Water Birth – Benefits, Risks, and Controversies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2025.37.57158Keywords
water birth, pregnancy, newbornAbstract
Introduction:
Water birth, involving immersion in water during childbirth, has gained popularity for its potential benefits, such as pain relief and comfort. While widely practiced in some countries, concerns regarding its safety, particularly for neonates, remain. This paper explores the maternal and fetal benefits and risks associated with water birth, as well as the epidemiological trends, medical protocols, and legal considerations.
Aim of Study:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of water immersion and water birth, focusing on the safety, efficacy, and factors influencing its adoption in different populations.
Material and methods:
A comprehensive review of the literature on water birth including its benefits, risks and controversies was performed using the PubMed database.
Results and Conclusions:
Water immersion during labor is associated with significant maternal benefits, including reduced pain and anxiety, shorter labor, and fewer pharmacological interventions. Water birth, however, carries potential risks, such as neonatal respiratory complications and infections, although studies generally report no significant differences in neonatal outcomes compared to land birth. Epidemiological trends show higher water birth rates among women aged 30–39, while socioeconomic factors, such as deprivation, are linked to lower rates. Water birth has been shown to reduce the incidence of severe perineal tears and postpartum hemorrhage. While promising, the practice requires careful adherence to medical protocols to ensure safety, with further research needed to fully establish its long-term benefits and risks.
References
1. Brooks EJ. Water Birth: Using Water as a Comfort Measure in Labor. International Journal of Childbirth
Education, 2018, Vol 33, Issue 1, p30. 2018. doi:
2. Lim KM, Tong PS, Chong YS. A comparative study between the pioneer cohort of waterbirths and
conventional vaginal deliveries in an obstetrician-led unit in Singapore. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55(3):363-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.04.012
3. Iturralde SREO-PDADRA. A Retrospective Study of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Following
Conventional and Water Birth in Ecuador. Global Journal of Health Science 2017. doi:
4. Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and Their Babies During Childbirth. National Institute for
Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. London2014.
5. Cluett ER, Burns E, Cuthbert A. Immersion in water during labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2018;5(5):CD000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4
6. Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP. Position in the second stage of labour for women without
epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5(5):CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub4
7. Edqvist M, Blix E, Hegaard HK, Olafsdottir OA, Hildingsson I, Ingversen K, et al. Perineal injuries and
birth positions among 2992 women with a low risk pregnancy who opted for a homebirth. BMC Pregnancy
Childbirth. 2016;16(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0990-0
8. Martyna Katarzyna Szymkowiak PS, Małgorzata Baumert, Ewa Bujacz, Izabella Klajnowicz, Julia
Gonciarz,Andrzej Witek. The influence of water birth on newborns' condition in early adaptation period. Ann Acad
Med Siles 2017;71:383-392. 2017. doi:
9. Vanderlaan J, Hall PJ, Lewitt M. Neonatal outcomes with water birth: A systematic review and meta-
analysis. Midwifery. 2018;59:27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.12.023
10. Burns E, Feeley C, Hall PJ, Vanderlaan J. Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine intrapartum
interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes following immersion in water during labour and waterbirth. BMJ
Open. 2022;12(7):e056517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056517
11. Cluett ER, Burns E. Immersion in water in labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2009(2):CD000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub3
12. Committee Opinion No. 679: Immersion in Water During Labor and Delivery. Obstet Gynecol.
2016;128(5):e231-e6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001771
13. Hodgson ZG, Comfort LR, Albert AAY. Water Birth and Perinatal Outcomes in British Columbia: A
Retrospective Cohort Study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42(2):150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.07.007
14. Sidebottom AC, Vacquier M, Simon K, Wunderlich W, Fontaine P, Dahlgren-Roemmich D, et al. Maternal
and Neonatal Outcomes in Hospital-Based Deliveries With Water Immersion. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(4):707-15.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003956
15. Bailey JM, Zielinski RE, Emeis CL, Kane Low L. A retrospective comparison of waterbirth outcomes in
two United States hospital settings. Birth. 2020;47(1):98-104. doi: 10.1111/birt.12473
16. Fair CD, Crawford A, Houpt B, Latham V. "After having a waterbirth, I feel like it's the only way people
should deliver babies": The decision making process of women who plan a waterbirth. Midwifery. 2020;82:102622.
doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102622
17. Lewis L, Hauck YL, Butt J, Hornbuckle J. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women intending to use
immersion in water for labour and birth in Western Australia (2015-2016): A retrospective audit of clinical
outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;58(5):539-47. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12758
18. Sidebottom AC, Vacquier M, Simon K, Fontaine P, Dahlgren-Roemmich D, Hyer B, et al. Who Gives Birth
in the Water? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Intended versus Completed Waterbirths. J Midwifery Womens
Health. 2019;64(4):403-9. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12961
19. Lewis L, Hauck YL, Crichton C, Barnes C, Poletti C, Overing H, et al. The perceptions and experiences of
women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):23. doi:
10.1186/s12884-017-1637-5
20. Lathrop A, Bonsack CF, Haas DM. Women's experiences with water birth: A matched groups prospective
study. Birth. 2018;45(4):416-23. doi: 10.1111/birt.12362
21. Westreich D, Cole SR. Invited commentary: positivity in practice. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171(6):674-7;
discussion 8-81. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp436
22. Hernan MA, Alonso A, Logan R, Grodstein F, Michels KB, Willett WC, et al. Observational studies
analyzed like randomized experiments: an application to postmenopausal hormone therapy and coronary heart
disease. Epidemiology. 2008;19(6):766-79. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181875e61
23. Aughey H, Jardine J, Moitt N, Fearon K, Hawdon J, Pasupathy D, et al. Waterbirth: a national retrospective
cohort study of factors associated with its use among women in England. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth.
2021;21(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03724-6
24. Bashaikh SM, Mahboub FA, Orabi A. Perception and knowledge of Saudi women about water birth: A
cross-sectional study. Belitung Nurs J. 2022;8(5):422-30. doi: 10.33546/bnj.2185
25. Carlsson T, Ulfsdottir H. Waterbirth in low-risk pregnancy: An exploration of women's experiences. J Adv
Nurs. 2020;76(5):1221-31. doi: 10.1111/jan.14336
26. Cooper M, Warland J. What are the benefits? Are they concerned? Women's experiences of water
immersion for labor and birth. Midwifery. 2019;79:102541. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102541
27. Feyza Reyhan FDS. What Do Pregnant Women In Turkey Think About Water Birth? International Journal
of Caring Sciences January-April 2019 Volume 12 | Issue 1| Page305. 2019. doi:
28. Joyce da Costa Silveira de Camargo MBMU, Rosemeire, Sartori de Albuquerque, Ana Rute de Jesus Freitas
Serra, Maria Emília Bulcão, Macedo Mendonça, Manuela Néné,Maria Catarina L. R. Grande Women’s perceptions
of the care received during water birth. REVISTA DE ENFERMAGEM REFERÊNCIA. 2022. doi:
29. Bovbjerg ML, Cheyney M, Caughey AB. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following waterbirth: a cohort
study of 17 530 waterbirths and 17 530 propensity score-matched land births. BJOG. 2022;129(6):950-8. doi:
10.1111/1471-0528.17009
30. Snapp C, Stapleton SR, Wright J, Niemczyk NA, Jolles D. The Experience of Land and Water Birth Within
the American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry, 2012-2017. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs.
2020;34(1):16-26. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000450
31. Geissbuehler V, Stein S, Eberhard J. Waterbirths compared with landbirths: an observational study of nine
years. J Perinat Med. 2004;32(4):308-14. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2004.057
32. Jacoby S, Becker G, Crawford S, Wilson RD. Water Birth Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Among
Midwifery Clients in Alberta, Canada, from 2014 to 2017: A Retrospective Study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can.
2019;41(6):805-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.12.014
33. Hill AB. The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58(5):295-300.
doi: 10.1177/003591576505800503
34. Deans AC, Steer PJ. Labour and birth in water. Temperature of pool is important. BMJ.
1995;311(7001):390-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.390b
35. Johnson P. Birth under water--to breathe or not to breathe. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103(3):202-8. doi:
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09706.x
36. Collins SL, Afshar B, Walker JT, Aird H, Naik F, Parry-Ford F, et al. Heated birthing pools as a source of
Legionnaires' disease. Epidemiol Infect. 2016;144(4):796-802. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815001983
37. Fritschel E, Sanyal K, Threadgill H, Cervantes D. Fatal legionellosis after water birth, Texas, USA, 2014.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(1):130-2. doi: 10.3201/eid2101.140846
38. Zanetti-Daellenbach RA, Tschudin S, Zhong XY, Holzgreve W, Lapaire O, Hosli I. Maternal and neonatal
infections and obstetrical outcome in water birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;134(1):37-43. doi:
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.09.012
39. Davies R, Davis D, Pearce M, Wong N. The effect of waterbirth on neonatal mortality and morbidity: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015;13(10):180-231. doi:
10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2105
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Julia Górny, Alicja Kapciak, Katarzyna Naja, Jakub Zwardoń, Artur Hawajski, Natalia Jankowska, Oliwia Kamieniecka, Adrianna Świerzyńska, Weronika Mazur, Natalia Pawelec
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 437
Number of citations: 0
