Customer value development in the light of design thinking approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JPM.2017.125Keywords
design thinking, customer value development, empathy, customer experience design, value proposition canvas, business model canvasAbstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to ascertain the meaning and characteristics of the entrepreneurs’ empathy as the most signifi cant approach for modern business and its role in design thinking methodology, where empathy is used for multiple purposes.
Methodology: Literature review on design thinking approach and objectives, empathy and customer value development as well as abstract modelling and synthesis is the methodology of this study.
Findings: Content analysis shows that among the many approaches and defi nitions of the entrepreneurs’ empathy to the customers, none directly points the role of design thinking in ensuring customer value development. There has been a conceptual transition to integrated conceptualization of design thinking, which allows the theoretical assumptions to move beyond traditional design practices and theories, and there is a potential for new design approaches focused on customer experience that promote customer and business value.
Originality/value: The novelty of this study is a presentation of meaning and characteristics of the entrepreneurs’ empathy, its role in design thinking approach, as well as development models which both refer to the value for customers and business. The author proposes a new approach and conceptual framework for design thinking process in order to promote solutions which allow to build a new customer value by entrepreneurs.
References
Blank, S. (2013), The Four Steps to the Epiphany. Successful Strategies for Products that Win, K&S Ranch, Pennsylvania.
Brown, T. (2009), Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation, Harper Business, New York.
Brown, T., Wyatt, Y. (2010), “Design Thinking for Social Innovation (SSIR)”, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 29-53.
Buchanan, R. (1992), “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking”, Design Issues, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 5-21.
Collins, H. (2013), “Can Design Thinking Still Add Value?”, Design Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 35-39. DOI: 10.1111/drev.10239.
Cova, B., Pace, S. (2006), “Brand Community of Convenience Products: New forms of customer empowerment – the case “my Nutella The Community”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 40 No. 9/10, pp. 1088-1089.
Dziadkiewicz, A. (2014), „Rola designu w procesie tworzenia nowego produktu”, Marketing i Rynek, Vol. 21 No. 8, pp. 386-394.
Dziewanowska, K., Kacprzak, A. (2013), Marketing doświadczeń, Polskie Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.
Fisher, G. (2011), “Radical Business Model Innovation”, Entrepreneur Magazine, available at: http://www.entrepreneurmag.co.za/advice/starting-a-business/business-model/radical-business-model-innovation/ (accessed 30 December 2016).
Fournier, S. (1998), “Consumers and their Brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research”, Journal of Consumer Research, No. 4, pp. 342-373.
Gardner, M. (1985), “Mood States and Consumer Behaviour: A critical review”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12, pp. 281-300.
Gasparini, A. (2014), “The Value of Empathy in Design Thinking”, working paper, Innovation in HCI: What can we learn from Design Thinking? (NORDICHI 2014), Helsinki, pp. 8-11.
Gasparini, A.A. (2015), “Perspective and Use of Empathy in Design Thinking”, conference Paper, The Eighth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, (ACHI 2015), International Academy, Research, and Industry Association, Lisbon, 22-27 February, pp. 49-54.
Jachnis, A. (2007), Psychologia konsumenta. Psychologiczne i socjologiczne uwarunkowania zachowań konsumenckich, Oficyna Wydawnicza Branta, Bydgoszcz-Warszawa.
Kahneman, D. (2003), “Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice”, in: Frangsmyr, T. (Ed.), Les Prix Nobel 2002, Almquist & Wiksell International, Stockholm.
Koskinen, I., Battarbee, K., Mattelmäki, T. (2003), Empathic design: user experience in product design, IT Press, Finland.
Lindstrom, M. (2005), Brand Sense. Build Powerful Brands through Touch, Taste, Smell, Sight, and Sound, Free Press, New York.
Lonsway, B. (2009), Making Leisure Work: Architecture and the Experience Economy, Routledge Press, Oxford.
Muniz, A. Jr, O’Guinn, T. (2001), “Brand Community”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 412-432.
New, S., Kimbell, L. (2013), “Chimps, Designers, Consultants and Empathy: A “Theory of Mind” for Service Design”, Proceedings of Cambridge Academic Design Management Conference (CADMC 2013), University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Nussbaum, B. (2011), Design Thinking is a Failed Experiment. So What’s Next?, available at: http://www.fastcodesign.com/1663558/design-thinking-is-afailed-experiment-sowhats-next (accessed 30 December 2016).
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., Smith, A., Papadakos, T. (2014), Value Proposition Design. How to create products and services customer want, Wiley, Hoboken.
Pine, J., Gilmore, J. (1999), The Experience Economy, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Ries, E. (2011), The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses, Crown Business, New York.
Schmitt, B.H. (1999), “Experiential Marketing”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 15 No. 1-3.
Schmitt, B.H. (1999), Experiential Marketing. How to get Customers to Sense, Feel, Think, Act, and Relate to your Company and Brands, Free Press, New York.
Spencer, E. (1881), The principles of psychology, Williams and Norgate, London.
Staszewski, W. (2016), „Karkówska śpiewa ze szczęścia”, Newsweek, No. 48.
Stolterman, E. (2008), “The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 55-65.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form, or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.
Plagiarism and ghostwriting
In response to the issue of plagiarism and ghostwriting the editors of the Journal of Positive Management has introduced the following rules to counteract these phenomena:
1. Contributors should be aware of their responsibility for a content of manuscripts.
2. Collective authors are obliged to reveal the contribution and an affiliation of each author (i.e. who is an author of specified part of a paper).
3. Any act of dishonesty will be denounced, the editors will inform appropriate institutions about the situation and give evidence of all cases of misconduct and unethical behaviour.
4. The editors may ask contributors for financial disclosure (i.e. contribution of specified institutions).
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 924
Number of citations: 0
