Case Study Methodology in Research on Corporate Social Responsibility: General Publication Profiling and Identifying Research Contexts

Andrzej Lis

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/JCRL.2019.005

Abstract


Purpose: The aim of the paper is to profile the scientific output in research on corporate social responsibility employing the methodology of case study. The research process is focused around the following research questions: (1) How has the research productivity in CSR case studies been changing? (2) What are the most productive contributors (countries,
research institutions, source titles and scholars) to the scientific output? (3) What are the most popular contexts (geography, industry, company type) of CSR studies employing case study ethodology?  Design/methodology/approach: The study employed the method of research profiling, which is categorized among bibliometric descriptive studies. The standard version of general publication profiling, comprising four aspects used to describe the scientific output in the research field i.e.: country profiling, research institution profiling, source title profiling
and author profiling, was supplemented with identification of the research contexts of CSR case studies. Research profiling was supported with citation analysis and co-authorship analysis, representing science mapping methods. VOSviewer software was employed to conduct citation analysis and co-authorship analysis and visualize the findings.
Findings: The studies employing case study analysis methodology to explore corporate social responsibility issues are still within the growth phase of the research field life cycle. Research profiling of the most productive countries, research institutions, and authors indicates the leading position of the United Kingdom. The followers are both developed nations, mainly Anglo-Saxon countries (the United States, Australia, Canada) and European continental countries (Spain, Italy, Denmark), as well as developing nations (India, Indonesia, China). Source titles profiling points out the following journals of the highest prominence publishing CSR case studies: Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Cleaner Production, and Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The CSR case studies are embedded in the contexts of both developed and developing nations. The mining industry is found to be the sector attracting the most attention of researchers. Other industries which are often analysed in CSR studies include: tourism and hospitality, food, banking and financial services, chemical, forestry, anufacturing, public health, fashion and textile, oil industries. Research implications: Through bibliometric analysis of case  studies in corporate social responsibility, the study contributes first and foremost to management theory. Firstly, it provides the scholars interested in the field with a detailed map identifying key contributors (countries, research institutions and authors), which may be useful for establishing research collaboration. Secondly, analysing leading source titles is of high practical value for the authors considering journals for submitting their works. Finally, discovering the most often explored contexts of CSR case studies (in regard to geography, industries, and company types), on the one hand, indicates main research interests in the field, but on the other hand may be an indication to find interesting gaps to be covered in prospective case studies. Originality/value: The originality of the study derives from the fact that scientific output including CSR related case studies has not been mapped, so far. The employed methodology, including combination of the bibliometric descriptive approach represented by the research profiling framework and quantitative science mapping methods (citation and co-authorship analysis) creates the unique value of the study. Paper type: Review. 


Keywords


corporate social responsibility; CSR; case study; bibliometrics; research profiling

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andersen, M., & Skjoett‐Larsen, T. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540910941948

Brice, H., & Wegner, T. (1989). A quantitative approach to corporate social responsibility programme formulation. Managerial and Decision Economics, 10(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090100213

Ciliberti, F., Pontrandolfo, P., & Scozzi, B. (2008). Investigating corporate social responsibility in supply chains: A SME perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1579–1588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.016

Czakon, W. (2011). Metodyka systematycznego przeglądu literatury. Przegląd Organizacji, 3, 57–61. https://doi.org/doi:10.33141/po.2011.03.13.

Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00582.x

Herrera, J., & de las Heras-Rosas, C. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: Towards sustainable business organizations. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030841

Jenkins, H. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry: Conflicts and constructs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,

(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.50

Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9182-6

Jenkins, H., & Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner

Production, 14(3–4), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.10.004

Jones, P., & Comfort, D. (2019). Storytelling and corporate social responsibility reporting: A case study commentary on U.K. food retailers. Journal of Public

Affairs, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1834

Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2005). Corporate social responsibility as a means of marketing to and communicating with customers within stores: A case study of UK food retailers. Management Research News, 28(10), 47–56. https://doi.org/

1108/01409170510785011

Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2006a). Healthy eating and the UK’s major food retailers: A case study in corporate social responsibility. British Food Journal,

(10), 838–848. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700610702091

Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2006b). Reporting and reflecting on corporate social responsibility in the hospitality industry: A case study of pub operators in

the UK. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 18(4), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110610665339

Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2007a). Marketing and corporate social responsibility within food stores. British Food Journal, 109(8), 582–593. https://

doi.org/10.1108/00070700710772381

Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2007b). Corporate social responsibility: A case study of the top ten global retailers. EuroMed Journal of Business, 2(1), 23–35.

https: //doi.org/10.1108/14502190710749938

Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and marketing communications within stores: A case study of U.K. food retailers. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 14(4), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454440801987908

Jones, P., Comfort, D., Hillier, D., & Eastwood, I. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: A case study of the UK’s leading food retailers. British Food Journal, 107(6), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700510602192

Jones, P., Hillier, D., & Comfort, D. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in the UK gambling industry. Corporate Governance, 9(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700910946622

Jones, P., Hillier, D., & Comfort, D. (2012). Fashioning corporate social responsibility. Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies, 2(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/20450621211295578

Lis, A. (2018). Profiling and mapping the contexts of the case study research in business, management and accounting. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 17(1), 179–196. https://doi.org/doi:10.4467/24498939IJCM.18.010.8389

Lis, A., & Cegliński, P. (2017). General research profiling for the role of leadership in corporate social responsibility. Marketing i Rynek, 11 (CD), 321–332.

Martinez, H., Jaime, A., & Camacho, J. (2012). Relative absorptive capacity: A research profiling. Scientometrics, 92(3), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0652-6

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.

org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Porter, A. L., Kongthon, A., & Lu, J.-C. C. (2002). Research profiling: Improving the literature review. Scientometrics, 53(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014873029258

Preslmayer, C., Kuttner, M., & Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B. (2018). Uncovering the research field of corporate social responsibility in family firms: A citation analysis.

Journal of Family Business Management, 8(2), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-10-2017-0032

Schotten, M., El Aisati, M., Meester, W. J. N., Steiginga, S., & Ross, Cameron, A. (2017). A brief history of Scopus: The world’s largest abstract and citation database of scientific literature. In F. J. Cantú-Ortiz (Ed.), Research Analytics: Boosting University Productivity and Competitiveness through Scientometrics (pp. 31–58). Auerbach Publications. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315155890

Scopus Content Coverage Guide 2020. (2020). https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/

pdf_file/0007/69451/Scopus_ContentCoverage_Guide_WEB.pdf

Sudolska, A., & Lis, A. (2018). Profiling research on a sustainable enterprise and a sustainable organization. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej: Organizacja

i Zarządzanie, 127, 263–272.

Sudolska, A., Lis, A., & Chodorek, M. (2019). Research profiling for responsible and sustainable innovations. Sustainability, 11(23), art. 6553. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236553

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2018). VOSviewer Manual. Universiteit Leiden. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.9.pdf

Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.10

/s11192-020-03387-8

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/109


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


p-ISSN 2392-2680
e-ISSN 2392-2699

Partnerzy platformy czasopism