Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Quality in Sport

Intraoperative Hypotension — From Blood Pressure Thresholds to Individualized Hemodynamic Management: Current State of Knowledge
  • Home
  • /
  • Intraoperative Hypotension — From Blood Pressure Thresholds to Individualized Hemodynamic Management: Current State of Knowledge
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 76 (2026) /
  4. Medical Sciences

Intraoperative Hypotension — From Blood Pressure Thresholds to Individualized Hemodynamic Management: Current State of Knowledge

Authors

  • Mikołaj Bochnak Uniwersytet Rzeszowski https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9913-8470

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2026.76.75443

Keywords

intraoperative hypotension; mean arterial pressure; perioperative hemodynamics; blood pressure monitoring; hemodynamic management; non-cardiac surgery

Abstract

Introduction and Purpose. Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is common during non-cardiac surgery and has been associated with postoperative organ injury. However, definitions vary between studies, arterial pressure alone does not identify the underlying hemodynamic disturbance, and the optimal blood pressure target remains uncertain. This review examines current evidence on the consequences, monitoring, risk assessment, and management of IOH, with particular attention to individualized hemodynamic management.

Materials and Methods. A structured PubMed/MEDLINE search was performed, with the final search completed on 16 August 2026. Studies published mainly between January 2015 and August 2026 were considered, including randomized and observational studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and current perioperative guidelines and consensus statements.

Results. Deeper and longer IOH is associated with greater postoperative risk, particularly acute kidney injury and myocardial injury, although these associations do not establish causality. Pragmatic MAP thresholds remain clinically useful, but no optimal target has been identified for all patients. Current recommendations favour cause-directed treatment. Continuous and predictive monitoring can reduce hypotension exposure, but improved blood pressure control has not consistently translated into better patient-centred outcomes.

Conclusions. IOH cannot be interpreted from a single blood pressure value alone. Management should consider the severity and duration of hypotension, its likely hemodynamic cause, and patient risk. Further studies are needed to determine which patients benefit from individualized monitoring and treatment.

References

1. Weinberg L, Li SY, Louis M, Karp J, Poci N, Carp BS, et al. Reported definitions of intraoperative hypotension in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia: a review. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22:69. doi:10.1186/s12871-022-01605-9.

2. Saugel B, Fletcher N, Gan TJ, Grocott MPW, Myles PS, Sessler DI; PeriOperative Quality Initiative XI (POQI XI) Workgroup Members. PeriOperative Quality Initiative (POQI) international consensus statement on perioperative arterial pressure management. Br J Anaesth. 2024;133(2):264–276. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2024.04.046.

3. Saugel B, Buhre W, Chew MS, Cholley B, Coburn M, Cohen B, et al. Intra-operative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having noncardiac surgery: a statement from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025;42(6):543–556. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002174.

4. Salmasi V, Maheshwari K, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Singh A, Sessler DI, Kurz A. Relationship between intraoperative hypotension, defined by either reduction from baseline or absolute thresholds, and acute kidney and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(1):47–65. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001432.

5. Chiou K, Vikram S, Rowshan K, Shah S, Modha D, Engelman E, et al. Higher versus routine intraoperative blood pressure targets in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology. 2026. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000006190.

6. Kouz K, Hoppe P, Briesenick L, Saugel B. Intraoperative hypotension: pathophysiology, clinical relevance, and therapeutic approaches. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64(2):90–96. doi:10.4103/ija.IJA_939_19.

7. Terwindt LE, Tol JTM, van der Ven WH, Kurucz VC, Noteboom SH, Breel JS, et al. The influence of anesthetic drug strategy on the incidence of post-induction hypotension in elective, non-cardiac surgery: a prospective observational cohort study. J Clin Anesth. 2024;99:111671. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111671.

8. Walsh M, Devereaux PJ, Garg AX, Kurz A, Turan A, Rodseth RN, et al. Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery: toward an empirical definition of hypotension. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(3):507–515. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a10e26.

