Why Would the Skalds Not Have Lied about the Rulers’ Expeditions and Battles? Some Remarks on a Relic of Medieval Attitude toward Sources in Modern Medieval Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/APH.2020.122.07Słowa kluczowe
Snorri Sturluson, Morkinskinna, skaldic poetry, methodology of history, medieval historiographyAbstrakt
The article presents a critique of a research method whereby historical sources could not have possibly lied as they were targeted at the addressees who knew the actual course of the events described or referred to. This attitude toward the sources has its antecedence in Snorri Sturluson’s argument on the reliability of skaldic poetry. To his mind, the poems were biased but still valuable, in a way, as they were declaimed before the rulers who would have perceived an untrue account “as a mockery, rather than a praise”. The question arises, what kind of a situation Snorri tried to preclude: one where a mean warrior would have been shown as a great hero? Or, perhaps, one where a defector would have been portrayed as a warrior bravely marching in the first rank? The story of Giffard from the Morkinskinna saga seems to offer the answer. Giffard fled from the battlefield but had a praise poem dedicated to him, which the (real) character aptly deciphered as derision aimed at him.
Bibliografia
Andersson Theodore M., ‘The Oral Sources of Óláfs Saga helga in Heimskringla’, Saga-Book, xxxii (2008), 5–38.
Bagge Sverre, review of: Shami Ghosh, Kings’ Sagas and Norwegian History. Problems and Perspectives (Leiden–Boston, 2011), Journal of English and Germanic Philology, cxii, 1 (2013), 98–100.
Boulhosa Patricia P., Icelanders and the Kings of Norway. Medieval Sagas and Legal Texts (Leiden–Boston, 2005).
Buc Philippe, ‘Noch einmal 918–919. On the Ritualized Demise of Kings and of Political Rituals in General’, in Gerd Althoff (ed.), Zeichen, Rituale, Werte: Internationales Kolloquium des Sonderforschungsvereichs 496 an der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster (Münster, 2004), 151–78.
Cetwiński Marek, Historia i polityka. Teoria i praktyka mediewistyki na przykładzie badań dziejów Śląska (Kraków, 2008).
Gade Kari E., ‘Morkinskinna’s Giffarðsþattr: Literary Fiction or Historical Fact?’, Gripla, xi (2000), 181–97.
Ghosh Shami, Kings’ Sagas and Norwegian History. Problems and Perspectives (Leiden– Boston, 2011).
Meulengracht Sørensen Preben, ‘The Prosimetrum Form. 1: Verses as the Voice of the Past’, in Russell Poole (ed.), Skaldsagas: Text, Vocation, and Desire in the Icelandic Sagas of Poets (Berlin–New York, 2000), 172–90.
Michałowski Roman, Princeps fundator. Studium z dziejów kultury politycznej w Polsce X–XIII wieku (Warszawa, 19932).
Morawiec Jakub, Między poezją a polityką. Rozgrywki polityczne w Skandynawii XI wieku w świetle poezji ówczesnych skaldów (Katowice, 2016).
Morkinskinna, ed. by Finnur Jónsson (København, 1932).
Phelpstead Carl, Holy Vikings: Saints’ Lives in the Old Icelandic Kings’ Sagas (Tempe, 2007).
Rutkowski Rafał, Północna tradycja historyczna wprowadzona w nurt dziejów powszechnych. Kronika Mnicha Teodoryka “O starożytności norweskich królów” (koniec XII wieku) (Toruń, 2019).
Snorri Sturluson, Heimskringla. Nóregs Konunga Sögur, ed. by Finnur Jónsson, i (København, 1893–1900).
Żmudzki Paweł, Władca i wojownicy. Narracje o wodzach, drużynie i wojnach w najdawniejszej historiografii Polski i Rusi (Wrocław, 2009).
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Title, logo and layout of journal are reserved trademarks of APH.Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 378
Liczba cytowań: 0