Peripheral and Central Vascular Access Devices: Dwell Time, Indications, and Complications (Narrative Review)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2026.50.67832Keywords
Vascular access devices, midline catheters, long peripheral catheters, peripherally inserted central catheters, difficult intravenous access, central venous cathetersAbstract
Introduction and Purpose: Vascular access devices (VADs) are essential for modern inpatient care, yet optimal device selection remains complex due to heterogeneous data on dwell time, indications, and complications. Peripheral options such as midline catheters (MCs) and long peripheral catheters (LPCs) are increasingly proposed as alternatives to peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and central venous catheters (CVCs), particularly for intermediate-duration therapy and in patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA). The aim of this narrative review is to synthesize current evidence on peripheral and central vascular access, focusing on peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs), MCs, LPCs, PICCs, and CVCs, with respect to dwell time, therapeutic indications, and complication rates, including catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and thrombosis.
State of Knowledge: PIVCs, although most commonly used, have short dwell times and high failure rates, often complicated by phlebitis, infiltration, and occlusion. Midline catheters provide longer dwell times and reduce repeated cannulation but are associated with minor mechanical complications such as superficial thrombophlebitis and occlusion. PICCs and CVCs enable prolonged delivery of vesicant and hyperosmolar therapies but carry higher risks of bloodstream infection and venous thromboembolism. Comparative studies suggest midlines may reduce CRBSI and CLABSI-reportable events relative to PICCs, at the cost of more frequent minor complications.
Conclusion: No single VAD is universally optimal. Device choice should integrate therapy duration, infusate characteristics, vascular anatomy, and the balance of infectious, thrombotic, and mechanical risks. MCs and LPCs appear promising for intermediate-duration, peripherally compatible therapies; however, high-quality randomized studies are needed to refine vascular access algorithms and confirm safety signals.
References
1. Rivera AM, Strauss KW, van Zundert A, Mortier E. The history of peripheral intravenous catheters: how little plastic tubes revolutionized medicine. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2005;56(3):271-282.
2. Dudrick, Stanley J. „History of Vascular Access”. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 30, nr 1S (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/01486071060300S1S47.
3. Moureau, Nancy, i Vineet Chopra. „Indications for peripheral, midline and central catheters: summary of the MAGIC recommendations.” British journal of nursing, advance online publication, 2016. https://doi.org/10.12968/BJON.2016.25.8.S15.
4. Bompoint, Caroline, Alberto Castagna, Daphna Hutt, et al. „Transplant Preparation”. W The European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Textbook for Nurses, zredagowane przez Michelle Kenyon i Aleksandra Babic. Springer International Publishing, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50026-3_4.
5. Nickel, Barb. „Does the Midline Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Have a Place in Critical Care?” Critical Care Nurse, advance online publication, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4037/CCN2021818.
6. Urtecho M, Torres Roldan VD, Nayfeh T, et al. Comparing Complication Rates of Midline Catheter vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023;10(2):ofad024. Published 2023 Jan 18. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofad024
7. Lu H, Yang Q, Tian B, Lyu Y, Zheng X, Xin X. A meta-analysis of the comparison of phlebitis between midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters in infusion therapy. Int J Nurs Pract. 2022;28(2):e12976. doi:10.1111/ijn.12976.
8. Mushtaq A, Navalkele B, Kaur M, et al. Comparison of complications in midlines versus central venous catheters: Are midlines safer than central venous lines? Am J Infect Control. 2018;Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/J.AJIC.2018.01.006.
9. Bentridi A, Giroux MF, Soulez G, et al. Midline Venous Catheter vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter for Intravenous Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(3):e251258. Published 2025 Mar 3. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1258
10. Beecham GB, Tackling G. Peripheral Line Placement. [Aktualizacja 25 lipca 2023]. W: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; styczeń 2025. Dostępne na stronie: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539795/
11. Marsh N, Larsen EN, O'Brien C, et al. Safety and efficacy of midline catheters versus peripheral intravenous catheters: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Pract. 2023;29(2):e13110. doi:10.1111/ijn.13110
12.Marsh N, Webster J, Ullman AJ, et al. Peripheral intravenous catheter non-infectious complications in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(12):3346-3362. doi:10.1111/jan.14565
13. Krath J, Fredskilde J, Christensen SK, et al. The performance and complications of long peripheral venous catheters: A retrospective single-centre study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024;68(10):1463-1470. doi:10.1111/aas.14517
14.Thomsen SL, Boa R, Vinter-Jensen L, Rasmussen BS. Safety and Efficacy of Midline vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Among Adults Receiving IV Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(2):e2355716. Published 2024 Feb 5. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55716
15. Agarwal A, Montanarella MJ, Moon B. Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Line Placement. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; January 10, 2024.
