Wearable Technologies in Team Sports: A Systematic Review of Their Role in Training Load Management and Injury Prevention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2026.53.70197Keywords
technology, sport, team sports, athlete monitoring, training load, injury prevention, performanceAbstract
The rapid development of wearable technologies has significantly influenced contemporary team sports by enabling advanced athlete monitoring and supporting data-driven training management. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the role of wearable technologies in team sports, with particular emphasis on training load monitoring, athlete performance analysis, and injury prevention. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, and studies were selected according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The analyzed literature indicates that wearable technologies, such as global positioning systems (GPS), inertial measurement units (IMU), accelerometers, and heart rate monitors, are widely used to assess both external and internal training load. These systems enable continuous data collection on movement patterns, physiological responses, and biomechanical demands during training and competition. As a result, they support workload evaluation, facilitate individualized training programs, and enhance evidence-based decision-making. Wearable technologies also contribute to injury prevention by enabling monitoring of cumulative load and sudden changes in training intensity, which may indicate increased injury risk. However, limitations remain, including issues related to measurement validity, inter-device variability, and challenges in data interpretation. In conclusion, wearable technologies represent valuable tools for improving athlete monitoring, optimizing training processes, and supporting injury prevention in team sports. Their effectiveness depends on both device accuracy and appropriate data interpretation. Further research is needed to standardize their application across different sports and performance levels.
References
1. Kajzar M. Wearable Devices for Training and Patient Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review. Quality in Sport. 2024;29:55667. doi: 10.12775/QS.2024.29.55667.
2. Dudek S, Koziak W, Makieła M, et al. The Role of Wearable Technology and AI in Training and Performance Analysis. Quality in Sport. 2025. doi: 10.12775/QS.2025.30.58456.
3. Kowalski P, Zukow W. Modern athlete monitoring systems in team sports: Practical applications and methodological challenges. Quality in Sport. 2022;18:24567. doi: 10.12775/QS.2022.18.24567.
4. Nowak A, Dudek S. Digital technologies in sport performance analysis: Emerging trends in athlete monitoring. Quality in Sport. 2023;20:36781. doi: 10.12775/QS.2023.20.36781
5. Theodoropoulos JS, Bettle J, Wang E, et al. The use of GPS and inertial devices for player monitoring in team sports: A review of current and future applications. PMC. 2020;8:108. doi: 10.3390/sports8040108. PMID: 32872867.
6. Bourdon PC, Cardinale M, Murray A, et al. Monitoring Athlete Training Loads: Consensus Statement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(Suppl 2):S2–S12. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0208. PMID: 28463642.
7. Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM, Coutts AJ. Internal and External Training Load: 15 Years On. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(2):270–273. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0939. PMID: 30461299.
8. Benson LC, Räisänen AM, Volkova VG, et al. Workload a-WEAR-ness: Monitoring Workload in Team Sports With Wearable Technology. A Scoping Review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020;50(12):673–683. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9532. PMID: 32998615.
9. Seçkin AÇ, et al. Review on Wearable Technology in Sports: Concepts, Challenges and Opportunities. Appl Sci. 2023;13(18):10399. doi: 10.3390/app131810399.
10. Kajzar M. Wearable Devices for Training and Patient Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review. Quality in Sport. 2024;29:55667. doi: 10.12775/QS.2024.29.55667.
11. Dudek S, Koziak W, Makieła M, et al. The Role of Wearable Technology and AI in Training and Performance Analysis. Quality in Sport. 2025. doi: 10.12775/QS.2025.30.58456.
12. Theodoropoulos JS, Bettle J, Wang E, et al. The use of GPS and inertial devices for player monitoring in team sports: A review of current and future applications. Sports. 2020;8:108. doi: 10.3390/sports8040108. PMID: 32872867.
13. Bourdon PC, Cardinale M, Murray A, et al. Monitoring Athlete Training Loads: Consensus Statement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(Suppl 2):S2–S12. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0208. PMID: 28463642.
14. Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM, Coutts AJ. Internal and External Training Load: 15 Years On. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(2):270–273. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0939. PMID: 30461299.
15. Benson LC, Räisänen AM, Volkova VG, et al. Workload a-WEAR-ness: Monitoring Workload in Team Sports With Wearable Technology. A Scoping Review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020;50(12):673–683. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9532. PMID: 32998615.
16. Seçkin AÇ, et al. Review on Wearable Technology in Sports: Concepts, Challenges and Opportunities. Appl Sci. 2023;13(18):10399. doi: 10.3390/app131810399.
17. Theodoropoulos JS, Bettle J, Wang E, et al. The use of GPS and inertial devices for player monitoring in team sports: A review of current and future applications. Sports. 2020;8:108. doi: 10.3390/sports8040108. PMID: 32872867.
18. Seçkin AÇ, et al. Review on Wearable Technology in Sports: Concepts, Challenges and Opportunities. Appl Sci. 2023;13(18):10399. doi: 10.3390/app131810399.
19. Bourdon PC, Cardinale M, Murray A, et al. Monitoring Athlete Training Loads: Consensus Statement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(Suppl 2):S2–S12. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0208. PMID: 28463642.
20. Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM, Coutts AJ. Internal and External Training Load: 15 Years On. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(2):270–273. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0939. PMID: 30461299.
21. Benson LC, Räisänen AM, Volkova VG, et al. Workload a-WEAR-ness: Monitoring Workload in Team Sports With Wearable Technology. A Scoping Review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020;50(12):673–683. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9532. PMID: 32998615.
22. Gabbett TJ. The training-injury prevention paradox: Should athletes be training smarter and harder? Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(5):273–280. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788.
23. Kajzar M. Wearable Devices for Training and Patient Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review. Quality in Sport. 2024;29:55667. doi: 10.12775/QS.2024.29.55667.
24. Dudek S, Koziak W, Makieła M, et al. The Role of Wearable Technology and AI in Training and Performance Analysis. Quality in Sport. 2025;30:58456. doi: 10.12775/QS.2025.30.58456.
25. Popovych I, Zukow W, et al. Monitoring physiological and performance adaptations in athletes using modern sport technologies. Quality in Sport. 2023;19:34521. doi: 10.12775/QS.2023.19.34521.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Urszula Zaluska, dr. Simone Szymczyk, dr Patryk Barczuk, dr Natalia Pluta , Dr Karol Stobiński, dr Anna Marcinkowska, Dr Jakub Lech, dr Aleksandra Płusa, dr Weronika Kopyt, dr. Sabina Jóźwiak

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 32
Number of citations: 0