Perception of the probability of Korean unification amongst South Korea’s elderly population
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2022-0006Keywords
Korean unification, South Korea, elderly, aging, public perceptionAbstract
While Korean unification remains one of the most significant issues in inter-Korean and international affairs, little is known about the perception of the likelihood of the Korean unification, especially amongst the elderly population. Yes, the proportion of the population in South Korea has been rapidly rising, becoming an increasingly important civic group. In this study, we analyzed the data from the 2018 nationally representative Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging survey using ordered logistic regression modelling. The results show that age, life satisfaction, health status, participation in social activities, and geographical location are the most important factors affecting the perception of Korean unification. We also find some gender differences in relation to the impact of education and wealth. Further qualitative studies might be useful to gain an in-depth understanding of people’s perceptions as well as possible socioeconomic and cultural barriers to a potential pre-unifying process.
References
Ahmed, S., Hasan, Z., Pongsiri, M., Ahmed, M.W., Szabo, S. (2020). Impact of Extreme Weather Events on Injury, Disability, and Death in Bangladesh, Climate and Development
_____________________________________________
Chen, X. (2012). China’s policy of unification of the Korean Peninsula. Asia and Africa Review, (5), 21-24
_____________________________________________
Glaser, B. S., & Sun, Y. (2015). Chinese attitudes toward Korean unification. International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, no.2: 71-98
_____________________________________________
Ham, S. K. (2017). A study on change and determinants of South Koreans' Perceptions of Unification.” MPA/MPP Capstone Projects. 273
_____________________________________________
Jiyoon, K., Friedhoff, K., Chungku, K., & Euicheol, L. (2015). South Korean Attitudes toward North Korea and Reunification. Asan Public Opinion Report, The Asian Institute for Policy Studies, Seoul
_____________________________________________
Kim, D. Y., & Oh, H. J. (2001). Psychosocial aspects of Korean reunification: Explicit and implicit national attitudes and identity of South Koreans and North Korean defectors.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 7(3), 265-288
_____________________________________________
Kim, Heuijeong, and Sun Kim. (2018). A Study on the Opinions Towards Unification by Generation and Unification Education: Focusing on Unification Perception Survey.” Asian Cultural Institute, no.9 (December): 1643-1654
_____________________________________________
Kim, J., Kim, K., & Kang, C. (2018). South Korean Youths’ Perceptions of North Korea and Unification. The Asan Institute for Policy Studies Issue Brief, 3.
_____________________________________________
Kim, Sun, Heuijeong Kim, and Sujin, Kim. (2017). An Analysis of the Social Demographic Characteristics of the South Koreans According to their Views on Unification with North Korea. Inha University Institute of Education, no.23 (December): 27-48.
_____________________________________________
Korean General Research Survey (KGRS). (2013). Survey Research Center, http://kgss.skku.edu/, last accessed: 01.04.2021
_____________________________________________
Lee, W, Yoon, J-H., Koo, J-W., Chang, S-J., Roh, J. & Won, J-U. (2018). Predictors and estimation of risk for early exit from working life by poor health among middle and older aged workers in Korea. Nature Publishing Group, no. 8 (December): 1-12.
_____________________________________________
Lee, Nae-Young. (2014). “What Determines Korean Perception and Attitude on National Unification? Searching for the new analytical model.” Korea University Peace & Democracy Institute, no. 22 (April): 167-206.
_____________________________________________
Lee, Soonmi. (2014). “The Influence of Participation in Old Age Education on the Consciousness and Behavior of the Elderly in Political Participation.” Hanseo University Graduate School, (February): 1-58.
_____________________________________________
Noland, M., Robinson, S., & Liu, L. G. (1998). The costs and benefits of Korean unification: Alternate scenarios. Asian Survey, 38(8), 801-814.
_____________________________________________
Park, S. (2015). The Difference Analysis of Portion Recognition and Age Classification on Basic Direction Unification Preparation: Focused on Peaceful Unification Consultant Member in Busan. Korean Association of Unification Strategy, no.15 (November): 103-127.
_____________________________________________
Park, Y. & Lee, J. (2016). A Cohort Analysis of Attitudes toward National Unification and North Korea. Institute of Global Politics, no.9 (December): 31-67.
_____________________________________________
Rich, T. S. (2019). South Korean Perceptions of Unification: Evidence from an Experimental Survey. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 20(1), 142-149.
_____________________________________________
Seo, H. (2017). School Education for Korean Reunification and Generational Differences regarding Reunification Issues. Peace Research Institute 29(1): 93-127.
_____________________________________________
StataCorp. (2015). Stata statistical software: Release 15. StataCorp LP.
_____________________________________________
Szabo, S., Hossain, S., Matthews, Z., Lazar, A., Ahmad, S. (2015). Soil salinity, household wealth and food insecurity in agriculture-dominated delta, Sustainability Science, 1-11 (doi: 10.1007/s11625-015-0337-1)
_____________________________________________
The Guardian. (2019). Korean Peninsula will be united by 2045, says Seoul amid Japan row, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/aug/15/korean-peninsula-will-be-united-by-2045-says-seoul-amid-japan-row, last accessed: 01.04.2021
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.Stats
Number of views and downloads: 344
Number of citations: 1