Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Quality in Sport

Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Twenty-First Century: Risk-Adapted Surveillance, Biomarkers, and Evolving Therapeutic Strategies
  • Home
  • /
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Twenty-First Century: Risk-Adapted Surveillance, Biomarkers, and Evolving Therapeutic Strategies
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 75 (2026) /
  4. Medical Sciences

Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Twenty-First Century: Risk-Adapted Surveillance, Biomarkers, and Evolving Therapeutic Strategies

Authors

  • Mikołaj Bochnak Uniwersytet Rzeszowski https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9913-8470
  • Kinga Skalniak https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4752-9351
  • Julia Wojtanowicz https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0747-9946

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2026.75.75926

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, surveillance, abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging, biomarkers, risk stratification

Abstract

Introduction and Purpose

The increasing contribution of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has highlighted important limitations of conventional ultrasound-based surveillance. Obesity, hepatic steatosis, and heterogeneous liver parenchyma may impair visualization and reduce sensitivity for early-stage tumors. This review summarizes current evidence on HCC risk stratification, surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment, with particular emphasis on risk-adapted strategies in patients with MASLD.

Materials and Methods

Peer-reviewed literature was reviewed, with emphasis on studies addressing ultrasound-based surveillance, abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (AMRI), elastography, biomarker-based risk models, liquid biopsy, radiomics, artificial intelligence, and recent advances in locoregional and systemic treatment.

Results

Ultrasound with or without alpha-fetoprotein remains the standard surveillance strategy for patients at increased risk of HCC, although its effectiveness is reduced when visualization is inadequate. In selected patients, alternative imaging approaches, including AMRI, may improve surveillance performance. Elastography, clinical risk models, and biomarker panels such as GALAD may support risk stratification, whereas liquid biopsy, radiomics, and artificial intelligence remain investigational. Advances in locoregional therapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy have also expanded treatment options across different stages of HCC.

Conclusion

The key challenge is to identify patients in whom ultrasound-based surveillance is insufficient rather than to replace ultrasonography universally. A risk-adapted strategy integrating individual HCC risk, ultrasound quality, and selected complementary tools may be particularly relevant in MASLD. Further prospective studies are needed to determine whether such approaches improve early detection and clinical outcomes.

References

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834

2. Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):6. doi:10.1038/s41572-020-00240-3

3. Huang DQ, El-Serag HB, Loomba R. Global epidemiology of NAFLD-related HCC: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(4):223-238. doi:10.1038/s41575-020-00381-6

4. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Hepatology. 2023;78(6):1966-1986. doi:10.1097/HEP.0000000000000520

5. European Association for the Study of the Liver; European Association for the Study of Diabetes; European Association for the Study of Obesity. EASL–EASD–EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). J Hepatol. 2024;81(3):492-542. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2024.04.031

6. Singal AG, Llovet JM, Yarchoan M, et al. AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2023;78(6):1922-1965. doi:10.1097/HEP.0000000000000466

7. Tzartzeva K, Obi J, Rich NE, et al. Surveillance imaging and alpha fetoprotein for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(6):1706-1718.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.064

8. Gupta P, Soundararajan R, Patel A, Kumar-M P, Sharma V, Kalra N. Abbreviated MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2021;75(1):108-119. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2021.01.041

9. Johnson PJ, Pirrie SJ, Cox TF, et al. The detection of hepatocellular carcinoma using a prospectively developed and validated model based on serological biomarkers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(1):144-153. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0870

10. Bianco C, Jamialahmadi O, Pelusi S, et al. Non-invasive stratification of hepatocellular carcinoma risk in non-alcoholic fatty liver using polygenic risk scores. J Hepatol. 2021;74(4):775-782. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.024

11. Anstee QM, Reeves HL, Kotsiliti E, Govaere O, Heikenwalder M. From NASH to HCC: current concepts and future challenges. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(7):411-428. doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0145-7

12. Ringelhan M, Pfister D, O’Connor T, Pikarsky E, Heikenwalder M. The immunology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Immunol. 2018;19(3):222-232. doi:10.1038/s41590-018-0044-z

13. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2025;82(2):315-374. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.028

14. Reig M, et al. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendations: the 2026 update. J Hepatol. 2026;84:631-654. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2025.10.020

15. Marsh TL, Parikh ND, Roberts LR, et al. A phase 3 biomarker validation of GALAD for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2025;168(2):316-326.e6. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.09.008

16. Tayob N, Christie I, Richardson P, et al. Validation of the hepatocellular carcinoma early detection screening algorithm in a cohort of veterans with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(9):1886-1893.e5. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2018.12.005

17. Ren Q, et al. Non-invasive tumor-naïve minimal residual disease detection of liver cancer by incorporating circulating tumor DNA features and alpha-fetoprotein: a prospective study. Cancer Med. 2024;13(24):e70511. doi:10.1002/cam4.70511

18. Chernyak V, Fowler KJ, Kamaya A, et al. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018: imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in at-risk patients. Radiology. 2018;289(3):816-830. doi:10.1148/radiol.2018181494

19. Calderaro J, Seraphin TP, Luedde T, Simon TG. Artificial intelligence for the prevention and clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2022;76(6):1348-1361. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2022.01.014

20. John BV, Bastaich DR, Deng Y, Singal AG, Dahman B. Use of liver stiffness measurement for hepatocellular carcinoma risk stratification in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Hepatology. 2026. doi:10.1097/HEP.0000000000001498

21. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(11):693-699. doi:10.1056/NEJM199603143341104

22. Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1894-1905. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1915745

23. Abou-Alfa GK, Lau G, Kudo M, et al. Tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(8):EVIDoa2100070. doi:10.1056/EVIDoa2100070

24. Yau T, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the CheckMate 9DW trial. Lancet. 2025;405(10492):1851-1864. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00403-9

25. Gordan JD, Kennedy EB, Abou-Alfa GK, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(15):1830-1850. doi:10.1200/JCO.23.02745

26. Pfister D, Núñez NG, Pinyol R, et al. NASH limits antitumour surveillance in immunotherapy-treated HCC. Nature. 2021;592(7854):450-456. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03362-0

27. Liang J, Peng H, Li W, Liu Z. Head-to-head study of [18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT for non-invasive assessment of liver cancer and its immunohistochemical markers. BMC Cancer. 2024;24(1):1378. doi:10.1186/s12885-024-13153-1

28. Hannah N, Yu C, Nedumannil L, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT in the detection and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(22):3865. doi:10.3390/cancers16223865

29. Lee PC, Wu CJ, Hung YW, et al. Gut microbiota and metabolites associate with outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10(6):e004779. doi:10.1136/jitc-2022-004779

30. Lu LL, Xiao SX, Lin ZY, et al. GPC3-IL7-CCL19-CAR-T primes immune microenvironment reconstitution for hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2023;39(6):3101-3119. doi:10.1007/s10565-023-09821-w

31. Yarchoan M, Gane EJ, Marron TU, et al. Personalized neoantigen vaccine and pembrolizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase 1/2 trial. Nat Med. 2024;30(4):1044-1053. doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02894-y

Quality in Sport

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-09-22

How to Cite

1.
BOCHNAK, Mikołaj, SKALNIAK, Kinga and WOJTANOWICZ, Julia. Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Twenty-First Century: Risk-Adapted Surveillance, Biomarkers, and Evolving Therapeutic Strategies. Quality in Sport. Online. 22 September 2026. Vol. 75, p. 75926. [Accessed 23 September 2026]. DOI 10.12775/QS.2026.75.75926.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 75 (2026)

Section

Medical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Mikołaj Bochnak, Kinga Skalniak, Julia Wojtanowicz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 33
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

hepatocellular carcinoma, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, surveillance, abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging, biomarkers, risk stratification
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop