Complications of voice prostheses and their management in patients after laryngectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2025.48.67030Keywords
tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis, primary tracheoesophageal puncture, tracheoesophageal fistula, laryngectomy, voice prosthesis complicationsAbstract
Total laryngectomy remains the treatment of choice for advanced stages of laryngeal cancer. Voice prostheses are considered by many authors to be the gold standard for restoring speech after total laryngectomy. Their effectiveness has led to their widespread adoption in clinical practice. As a result, the population of patients using such devices is steadily increasing, which is reflected in a growing scientific interest in this area. This trend has generated an expanding number of studies focused on the analysis of potential complications, available treatment methods in this group of patients. The aim of this review is to analyze potential complications and their management options in patients with tracheoesophageal voice prostheses.
All authors independently searched the PubMed database using the following keywords: “tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis,” “primary tracheoesophageal puncture,” “tracheoesophageal fistula,” “laryngectomy,” and “voice prosthesis complications.” Particular attention was paid to reflux therapy with proton pump inhibitors and the potential benefits for patients after laryngectomy. Another important issue discussed in the article concerns methods aimed at reducing biofilm formation on voice prostheses, which consequently translates into longer device lifespan. The effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A was compared with surgical treatment in patients with impaired voice due to spasm of the middle and inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscles (PCM). The studies discussed in this article contribute to improving the quality of life of patients with voice prostheses after laryngectomy. Nevertheless, further research is needed to determine the safety and long-term outcomes of the methods used to manage complications.
References
1. da Fonte ALF, Costa GJ, da Fonte Neto AS, Pinto RA, de Mello MJG. Epidemiology of laryngeal cancer in Brazil: Historical data from 2000 to 2019. Cancer Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;85:102397.
2. Obid R, Redlich M, Tomeh C. The treatment of laryngeal cancer. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019 Feb;31(1):1–11.
3. Reizenstein JA, Bergström SN, Holmberg L, Linder A, Ekman S, Blomquist E, et al. Impact of age at diagnosis on prognosis and treatment in laryngeal cancer. Head Neck. 2010 Aug;32(8):1062–8.
4. Balm AJM, van den Brekel MWM, Tan IB, Hilgers FJM. The indwelling voice prosthesis for speech rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: a safe approach. Otolaryngol Pol. 2011;65(6):402–9.
5. Tong JY, Pasick LJ, Benito DA, Sataloff RT. Complications associated with tracheoesophageal voice prostheses from 2010 to 2020: A MAUDE study. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Jul 17;41(6):102652.
6. Martins de Sousa M, Matos R, Vilarinho H, Santos M, Silveira H. Voice rehabilitation with voice prosthesis: Long term results, complications and risk factors. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2022;73(4):219–24.
7. Parrilla C, Longobardi Y, Galli J, Rigante M, Paludetti G, Bussu F, et al. Periprosthetic leakage in tracheoesophageal prosthesis: proposal of a standardized therapeutic algorithm. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Sep;165(3):446–54.
8. Lewin JS, Hutcheson KA, Barringer DA, Croegaert LE, Lisec A, Chambers MS. Customization of the voice prosthesis to prevent leakage from the enlarged tracheoesophageal puncture: results of a prospective trial. Laryngoscope. 2012 Aug;122(8):1767–72.
9. Acton LM, Ross DA, Sasaki CT, Leder SB. Investigation of tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis leakage patterns: patient’s self-report versus clinician’s confirmation. Head Neck. 2008 May;30(5):618–21.
10. Naunheim MR, Remenschneider AK, Scangas GA, Bunting GW, Deschler DG. The effect of initial tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis size on postoperative complications and voice outcomes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016 Jun;125(6):478–84.
11. Mayo-Yáñez M, Ramos-Neble MD, Cabo-Varela I, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Lechien JR, Fakhry N, et al. Tissue augmentation treatment for periprosthetic leakage in patients who have undergone a total laryngectomy: A systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol. 2023 Jul;48(4):515–26.
12. Saeedi A, Strum DP, Mir G, Chow MS, Bhatt N, Jacobson AS. Management of Enlarging Tracheoesophageal Fistula with Voice Prosthesis in Laryngectomized Patients. Laryngoscope. 2024 Jan;134(1):198–206.
13. Danic Hadzibegovic A, Kozmar A, Hadzibegovic I, Prgomet D, Danic D. Influence of proton pump inhibitor therapy on occurrence of voice prosthesis complications. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Apr;277(4):1177–84.
