Archaeology, film, and digital media: From film archaeology to media archaeology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/AHP.2024-2025.012Keywords
archaeology, film, mutual relationsAbstract
This article on the relationships between archaeology and film seeks to show various aspects of this issue using historical, comparative, and anthropological methods. Aside from cinematic fantasies about archaeology, accurate depictions of archaeology in fiction film have been exemplified; they are even more perfect in documentaries. The visualisation of archaeological monuments goes beyond the framework of classical cinema. It falls within the scope of digital technologies and three-dimensional digitalisation of archaeological features. The utmost subtlety of these relationships lies in the archaeological metaphor of the past in the media and film. Comparing all the analysed situations, we arrive at the conclusion that our approach has been based on the hermeneutic circle model that leads to a pre-understanding of the relationships between archaeology and film in popular culture, explaining of the rank of these relations in archaeological documentaries, and digital imaging of archaeological artefacts, ending with a correct understanding of the relationship of archaeology and film in contemporary concepts of media archaeology.
The furthest thing is the (not) obvious archaeological metaphor of the past of media and film. The furthest thing is the (not) obvious archaeological metaphor of the past of media and film. Comparing all the analysed situations, we come to the conclusion that our procedure was based on the formula of the hermeneutic circle, leading from pre-understanding the relationship between archaeology and film in popular culture, explaining the importance of these relationships in archaeological documentaries and digital imaging of archaeological monuments, to a proper understanding of the relationship archaeology and film in contemporary concepts of media archaeology.
References
1. Brezillon M., 2001, Encyklopedia kultur pradziejowych, Warszawa.
2. Bahn P.G., 2004, Archeologia. Przewodnik, translated by R. Oracz, Warszawa.
3. Johnson, J.W.G., 1989, Na bezdrożach teorii ewolucji, Warszawa–Struga.
4. Loska K., 2004, Encyklopedia filmu science fiction, Kraków.
5. Markiewicz M., 2013, Trójwymiarowa wizualizacja grobów odkrytych na halsztackim cmentarzysku w Domasławiu, stan. 10/11/12, Przegląd Archeologiczny, vol. 61, pp. 215–231.
6. Markiewicz M., 2018, Wizualizacja 3D halsztackiej osady ze Starego Śleszowa – nowa forma narracji w archeologii, Śląskie Sprawozdania Archeologiczne, vol. 60, issue no. 1, pp. 383–398.
7. Pawleta M., 2012, Obrazy przeszłości w narracjach współczesności, [in:] Przeszłość społeczna. Próba konceptualizacji, ed. S. Tabaczyński et al., Poznań, pp. 1124–1140.
8. Pawleta M., Zapłata R., 2012, Archeologia i nowe media; cyfrowa przyszłość, [in:] Przeszłość społeczna. Próba konceptualizacji, ed. S. Tabaczyński et al., Poznań, pp. 1169–1174.
9. Petziger von G., 2018, Pierwsze znaki. Najstarsze symbole świata, Kraków.
10. Piotrowska M., 2016, Rola i znaczenie filmu w popularyzacji historii a kształtowanie społecznej świadomości historycznej, Zeszyty Naukowe Towarzystwa Doktorantów UJ, Nauki Humanistyczne, issue no. 14 (3/2016), pp. 59–78.
11. Zapłata R., 2012, Metodyka i metodologia badań archeologicznych, [in:] Przeszłość społeczna. Próba konceptualizacji, ed. S. Tabaczyński et al., Poznań 2012, pp. 480–499.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jacek Woźny

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 6
Number of citations: 0