Swimming-Induced Pulmonary Edema in Open-Water Sports: Implications for Athlete Health and Event Medical Care — A Narrative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2026.76.76123Keywords
swimming-induced pulmonary edema, immersion pulmonary edema, open-water swimming, triathlon, event medicine, prehospital care, lung ultrasound, continuous positive airway pressure, Athlete HealthAbstract
Background: Swimming-induced pulmonary edema (SIPE) is an uncommon but potentially serious complication of open-water swimming and triathlon. For event medical teams, the challenge extends beyond diagnosis to safe extraction, race-side assessment, respiratory support, and decisions about transfer or discharge.
Objective: To review the clinical, physiological, and event-medicine literature on SIPE and develop a practical framework for medical care at mass-participation open-water events.
Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE and supplemented the search with Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Crossref, publisher websites, and citation tracking. Because the review was intended to inform event medicine, studies conducted in mass-participation settings were given greatest weight, with military, diving, physiological, and other clinical literature used when directly relevant.
Results: Direct event evidence is concentrated in a small number of overlapping Vansbro cohorts. In symptomatic swimmers, pulse oximetry and auscultation performed well against LUS-confirmed pulmonary edema; at one low-altitude event, SpO₂ ≤95% or crackles gave 97% sensitivity and 86% specificity. These figures are specific to that setting. Lung ultrasound can add useful information, particularly because edema may be focal or anterior. CPAP and PEP have both been used on site with clinical improvement in observational data, but the available observational data do not establish comparative effectiveness. Crackles and B-lines may persist after symptoms and oxygenation improve. Severe, atypical, or non-resolving presentations require escalation.
Conclusions: The literature supports a coherent sequence of event care: preparation, recognition, extraction, assessment, supportive treatment, reassessment, and a decision between escalation and stable disposition, followed by handover and follow-up. The framework proposed here is intended as a practical aid for local adaptation, not as a validated clinical protocol.
References
1. Magdalena Papiez, Professor Witold Orłowski Independent Public Clinical Hospital, Poland, E-Mail: magda.papiez.9@gmail.com
2. Maria Królikowska, Department of Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland, e-mail: marysia.krolikowska@gmail.com
3. Dominik Gajewski, St. John of God Brothers HospitallerHospital in Lodz, Poland,
E-Mail: dominik.gajewski@stud.umed.lodz.pl
4. Julia Stokowiec, Medical University of Łódź, E-Mail: julia.stokowiec@student.umed.lodz.pl
5. Jakub Kowalczyk, Central Teaching Hospital of the Medical University of Łódź, E-Mail: jakub.kowalczyk1@student.umed.lodz.pl
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Barbara Bralewska, Mateusz Polak, Julia Nowak, Mateusz Łaszczych, Jakub Grandos, Jakub Jonakowski, Julia Wykrota

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 6
Number of citations: 0