into the shift in Floor-Area Uplift (FAU) compensation policy and its relationship with the expansion of mass transportation system development. We analysed urban planning and high-rise building policy documents from 1975–2017 and modelled the allowable FAU based on those policies. We illustrate, first, the transformation of FAU discourse in urban policies and how its operability is facilitated in discretionary planning regimes. This paper then demonstrates the planning gain delivery and consequences produced through FAU compensation policy. We argued how volumetric urbanism in Jakarta had been produced and sustained through entrepreneurial motives. It continues to segregate the city both in local and urban contexts despite its positivist development goals.

 

References

Adey, P. (2010). Vertical Security in the Megacity: Legibility, Mobility, and Aerial Politics. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(6): 51–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276410380943.

Amin, A. & Thrift, N. (2016). Seeing Like a City. Polity.

Azhari, J. (2019). Tunggakan Penghuni Rusunawa Pesakih Capai 1,3 Miliar. Available at: https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2019/03/22/16484731/tunggakan-penghuni-rusunawa-pesakih-capai-rp-13-miliar (Accessed: 10 August 2020).

Bertaud, A. (2011). Mumbai FAR/FSI conundrum’ Available at: http://alain-bertaud.com. (Accessed: 10 August 2020).

Chen, H.Y. (2020). Cashing in on the sky: financialization and urban air rights in the Taipei Metropolitan Area. Regional Studies, 54(2): 198–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1599104.

Crook, T., Henneberry, J. and Whitehead, C. (2016). Introduction, In: Crook, T., Henneberry, J. and Whitehead, C. (eds) Planning gain: providing infrastructure & affordable housing. Oxford : Wiley Blac.

Elden, S. (2013). Secure the volume: Vertical geopolitics and the depth of power. Political Geography, 34: 35–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.12.009.

Flyvberg, B. (2014). What You Should Know About Megaprojects and Why: An Overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2): 6–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409.

Graham, S. (2000). Constructing premium network spaces: Reflections on infrastructure networks and contemporary urban development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1): 183–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00242.

Graham, S. (2015). Luxified skies: How vertical urban housing became an elite preserve. City, 19(5): 618–645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1071113.

Graham, S. & Hewitt, L. (2013). Getting off the ground: On the politics of urban verticality. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1): 72–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512443147.

Harris, A. (2015). Vertical urbanisms: Opening up geographies of the three-dimensional city. Progress in Human Geography, 39(5): 601–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514554323.

Harris, A. (2018). Engineering Formality: Flyover and Skywalk Construction in Mumbai. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(2): 295–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12525.

Harvey, D. (1989). From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 71(1): 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583.

Helen Day Urbanism (2016). Comparative Planning Controls Report.

Herlambang, S., Leitner, H., Liong, J.T., Sheppard, E & Anguelov, D. (2019). Jakarta’s great land transformation: Hybrid neoliberalization and informality. Urban Studies, 56(4): 627-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018756556.

Hewitt, L. & Graham, S. (2015). Vertical cities: Representations of urban verticality in 20th-century science fiction literature. Urban Studies, 52(5): 923–937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014529345.

Hou, J. (2012). Vertical urbanism, horizontal urbanity: Notes from east Asian cities. The Emerging Asian City: Concomitant Urbanities and Urbanisms, 234–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203094655.

Jackson, M. & della Dora, V. (2009). “Dreams so big only the sea can hold them”: Man-made islands as anxious spaces, cultural icons, and travelling visions. Environment and Planning A, 41(9): 2086–2104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a41237.

Jessop, B. (1997). The Entrepreneurial City: Re-Imaging Localities, Redesigning Economic Governance, or Restructuring Capital? In: Jewson, Nick & MacGregor, S. (ed.) Transforming Cities: New Spatial Divisions and Social Tranformation, 28–41, Routledge.

Jose, G. (2017). Hawa khaana in Vasai Virar: Urban housing and the commodification of airspace in Mumbai’s periphery. City, 21(5): 632–640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1374779.

Klauser, F. & Pedrozo, S. (2015). Power and space in the drone age: A literature review and politico-geographical research agenda. Geographica Helvetica, 70(4): 285–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-70-285-2015.

Kusno, A. (2012). Housing the Margin: Perumahan Rakyat and the Future Urban Form of Jakarta. Indonesia, 94: 23–56.

Leitner, H. & Sheppard, E. (2018). From Kampungs to Condos? Contested accumulations through displacement in Jakarta. Environment and Planning A, 50(2): 437–456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17709279.

Liong, J., Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., Herlambang, S. & Astuti, W. (2020). Space grabs: colonizing the vertical city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(6): 1072-1082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12949.

Mardiana, C. (2017). Disebut Kampung, Ini Kecanggihan Jembatan Susun Semanggi. Avaliable at: https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-3584802/disebut-kampung-ini-kecanggihan-konstruksi-simpang-susun-semanggi (Accessed: 17 March 2022).

Monk, S. & Crook, T. (2016). International Experience. In: Crook, T., Henneberry, J., and Whitehead, C. (eds) Planning gain: providing infrastructure & affordable housing, 227-268, Wiley Blac. Oxford.

McNeill, D. (2019). Volumetric urbanism: The production and extraction of Singaporean territory. Environment and Planning A, 51(4): 849–868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19830699.

Padawangi, R. & Douglass, M. (2015). Water, water everywhere: Toward participatory solutions to chronic urban flooding in Jakarta. Pacific Affairs, 88(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5509/2015883517.

Peck, J., Theodore, N. & Brenner, N. (2009). Neoliberal Urbanism: Models, Moments, Mutations. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 29(1): 49–66.

Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta (2019). Audited Financial Report (Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah).

Pramanti, L. & Oldfield, P. (2015). Tall Building Planning Strategy and Governance What Can Jakarta Learn from Other Cities?’, presented in 3rd Annual Conference in Architecture and Civil Engineering (AVE 2015).

Sager, T. (2011). Neo-liberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990-2010. Progress in Planning, 76(4): 147–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2011.09.001.

Shatkin, G. (2016). The real estate turn in policy and planning: Land monetization and the political economy of peri-urbanization in Asia. Cities, 53: 141–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.015.

Shatkin, G. (2019). Financial sector actors, the state, and the rescaling of Jakarta’s extended urban region. Land Use Policy, 112: 104–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104159.

Shin, H.-B. (2011). Vertical accumulation and accelerated urbanism: the East Asian experience. In: Gandy, M. (ed.) Urban Constellations. JOVIS Verlag, 48–53.

Urban Redevelopment Authority (2020). Gross Floor Area Handbook.

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2022-05-19

How to Cite

1.
HERLAMBANG, Suryono, ASTUTI, Wahyu and SURYADJAJA, Regina. Contested volumetric space: floor area uplift policy in Jakarta. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series. Online. 19 May 2022. No. 56, pp. 101-112. [Accessed 17 June 2025]. DOI 10.12775/bgss-2022-0015.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

No. 56 (2022): June

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Suryono Herlambang, Wahyu Astuti, Regina Suryadjaja

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 855
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Floor-Area Uplift (FAU) , volumetric urbanism, Jakarta
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop