Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in Physically Active Patients - A Narrative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2026.55.70921Keywords
autologous chondrocyte implantation, physically active patients, ACI, MACI, articular cartilage, cartilage defects, knee joint, cartilage regeneration, tissue engineering, physical activity, functional recoveryAbstract
Background.
Focal articular cartilage defects of the knee represent a significant clinical problem, particularly in physically active patients and individuals with high functional demands. These lesions are associated with pain, functional limitation, and an increased risk of early osteoarthritis. Due to the limited intrinsic healing capacity of hyaline cartilage, various reparative strategies have been developed, among which autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is one of the most important cell-based techniques.
Aim.
The aim of this study was to summarize current evidence regarding the biological basis, surgical techniques, clinical effectiveness, patient selection, and rehabilitation of ACI, with particular emphasis on physically active individuals.
Materials and Methods.
This study was designed as a structured narrative review synthesizing literature on cartilage biology, pathophysiology of focal defects, classification systems, operative treatment options, and ACI and MACI techniques. Consideration was also given to biomaterials, clinical outcomes, complications, patient selection, and rehabilitation strategies in individuals with increased functional demands.
Results.
Available evidence indicates that ACI enables formation of repair tissue with properties more similar to hyaline cartilage compared with marrow stimulation techniques. This results in clinically meaningful improvement in pain and knee function, particularly in physically active patients. Compared with microfracture, ACI may provide more durable outcomes, although success depends on appropriate patient selection, correction of biomechanical abnormalities, and structured rehabilitation.
Conclusions.
ACI represents a valuable treatment option for physically active patients with focal knee cartilage defects, although it remains technically demanding and requires further optimization.
References
Anz A.W., et al. (2020). Platelet-rich plasma versus bone marrow aspirate concentrate for knee osteoarthritis. *Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine*, 8(2).
Andia I., Maffulli N. (2013). Platelet-rich plasma for managing pain and inflammation. *Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy*, 13(5), 573–585.
Arden N.K., Perry T.A., Bannuru R.R., et al. (2021). Non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis: comparison of ESCEO and OARSI 2019 guidelines. *Nature Reviews Rheumatology*, 17, 59–66.
Bannuru R.R., Schmid C.H., Kent D.M., et al. (2015). Comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions for knee osteoarthritis. *Annals of Internal Medicine*, 162(1), 46–54.
Brittberg M., Lindahl A., Nilsson A., Ohlsson C., Isaksson O., Peterson L. (1994). Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. *New England Journal of Medicine*, 331(14), 889–895.
Campbell K.A., Saltzman B.M., Mascarenhas R., et al. (2015). Platelet-rich plasma in meniscus repair. *Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine*, 3(3).
Caplan A.I., Correa D. (2011). The MSC: an injury drugstore. *Cell Stem Cell*, 9(1), 11–15.
Dai W.L., Zhou A.G., Zhang H., Zhang J. (2017). Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. *Arthroscopy*, 33(3), 659–670.
Filardo G., Kon E., Buda R., et al. (2011). Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular injections for cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis. *Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy*, 19(4), 528–535.
Fox A.J.S., Bedi A., Rodeo S.A. (2009). The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function. *Sports Health*, 1(6), 461–468.
Freitag J., et al. (2016). Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in osteoarthritis. *Regenerative Medicine*, 11(4), 389–401.
Henderson I., Tuy B., Oakes B., Hettwer W. (2005). Autologous chondrocyte implantation for treatment of focal chondral defects of the knee. *The Knee*, 12(3), 175–184.
Hochberg M.C., et al. (2012). American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis. *Arthritis Care & Research*, 64(4), 465–474.
Hunziker E.B. (2000). Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. *Osteoarthritis and Cartilage*, 8(3), 161–166.
Jevsevar D.S., et al. (2013). The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons evidence-based guideline on osteoarthritis of the knee. *Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery*, 95(20), 1885–1886.
Karuppal R., et al. (2017). Current concepts in articular cartilage repair and regeneration. *Journal of Orthopaedics*, 14(2), 290–293.
Kolasinski S.L., et al. (2020). 2019 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the management of osteoarthritis. *Arthritis Care & Research*, 72(2), 149–162.
Kon E., et al. (2013). Biological treatments for cartilage regeneration. *The Journal of Knee Surgery*, 26(1), 1–8.
Liu Y., Shah K., Luo J. (2021). Strategies for articular cartilage repair and regeneration. *Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology*, 9, 770655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.770655
Martel-Pelletier J., Barr A.J., Cicuttini F.M., et al. (2016). Osteoarthritis. *Nature Reviews Disease Primers*, 2, 16072.
McAlindon T.E., LaValley M.P., Harvey W.F., et al. (2017). Effect of intra-articular triamcinolone vs saline on knee cartilage volume and pain. *JAMA*, 317(19), 1967–1975.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jakub Smagoń, Izabela Rafalska, Martyna Kaim, Melania Majewska, Natalia Piasecka, Wiktoria Siewiera, Joanna Bober, Natalia Kornacka, Krzysztof Bednarski, Magdalena Bochenek

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 21
Number of citations: 0