Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Quality in Sport

Enhancing the Integrity of Evidence-Based Medicine: A Literature Review on Reporting Quality in Systematic Reviews and Randomised Controlled Trials
  • Home
  • /
  • Enhancing the Integrity of Evidence-Based Medicine: A Literature Review on Reporting Quality in Systematic Reviews and Randomised Controlled Trials
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 44 (2025) /
  4. Medical Sciences

Enhancing the Integrity of Evidence-Based Medicine: A Literature Review on Reporting Quality in Systematic Reviews and Randomised Controlled Trials

Authors

  • Łukasz Woźniak West Pomeranian Center for the Treatment of Severe Burns and Plastic Surgery, ul. Niechorska 27 Gryfice, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6452-3066
  • Albert Lompart Saint Wojciech Hospital (Copernicus Hospital) al. Jana Pawła II 50, 80-462 Gdańsk, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7591-4765
  • Michał Wabiszczewicz Medunit Primary Care Clinic, Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 5, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0339-5628
  • Albert Kosarewicz University Clinical Centre of Gdańsk Medical University, Debinki 7, 80-952 Gdansk, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9108-1754
  • Patrycja Krysiak Medical University of Łódź, al. Tadeusza Kościuszki 4, 90-419 Łódź, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5777-3751

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2025.44.62873

Keywords

Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, Randomised Controlled Trials, Reporting Guidelines, PRISMA, CONSORT, Research Integrity, Methodological Quality, Evidence Synthesis, Publication Bias

Abstract

This literature review synthesises evidence on reporting quality and integrity in evidence-based medicine (EBM). It critically examines challenges undermining the trustworthiness of systematic reviews (SRs) and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and explores solutions and frameworks to address these issues. Based on 22 selected academic articles, including reviews, guidelines, studies, and opinions, the analysis highlights themes like reporting standards (PRISMA, CONSORT, SPIRIT), appraisal tools (GRADE, AMSTAR), technology (AI, telehealth, electronic data), and expert collaboration. Findings show a gap between reporting guidelines and practice, causing a “trustworthiness crisis”. Despite guideline adoption, poor reporting, data issues, and bias persist. Key solutions include involving information science experts to refine searches, using AI and automation to boost efficiency and spot integrity issues, adopting new tools like Evidence Gap Maps (EGMs), and improving trial design with Decentralised Clinical Trials (DCTs). Strengthening EBM’s integrity needs more than guideline compliance: it demands a cultural shift towards transparency, combined with methodological rigour, technology, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Only this integrated approach ensures that clinical and policy decisions rest on the most robust and credible evidence possible.

References

Belle. B, A., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Evidence-based decision-making: Using systematic cases to check the compliance of reviews with reporting guidelines such as PRISMA 2020. Expert Systems with Applications, 217, 119569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119569

Butt, F. A., Fawzy, M., Wattar, A., Bueno-Cavanillas, A., Khan, K. S., & Khalaf, Y. (2024). The randomised clinical trial trustworthiness crisis. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-023-00161-7

Butt, F. A., Nunez-Nunez, M., Juhász, B., Bueno-Cavanillas, A., & Khan, K. S. (2025). The quality and reporting of recommendation documents to enhance the integrity of clinical trials: A systematic review and critical appraisal. Medicina de Familia. SEMERGEN, 51(2), 102333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102333

Clyne, B., Boland, F., Murphy, N., Murphy, E., Moriarty, F., Barry, A., Wallace, E., Devine, T., Smith, S. M., Devane, D., Murphy, A., & Fahey, T. (2020). Quality, scope, and reporting standards of randomised controlled trials in Irish Health Research: an observational study. Trials, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04396-x

Dermody, G., Whitehead, L., Wilson, G., & Glass, C. (2020). The role of virtual reality in improving health outcomes for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e17331–e17331. https://doi.org/10.2196/17331

Drewry, M. B., Yanguela, J., Khanna, A., O’Brien, S., Phillips, E., Bevel, M. S., McKinley, M. W., Corbie, G., & Dave, G. (2023). A systematic review of electronic community resource referral systems. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 65(6), 1142–1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2023.06.001

Goodson, N., Wiltrout, C., Warren, J., Reis, S., & Massart, M. (2025). The research visit of the future: An academic-industry model for telehealth, electronic clinical outcomes assessments, and Decentralised Clinical Trials (DCTs). Trials, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08886-8