9. Cai J, Tang M, Wu H, Yuan J, Liang H, Wu X, et al. Association of intraoperative hypotension and severe postoperative complications during non-cardiac surgery in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2023;9(5):e15997. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15997.

10. Daum N, Bill D, Thiele M, Felber J, von Wedel D, Spies C, et al. Preoperative patient risk factors for intraoperative hypotension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025;12:1709004. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1709004.

11. Juri T, Suehiro K, Kimura A, Mukai A, Tanaka K, Yamada T, et al. Impact of continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring on hemodynamic fluctuation during general anesthesia: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018;32(6):1005–1013. doi:10.1007/s10877-018-0125-4.

12. Wijnberge M, Geerts BF, Hol L, Lemmers N, Mulder MP, Berge P, et al. Effect of a machine learning-derived early warning system for intraoperative hypotension vs standard care on depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension during elective noncardiac surgery: the HYPE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1052–1060. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.0592.

13. Piscopo R, Giustiniano E, Meco M, Nisi F, Dalla Corte F, Piccioni F, Cecconi M. Does Hypotension Prediction Index limit the occurrence of postoperative complications associated with intraoperative hypotension? A systematic review and model-averaged Bayesian meta-analysis of statistically sound studies. J Anesth. 2026. doi:10.1007/s00540-026-03741-9.

14. Legrand M, Kothari R, Fong N, Palaniappa N, Boldt D, Chen LL, et al.; VEGA-1 Trial Investigators. Norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for treating hypotension during general anaesthesia in adult patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery: a multicentre, open-label, cluster-randomised, crossover, feasibility, and pilot trial. Br J Anaesth. 2023;130(5):519–527. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.004.

15. Liem VGB, Hoeks SE, Mol KHJM, Potters JW, Grüne F, Stolker RJ, van Lier F. Postoperative hypotension after noncardiac surgery and the association with myocardial injury. Anesthesiology. 2020;133(3):510–522. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000003368.

16. Khanna AK, Shaw AD, Stapelfeldt WH, Boero IJ, Chen Q, Stevens M, et al. Postoperative hypotension and adverse clinical outcomes in patients without intraoperative hypotension, after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2021;132(5):1410–1420. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000005374.

17. Futier E, Lefrant JY, Guinot PG, Godet T, Lorne E, Cuvillon P, et al.; INPRESS Study Group. Effect of individualized vs standard blood pressure management strategies on postoperative organ dysfunction among high-risk patients undergoing major surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(14):1346–1357. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.14172.

18. Saugel B, Meidert AS, Brunkhorst FM, Bischoff R, Esser J, Mattis M, et al.; IMPROVE-multi Trial Group. Individualized perioperative blood pressure management in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: the IMPROVE-multi randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2025;334(21):1893–1904. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.17235.

19. Chiou K, Patrick P, Srivastava I, Engelman E, Rinehart J, Joosten A, Coeckelenbergh S. Closed-loop versus manual vasopressor titration for blood pressure control in surgical and critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. J Clin Anesth. 2026;112:112230. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112230.

20. Alvarado-Sánchez JI, Abril-Calderón DM, Sánchez-Quimbayo I, Oñoro-Patiño L, Vega-Useche C, Reyes-Gonzales JS, Carreño-Hernandez FL. Closed-loop vasopressor systems for hemodynamic control in perioperative and critical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2026. doi:10.1007/s10877-026-01463-7.

Quality in Sport

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-09-24

How to Cite

1.
BOCHNAK, Mikołaj. Intraoperative Hypotension — From Blood Pressure Thresholds to Individualized Hemodynamic Management: Current State of Knowledge. Quality in Sport. Online. 24 September 2026. Vol. 76, p. 75443. [Accessed 25 September 2026]. DOI 10.12775/QS.2026.76.75443.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 76 (2026)

Section

Medical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Mikołaj Bochnak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 11
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

intraoperative hypotension; mean arterial pressure; perioperative hemodynamics; blood pressure monitoring; hemodynamic management; non-cardiac surgery
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop