Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Quality in Sport

Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents and Functional Recovery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications for Exercise Capacity and Cardiac Rehabilitation
  • Home
  • /
  • Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents and Functional Recovery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications for Exercise Capacity and Cardiac Rehabilitation
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 53 (2026) /
  4. Medical Sciences

Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents and Functional Recovery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications for Exercise Capacity and Cardiac Rehabilitation

Authors

  • Justyna Czechowicz Szpital Specjalistyczny i.m Stefana Żeromskiego w Krakowie https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1035-1648
  • Paweł Czechowicz University Hospital in Krakow https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0143-0404
  • Mikołaj Antkiewicz Ludwik Rydygier Specialist Hospital in Krakow sp. z o.o. https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8735-9339
  • Aleksandra Arczyńska-Antkiewicz Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0410-4751
  • Maria Drozd Ludwik Rydygier Specialist Hospital in Krakow sp. z o.o. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4246-4095
  • Zuzanna Kruczek SP ZOZ MSWiA in Rzeszów https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6153-1995
  • Julia Kociuba LUX MED Sp. z o.o. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9030-0108
  • Dorota Kołkowicz Provincial Specialist Hospital in Wrocław https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3410-4401
  • Natalia Pawełczak Health Care Facility of the Ministry of Interior and Administration in Lublin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9933-258X
  • Agata Krawczyk University Clinical Hospital No. 4 in Lublin https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8883-3572
  • Martyna Kudła University Clinical Hospital No. 4 in Lublin https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7465-5199
  • Paulina Łobaza Medical Center in Łańcut Sp z o.o. https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3566-005X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2026.53.69903

Keywords

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), drug-eluting stents (DES), cardiac rehabilitation, exercise capacity, physical activity, coronary artery disease, vascular healing, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), exercise tolerance, secondary prevention

Abstract

Background. Technological advances in contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) have significantly improved the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, most studies focus on traditional clinical endpoints, while the impact of modern PCI technologies on functional recovery and return to physical activity remains less well defined.

Aim. This review aimed to examine the relationship between contemporary PCI, vascular healing, and restoration of exercise capacity, with particular emphasis on cardiac rehabilitation.

Material and methods. A narrative review of current literature was performed, focusing on vascular healing after PCI, endothelial recovery with newer-generation DES, thrombotic and bleeding risks during exercise, and the role of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation.

Results. Modern DES characterized by thinner struts and improved biocompatibility are associated with enhanced vascular healing and lower rates of late stent thrombosis. These features may support safer return to physical activity. However, exercise capacity depends not only on coronary patency but also on microvascular function, peripheral conditioning, and participation in rehabilitation programs. Cardiac rehabilitation plays a key role in improving fitness, quality of life, and long-term physical activity.

Conclusions. Contemporary PCI provides a stable basis for safe rehabilitation and physical activity. Optimal recovery requires integration of interventional treatment with structured exercise programs and individualized management. Future studies should include standardized functional outcomes.

References

1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: Update from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982–3021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010

2. Byrne RA, Joner M, Kastrati A. Stent thrombosis and restenosis: What have we learned and where are we going? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(8):963–972. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv511

3. Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson DR, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044

4. Finn AV, Nakazawa G, Joner M, et al. Vascular responses to drug-eluting stents: Importance of delayed healing. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27(7):1500–1510.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.144220

5. Stone GW, Rizvi A, Newman W, et al. Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(18):1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0910496

6. Palmerini T, Benedetto U, Bacchi-Reggiani L, et al. Mortality in patients treated with extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: a pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Lancet.2015;385(9985):2371-2382.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60263-X

7. Bangalore S, Kumar S, Fusaro M, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal coronary stents: A mixed-treatment comparison analysis of randomized trials. Circulation. 2012;125(23):2873-2891

https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.097014

8. Stone GW, et al. Five-year outcomes after PCI with everolimus-eluting stents or bypass surgery for left main coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(19):1820–1830. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1909406

9. Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1995;94(7):135–141.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(94)00397-9

10. Rumsfeld JS, Alexander KP, Goff DC, et al. Cardiovascular health status measures in clinical research. Circulation. 2013;127(22):2233–2249. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182949a2e

11. Balady GJ, Williams MA, Ades PA, et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update. Circulation. 2007;115(20):2675–2682. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.180945

12. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(29):2315–2381. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106

13. Valgimigli M, Frigoli E, Heg D, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI in patients at high bleeding risk. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(18):1643–1655. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2108749

14. Palmerini T, Biondi-Zoccai G, Della Riva D, et al. Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: Evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379(9824):1393–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60324-9

15. Kandzari DE, Mauri L, Koolen JJ, et al. Ultrathin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in PCI (BIOFLOW V). Lancet. 2017;390(10105):1843–1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32249-3

16. Mauri L, Kereiakes DJ, Yeh RW, et al. Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(23):2155–2166. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1409312

17. Watanabe H, Domei T, Morimoto T, et al. Effect of 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by clopidogrel vs 12-month DAPT after PCI (STOPDAPT-2). JAMA. 2019;321(24):2414–2427. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.8145

18. Hahn JY, Song YB, Oh JH, et al. P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI (SMART-CHOICE). JAMA. 2019;321(24):2428–2437. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.8146

19. Vranckx P, Valgimigli M, Jüni P, et al. Ticagrelor plus aspirin followed by ticagrelor monotherapy after drug-eluting stent implantation (GLOBAL LEADERS). Lancet. 2018;392(10151):940–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31858-0

20. Rao SV, Kaltenbach LA, Weintraub WS, et al. Same-day discharge after elective PCI among older patients. JAMA. 2011;306(13):1461–1467. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1409

21. Amin AP, Pinto D, House JA, et al. Same-day discharge after elective PCI: Costs and outcomes. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;2(9):1041–1049. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3029

22. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL). Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2

23. Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(11):793–801. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011858

24. Hambrecht R, Walther C, Möbius-Winkler S, et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty compared with exercise training in stable coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2004;109(11):1371–1378. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000121360.31954.1F

25. Serves N, Pazart L, Damien G, et al. Adherence to cardiac rehabilitation and home exercise after myocardial infarction: a qualitative study of expectations, barriers and drivers BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2023;15:63 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00714-3

26. Lee S, Bohplian S, & Bronas UG. (2022).

Accelerometer use to measure physical activity in older adults with coronary artery disease: An integrative review. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 38(6), 568–580.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37816084/

27. Kodama S, Saito K, Tanaka S, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality. JAMA. 2009;301(19):2024–2035. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.681

28. Doll JA, Hellkamp A, Thomas L, et al. Effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2015;170(5):855–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2015.08.001

29. Pelliccia A, Solberg EE, Papadakis M, et al. ESC guidelines on sports cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2020;42(1):17–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa605

30. Tully PJ, Harrison NJ, Cheung P et al. Anxiety and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: a Review Curr Cardiol Rep 18, 120 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-016-0800-3

31. Joner M, Finn AV, Farb A, et al. Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(1):193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.042

32. Otsuka F, Byrne RA, Yahagi K, et al. Neoatherosclerosis. Eur Heart J. 2015;35(32):2147–2159. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv205

33. Mittleman MA, Maclure M, Tofler GH, et al. Triggering of myocardial infarction by heavy physical exertion. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(23):1677–1683. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312023292301

34. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(3):213–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419

35. Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(26):1703–1708. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199606273342604

36. Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding PCI. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213–224. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0807611

37. De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI vs medical therapy. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(11):991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1205361

38. Urban P, Meredith IT, Abizaid A, et al. Polymer-free drug-coated coronary stents in patients at high bleeding risk. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(21):2038–2047. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1503943

39. Afilalo J, Alexander KP, Mack MJ, et al. Frailty assessment in cardiovascular care. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;63(8):747–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.070

40. Kedhi E, Joesoef KS, McFadden E, et al. COMPARE trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9710):201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62127-9

41. Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, et al. ACC/AHA guideline update on dual antiplatelet therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(10):1082–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.513

42. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(34):3227–3337. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484

43. Smith SC, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACCF secondary prevention guideline update. Circulation. 2011;124(22):2458–2473. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e318235eb4d

44. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. ESC/EACTS myocardial revascularization guidelines. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394

45. Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M. Direct vs self-report physical activity measures. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-56

46. Troiano RP, McClain JJ, Brychta RJ, Chen KY. Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(13):1019–1023. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-093546

47. Kereiakes DJ, Onuma Y, Serruys PW, Stone GW. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for coronary revascularization. Circulation. 2016;131(6):598–610. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021539

48. Piotrowicz E, Piepoli MF, Jaarsma T, et al. Telerehabilitation in heart failure patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;26(10):1093–1101. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.277

Quality in Sport

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-03-28

How to Cite

1.
CZECHOWICZ, Justyna, CZECHOWICZ, Paweł, ANTKIEWICZ, Mikołaj, ARCZYŃSKA-ANTKIEWICZ, Aleksandra, DROZD, Maria, KRUCZEK, Zuzanna, KOCIUBA, Julia, KOŁKOWICZ, Dorota, PAWEŁCZAK, Natalia, KRAWCZYK, Agata, KUDŁA, Martyna and ŁOBAZA, Paulina. Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents and Functional Recovery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications for Exercise Capacity and Cardiac Rehabilitation. Quality in Sport. Online. 28 March 2026. Vol. 53, p. 69903. [Accessed 10 April 2026]. DOI 10.12775/QS.2026.53.69903.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 53 (2026)

Section

Medical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Justyna Czechowicz, Paweł Czechowicz, Mikołaj Antkiewicz, Aleksandra Arczyńska-Antkiewicz, Maria Drozd, Zuzanna Kruczek, Julia Kociuba, Dorota Kołkowicz, Natalia Pawełczak, Agata Krawczyk, Martyna Kudła, Paulina Łobaza

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 60
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), drug-eluting stents (DES), cardiac rehabilitation, exercise capacity, physical activity, coronary artery disease, vascular healing, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), exercise tolerance, secondary prevention
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop