Clinical Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2025.41.60073Keywords
knee injuries, knee joint, UKA, TKA, Treatment, RecoveryAbstract
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has gained significant attention in recent years as an important treatment option for isolated compartmental osteoarthritis of the knee, offering distinct advantages over Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). This review article aims to comprehensively analyze the clinical outcomes of UKA, focusing on surgical techniques, patient satisfaction, functional improvement, implant survivorship, complications and future directions. Through an examination of current literature and clinical studies, this review provides valuable insights into the efficiency and limitations of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as a surgical intervention for managing unicompartmental knee pathology, with an emphasis on its growing role in modern orthopedic practice.
AIM OF THE STUDY:
The aim of the study is to evaluate the available knowledge about surgical techniques and clinical outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, highlight its strengths and weaknesses and benefits compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
The literature available in PubMed, Google Scholar, BMJ, JBJS, JOSR, database was reviewed using the following keywords: “UKA”, “Knee”, “Arthroplasty”, “TKA”, “Recovery” , “Clinical Outcomes”.
RESULTS:
A review of the literature underscore the importance of tailored treatment decisions, emphasizing that UKA is best suited for patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis who meet strict selection criteria. Its benefits make it a strong choice in such cases, but careful consideration is needed for long-term success.
References
1. Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, et al. "The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study." Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1323-1330. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763
2. Luo TD, Hubbard JB. Arthroplasty Knee Unicompartmental. 2023 Jul 3. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30855855.
3. Katz JN, Arant KR, Loeser RF. Diagnosis and treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: A review. JAMA. 2021;325(6):568-578. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.22171
4. Ho, K.KW., Lau, L.CM., Chau, WW. et al. End-stage knee osteoarthritis with and without sarcopenia and the effect of knee arthroplasty – a prospective cohort study. BMC Geriatr 21, 2 (2021). doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01929-6
5. Mittal A, Meshram P, Kim WH, Kim TK. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, an enigma, and the ten enigmas of medial UKA. J Orthop Traumatol. 2020 Sep 2;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s10195-020-00551-x.
6. Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW. Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J. 2015 Jun;97-B(6):793-801. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B6.35155.
7. Kim MS, Koh IJ, Choi YJ, Lee JY, In Y. Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1453-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.034.
8. Lyons MC, MacDonald SJ, Somerville LE, Naudie DD, McCalden RW. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):84-90. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2144-z.
9. Suarez JC, Saxena A, Arguelles W, Watson Perez JM, Ramamoorthy V, Hernandez Y, Osondu CU. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Risk-adjusted Comparison of 30-day Outcomes Using National Data From 2014 to 2018. Arthroplast Today. 2022 Aug 29;17:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.06.017.
10. Ho FY, Ma HM, Liau JJ, Yeh CR, Huang CH. Mobile-bearing knees reduce rotational asymmetric wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Sep;462:143-9. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31806dba05.
11. Kort N, Stirling P, Pilot P, Müller JH. Robot-assisted knee arthroplasty improves component positioning and alignment, but results are inconclusive on whether it improves clinical scores or reduces complications and revisions: a systematic overview of meta-analyses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2639-2653. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06472-4.
12. MacNeille R, Law TY, Roche M, Chow J. Does robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty improve alignment and outcomes? J ISAKOS. 2024 Dec;9(6):100336. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100336.
13. Fan X, Wang Y, Zhang S, Xing Y, Li J, Ma X, Ma J. Orthopedic surgical robotic systems in knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Feb 20;13:1523631. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1523631
14. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M, Ragland PS, Kester M. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A Suppl 2:26-32. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200412002-00005.
15. Tria AJ, Scuderi GR. Minimally invasive knee arthroplasty: An overview. World J Orthop. 2015 Nov 18;6(10):804-11. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i10.804.
16. Malhotra R, Gupta S, Gupta V, Manhas V. Navigated Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Different Perspective. Clin Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec;13(4):491-498. doi: 10.4055/cios20166.
17. Konyves A, Willis-Owen CA, Spriggins AJ. The long-term benefit of computer-assisted surgical navigation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010 Dec 31;5:94. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-5-94.
18. Wang, Huihui MDa; Zhang, Liang MDa; Teng, Xueren MDa,*. The efficacy and safety of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Medicine 103(3):p e36484, January 19, 2024. | DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036484
19. Kerens B, Leenders AM, Schotanus MGM, Boonen B, Tuinebreijer WE, Emans PJ, Jong B, Kort NP. Patient-specific instrumentation in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is reliable and accurate except for the tibial rotation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1823-1830. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4826-x.