Hamilton, D. G., Hong, K., Fraser, H., Rowhani-Farid, A., Fidler, F., & Page, M. J. (2023). Prevalence and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: Systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ, e075767–e075767. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-075767

Han, R., Acosta, J. N., Shakeri, Z., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Topol, E. J., & Rajpurkar, P. (2024). Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review. The Lancet Digital Health, 6(5), e367–e373. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(24)00047-5

Jafari, A., & Sahebkar, A. (2025). Can ginger improve cardiovascular health indices? A protocol for a GRADE-assessed systematic review and planned dose-response meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Systematic Reviews, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02867-3

Lighterness, A., Adcock, M., Scanlon, L. A., & Price, G. (2024). Data Quality–Driven Improvement in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e57615. https://doi.org/10.2196/57615

Mancin. S., Sguanci, M., Andreoli, D., Soekeland, F., Anastasi, G., Michela Piredda, & Grazia, M. (2023). Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews: A method for conducting comprehensive analysis. MethodsX, 12, 102532–102532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102532

Muka, T., Li, J. J., Farahani, S. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2023). An umbrella review of systematic reviews on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer prevention and management, as well as patient needs. ELife, 12. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.85679

Nawijn. F., Ham, W., Houwert, R. M., Rolf, Hietbrink, F., & Diederik P. J. Smeeing. (2019). Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement. BMC Emergency Medicine, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0233-6

Núñez-Núñez. M., Cano-Ibáñez, N., Zamora, J., Bueno-Cavanillas, A., & Khan, K. S. (2023). Assessing the Integrity of Clinical Trials Included in Evidence Syntheses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(12), 6138–6138. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20126138

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, L., M. M., L., T., L., E. W., M.-W., E., M., S., & McGuinness, L. A. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71–n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Platz, T. (2021). Methods for the Development of Healthcare Practice Recommendations Using Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Frontiers in Neurology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.699968

Randles, R., & Finnegan, A. (2023). Guidelines for writing a systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 125, 105803–105803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105803

Sablerolles, R. S. G., Rietdijk, W. J. R., Goorhuis, A., Postma, D. F., Visser, L. G., Geers, D., Schmitz, K. S., Garcia Garrido, H. M., Koopmans, M. P. G., Dalm, V. A. S. H., Kootstra, N. A., Huckriede, A. L. W., Lafeber, M., van Baarle, D., GeurtsvanKessel, C. H., de Vries, R. D., & van der Kuy, P. H. M. (2022). Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of Vaccine Boosters after Ad26.COV2.S Priming. New England Journal of Medicine, 386(10), 951–963. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2116747

Shaheen, N., Shaheen, A., Ramadan, A., Mahmoud Tarek Hefnawy, Ramadan, A., Ibrahim, I. A., Hassanein, M. E., Ashour, M. E., & Flouty, O. (2023). Appraising systematic reviews: A comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1268045

Stevens, E. R., & Laynor, G. (2024). Enhancing the quality and efficiency of regulatory science literature reviews through innovation and collaboration with library and information science experts. Frontiers in Medicine, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1434427

Zhang, D., Li, C., Tian, X., Miao, G., Shi, W., Lu, H., Qu, Y., Cai, M., Tang, Y., Shen, H., & Gao, B. (2025). Evidence map of nutrient interventions for major depression: A systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02868-2

Quality in Sport

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2025-08-09

How to Cite

1.
WOŹNIAK, Łukasz, LOMPART, Albert, WABISZCZEWICZ, Michał, KOSAREWICZ, Albert and KRYSIAK, Patrycja. Enhancing the Integrity of Evidence-Based Medicine: A Literature Review on Reporting Quality in Systematic Reviews and Randomised Controlled Trials. Quality in Sport. Online. 9 August 2025. Vol. 44, p. 62873. [Accessed 16 December 2025]. DOI 10.12775/QS.2025.44.62873.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 44 (2025)

Section

Medical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Łukasz Woźniak, Albert Lompart, Michał Wabiszczewicz, Albert Kosarewicz, Patrycja Krysiak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 261
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, Randomised Controlled Trials, Reporting Guidelines, PRISMA, CONSORT, Research Integrity, Methodological Quality, Evidence Synthesis, Publication Bias
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop