Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches for Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Comprehensive Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2025.40.59482Keywords
Inguinal hernia, laparoscopic hernia repair, robotic hernia repairAbstract
Introduction and Purpose
Inguinal hernia is one of the most common surgical conditions, affecting 27% of men and 3% of women over a lifetime. The mainstay of treatment is surgical repair, which prevents complications such as strangulation and bowel obstruction. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of inguinal hernia pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnostic strategies, and treatment options, focusing on open, laparoscopic, and robotic repair techniques.
Description of State of Knowledge
The development of inguinal hernias is associated with connective tissue abnormalities, with studies showing an increased ratio of type III to type I collagen. Diagnosis relies primarily on clinical examination, with imaging techniques such as ultrasonography and MRI used in complex cases. Lichtenstein repair remains the standard open approach, offering low recurrence rates, while laparoscopic techniques (TAPP, TEP) are preferred for bilateral and recurrent hernias due to faster recovery and reduced chronic pain. Robotic-assisted repair provides enhanced precision and ergonomics, but current evidence shows no significant clinical advantage over laparoscopy, with higher costs and longer operative times.
Conclusions
Surgical repair is the gold standard for inguinal hernia treatment, with the choice of technique depending on patient factors, hernia characteristics, and surgical expertise. Lichtenstein repair remains the preferred open approach, while laparoscopic techniques (TAPP, TEP) are recommended for bilateral and recurrent cases due to their faster recovery and lower risk of chronic pain.
References
1. PRIMATESTA, P. and M.J. GOLDACRE, Inguinal Hernia Repair: Incidence of Elective and Emergency Surgery, Readmission and Mortality. International Journal of Epidemiology, 1996. 25(4): p. 835-839.
2. Öberg, S., K. Andresen, and J. Rosenberg, Etiology of Inguinal Hernias: A Comprehensive Review. Front Surg, 2017. 4: p. 52.
3. Lau, H., C. Fang, W.K. Yuen, and N.G. Patil, Risk factors for inguinal hernia in adult males: A case-control study. Surgery, 2007. 141(2): p. 262-266.
4. Henriksen, N., et al., Connective tissue alteration in abdominal wall hernia. Journal of British Surgery, 2011. 98(2): p. 210-219.
5. Tanyel, F.C., et al., Inguinal hernia revisited through comparative evaluation of peritoneum, processus vaginalis, and sacs obtained from children with hernia, hydrocele, and undescended testis. Journal of pediatric surgery, 1999. 34(4): p. 552-555.
6. Ruhl, C.E. and J.E. Everhart, Risk factors for inguinal hernia among adults in the US population. Am J Epidemiol, 2007. 165(10): p. 1154-61.
7. Ravanbakhsh, S., M. Batech, and T. Tejirian, Increasing Body Mass Index Is Inversely Related to Groin Hernias. Am Surg, 2015. 81(10): p. 1043-6.
8. Burcharth, J., H.-C. Pommergaard, T. Bisgaard, and J. Rosenberg, Patient-related risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Surgical innovation, 2015. 22(3): p. 303-317.
9. Van Veen, R., et al., Patent processus vaginalis in the adult as a risk factor for the occurrence of indirect inguinal hernia. Surgical endoscopy, 2007. 21: p. 202-205.
10. Rutkow, I.M. and A.W. Robbins, Classification systems and groin hernias. Surgical Clinics of North America, 1998. 78(6): p. 1117-1127.
11. Onuigbo, W. and G. Njeze, Inguinal hernia. A Review. J Surg Oper Care, 2016. 1(2): p. 202.
12. VAN DEN BERG, J.C., J.C. DE VALOIS, P.M. Go, and G. Rosenbusch, Detection of groin hernia with physical examination, ultrasound, and MRI compared with laparoscopic findings. Investigative radiology, 1999. 34(12): p. 739.
13. Jenkins, J.T. and P.J. O’dwyer, Inguinal hernias. Bmj, 2008. 336(7638): p. 269-272.
14. Hair, A., et al., What effect does the duration of an inguinal hernia have on patient symptoms? Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2001. 193(2): p. 125-129.
15. Pérez Lara, F.J., A. del Rey Moreno, and H. Oliva Muñoz, Do we really know the symptoms of inguinal hernia? Hernia, 2015. 19(5): p. 703-712.
16. Misiakos, E., et al., Strangulated inguinal hernia. Inguinal Hernia, 2014. 4: p. 87.
17. LeBLANC, K.E., L.L. LeBLANC, and K.A. LeBLANC, Inguinal hernias: diagnosis and management. American family physician, 2013. 87(12): p. 844-848.
