Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Development of crop production in the Slovakia and Czechia after the year 2004 in comparison with V4 countries
  • Home
  • /
  • Development of crop production in the Slovakia and Czechia after the year 2004 in comparison with V4 countries
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. No. 50 (2020): December /
  4. Articles

Development of crop production in the Slovakia and Czechia after the year 2004 in comparison with V4 countries

Authors

  • Jana Némethová Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Geography and regional Development, Trieda A. Hlinku 1, 949 74 Nitra
  • Hana Svobodová Masaryk Univerzity, Faculty of Education, Department of Geography, Porici 7, 603 00 Brno
  • Ondřej Krejčí Masaryk Univerzity, Faculty of Science, Department of Geography
  • Antonín Věžník Masaryk Univerzity, Faculty of Science, Department of Geography

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2020-0028

Keywords

crop production, V4 countries, crop production indices, regional disparities

Abstract

The V4 countries went through a transformation of their entire economies, including the agricultural sector, in the 1990s. Each of these countries approached the transformation of agriculture differently, but later the V4 countries’ approach to agricultural development was unified by the EU’s common agricultural policy. The aim of the paper was to compare the development of the production (sown area and hectare yield) of selected most commonly cultivated crops in Slovak and Czech regions (NUTS 3) in the period between 2004 and 2017. The development of production in these two countries was also evaluated against the trends of V4 countries. Based on these analyses, common and specific agriculture development trends in V4 countries were revealed. A chronological average was used to evaluate the average values of the monitored indicators in the period from 2004 to 2017 in Slovak and Czech regions. To express the development of the given indicators between 2004 and 2017, the change index was used and visualised cartographically. Regression analysis was used to show the development trends of agricultural production in the V4 countries. In general, the agricultural sectors in the V4 countries show similar characteristics with similar trends, and the average hectare yield has a modest growing trend. In terms of the structure of the cultivated plants, the size of the cultivated areas, the volume of production and the average hectare yields, there have been considerable changes to crop farming in Slovak and Czech regions. The study showed that the changes in the agrarian sector after the year 2004 conditioned by the entry of Czechia and Slovakia into the European Union were reflected in a decrease in crop production and an increase in regional disparities. From the point of view of the production indicator expressing the hectare yield of crops, Czechia achieves better indicator values than does Slovakia.

References

Bodian, J. (1989). Dlhodobý rozvoj rastlinnej výroby v SSR. Zemědělská Ekonomika, 1989/3, 177–188.

Bojnec, Š. Fertő, I. (2019). Do CAP subsidies stabilise farm income in Hungary and Slovenia? Agricultural Economics – Czech, 65(3) 103–111. DOI:10.17221/190/2018-Agriceon

Boltižiar, M. Olah, B. Gallay, I. Gallayová, Z. (2016). Transformation of the Slovak cultural landscape and its recent trends. Landscape and landscape ecology: proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Landscape Ecology. Proceedings. Halada, Ľ., Bača, A., Boltižiar, M (Eds.). Bratislava: Institute of Landscape Ecology SAS, 2016, 57–67.

Buchenrieder, G. Mollers, J. (Eds.) (2009). Structural Change in Europe’s rural regions. Farm livelihoods between subsistence orientation, modernisation and non-farm diversification. Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Central and Eastern Europe, Vol. 49. Halle (Saale)

Čechura, L. Grau, A. Hockmann, H. Levkovych, I. Kroupova, Z. (2017). Catching Up or Falling Behind in European Agriculture: The Case of Milk Production. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 206–227. ISSN 0021857X.

Ďuričová, I. (2014). Podporná politika do poľnohospodárstva SR v rokoch 2004–2012. Ekonomika Poľnohospodárstva 14(2), 5-19.

Hoffmann, Z. (1965). Změny v rozmístnění rostlinné výroby v Československu v letech 1930-1960. Zprávy o vědecké činnosti, GÚ ČSAV (5), Problémy geografie, Brno 1965, 11–18.

Houška, V. (1982). Vývoj hektarových výnosů zemědělských plodin v ČSSR a ve světě. Statistika, 12/1982, 513–529.

Hýblová, E. Skalický, R. (2018). Return on sales and wheat yields per hectare of European agricultural entities. Agric. Econ. – Czech, 64(10), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.17221/209/2017-AGRICECON

Ivanová, M. Michaeli, E. Boltižiar, M. Fazekašová, D. (2013). The analysis of changes ecological stability of landscape in the contrasting region of the mountain range and a lowland. Ecology, economics, education and Legislation. 13th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference SGEM 2013. Albena; Bulgaria. 1, 2013, 925–938.

Jurášek, P. (1987). Analýza úrovne rastlinnej výroby v ČSSR a v krajinách RVHP. Zemědělská Ekonomika, 5/1987, 357–368.

Kabrda, J. Jančák, V. (2007). Impact of selected political and institutional factors on Czech agriculture and landscape. Geografie, 112(1), 48–60.

