Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Quality in Sport

Neuroprotection in acute ischemic stroke: promising pharmacological strategies beyond thrombolysis and thrombectomy
  • Home
  • /
  • Neuroprotection in acute ischemic stroke: promising pharmacological strategies beyond thrombolysis and thrombectomy
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 65 (2026) /
  4. Medical Sciences

Neuroprotection in acute ischemic stroke: promising pharmacological strategies beyond thrombolysis and thrombectomy

Authors

  • Patrycja Białowąs Ludwik Rydygier Specialist Hospital in Kraków https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8913-3656
  • Wojciech Białowąs Doctoral School, Catholic University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1897-5166
  • Zuzanna Michalik Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Krakow https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5031-1173
  • Wiktor Jabłoński Provincial Specialist Hospital No. 5 St. Barbara in Sosnowiec https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9357-8650
  • Julia Raszewska Provincial Specialist Hospital No. 5 St. Barbara in Sosnowiec https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5828-374X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2026.65.74110

Keywords

Acute ischemic stroke, Neuroprotection, Ischemic cascade, Reperfusion injury

Abstract

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains one of the leading causes of mortality and long-term disability worldwide. Although intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy have substantially improved clinical outcomes, their effectiveness is limited by narrow therapeutic windows, restricted accessibility, contraindications, and the risk of reperfusion injury. Consequently, increasing attention has been directed toward pharmacological neuroprotection targeting the ischemic cascade. This review aimed to evaluate emerging pharmacological neuroprotective strategies in AIS beyond established reperfusion therapies, with particular emphasis on the ischemic cascade as a therapeutic target and on selected pharmacological agents with potential neuroprotective efficacy. A narrative literature review was conducted focusing on the pathophysiology of ischemic brain injury and the current evidence regarding the neuroprotective potential of fingolimod, citicoline, and Cerestat. The analysis included randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, and experimental studies investigating their neuroprotective and neuroreparative mechanisms of action and clinical efficacy. The ischemic cascade represents a promising target for adjunctive therapeutic interventions in AIS. Fingolimod demonstrated beneficial immunomodulatory effects and stabilization of the blood–brain barrier, particularly when administered in combination with reperfusion therapies. Citicoline exhibited pleiotropic neuroprotective and neuroreparative properties, with the greatest clinical benefit observed among patients who did not receive thrombolytic therapy; however, its efficacy appears less pronounced in the context of contemporary stroke management. Effective neuroprotection in AIS is likely to require a multimodal, individualized therapeutic strategy targeting multiple components of the ischemic cascade.

References

1. Campbell BCV, De Silva DA, Macleod MR, Coutts SB, Schwamm LH, Davis SM, et al. Ischaemic stroke. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):70.

2. Iadecola C, Buckwalter MS, Anrather J. Immune responses to stroke: mechanisms, modulation, and therapeutic potential. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(6):2777-2788.

3. Feigin VL, Stark BA, Johnson CO, Roth GA, Bisignano C, Abady GG, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):795-820.

4. Deresse B, Shaweno D. Epidemiology and in-hospital outcome of stroke in South Ethiopia. J Neurol Sci. 2018;393:103-108.

5. Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, Martins S, Sacco RL, Hacke W, et al. World Stroke Organization global stroke fact sheet 2022. Int J Stroke. 2022;17(1):18-29.

6. O’Donnell MJ, Chin SL, Rangarajan S, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, et al. Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke (INTERSTROKE). Lancet. 2019;394(10205):1345-1357.

7. GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):795-820.

8. Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, et al. Effect of treatment delay and age on outcomes with intravenous thrombolysis. Lancet. 2019;394(10193):139-147.

9. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DWJ, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: meta-analysis. Lancet. 2019;393(10175):1373-1382.

10. Heran M, Lindsay P, Gubitz G, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations. Can J Neurol Sci. 2024;51(1):1-31.

11. Adeoye O, Nyström KV, Yavagal DR, et al. Stroke systems of care: 2019 update. Stroke. 2019;50(7):e187-e210.

12. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Early management of acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update. Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344-e418.

13. Tsivgoulis G, Katsanos AH, Schellinger PD. Advanced neuroimaging in acute stroke. Neurology. 2019;92(20):e2331-e2343.

14. Amarenco P, Labreuche J. Lipid management in stroke prevention. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(7):628-639.

15. Neuhaus AA, Couch Y, Hadley G, Buchan AM. Neuroprotection in stroke: current status. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019;39(4):627-641.

16. Lai TW, Zhang S, Wang YT. Excitotoxicity and NMDA receptors in stroke. Trends Mol Med. 2019;25(7):639-651.

17. Yang Y, Rosenberg GA. MMP-mediated disruption of BBB in stroke. Stroke. 2018;49(3):e66-e68.

18. Rempe RG, Hartz AMS, Bauer B. Matrix metalloproteinases in BBB breakdown. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:343.

19. Bano D, Ankarcrona M. Beyond the caspase cascade: AIF in neuronal death. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(6):1071-1083.

20. Fricker M, Tolkovsky AM, Borutaite V, Coleman M, Brown GC. Neuronal apoptosis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(7):405-417.

21. Jayaraj RL, Azimullah S, Beiram R, Jalal FY, Rosenberg GA. Neuroinflammation in stroke. J Neuroinflammation. 2019;16(1):142.

22. Iadecola C, Buckwalter MS, Anrather J. Immune responses to stroke. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(6):2777-2788.

23. Drieu A, Iadecola C. Neurovascular unit in ischemic stroke. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020;21(10):559-571.

24. Chamorro Á, Dirnagl U, Urra X, Planas AM. Neuroprotection in acute stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(4):338-351.

25. Jiang X, Andjelkovic AV, Zhu L, Yang T, Bennett MVL, Chen J. Brain edema in stroke. Stroke. 2020;51(4):e116-e124.

26. Chun J, Giovannoni G, Hunter SF. S1P receptor modulators in MS. Lancet. 2021;398(10306):1184-1194.

27. Kappos L, Fox RJ, Burcklen M, et al. Ponesimod vs teriflunomide in relapsing MS. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(3):218-228.

28. Greenhalgh AD, David S, Bennett FC. Immune cell regulation of BBB integrity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020;21(7):393-408.

29. Hait NC, Maiti A. Epigenetic regulation by sphingosine kinase. Pharmacol Res. 2019;139:115-121.

30. Qin C, Zhou LQ, Ma XT, Hu ZW, Yang S, Chen M, et al. Neuroinflammation in ischemic stroke. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2911.

31. Schmitz K, Barthelmes J, Stolz L, et al. Fingolimod promotes neuroprotection. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:391.

32. Di Menna L, Molinaro G, et al. Fingolimod neuroprotection mechanisms. Cells. 2020;9(5):1099.

33. Fu Y, Hao J, Zhang N, Ren L, Sun N, Li YJ, et al. Fingolimod for acute ischemic stroke. Circulation. 2018;138(5):527-536.

34. Tian DC, Shi K, Zhu Z, Yao J, Yang L, Zhang S, et al. Fingolimod in ischemic stroke outcomes. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018;24(3):254-260.

35. Secades JJ. Citicoline: update on pharmacology and clinical use. CNS Drugs. 2019;33(7):657-672.

36. Hurtado O, Moro MA, Cárdenas A. Neurorepair and plasticity after stroke. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:576.

37. Saver JL. Citicoline neuroprotection: clinical perspectives. Stroke. 2020;51(6):e205-e207.

38. Martí-Fàbregas J, Gomis M, Arboix A, et al. Citicoline in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2021;52(1):e1-e4.

39. Fioravanti M, Yanagi M. Cytidine-5’-diphosphocholine for cognitive disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7:CD000269.

40. Adibhatla RM, Hatcher JF. Citicoline neuroprotection and neurorepair mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(21):8221.

41. Gutiérrez-Fernández M, Rodríguez-Frutos B, Ramos-Cejudo J, et al. Brain repair after stroke with citicoline. Brain Res. 2018;1690:45-54.

42. Dávalos A. Citicoline in stroke recovery: modern evidence. Front Neurol. 2021;12:686791.

43. Ortega-Gutiérrez S, et al. Neuroprotective agents in ischemic stroke. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2019;21(6):28.

44. Warach S, Albers GW. Imaging biomarkers in stroke therapy. Stroke. 2019;50(9):2470-2476.

45. Lapchak PA, Zhang JH. The high cost of stroke and translational failure. Transl Stroke Res. 2018;9(5):437-449.

46. García-Cobos R, et al. Real-world effectiveness of citicoline. Neurologia. 2020;35(6):413-420.

47. Chamorro Á, Dirnagl U, Urra X, Planas AM. Neuroprotection in acute stroke: targeting excitotoxicity. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(4):338-351.

48. Tymianski M. Novel approaches to NMDA receptor modulation in stroke. Stroke. 2018;49(12):e354-e356

Quality in Sport

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-08-04

How to Cite

1.
BIAŁOWĄS, Patrycja, BIAŁOWĄS, Wojciech, MICHALIK, Zuzanna, JABŁOŃSKI, Wiktor and RASZEWSKA, Julia. Neuroprotection in acute ischemic stroke: promising pharmacological strategies beyond thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Quality in Sport. Online. 4 August 2026. Vol. 65, p. 74110. [Accessed 9 August 2026]. DOI 10.12775/QS.2026.65.74110.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 65 (2026)

Section

Medical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Patrycja Białowąs, Wojciech Białowąs, Zuzanna Michalik, Wiktor Jabłoński, Julia Raszewska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 22
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Acute ischemic stroke, Neuroprotection, Ischemic cascade, Reperfusion injury
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop