Does Shared Physical Activity Strengthen Interpersonal Relationships? — A Review on Couples and Families
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2026.75.75692Keywords
physical activity, exercise; couples, romantic relationships, family functioning, relationship satisfaction, social supportAbstract
Background. Physical activity is commonly studied as an individual health behavior, although participation with romantic partners or family members may also influence interpersonal functioning. Shared activity may provide opportunities for social support, cooperation, positive affect, and shared goal pursuit. However, evidence regarding its effects on relationship quality remains heterogeneous.
Aim. To review evidence on whether shared physical activity is associated with improved relationship quality, intimacy, family cohesion, or other interpersonal outcomes in couples and families, while distinguishing direct relational outcomes from behavioral and mechanistic evidence.
Materials and Methods. A narrative review was conducted using targeted searches of PubMed and publisher-indexed literature in August 2026. Observational studies, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and qualitative syntheses were considered.
Results. Observational studies directly examining shared activity suggest associations with positive affect and daily relationship satisfaction, whereas separate dyadic studies indicate that partner support may facilitate physical activity rather than demonstrate improvements in relationship quality. Dyadic interventions improve physical activity, but evidence for broader relationship benefits is limited. Partnered exercise has demonstrated selected improvements in physical intimacy in couples affected by cancer. Family-based interventions show more consistent effects on cohesion and organization than on global family functioning. Experimental studies support potential mechanisms involving synchrony and cooperation but provide indirect evidence for established relationships.
Conclusions. Shared physical activity may support interpersonal functioning, but current evidence does not establish a general causal effect on relationship quality. Further well-controlled dyadic and family RCTs are needed.
References
1. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput JP, Chastin S, Chou R, Dempsey PC, DiPietro L, Ekelund U, Firth J, Friedenreich CM, Garcia L, Gichu M, Jago R, Katzmarzyk PT, Lambert E, Leitzmann M, Milton K, Ortega FB, Ranasinghe C, Stamatakis E, Tiedemann A, Troiano RP, van der Ploeg HP, Wari V, Willumsen JF. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955. PMID: 33239350; PMCID: PMC7719906.
2. Arden-Close E, McGrath N. Health behaviour change interventions for couples: A systematic review. Br J Health Psychol. 2017 May;22(2):215-237. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12227. Epub 2017 Feb 2. PMID: 28150410; PMCID: PMC5408388.
3. Berli C, Bolger N, Shrout PE, Stadler G, Scholz U. Interpersonal Processes of Couples' Daily Support for Goal Pursuit: The Example of Physical Activity. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Mar;44(3):332-344. doi: 10.1177/0146167217739264. Epub 2017 Nov 9. PMID: 29121824.
4. Rhodes RE, Perdew M, Malli S. Correlates of Parental Support of Child and Youth Physical Activity: a Systematic Review. Int J Behav Med. 2020 Dec;27(6):636-646. doi: 10.1007/s12529-020-09909-1. PMID: 32529629.
5. Rhodes RE, McEwan D, Rebar AL. Theories of physical activity behaviour change: a history and synthesis of approaches. Psychol Health. 2019;34(8):961-981.
6. Davis A, Taylor J, Cohen E. Social Bonds and Exercise: Evidence for a Reciprocal Relationship. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0136705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136705. PMID: 26317514; PMCID: PMC4552681.
7. Berli C, Schwaninger P and Scholz U (2021) “We Feel Good”: Daily Support Provision, Health Behavior, and Well-Being in Romantic Couples. Front. Psychol. 11:622492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.622492
8. Carr RM, Prestwich A, Kwasnicka D, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Gucciardi DF, Quested E, Hall LH, Ntoumanis N. Dyadic interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour: systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2019 Mar;13(1):91-109. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1532312. Epub 2018 Oct 14. PMID: 30284501.
9. Rhodes RE, Hollman H, Sui W. Family-based physical activity interventions and family functioning: A systematic review. Fam Process. 2024 Mar;63(1):392-413. doi: 10.1111/famp.12864. Epub 2023 Feb 7. PMID: 36748347.
10. Sackett-Fox K, Gere J, Updegraff JA. Better together: the impact of exercising with a romantic partner. J Soc Pers Relat. 2021;38(11):3078-3096.
11. Wilson SJ, Novak JR. The implications of being “in it together”: relationship satisfaction and joint health behaviors predict better health and stronger concordance between partners. Ann Behav Med. 2022;56(10):1014-1025.
12. Novak JR, August KJ, Wei M, Gast J, Peak T. Examining the link between exercise-specific relational processes and physical activity, psychological distress, and relationship satisfaction among heterosexual and gay male couples. J Health Psychol. 2023 Aug;28(9):804-817. doi: 10.1177/13591053221150351. Epub 2023 Jan 20. PMID: 36661252.
13. Howland, Maryhope & Farrell, Allison & Simpson, Jeffry & Rothman, Alexander & Burns, Rachel & Fillo, Jennifer & Wlaschin, Jhon. (2016). Relational Effects on Physical Activity: A Dyadic Approach to the Theory of Planned Behavior. Health Psychology. 35. 733-741. 10.1037/hea0000334.
14. Ricard NC, Beaudry SG, Pelletier LG. Lovers with happy feet: the interdependence of relationship and activity factors for individuals dancing with a romantic partner. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2012;42(4):939-963.
15. Totenhagen CJ, Li X, Wilmarth MJ, Archuleta KL, Yorgason JB. Do couples who play together stay together? A longitudinal dyadic examination of shared leisure, financial distress, and relationship outcomes. Fam Process. 2024 Mar;63(1):210-227. doi: 10.1111/famp.12869. Epub 2023 Feb 17. PMID: 36802045.
16. Wang H, Li L. Effects of two-person synchronized cycling exercise on interpersonal cooperation: A near-infrared spectroscopy hyperscanning study. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Jul-Sep;24(3):100492. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100492. Epub 2024 Sep 11. PMID: 39308780; PMCID: PMC11416475.
17. Winters-Stone KM, Lyons KS, Dobek J, Dieckmann NF, Bennett JA, Nail L, Beer TM. Benefits of partnered strength training for prostate cancer survivors and spouses: results from a randomized controlled trial of the Exercising Together project. J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Aug;10(4):633-44. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0509-0. Epub 2015 Dec 29. PMID: 26715587.
18. Lyons KS, Winters-Stone KM, Bennett JA, Beer TM. The effects of partnered exercise on physical intimacy in couples coping with prostate cancer. Health Psychol. 2016 May;35(5):509-13. doi: 10.1037/hea0000287. Epub 2015 Oct 12. PMID: 26462060; PMCID: PMC4829498.
19. Winters-Stone KM, Lyons KS, Beer TM, Skiba MB, Hung A. A pilot feasibility study of Exercising Together© during radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a dyadic approach for patients and spouses. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Dec 8;7(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00952-7. PMID: 34879873; PMCID: PMC8653603.
20. Winters-Stone KM, Lyons KS, Dieckmann NF, Lee CS, Mitri Z, Beer TM. Study protocol for the Exercising Together© trial: a randomized, controlled trial of partnered exercise for couples coping with cancer. Trials. 2021 Aug 30;22(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05548-3. PMID: 34461975; PMCID: PMC8404361.
21. Brown HE, Atkin AJ, Panter J, Wong G, Chinapaw MJ, van Sluijs EM. Family-based interventions to increase physical activity in children: a systematic review, meta-analysis and realist synthesis. Obes Rev. 2016 Apr;17(4):345-60. doi: 10.1111/obr.12362. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Erratum in: Obes Rev. 2017 Apr;18(4):491-494. doi: 10.1111/obr.12493. PMID: 26756281; PMCID: PMC4819691.
22. Forghani Soong Y, Hollman H, Rhodes RE. Association between child and youth physical activity and family functioning: a systematic review of observational studies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025;22:101.
23. Brennan C, Streight E, Cheng S, Rhodes RE. Parents' experiences of family-based physical activity interventions: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jul 1;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01778-9. PMID: 40598290; PMCID: PMC12220237.
24. Knoll N, Hohl DH, Keller J, Schuez N, Luszczynska A, Burkert S. Effects of dyadic planning on physical activity in couples: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2017 Jan;36(1):8-20. doi: 10.1037/hea0000423. Epub 2016 Sep 19. PMID: 27642760.
25. Xiong L, et al. Challenges and facilitators to parent-child shared physical interventions during preschool and school age education: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Front Public Health. 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Patryk Dąbrowski, Weronika Świt, Bartosz Cichoń, Krzysztof Zachwieja, Jakub Wodnicki , Krzysztof Prokop , Maciej Wojtarowicz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 10
Number of citations: 0