14. Lorenz KJ, Kraft K, Graf F, Pröpper C, Steinestel K. [Importance of cellular tight junction complexes in the development of periprosthetic leakage after prosthetic voice rehabilitation]. HNO. 2015 Mar;63(3):171–2, 174.
15. Chaturvedi P, Syed S, Pawar PV, Kelkar R, Biswas S, Datta S, et al. Microbial colonization of Provox voice prosthesis in the Indian scenario. Indian J Cancer. 2014 Jun;51(2):184–8.
16. Somogyi-Ganss E, Chambers MS, Lewin JS, Tarrand JJ, Hutcheson KA. Biofilm on the tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis: considerations for oral decontamination. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;274(1):405–13.
17. Messing BP, Kim M, Hirata R, Thompson CB, Gebhart S, Sugar EA, et al. Evaluation of prophylaxis treatment of Candida in alaryngeal patients with tracheoesophageal voice prostheses. Laryngoscope. 2015 May;125(5):1118–23.
18. Wannemuehler TJ, Lobo BC, Johnson JD, Deig CR, Ting JY, Gregory RL. Vibratory stimulus reduces in vitro biofilm formation on tracheoesophageal voice prostheses. Laryngoscope. 2016 Dec;126(12):2752–7.
19. Tsikopoulos A, Petinaki E, Festas C, Tsikopoulos K, Meroni G, Drago L, et al. In vitro Inhibition of Biofilm Formation on Silicon Rubber Voice Prosthesis: Α Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2022;84(1):10–29.
20. Bartolomei L, Zambito Marsala S, Pighi GP, Cristofori V, Pagano G, Pontarin M, et al. Botulinum toxin type A: an effective treatment to restore phonation in laryngectomized patients unable to voice. Neurol Sci. 2011 Jun;32(3):443–7.
21. Chakravarty PD, McMurran AEL, Banigo A, Shakeel M, Ah-See KW. Primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Jan;132(1):14–21.
22. Bianco MR, Saita V, Occhiuzzi F, Modica DM, Latella D, Azzolina A, et al. Long-Term Complications of Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis. J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 26;13(7).
23. Boscolo-Rizzo P, Zanetti F, Carpené S, Da Mosto MC. Long-term results with tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis: primary versus secondary TEP. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Jan;265(1):73–7.
24. Robinson RA, Simms VA, Ward EC, Barnhart MK, Chandler SJ, Smee RI. Total laryngectomy with primary tracheoesophageal puncture: Intraoperative versus delayed voice prosthesis placement. Head Neck. 2017 Jun;39(6):1138–44.
25. Barauna Neto JC, Dedivitis RA, Aires FT, Pfann RZ, Matos LL, Cernea CR. Comparison between Primary and Secondary Tracheoesophageal Puncture Prosthesis: A Systematic Review. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2017 Jul 29;79(4):222–9.
26. Dedivitis RA, Aires FT, Cernea CR, Brandão LG. Pharyngocutaneous fistula after total laryngectomy: systematic review of risk factors. Head Neck. 2015 Nov;37(11):1691–7.
27. Scherl C, Kauffels J, Schützenberger A, Döllinger M, Bohr C, Dürr S, et al. Secondary tracheoesophageal puncture after laryngectomy increases complications with shunt and voice prosthesis. Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130(12):E865–73.
28. Kummer P, Chahoud M, Schuster M, Eysholdt U, Rosanowski F. [Prosthetic voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Failures and complications after previous radiation therapy]. HNO. 2006 Apr;54(4):315–22.
29. Lewin JS, Baumgart LM, Barrow MP, Hutcheson KA. Device life of the tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis revisited. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jan 1;143(1):65–71.
30. Żurek M, Czesak M, Czerwińska ME, Berezovska D, Niemczyk K, Rzepakowska A. A double-blind randomized clinical trial of inflammatory cytokine and pepsin levels in the saliva of patients with voice prostheses. Head Neck. 2024 Sep;46(9):2116–22.
31. Mayo-Yáñez M, Chiesa-Estomba C, Lechien JR, Calvo-Henríquez C, Vaira LA, Cabo-Varela I. Long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a magnet-based valve voice prosthesis for endoprosthesis leakage treatment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Aug;279(8):4167–72.
32. Brownlee B, Ahmad S, Grammer T, Krempl G. Selective patient experience with the Blom-Singer Dual Valve voice prosthesis. Laryngoscope. 2018 Feb;128(2):422–6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kamila Bała, Natalia Staszko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 7
Number of citations: 0
