Musculoskeletal asymmetries in adolescent fencers: developmental adaptations and injury implications – a narrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2026.54.70341Keywords
fencing, youth, musculoskeletal asymmetry, biological maturation, overuse injuries, injury prevention, asymmetrical sportAbstract
Introduction:
Fencing is an asymmetric sport, that combined with a dynamic development in young athletes can contribute to some functional imbalances especially in the musculoskeletal system. In young athletes, one-sided training loads can worsen physiological asymmetries associated with growth and puberty, potentially increasing the risk of overload injuries.
Aim of the study:
The aim of this narrative review was to analyse the available literature on the nature of musculoskeletal asymmetries in fencers during their developmental years, their relationship to maturation processes, and potential injury implications.
Methods:
A review of publications from 2000 to 2025 was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus databases. Studies on the population aged 10–18 and works related to biomechanics, biological maturation and injuries in asymmetrical sports, with particular emphasis on fencing, were included.
Results:
The available data indicate that young fencers exhibit asymmetries in muscle strength, range of motion and body segment alignment, especially in the lower limbs, shoulder girdle and spine. Small differences may determine a functional adaptation to the specifics of the discipline, but their intensity during the pubertal growth speed may increase the risk of overload injuries, including knee and lower back pain. The limited number of extensive studies makes it difficult to clearly determine cause-and-effect relationships.
Conclusions:
Musculoskeletal asymmetries in young fencers are an adaptive-pathological phenomenon, depending on the stage of biological development and the training load. Early observation of functional parameters and the implementation of correct training should be an integral part of injury prevention in this population.
References
1. Chen TL-W, Wong DW-C, Wang Y, Ren S, Yan F, Zhang M. Biomechanics of fencing sport: A scoping review. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(2):e0171578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171578
2. Gholipour M, Tabrizi A, Farahmand F. Kinematics analysis of lunge fencing using stereophotogrametry. World Journal of Sports Sciences. 2008;1(1):32–37. https://idosi.org/wjss/1(1)08WJSS/6.pdf
3. Roi GS, Bianchedi D. The science of fencing: implications for performance and injury prevention. Sports Med. 2008;38(6):465–481. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200838060-00003
4. Philippaerts RM, Vaeyens R, Janssens M, Van Renterghem B, Matthys D, Craen R, et al. The relationship between peak height velocity and physical performance in youth soccer players. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(5):1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500189371
5. Malina RM, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O. Growth, maturation, and physical activity. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2004. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781492596837
6. Caine D, Maffulli N. Epidemiology of children’s individual sports injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2005;24(1):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1159/isbn.978-3-318-01179-1
7. Gutiérrez-Dávila M, Zingsem C, Gutiérrez-Cruz C, Giles FJ, Rojas FJ. Effect of uncertainty during the lunge in fencing. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(1):1–11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3918569/
8. Turner A, Stewart P. Strength and conditioning for fencing. Strength Cond J. 2014;36(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0b013e31826e7283
9. Bishop C, Turner A, Read P. Interlimb asymmetry: understanding how to calculate differences from bilateral and unilateral tests. Sports Med. 2018;48(6):1357–1369. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000371
10. Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict ACL injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(4):492–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504269591
11. Kibler WB. Biomechanical analysis of the shoulder during tennis activities. Clin Sports Med. 1995 Jan;14(1):79-85. PMID: 7712559. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7712559/
12. Borsa PA, Laudner KG, Sauers EL. Mobility and stability adaptations in the shoulder of the overhead athlete: a theoretical and evidence-based perspective. Sports Med. 2008;38(4):17-36. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200838010-00003
13. Fleisig GS, Andrews JR, Dillman CJ, Escamilla RF. Kinetics of baseball pitching with implications about injury mechanisms. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(2):233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659502300218
14. Grabara M. Anteroposterior curvatures of the spine in adolescent athletes. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(4):513-9. https://doi.org/10.3233/bmr-140475
15. Caine D, DiFiori JP, Maffulli N. Physeal injuries in children’s and youth sports: reasons for concern? Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(9):749–760. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.017822
16. Harmer PA. Incidence and characteristics of injuries in fencing: a prospective study. Clin J Sport Med. 2008;18(2): 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1097/jsm.0b013e318161548d
17. Emery CA, Roy TO, Whittaker JL, Nettel-Aguirre A, Van Mechelen W. Neuromuscular training injury prevention strategies in youth sport: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(13):865–870. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094639
18. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Movement: functional movement systems - screening, assessment, corrective strategies. Santa Cruz (CA): On Target Publications; 2010. ISBN-10: 1931046727
19. Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe A, Romero-Rodriguez D, Montalvo AM, Kiefer AW, Lloyd RS, Myer GD. Integrative neuromuscular training and injury prevention in youth athletes. Part I: identifying risk factors. Strength Cond J. 2016;38(3):36–48. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000229
20. Leppänen M, Pasanen K, Kujala UM, Parkkari J. Interventions to prevent sports-related injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Sports Med. 2014;44(4):473–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0136-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wiktor Wisoky, Natalia Czapla, Ewelina Strużyńska, Weronika Ziółkowska, Joanna Łopińska, Marta Majchrzycka, Martyna Graczyk, Piotr Ignyś, Natalia Graczyk, Mateusz Majchrzak

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 55
Number of citations: 0