A Realistic Examination, International Comparison, and Chinese Reflections on the Allocation of Public Service Resources for National Fitness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2025.41.60379Keywords
National Fitness Public Service Resource Allocation, Equity and Efficiency, Sports GovernanceAbstract
This paper examines the allocation of public service resources for national fitness in China, providing a realistic assessment, international comparisons, and Chinese reflections. It highlights the growing importance of national fitness as emphasized in the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, alongside the 14th Five-Year Plan for Public Service Development. The paper identifies key challenges in China’s public resource allocation for national fitness, including high costs, low efficiency, and regional imbalances. Acknowledging the growing demand for fitness services, it explores the inefficiencies caused by a government-dominated allocation system and the lack of market mechanisms.
The paper compares international practices from the UK, US, and Germany, which have successfully integrated market mechanisms, legal frameworks, and digital technologies to enhance resource allocation efficiency and equity in public service provision. It draws lessons from these countries’ experiences, particularly in optimizing competitive market approaches, involving social participation, and ensuring legal and procedural transparency.
Based on these insights, the paper proposes several reforms for China: optimizing resource allocation models by introducing market mechanisms, improving regional balance in resource distribution, advancing digital empowerment for better management, and strengthening performance evaluation systems to enhance service quality and efficiency. By adopting these strategies, China can overcome existing barriers and create a more effective and equitable national fitness public service system, contributing to the realization of its sports powerhouse goal.
References
[1] Dong, X. G. (2007). On the imbalance and reform direction of public sports resource allocation. Journal of Sports Culture Guide, (03), 6–11.
[2] Liang, J. H. (2008). A study on the optimization of public sports resource allocation. Journal of Sports Culture Guide, (01), 7–9.
[3]He, Y. C. (2011). Analysis and countermeasures of the benefits of rural public sports resource allocation. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Physical Education (Social Science Edition), 25(01), 44–47. https://doi.org/10.15877/j.cnki.nsic.2011.01.015
[4]Fan, B. Y., & Wang, J. S. (2019). Study on the differences in public sports resource allocation among the top 100 counties in terms of economic strength. Journal of Beijing Sport University, 42(12), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.19582/j.cnki.11-3785/g8.2019.12.014
[5] Liu, J., & Zou, Y. H. (2022). Research on the equity of public sports resource allocation in the Yangtze River Delta under the regional coordination strategy. Journal of Nantong University (Social Sciences Edition), 38(04), 56–63.
[6] Liu, L. (2012). The current situation of equalization of sports public services in China: A multi-dimensional analysis based on resource allocation. Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education, 46(12), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.15930/j.cnki.wtxb.2012.12.005
[7] Zhu, Y. (2019). Evaluation and strategic improvement of public sports resource allocation across regions in China. [Master’s thesis, Dalian University of Technology]. https://doi.org/10.26991/d.cnki.gdllu.2019.004478
[8] Cai, P. L., & Wang, J. H. (2019). “Effective market” and “competent government”: The triple boundaries between government and market in the market-oriented reform of public sports resource allocation. Journal of Tianjin University of Sport, 34(03), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2019.03.004
[9] Zhang, W. J., & Shen, K. Y. (2020). Market-oriented reform of public sports resource allocation from the perspective of government service procurement. Journal of Sports Culture Guide, (02), 24–30.
[10]Pan, W. W. (2016). On the value orientation of the government and the effective supply of public sports resources. Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, 28(02), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.14036/j.cnki.cn11-4513.2016.02.003
[11] Aitchison, C. (1997). A decade of compulsory competitive tendering in UK sport and leisure services: some feminist reflections. Leisure Studies, 16(2), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/026143697375430
[12] Widdop, P., King, N., Parnell, D., Cutts, D., & Millward, P. (2017). Austerity, policy and sport participation in England. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 10(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2017.1348964
[13] Edwards, Angela E. (2000). The impact of compulsory competitive tendering on the role of the local authority leisure professional. Loughborough University. Thesis. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/7374
[14] Powell-Wiley TM, Martinez MF, Heneghan J, Weatherwax C, Osei Baah F, Velmurugan K, Chin KL, Ayers C, Cintron MA, Ortiz-Whittingham LR, Sandler D, Sharda S, Whitley M, Bartsch SM, O'Shea KJ, Tsintsifas A, Dibbs A, Scannell SA, Lee BY. Health and Economic Value of Eliminating Socioeconomic Disparities in US Youth Physical Activity. JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e240088. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0088. PMID: 38488779; PMCID: PMC10943408.
[15] Breuer, C., & Feiler, S. (2019). Public subsidies for sports clubs in Germany: funding regulations vs. empirical evidence. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19(5), 555-575
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ZongQian Yang, Liang Deng, XiaoLing Huang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 59
Number of citations: 0