Identity disturbances and existential crises in athletes ending their careers as a substrate for the development of alcoholism and pathological gambling: a narrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2026.61.72994Keywords
choking under pressure, performance anxiety, working memory, motor automatism, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, implicit learning, error-related negativity, neurofeedbackAbstract
Background. The end of an elite sporting career is increasingly recognised not as a discrete event but as a prolonged transition during which many athletes lose a dominant athletic identity and confront fundamental questions about who they are outside sport. These identity disturbances and existential crises coincide with elevated psychological distress and with two frequently co-occurring addictions: alcohol use disorder and pathological gambling.
Aim. This narrative review synthesises evidence on how identity disturbance and existential crisis surrounding athletic retirement may function as a predisposing substrate for the development of alcoholism and pathological gambling, and it compares the mechanisms, prevalence estimates, and moderators reported across the literature.
Material and methods. A narrative review synthesised peer-reviewed conceptual analyses, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and cohort and cross-sectional studies on athletic identity, career transition, mental health, alcohol use, and gambling in athletes, retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO and interpreted qualitatively.
Results. An exclusive athletic identity consistently predicted more difficult transitions, greater distress, and slower adjustment. Former athletes showed roughly twice the population prevalence of anxiety and depression, with substance misuse concentrated in subgroups burdened by pain, injury, and weak social support. Problem gambling was repeatedly elevated in male athletes, while alcohol and opioid pathways were tied to in-career culture, sensation seeking, and post-career self-medication.
Conclusions. Identity disturbance and existential crisis appear to be plausible, partly modifiable contributors to addictive behaviour after sport, although direct longitudinal evidence remains scarce. Planned, gradual transitions, identity diversification, social-identity continuity, and proactive screening emerge as priority protective strategies.
References
[1] Yu R. Choking under pressure: the neuropsychological mechanisms of incentive-induced performance decrements. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:19. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00019.
[2] Clarke P, Sheffield D, Akehurst S. Personality predictors of yips and choking susceptibility. Front Psychol. 2020;10:2784. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02784.
[3] Huang D, Wang H, Tang Y, Lei H, Koh D. Enhancing athlete performance under pressure: the role of attribution training in mitigating choking. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1435374. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1435374.
[4] Lee TG, Grafton ST. Out of control: diminished prefrontal activity coincides with impaired motor performance due to choking under pressure. Neuroimage. 2015;105:145–155. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.058.
[5] Masaki H, Maruo Y, Meyer A, Hajcak G. Neural correlates of choking under pressure: athletes high in sports anxiety monitor errors more when performance is being evaluated. Dev Neuropsychol. 2017;42(2):104–112. doi:10.1080/87565641.2016.1274314.
[6] Ganesh G, Minamoto T, Haruno M. Activity in the dorsal ACC causes deterioration of sequential motor performance due to anxiety. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4287. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12205-6.
[7] Shansky RM, Lipps J. Stress-induced cognitive dysfunction: hormone-neurotransmitter interactions in the prefrontal cortex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:123. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00123.
[8] Cheron G, Petit G, Cheron J, et al. Brain oscillations in sport: toward EEG biomarkers of performance. Front Psychol. 2016;7:246. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00246.
[9] Dunne S, Chib VS, Berleant J, O'Doherty JP. Reappraisal of incentives ameliorates choking under pressure and is correlated with changes in the neural representations of incentives. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019;14(1):13–22. doi:10.1093/scan/nsy108.
[10] Kal E, Prosée R, Winters M, van der Kamp J. Does implicit motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor skills compared to explicit motor learning? A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0203591. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203591.
[11] Kawabata M, Imanaka K. Exploring the dimensions of movement-specific reinvestment from personal characteristics perspectives. Front Psychol. 2021;12:716945. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716945.
[12] Luo X, Zhang L, Wang J. The benefits of working memory capacity on attentional control under pressure. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1105. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01105.
[13] Shields GS, Sazma MA, Yonelinas AP. The effects of acute stress on core executive functions: a meta-analysis and comparison with cortisol. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;68:651–668. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.038.
[14] Baladron J, Vitay J, Fietzek T, Hamker FH. The contribution of the basal ganglia and cerebellum to motor learning: a neuro-computational approach. PLoS Comput Biol. 2023;19(4):e1011024. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011024.
[15] Ponce P, Del Arco A, Loprinzi P. Physical activity versus psychological stress: effects on salivary cortisol and working memory performance. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55(5):119. doi:10.3390/medicina55050119.
[16] Ren P, Song T, Chi L, Wang X, Miao X. The adverse effect of anxiety on dynamic anticipation performance. Front Psychol. 2022;13:823989. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823989.
[17] Ong NT, Bowcock A, Hodges NJ. Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure. Front Psychol. 2010;1:196. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00196.
[18] Lawrence GP, Gottwald VM, Khan MA, Kramer RSS. The movement kinematics and learning strategies associated with adopting different foci of attention during both acquisition and anxious performance. Front Psychol. 2012;3:468. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00468.
[19] Mullen R, Faull A, Jones ES, Kingston K. Attentional focus and performance anxiety: effects on simulated race-driving performance and heart rate variability. Front Psychol. 2012;3:426. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00426.
[20] Tosti B, Buscemi S, Beretta GD, et al. Neurofeedback training protocols in sports: a systematic review of recent advances in performance, anxiety, and emotional regulation. Brain Sci. 2024;14(10):1036. doi:10.3390/brainsci14101036.
[21] Iwatsuki T, Van Raalte JL, Brewer BW, Petitpas A, Takahashi M. Relations among reinvestment, self-regulation, and perception of choking under pressure. J Hum Kinet. 2018;65:281–290. doi:10.2478/hukin-2018-0042.
[22] Thiessen B, Blacker M, Sullivan P. Mental toughness and choking susceptibility in athletes. Front Psychol. 2024;15:1414499. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1414499.
[23] Tang Y, Jing L, Liu Y, Wang H. Association of mindfulness on state-trait anxiety in choking-susceptible athletes: mediating roles of resilience and perceived stress. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1232929. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232929.
[24] Wergin VV, Beckmann J, Gröpel P, Mesagno C. Investigating cumulative effects of pre-performance routine interventions in beach volleyball serving. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0228012. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228012.
[25] Lubert VJ, Nordin-Bates SM, Gröpel P. Effects of tailored interventions for anxiety management in choking-susceptible performing artists: a mixed-methods collective case study. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1164273. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1164273.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arkadiusz Psiuk, Joanna Szymocha, Igor Smędowski, Jarosław Tsukerman, Aleksandra Wojas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 62
Number of citations: 0