Territorial polarisation of the economy and population distribution in post-Soviet Russia

Authors

  • Giennadij Fiodorow Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University of Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2019-0033

Keywords

Russian Federation, spatial development, polarisation, levelling, GRP per capita, population density, macroregions, mesoregions, microregions

Abstract

Scientists, experts, and politicians have differing views on polarisation and levelling in the development of regions. Many researchers consider polarisation to be an objective process that benefits the country and the region because labour productivity is higher in larger centres. As for social differences, many states (and the European Union as an organisation) redistribute part of their revenue from more prosperous regions to poorer ones using regional budget policies. The article provides useful data on the regional specificity of polarisation and levelling in Russia at macro-, meso-, and microregional levels based on statistical, economic and cartographic analysis. The article shows that in Russia the polarisation of the economy and population distribution strongly prevails over the levelling of regional differences.

References

Anokhin, А.А. and Fedorov, G.M. (2017). O sootnoshenii protsessov polyarizatsii i vyravnivaniya urovnya sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya sub”yektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii (The correlation of the processes of polarization and levelling of the level of social and economic development in the subjects of Russian

Federation). In: Vestnik SPbGU. Nauki o Zemle (Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Earth Sciences), 62, 4, pp. 327 – 342. http://doi.org/10.21638/11701/

spbu07.2017.401

Boudeville, J. (1966). Problems of Regional Economic Planning. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2002.

Chistobaev, A. I. and Fedulova, S. I. (2018). Spatial planning in the European Union: Practices to draw on in Russia. In: Baltic Region, 10, 2, pp. 86-99. Doi:

http://doi.org/10.5922 / 2079-8555-2018-2-6, available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20140214222113/ http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/what/future/eligibility/ index_en.cfm, DoA: February 24 2019.

Federal’naya sluzhba Gosudarstvennoy statistiki (Federal State Statistics Service), available at: http://www.gks.ru/, DoA: February 12 2019.

Friedmann, J. (1967). A general theory of polarized development. In: Urban and Regional Development Advisory Program in Chile, Santiago (Chile): The Ford Foundation, 41–61.

Gritsay, O. Ioffe, G. and Treyvish, A. (1991). Tsentr i periferiya v regional’nom razvitii (Center and periphery in regional development). Moscow: Nauka.

Khorev, B.S. (1975). Problemy gorodov (Problems of cities). 2nd ed. Moscow: Mysl.

Khorev, B.S. (1981). Territorial’naya organizatsiy aobshchestva (The territorial organization of society). Moscow: Mysl.

Kolomak, E.A. Kryukov, V.A. Melnikova, L.V. Seliverstov, V.E. Suslov, V.I. and Suslov, N.I. (2018). Strategiya prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossii: ozhidaniya i realii (Spatial Development Strategy of Russia: Expectations and Realities). In: Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya (Region: Economics and Sociology), 2:

-287.

Krugman, P. (1991a). Geography and Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Krugman, P. (1991b). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. In: Journal of Political Economy, 99(3): 483-499.

Kuznetsova, O. V. (2019). Trade-offs of spatial development priorities choice. In: Voprosy Ekonomiki (Economic issues), 1: 146-157.

Kuznetsova, O. V. (2018). Rol’ «Strategii prostranstvennogo razvitiya» v formirovanii federal’noy regional’noy politiki (The Role of the Spatial Development

Strategy in the Formation of a Federal Regional Policy). In: Bykov, N.I., editor: Sovremennye tendencii prostranstvennogo razvitiya i prioritety obshchestvennoy geografii (Current trends in spatial development and priorities of social geography). Barnaul, 76-80.

Lappo, G.M. (1978). Gorodskie aglomeracii v SSSR (Urban agglomerations in the USSR). Moscow: Nauka, 1978.

Lappo, G. (2015). Urbanizaciya: 100 let peremen (Urbanization: 100 Years of Change). In: Demoscop, 19 October, available at: https://m.polit.ru/article/2005/10/19/demoscope217/ DoA: February 22 2019.

Lebedinskaya, G.A. (2018). O meste strategii prostranstvennogo razvitiya v sisteme territorial’nogo planirovaniya Rossijskoy Federacii (About the Place of Strategy of Spatial Development in the System of Territorial Planning of the Russian Federation). In: Academia. Arhitektura i stroitel’stvo (Academia. Architecture and Construction),1: 59 – 66 DOI: http://doi.org/10.22337 / 2077-9038-2018-1-59-66

Mikheeva, N.N. (2018). Strategiya prostranstvennogo razvitiya: novyy etap ili povtorenie staryh oshibok? (Strategy of Spatial Development: New Stage or Repetition

of Old Mistakes?) In: ECO, 5; 158 - 178, available at: https://ecfor.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/miheeva-eko-2018.pdf DoA: February 22 2019. DOI: http://doi.org/10.30680 / ESO0131-7652-2018-5-158-178

Nefedova, T.G. and Treyvish, A.I. (2017). Perestrojka rasseleniya v sovremennoy Rossii: urbanizaciya ili dezurbanizaciya? (The transformation of settlement

in modern Russia: urbanization or de-urbanization?) In: Regional’nye issledovaniya (Regional Studies), 2: 12–23.

Perroux, F. (1955). Note sur la notion de “pôle de croissance”. In: Économique Appliquée, 307–320.

Pivovarov, Yu.L. (1976). Modern Urbanization: Major Trends in Settlement. Moscow: Statistika.

Protsenko, N. (2019). Tochki rosta bez prostranstva razvitiya: Rossiya szhimayetsya do mega aglomeratsiy (Growth points without space for development: Russia shrinks to mega-agglomerations).Available at: https://www.e-vid.ru/ekonomika/030119/tochki-rosta-bez-prostranstva-razvitiya-rossiya-szhimaetsya-do-megaaglomeraciy DoA: February 24 2019.

Regions of Russia, 2018. Moscow: Rosstat.

Regions of Russia, 2012. Moscow: Rosstat.

Zubarevich, N. V. (2001). The polarization of Russian cities as a consequence of the crisis of the 1990s. In: Vestnik Evrasii (Bulletin of Eurasia), 1(5).

Zubarevich, N.V. (2015). Spatial development strategy after the crisis: from large projects to institutional modernization. In: Journal of the New Economic Association (2:13): 226–230.

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

1.
FIODOROW, Giennadij. Territorial polarisation of the economy and population distribution in post-Soviet Russia. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series. Online. 31 December 2019. Vol. 46, no. 46, pp. 41-52. [Accessed 3 December 2024]. DOI 10.2478/bog-2019-0033.

Issue

No. 46 (2019): December

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Title, logo and layout of journal Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series are reserved trademarks of Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 1301
Number of citations: 2