18. Korenkov, M., A. Paul, and H. Troidl, Color duplex sonography: diagnostic tool in the differentiation of inguinal hernias. Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 1999. 18(8): p. 565-568.
19. Robinson, A., D. Light, A. Kasim, and C. Nice, A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of radiology in the diagnosis of occult inguinal hernia. Surgical Endoscopy, 2013. 27(1): p. 11-18.
20. LeBlanc, K.E. and K.A. LeBlanc, Groin pain in athletes. Hernia, 2003. 7: p. 68-71.
21. Tibor, L.M. and J.K. Sekiya, Differential diagnosis of pain around the hip joint. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2008. 24(12): p. 1407-1421.
22. Simons, M.P., et al., European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia, 2009. 13(4): p. 343-403.
23. Fitzgibbons, R.J., Jr., et al., Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial. Jama, 2006. 295(3): p. 285-92.
24. Messias, B.A., et al., Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair: ten recommendations to optimize surgical outcomes. Hernia, 2024. 28(4): p. 1467-1476.
25. de Goede, B., et al., Meta-analysis of glue versus sutured mesh fixation for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. British Journal of Surgery, 2013. 100(6): p. 735-742.
26. Amato, B., et al., Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009(4).
27. Grant, A., Mesh compared with non‐mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. British Journal of Surgery, 2000. 87(7): p. 854-859.
28. Marcolin, P., et al., Mesh repair versus non-mesh repair for incarcerated and strangulated groin hernia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia, 2023. 27(6): p. 1397-1413.
29. Wauschkuhn, C.A., J. Schwarz, U. Boekeler, and R. Bittner, Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: gold standard in bilateral hernia repair? Results of more than 2800 patients in comparison to literature. Surgical Endoscopy, 2010. 24(12): p. 3026-3030.
30. Bittner, R., et al., Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society). Surgical Endoscopy, 2015. 29(2): p. 289-321.
31. Eker, H.H., et al., Laparoscopic vs Open Incisional Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surgery, 2013. 148(3): p. 259-263.
32. Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. The Lancet, 1999. 354(9174): p. 185-190.
33. McCormack, K., et al., Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review. Hernia, 2005. 9(2): p. 109-114.
34. Bracale, U., et al., Which is the best laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia repair: TEP or TAPP? A systematic review of the literature with a network meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, 2012. 26(12): p. 3355-3366.
35. Van Koughnett, J.A., et al., Are there advantages to robotic-assisted surgery over laparoscopy from the surgeon’s perspective? Journal of robotic surgery, 2009. 3: p. 79-82.
36. Solaini, L., et al., Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg, 2022. 16(4): p. 775-781.
37. Waite, K.E., M.A. Herman, and P.J. Doyle, Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2016. 10(3): p. 239-244.
38. Gerdes, S., et al., Results of robotic TAPP and conventional laparoscopic TAPP in an outpatient setting: a cohort study in Switzerland. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2022. 407(6): p. 2563-2567.
39. Bay-Nielsen, M., et al., Quality assessment of 26 304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. The Lancet, 2001. 358(9288): p. 1124-1128.
40. Haapaniemi, S., G. Sandblom, and E. Nilsson, Mortality after elective and emergency surgery for inguinal and femoral hernia. Hernia, 1999. 3: p. 205-208.
41. Aufenacker, T., M. Koelemay, D. Gouma, and M. Simons, Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of wound infection after mesh repair of abdominal wall hernia. Journal of British Surgery, 2006. 93(1): p. 5-10.
42. Kokotovic, D., T. Bisgaard, and F. Helgstrand, Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated With Elective Incisional Hernia Repair. JAMA, 2016. 316(15): p. 1575-1582.
43. Berndsen, F.H., et al., Discomfort five years after laparoscopic and Shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomised trial with 867 patients. A report from the SMIL study group. Hernia, 2007. 11: p. 307-313.
44. Fränneby, U., et al., Risk factors for long-term pain after hernia surgery. Annals of surgery, 2006. 244(2): p. 212-219.
45. Fitzgibbons Jr, R.J., Can we be sure polypropylene mesh causes infertility? 2005, LWW. p. 559-561.
46. Perrone, J.M., et al., Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surgery, 2005. 138(4): p. 708-716.
47. Felix, E.L., N. Harbertson, and S. Vartanian, Laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surgical Endoscopy, 1999. 13(4): p. 328-331.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jakub Skiba, Zuzanna Skiba, Kinga Tylczyńska, Natalia Tylczyńska, Kinga Kowalik, Maria Michalska, Aleksandra Zielińska, Szymon Szypulski, Sebastian Iwaniuk, Ignacy Maciejewski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 148
Number of citations: 0
