Multivariate classification of provinces of Vietnam according to the level of sustainable development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2021-0009Keywords
Principal component analysis, cluster analysis, level of sustainability, indicatorsAbstract
The research aims to classify the level of sustainability of 63 provinces in Vietnam upon 24 indicators reflecting three main dimensions of sustainable development by using multivariate classification method for the year 2014-2016. First of all, the principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to group quantitative variables that reflect important aspects of each component of sustainable development of localities in Vietnam into a number of limited dimensions (factors). The results of PCA illustrate 8 principal components in which 3 main components of economic and social pillar, and 2 main components for environmental pillar. After that, the second method was applied by using the hierarchical methods of cluster analysis for the set of 8 principal components conducted by PCA. With the candidate solution divided all of the provinces into 6 clusters, the analysis shows that the higher level of sustainable development belongs to South East, Red River Delta, and North Central, in which 4 provinces of South East (Ho Chi Minh City, Binh Duong, Dong Nai, and Ba Ria – Vung Tau) form a group with the highest level of sustainability. The regions such as South Central Coastal, Highland area, and Mekong River Delta have a medium level; the North midland and mountain areas are regions at the low level of sustainability.
References
Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Applications. The International Institute for Sustainable Development, Manitoba, Canada.
Everitt, B., Landau, S., Leese, M., and Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Registered. DOI: 10.1007/BF00154794.
Cohen, S., Demeritt, D., Robinson, J., Rothman, D. (1998). Climate change and sustainable development: Towards dialogue, Global Environmental Change, 8(4), pp. 341–371. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-3780(98)00017-X.
Fredericks, S. E. (2014). Measuring and Evaluating Sustainability: Ethics in Sustainability Indexes. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203694312.
Hardi, P., Barg, S., Hodge, T., and Pinter, L. (1997). Measuring Sustainable Development: Review of Current Practice.
Hill, E. W., Brennan, J. F. and Wolman, H. L. (1998). What is a central city in the United States? Applying a statistical technique for developing taxonomies, Urban Studies, 35(11), pp. 1935–1969. DOI: 10.1080/0042098983962.
General Statistics Office (GSO) (2015, 2017). Result of the Vietnam household living standards surveys 2014, 2016. Hanoi: Statistical Publishing House.
General Statistics Office (GSO) (2017). Vietnam Statistical Yearbook 2016. Hanoi: Statistical Publishing House.
General Statistics Office (GSO) (2017). Vietnam rural, agriculture and fishery census 2016. Hanoi: Statistical Publishing House.
General Statistics Office (GSO) (2010). Vietnam Population and Housing census 2009. Hanoi: Statistical Publishing House.
General Statistics Office (GSO) (2017). Vietnam Statistical Yearbook 2016. Hanoi: Statistical Publishing House.
General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO) (no date). Statistical data. Available at: https://gso.gov.vn/Default_en.aspx?tabid=766 (Accessed: 27 January 2019).
Kaivo-Oja, J., Panula-Ontto, J., Vehmas, J., and Luukkanen, J. (2014). Relationships of the dimensions of sustainability as measured by the sustainable society index framework, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology. Taylor & Francis, 21(1), pp. 39–45. DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2013.860056.
Li-Yin Shen, Jorge Ochoa, J., Mona N. Shah, and Xiaoling Zhang (2011). The application of urban sustainability indicators - A comparison between various practices, Habitat International. Elsevier Ltd, 35(1), pp. 17–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.03.006.
Mierzejewska, L. (2009). Rozwój zrównoważony miasta. Zagadnienia poznawcze i praktyczne. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press. (in Polish)
Nguyen Viet Thinh and Do Thi Minh Duc (2005). Socio-Economic Typology of Provinces and Districts of Vietnam. Hanoi: The Ecyclopedia Publishing House. (in Vietnamese)
Roy, K., Kar, S. and Das, R. N. (2015). Understanding the basics of QSAR for applications in pharmaceutical sciences and risk assessment. Academic Press, an imprint of Elsevier.
Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (2001). International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Elsevier publishing.
Szirmai, A. (2015). Socio-Economic Development. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107054158.
Truong, V. C. (2019). Measuring sustainable development level in Vietnam by using a comprehensive index’, Prace i Studia Geograficzne, 64(2), pp. 7–21.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.Stats
Number of views and downloads: 186
Number of citations: 0