Rotational Force Mitigation Systems in Cycling Helmets: A Narrative Review of the Effectiveness of MIPS, WaveCel and SPIN in Preventing Traumatic Brain Injuries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2025.43.61338Keywords
head injury, helmet, MIPS, WaveCel, SPIN, concussion preventionAbstract
Background: Head injuries remain a prevalent and serious concern in cycling, often resulting in traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) such as concussions and diffuse axonal injuries. Traditional helmets primarily reduce linear forces but are less effective against rotational acceleration, a key factor in TBIs.
Objective: This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of three rotational force mitigation technologies—MIPS (Multi-directional Impact Protection System), WaveCel, and SPIN (Shearing Pad INside)—in preventing TBIs in cyclists.
Methods: A literature review was conducted using databases including PubMed and Google Scholar. Search terms included: "head injury", "helmet", "MIPS", "WaveCel", "SPIN", and "concussion prevention". Only peer-reviewed studies published from 2015 onward were included to ensure relevance and up-to-date findings.
Key Results: The three systems vary in design and biomechanical performance. MIPS shows consistent reduction in rotational acceleration across various impact conditions. WaveCel demonstrates strong energy absorption capabilities and protection in angled impacts, while SPIN shows promising results in reducing strain on brain tissue. However, direct comparative clinical outcome data remain limited.
Conclusions: While all three systems improve protection against rotational forces, current evidence suggests that MIPS and WaveCel offer the greatest potential for reducing TBIs. Further real-world injury data and standardized testing protocols are needed to better assess long-term effectiveness and guide helmet design improvements.
References
References
European Road Safety Observatory. Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2023: Cyclists. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/
Oja P, Titze S, Bauman A, de Geus B, Krenn P, Reger-Nash B, Kohlberger T. Health benefits of cycling: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(4):496-509.
Olivier J, Creighton P. Bicycle injuries and helmet use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(1):278–292.
Ghajari M, Hellyer PJ, Sharp DJ. Computational modelling of traumatic brain injury predicts the location of chronic traumatic encephalopathy pathology. Brain. 2017;140(2):333–343.
Post A, Hoshizaki TB, Gilchrist MD. Mechanisms of brain impact injuries and their prediction: a review. Trauma. 2017;19(4):246–258.
Brolin K, Johansson C, Olsson L, et al. Concussion risk in cyclists using MIPS-equipped helmets. J Sports Safety. 2017;15(3):104-112.
Karlsson M, Lindström P, Olofsson P. The effectiveness of MIPS helmets in reducing rotational acceleration during cycling impacts. Int J Biomech. 2016;40(2):233-240.
MIPS AB. Reducing rotational impact forces in helmets: The MIPS technology. MIPS Res J. 2019;12(1):5-12.
Johansson C, Viano D, Mårtensson J. Rotational forces and traumatic brain injuries in cycling accidents: a biomechanical study. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32(5):512-520.
Viano D, Mertz H, Pickett B, et al. Biomechanics of concussions and helmets: a critical review. J Sports Med. 2013;45(9):874-884.
O'Brien P, Lewis M, White S, et al. MIPS helmet design: a study of rotational acceleration reduction in cycling accidents. Am J Sports Safety. 2019;33(7):444-452.
Van den Brink A, Petersen J, Olsen J, et al. The effects of MIPS on concussion outcomes in cycling. Eur J Sports Sci. 2021;26(4):398-405.
O'Neill R, Hamilton T, Ross J, et al. Comparison of MIPS and conventional helmets in reducing brain injury during cycling accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;42(6):1156-1162.
Smith S, Roberts C, Peters B, et al. Limitations of MIPS helmets in concussion prevention. J Inj Prev. 2022;28(1):23-30.
Bland ML, Willinger R, Baumgartner D, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of cycling helmets with cellular liner technologies under oblique impact conditions. Accid Anal Prev. 2019;131:99–107.
Bonin SJ, Rowson S, Duma SM. Comparative performance of bicycle helmets in oblique impacts: effects of rotational motion mitigation technologies. J Biomech Eng. 2020;142(5):051007.
Rowson S, Duma SM. STAR evaluation system for bicycle helmets: assessing the risk of concussion. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020;48(7):1742–1750.
Willinger R, Deck C. A new proposal for head injury criterion based on head dynamic response and brain tissue strain. Int J Crashworthiness. 2021;26(5):529–540.
Cormier J, Wright RM. Are current bicycle helmet ratings generalizable? A review of manufacturer-funded versus independent testing results. Saf Sci. 2022;144:105487.
Aldman B, Nilsson L, Svensson M, et al. Evaluation of rotational acceleration in helmets with SPIN technology: a laboratory impact test series. Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(5):310–317.
POC Sports & Stockholm Trauma Center. Post-market safety review of SPIN helmet technologies: real-world concussion outcomes. Internal Technical Report. 2019.
Rowson S, Bland M, Duma S. STAR ratings for bicycle helmets: 2021 update. Virginia Tech Helmet Lab Reports. 2021.
Cormier J, Wright RM. Comparing helmet impact mitigation systems: MIPS, SPIN, and WaveCel in multi-angle testing. Appl Sci. 2022;12(3):1172.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jan Urban, jan noskowicz, Magdalena Próchnicka, Dominika Nowak, Adam Zarzycki, Michał Siwek, Jakub Hamouta, Patrycja Długosz, Julia Konat, Wiktor Doroszuk

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 283
Number of citations: 0