16. Kim H, Cho SB, Park SE, et al. A New Equation to Estimate Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Length. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;60(3):417. Published 2024 Feb 29. doi:10.3390/medicina60030417
17. Kim D, Park JW, Cho SB, Rhyu IJ. Anatomical Structures to Be Concerned With During Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Procedures. J Korean Med Sci. 2023;38(41):e329. Published 2023 Oct 23. doi:10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e329
18. Wang ZX, Li L, Zhao YF. Fluoroscopically guided repositioning of peripherally inserted central catheter in patients failing ultrasound-guided-only placement: a retrospective five-year study. Acta Radiol. 2023;64(6):2132-2136. doi:10.1177/02841851231168981
19. Swaminathan L, Flanders S, Horowitz J, Zhang Q, O'Malley M, Chopra V. Safety and Outcomes of Midline Catheters vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters for Patients With Short-term Indications: A Multicenter Study. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182(1):50-58. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6844
20. Paje D, Walzl E, Heath M, et al. Midline vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy. JAMA Intern Med. 2025;185(1):83-91. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5984
21. Kleidon TM, Gibson V, Cattanach P, et al. Midline Compared With Peripheral Intravenous Catheters for Therapy of 4 Days or Longer in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2023;177(11):1132-1140. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.3526
22. Gao Y, Liu Y, Zhang H, Fang F, Song L. The safety and accuracy of ECG-guided PICC tip position verification applied in patients with atrial fibrillation. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:1075-1081. Published 2018 Jun 6. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S156468
23. Pittiruti M, La Greca A, Scoppettuolo G. The electrocardiographic method for positioning the tip of central venous catheters. J Vasc Access. 2011;12(4):280-291. doi:10.5301/JVA.2011.8381
24.Chopra V, Kaatz S, Swaminathan L, et al. Variation in use and outcomes related to midline catheters: results from a multicentre pilot study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(9):714-720. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008554
25.Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle ME, et al. Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 8th Edition. J Infus Nurs. 2021;44(1S Suppl 1):S1-S224. doi:10.1097/NAN.0000000000000396
26. Chen G, Shen C, Pan C, Gao X, Sun M, Li X. Summary of best evidence for safe management of vasopressors through peripheral intravenous catheters. BMC Nurs. 2025;24(1):1000. Published 2025 Jul 31. doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03635-3
27. Nickel B, Gorski L, Kleidon T, et al. Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 9th Edition. J Infus Nurs. 2024;47(1S Suppl 1):S1-S285. doi:10.1097/NAN.0000000000000532
28. Gershengorn HB, Basu T, Horowitz JK, et al. The Association of Vasopressor Administration through a Midline Catheter with Catheter-related Complications. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023;20(7):1003-1011. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202209-814OC
29. Midline Catheters for Administering Intravenous Infusion Therapy: Health Technologies. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; March 2025.
30. Gonzalez R, Cassaro S. Percutaneous Central Catheter(Archived). In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; September 4, 2023.
31. Kolikof J, Peterson K, Williams C, Baker AM. Central Venous Catheter Insertion. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; February 4, 2025.
32. Jamshidi R. Central venous catheters: Indications, techniques, and complications. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2019;28(1):26-32. doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2019.01.005
33 Ertaş Akyüz G, Turan N. Association between peripheral intravenous catheters and clinical characteristics in the development of phlebitis. J Vasc Access. 2025;26(2):540-546. doi:10.1177/11297298231226426
34. Zanella MC, Catho G, Jackson H, et al. Dwell Time and Risk of Bloodstream Infection With Peripheral Intravenous Catheters. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(4):e257202. Published 2025 Apr 1. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.7202
35. Zhu A, Wang T, Wen S. Peripheral intravenous catheters in situ for more than 96 h in adults: What factors affect removal?. Int J Nurs Pract. 2016;22(6):529-537. doi:10.1111/ijn.12492
36. Villalba-Nicolau M, Chover-Sierra E, Saus-Ortega C, Ballestar-Tarín ML, Chover-Sierra P, Martínez-Sabater A. Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. Nurs Rep. 2022;12(4):814-823. Published 2022 Oct 31. doi:10.3390/nursrep12040079
37. Bundgaard Madsen E, Sloth E, Skov Illum B, Juhl-Olsen P. The clinical performance of midline catheters-An observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020;64(3):394-399. doi:10.1111/aas.13516
38. Nielsen EB, Antonsen L, Mensel C, et al. The efficacy of midline catheters-a prospective, randomized, active-controlled study. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;102:220-225. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.053
39.. Souri Y, Hernandez Cancino EF, Kerndl H, Hyhlik-Duerr A, Gosslau Y. Clinical evaluation of the PowerGlide Pro midline catheter- dwell time, complications and outcomes for various medications including prostaglandins. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024;409(1):363. Published 2024 Nov 27. doi:10.1007/s00423-024-03546-y
40. Johnson A, Gupta A, Feierabend T, Lopus T, Schildhouse R, Paje D. Midline catheters: A 3-year experience at a veterans administration medical center. Am J Infect Control. 2023;51(5):563-566. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2022.08.002
41. Tripathi S, Kumar S, Kaushik S. The Practice and Complications of Midline Catheters: A Systematic Review. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(2):e140-e150. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004764
42. Chopra V, Flanders SA, Saint S, et al. The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): Results From a Multispecialty Panel Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(6 Suppl):S1-S40. doi:10.7326/M15-0744
43. Grau D, Clarivet B, Lotthé A, Bommart S, Parer S. Complications with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) used in hospitalized patients and outpatients: a prospective cohort study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:18. Published 2017 Jan 28. doi:10.1186/s13756-016-0161-0.
44. Caris MG, de Jonge NA, Punt HJ, et al. Indwelling time of peripherally inserted central catheters and incidence of bloodstream infections in haematology patients: a cohort study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022;11(1):37. Published 2022 Feb 17. doi:10.1186/s13756-022-01069-z
45. Govindan S, Snyder A, Flanders SA, Chopra V. Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in the ICU: A Retrospective Study of Adult Medical Patients in 52 Hospitals. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(12):e1136-e1144. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003423
46. Campagna S, Gonella S, Berchialla P, et al. A retrospective study of the safety of over 100,000 peripherally-inserted central catheters days for parenteral supportive treatments. Res Nurs Health. 2019;42(3):198-204. doi:10.1002/nur.21939
47.Pitiriga V, Bakalis J, Kampos E, Kanellopoulos P, Saroglou G, Tsakris A. Duration of central venous catheter placement and central line-associated bloodstream infections after the adoption of prevention bundles: a two-year retrospective study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022;11(1):96. Published 2022 Jul 15. doi:10.1186/s13756-022-01131-w
48. Pitiriga VC, Bakalis J, Campos E, et al. Central Venous Catheters versus Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: A Comparison of Indwelling Time Resulting in Colonization by Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024;13(1):89. Published 2024 Jan 17. doi:10.3390/antibiotics13010089.
49. .Iachkine J, Buetti N, de Grooth HJ, et al. Development and validation of a multivariable prediction model of central venous catheter-tip colonization in a cohort of five randomized trials. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):205. Published 2022 Jul 7. doi:10.1186/s13054-022-04078-x
50. Kim KH, Park SW, Chang IS, Yim Y. The dwell time and survival rates of PICC placement after balloon angioplasty in patient with unexpected central venous obstruction. J Vasc Access. 2016;17(5):423-428. doi:10.5301/jva.5000579
51. Chopra V, O'Horo JC, Rogers MA, Maki DG, Safdar N. The risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34(9):908-918. doi:10.1086/671737
52. Xu T, Kingsley L, DiNucci S, et al. Safety and utilization of peripherally inserted central catheters versus midline catheters at a large academic medical center. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44(12):1458-1461. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2016.09.010
53.Adams DZ, Little A, Vinsant C, Khandelwal S. The Midline Catheter: A Clinical Review. J Emerg Med. 2016;51(3):252-258. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.05.029
54. Zhao L, Yang X, Liu C, et al. Comparative safety and efficacy of midline catheters versus long peripheral catheters in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):30534. Published 2025 Aug 20. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-12551-0
55. Hogle NJ, Balzer KM, Ross BG, et al. A comparison of the incidence of midline catheter-associated bloodstream infections to that of central line-associated bloodstream infections in 5 acute care hospitals. Am J Infect Control. 2020;48(9):1108-1110. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2019.11.004
56. Bahl A, Karabon P, Chu D. Comparison of Venous Thrombosis Complications in Midlines Versus Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are Midlines the Safer Option?. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019;25:1076029619839150. doi:10.1177/1076029619839150
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Antonina Drzewiecka, Artur Drzewiecki, Oliwia Maciaszek, Natalia Mućka, Maciej Grzela
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 2
Number of citations: 0