20. 20. https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/treatment/unicompartmental-knee-replacement/
21. Zhang, M., Wang, H., Cai, Z. et al. A systematic comparative analysis of gait characteristics in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review study. J Orthop Surg Res 19, 821 (2024). doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05308-4
22. Laoruengthana A, Reosanguanwong K, Rattanaprichavej P, Sahasoonthorn K, Santisathaporn N, Pongpirul K. Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Medial Compartmental Osteoarthritis: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Early Postoperative Recovery. Orthop Res Rev. 2024 Apr 10;16:103-110. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S444547.
23. Zhang W, Wang J, Li H, Wang W, George DM, Huang T. Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 5;10(1):19075. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76124-z.
24. Radhakrishnan GT, Magan A, Kayani B, Asokan A, Ronca F, Haddad FS. Return to Sport After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Mar 16;10(3):23259671221079285. doi: 10.1177/23259671221079285.
25. Li J, Zhao F, Gao J, Dong W, Yu X, Zhu C, Liu S, Jiang X, Liu G. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in geriatric patients underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 10;102(6):e32941. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032941.
26. Schneider AM, Schmitt DR, Brown NM. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and revision total knee arthroplasty have a lower risk of venous thromboembolism disease at 30 days than primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 Nov 4;32(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-00078-9.
27. Jansen K, Beckert M, Deckard ER, Ziemba-Davis M, Meneghini RM. Satisfaction and Functional Outcomes in Unicompartmental Compared with Total Knee Arthroplasty: Radiographically Matched Cohort Analysis. JB JS Open Access. 2020 Sep 28;5(3):e20.00051. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00051.
28. Brown NM, Sheth NP, Davis K, Berend ME, Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Della Valle CJ. Total knee arthroplasty has higher postoperative morbidity than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep;27(8 Suppl):86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.022.
29. Wilson HA, Middleton R, Abram SGF, Smith S, Alvand A, Jackson WF, Bottomley N, Hopewell S, Price AJ. Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019 Feb 21;364:l352. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l352. Erratum in: BMJ. 2019 Apr 2;365:l1032. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1032.
30. Waldstein W, Kolbitsch P, Koller U, Boettner F, Windhager R. Sport and physical activity following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):717-728. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4167-1.
31. Mohammad HR, Strickland L, Hamilton TW, Murray DW. Long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knees-a systematic review. Acta Orthop. 2018 Feb;89(1):101-107. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1367577.
32. Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):999-1006. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.00568.
33. Vossen RJM, Ten Noever de Brauw GV, Bayoumi T, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD. Patient satisfaction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current concepts. J ISAKOS. 2024 Dec;9(6):100349. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100349.
34. Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW. Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J. 2015 Jun;97-B(6):793-801. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B6.35155.
35. Vasso M, Corona K, D'Apolito R, Mazzitelli G, Panni AS. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Modes of Failure and Conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty. Joints. 2017 Jun 5;5(1):44-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601414.
36. van der List JP, Chawla H, Villa JC, Pearle AD. The Role of Patient Characteristics on the Choice of Unicompartmental versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Medial Osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):761-766. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.015.
37. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Walter CA, Aziz-Jacobo J, Cheney NA. Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1450-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0731-z. Epub 2009 Feb 19.
38. Pongcharoen B, Liengwattanakol P, Boontanapibul K. Comparison of Functional Recovery Between Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Feb 1;105(3):191-201. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00950.
39. Casper DS, Fleischman AN, Papas PV, Grossman J, Scuderi GR, Lonner JH. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Provides Significantly Greater Improvement in Function than Total Knee Arthroplasty Despite Equivalent Satisfaction for Isolated Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1611-1616. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.005.
40. Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB, Drake GN. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Oct;85(10):1968-73. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200310000-00016.
41. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Sep;80(5):862-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b5.8835.
42. Evans JT, Walker RW, Evans JP, Blom AW, Sayers A, Whitehouse MR. How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2019 Feb 16;393(10172):655-663. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32531-5. Epub 2019 Feb 14. Erratum in: Lancet. 2019 Mar 2;393(10174):876. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30415-5.
43. Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(12):1628–1631. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B12.25193.
44. Lin J, Yan S, Ye Z, Zhao X. A systematic review of MAKO-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int J Med Robot. 2020 Oct;16(5):1-7. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2124.
45. Chen Y, Cheng RJ, Wu Y, Huang D, Li Y, Liu Y. Advances in Stem Cell-Based Therapies in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 28;25(1):394. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010394.
46. Thoene M, Bejer-Olenska E, Wojtkiewicz J. The Current State of Osteoarthritis Treatment Options Using Stem Cells for Regenerative Therapy: A Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 May 18;24(10):8925. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108925.
47. Batailler, C., Shatrov, J., Sappey-Marinier, E. et al. Artificial intelligence in knee arthroplasty: current concept of the available clinical applications. Arthroplasty 4, 17 (2022). doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00119-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wojciech Domagała, Dariusz Salamon, Julia Stachowiak, Julia Sosin, Anna Pilarz, Maria Zwierzchowska, Aleksandra Sojka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 92
Number of citations: 0
