Comparison of Knowledge about Cellulite and Its Reduction Methods among Women and Men
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2025.48.66906Keywords
cellulite, lipodystrophy, panniculopathy, cellulite reduction, anti-cellulite therapyAbstract
Introduction and purpose Cellulite (gynoid lipodystrophy, GLD) is a disorder of adipose tissue characterized by fibrotic degeneration of connective tissue and structural changes within the subcutaneous layer. It mainly affects women, regardless of age and body weight, while in men it occurs less frequently and is usually associated with hormonal disturbances. The pathogenesis of cellulite is complex and involves impaired microcirculation, adipocyte hypertrophy, increased vascular permeability, genetic predisposition, and an unhealthy lifestyle. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge of women and men regarding cellulite and its reduction methods, as well as to analyze the relationship between the degree of severity and factors such as gender, age, BMI, and lifestyle.
Materials and method The study included 104 participants; after verification, 99 respondents (69 women and 30 men) were qualified for the analysis. A diagnostic survey was conducted using an original questionnaire consisting of 22 closed and one open-ended question. The responses regarding the occurrence of cellulite, the level of knowledge, and the applied preventive methods were analyzed.
Results Cellulite occurs more frequently and in more advanced stages in women than in men. The severity of changes correlates with higher Body Mass Index (BMI), poor diet, and low physical activity. Most respondents demonstrate general knowledge about cellulite but do not undertake professional treatments, which may result from limited awareness, high costs, or doubts about the effectiveness of procedures.
Conclusions Gynoid lipodystrophy is a common aesthetic issue whose severity depends on lifestyle and physiological factors. Public knowledge about its prevention and therapy is moderate and should be improved through education and the promotion of healthy habits.
References
1. Sadick N. Treatment for cellulite. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2018 Oct 22;5(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.09.002.
2. Gemza K., Surgiel- Gemza A. Wielokierunkowe działanie zabiegu karboksyterapii w walce z mechanizmami wywołującymi cellulit. Kosmetologia estetyczna 2018, 3(7), s. 317- 322.
3. Arora G, Patil A, Hooshanginezhad Z, et al. Cellulite: Presentation and management. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Apr;21(4):1393-1401. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14815.
4. Rubinow KB. Estrogens and Body Weight Regulation in Men. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1043:285-313. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-70178-3_14.
5. Kononowicz W. Tkanka podskórna. Charakterystyka oraz metody niwelowania i zastosowania tkanki tłuszczowej w kosmetologii i medycynie estetycznej. Aesthetic Cosmetology and Medicine 2020, 9(4), s. 353- 362.
6. Vejjabhinanta V., Obagi S., Singh A., Baumann L. Tłuszcz i warstwa podskórna [w:] Baumann L. [red.] Dermatologia estetyczna. Wydawnictwo PZWL 2019, s. 14-21.
7. Kim H, Kim SE, Sung MK. Sex and Gender Differences in Obesity: Biological, Sociocultural, and Clinical Perspectives. World J Mens Health. 2025 Oct;43(4):758-772. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.250126.
8. Tokarska K, Tokarski S, Woźniacka A,. et al. Cellulite: a cosmetic or systemic issue? Contemporary views on the etiopathogenesis of cellulite. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2018 Oct;35(5):442-446. doi: 10.5114/ada.2018.77235
9. Gabriel A, Chan V, Caldarella M,. et al. Cellulite: Current Understanding and Treatment. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Jun 21;5:ojad050. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad050
10. Bass LS, Kaminer MS. Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Cellulite: A Review. Dermatol Surg. 2020 Oct;46 Suppl 1(1):S77-S85. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002388
11. Tomczyk J., Malara B. Modern methods of cellulite diagnosis and treatment. Aesthetic Cosmetology and Medicine 2023, 12(4), s. 143-149.
12. Arora G., Patil A., Hooshanginezhad Z. Cellulite: presentation and management. J Cosmet Dermatol 2022, 21(4), s.1393-1401. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14815
13. Adamidis N, Papalexis P, Adamidis S. Exploring the Link Between Metabolic Syndrome and Cellulite. Cureus. 2024 Jun 29;16(6):e63464. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63464.
14. Bojarska-Hurnik S. Lipodystrofia- przyczyny i możliwości terapeutyczne. Kosmetologia Estetyczna 2019, 5(8), s. 623- 630
15. Hexsel D., Siega C., Schilling- Souza J., Porto MD., Rodrigues TC. A comparative study of the anatomy of adipose tissue in areas with and without raised lesions of cellulite using magnetic resonance imaging. Dermatol Surg 2013, 39(12), s. 1877- 1886. DOI: 10.1111/dsu.12360
16. Rudolph C., Hladik C., Hamade H., et al. Structural Gender Dimorphism and the Biomechanics of the Gluteal Subcutaneous Tissue: Implications for the
17. Migasiewicz A., Sobańska A., Dereń E.,et al. Komputerowo wspomagana ocena skuteczności terapii cellulitu na podstawie obrazowania termograficznego. Acta Bio-Optica et Informatica Medica 2017, 2(23), s. 87-95.
18. Troia S., Moreira AM., Pisco D., et al. Effect of shock wave therapy associated with aerobic exercise on cellulite: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 2021, 20(6), s.1732- 1742. DOI:10.1111/jocd.13791
19. Marques MA, Combes M, Roussel B, et al. Impact of a mechanical massage on gene expression profile and lipid mobilization in female gluteofemoral adipose tissue. Obes Facts. 2011;4(2):121-9. doi: 10.1159/000327347
20. Modena DAO, Nogueira da Silva C, Delinocente TCP, et al. Effectiveness of the Electromagnetic Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Cellulite. Dermatol Res Pract. 2019 Jun 20;2019:8246815. doi: 10.1155/2019/8246815.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Katarzyna Hołda, Dagmara Polak-Bielawska, Aleksandra Kutaj , Tatyana Savitskaya, Wiktoria Błaszczyk , Dawid Wiczkowski

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 58
Number of citations: 0