Kotyza, P. Slaboch, J. (2014). Food Self Suffi ciency in Selected Crops in the Czech Republic and Poland. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 62(6), 1329–1341.

Kotyza, P. (2015). Are V4 countries competitive in production of main oil-bearing crops in the perspective of production self-sufficiency and foreign trade development? Agrarian perspectives XXIV: Global Agribusiness and the Rural Economy, 1213-7960.

Kriščiukaitiené, I. Galnaitytė, A. Jedik, A. (2009). Analysis of agricultural policy scenario impacts on Lithuanian agriculture. Žemės ūkio mokslai, 16(3–4), 101–112.

Kupker, B. Hüttel, S. Kleinhanss, W. Offermann, F. (2006). Assessing impacts of CAP reform in France and Germany. Agrarwirtschaft, 55(5/6), 227–237.

Latruffe, L. Fogarasi, J. Desjeux, Y. (2012). Efficiency, productivity and technology comparison for farms in Central and Western Europe: The case of field crop and dairy farming in Hungary and France. Economic Systems, 36(2), 264–278.

Marsden, T. Sonnino, R. (2008). Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 422–431.

Némethová, J. Dubcová, A. Kramáreková, H. (2014). The Impacts of the European Union's common agricultural policy in Slovakia. Moravian Geographical Reports, 22(4), 51–64. DOI: 10.1515/mgr-2014-0023

Némethová, J. Civáň, M. (2017). Regional differences in agriculture in Slovakia after its accession to the European union. Quaestiones Geographicae, 36(2), 9–21. DOI: 10.1515/quageo– 2017–0011

Némethová, J. Dubcová, A. Kramáreková, H. (2017). Slovak agriculture in 2002 - 2014 and its regional differentiations. Geograficky Casopis, 69(3), 281–298.

Némethová, J. Midler, M. Civáň, M. (2018). Development tendencies in crop production in Slovakia after 2004 - regional differentiations. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 19(1), 245–269. DOI: 10.5513/JCEA01/19.1.2040

Petrovič, F. Stránovský, P. Muchová, Z. Falťan, V. Skokanová, H. Havlíček, M. Gábor, M. Špulerová, J. (2017). Landscape-ecological optimization of hydric potential in foothills region with dispersed settlements – a case study of Nová Bošáca, Slovakia. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 15(1), 379–400. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1501_379400

Psaltopoulos, D. Balamou, E. and Thomson, K. (2006). Rural–Urban Impacts of CAP Measures in Greece: An Inter‐regional SAM Approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(3), 441–458.

Ramniceanu, I. Ackrill, R. (2007). EU rural development policy in the new member states: Promoting multifunctionality? Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4), 416–429.

Rudnicki, R. (2009). Demographic Determinants of the Activity of Farms in Poland in the Acquisitionof European Union Funds in the Years 2004–2006. Bulletin of Geography Socio–economic Series, 12, 45-59. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10089-009-0003-4

Scrieciu, S. (2011). Socioeconomic and Environmental Impacts on Agriculture in the New Europe: Post-Communist Transition and Accession to the European Union. Routledge, 222.

Spišiak, P. Kusendová, D. Pavličková, K. Halás, M. Kolény, M. Zubriczký, G. Švoňavec, M., Hurbánek, P. Paľúch, T. Labuda, M. (2005). Agrorurálne štruktúry Slovenska po roku 1989. Geografika.

Šimo, D. (1998). Komparácia pestovatelských ploch a úrodnosti pšenice a kukurice v krajinách CEFTA a EU. Zemědělská Ekonomika, 44, 1998/10, 453–458.

Štolbová, M. Hlavsa, T. Hruška, M. Kučera, M. (2012). Hospodařenı́ zemědělců v oblastech s přı́rodnı́mi omezenı́mi po vstupu ČR do EU. Ústav zemědělské ekonomiky a informací, Praha.

Věžník, A. (1989). K růstu produkce obilovin v ČSSR. Sborník Československé geografické společnosti, 94(2), 121–126.

Věžník, A. Král, M. Svobodová, H. (2013). Agriculture of the Czech Republic in the 21st Century: From Productivism to Post-productivism. Quaestiones Geographicae, 32(4), 7–14. ISSN 0137-477X. DOI:10.2478/quageo-2013-0029

Wasilewski, M. Madra, M. (2008). Regional differentiation of the use of production factors in the Polish agriculture. European Countryside, 1, 22–33. DOI: 10.2478/v10091/009-0003-7

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2020-12-09

How to Cite

1.
NÉMETHOVÁ, Jana, SVOBODOVÁ, Hana, KREJČÍ, Ondřej and VĚŽNÍK, Antonín. Development of crop production in the Slovakia and Czechia after the year 2004 in comparison with V4 countries. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series. Online. 9 December 2020. Vol. 50, no. 50, pp. 7-22. [Accessed 8 July 2025]. DOI 10.2478/bog-2020-0028.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

No. 50 (2020): December

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 531
Number of citations: 4

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

crop production, V4 countries, crop production indices, regional disparities
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop