Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Quality in Sport

Two Approaches to Cognitive Evaluation: Assessing the Strengths and Limitations of GPCOG and ACE-III
  • Home
  • /
  • Two Approaches to Cognitive Evaluation: Assessing the Strengths and Limitations of GPCOG and ACE-III
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 41 (2025) /
  4. Medical Sciences

Two Approaches to Cognitive Evaluation: Assessing the Strengths and Limitations of GPCOG and ACE-III

Authors

  • Magdalena Mąka Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, ul. księcia J. Poniatowskiego 15, 40-055 Katowice, śląskie, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8702-9406
  • Dominik Sikora Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, ul. księcia J. Poniatowskiego 15, 40-055 Katowice, śląskie, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8604-1605
  • Piotr Oleksy Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, ul. księcia J. Poniatowskiego 15, 40-055 Katowice, śląskie, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0567-0317
  • Adam Zając Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, ul. księcia J. Poniatowskiego 15, 40-055 Katowice, śląskie, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1131-8700
  • Karol Zieliński Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, ul. księcia J. Poniatowskiego 15, 40-055 Katowice, śląskie, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6069-8053
  • Łukasz Papież Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, ul. księcia J. Poniatowskiego 15, 40-055 Katowice, śląskie, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1235-0057
  • Ewa Góralczyk Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, ul. księcia J. Poniatowskiego 15, 40-055 Katowice, śląskie, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9573-0381
  • Jakub Kamiński Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, ul. księcia J. Poniatowskiego 15, 40-055 Katowice, śląskie, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4725-5977
  • Bartosz Buczkowski Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, ul. księcia J. Poniatowskiego 15, 40-055 Katowice, śląskie, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8065-632X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2025.41.56680

Keywords

Cognitive screening tools, Primary and specialized healthcare settings, Dementia diagnosis, ACE-III, GPCOG

Abstract

Introduction
The growing elderly population underscores age as a key risk factor for cognitive disorders like dementia. Reliable assessment tools are essential. Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) and General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG) are two extensively utilized tools for cognitive assessment. This study compares their sensitivity, specificity, and clinical utility across healthcare settings.

Purpose of Research
The study evaluates ACE-III and GPCOG for diagnosing dementia such as Alzheimer’s and frontotemporal dementia, focusing on their application in primary care and specialized settings.

Materials and Methods
This study reviewed 37 publications, including clinical trials and validation studies. Systematic searches in PubMed, NCBI, and Google Scholar used keywords such as “GPCOG,” “ACE-III,” “cognitive screening,” and “dementia.” 

Results
ACE-III demonstrates high accuracy (sensitivity and specificity >93% and 96%) and excels in diagnosing complex dementia. However, its time requirements and need for trained personnel limit its use in resource-limited settings. GPCOG is quick and user-friendly, ideal for primary care but less effective for detailed diagnostics due to its brevity.

Conclusions
ACE-III is optimal for detailed evaluations in specialized settings, while GPCOG is suited for rapid screening in primary care. Combined, they enhance early detection and management of cognitive disorders.

References

Velayudhan, L., Ryu, S. H., Raczek, M., Philpot, M., Lindesay, J., Critchfield, M., & Livingston, G. (2014). Review of brief cognitive tests for patients with suspected dementia. International psychogeriatrics, 26(8), 1247-1262.

Bruno, D., & Schurmann Vignaga, S. (2019). Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination III in the diagnosis of dementia: a critical review. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 441-447.

Hsieh, S., Schubert, S., Hoon, C., Mioshi, E., & Hodges, J. R. (2013). Validation of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 36(3-4), 242-250.

Elamin, M., Holloway, G., Bak, T. H., & Pal, S. (2016). The utility of the Addenbrooke's cognitive examination version three in early-onset dementia. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 41(1-2), 9-15.

Beishon, L. C., Batterham, A. P., Quinn, T. J., Nelson, C. P., Panerai, R. B., Robinson, T., & Haunton, V. J. (2019). Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III (ACE‐III) and mini‐ACE for the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (12).

Brodaty, Henry, Nicola M. Kemp, and Lee‐Fay Low. "Characteristics of the GPCOG, a screening tool for cognitive impairment." International journal of geriatric psychiatry 19.9 (2004): 870-874.

Wojtowicz, Alex, and A. J. Larner. "General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition: use in primary care prior to memory clinic referral." Neurodegenerative Disease Management 5.6 (2015): 505-510.

Brodaty, Henry, et al. "Screening for dementia in primary care: a comparison of the GPCOG and the MMSE." Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders 42.5-6 (2016): 323-330.

Yokomizo, Juliana Emy, et al. "Cognitive screening test in primary care: cut points for low education." Revista de saude publica 52 (2018).

Zhang Hui, et al. "Application of the Chinese version of GPCOG in screening for mild cognitive impairment in community-dwelling elderly people." Journal of Tongji University (Medical Edition) 42.2 (2021): 220-225.

Gostyńska, Agnieszka, and Barbara Ostrowska. "Detection of Cognitive Impairments in Elderly Patients in Primary Care Settings." Neuropsychiatry & Neuropsychology/Neuropsychiatria i Neuropsychologia 13.3 (2018).

Brodaty, Henry, et al. "The GPCOG: a new screening test for dementia designed for general practice." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 50.3 (2002): 530-534.

Pirani, Alessandro, et al. "The validation of the Italian version of the GPCOG (GPCOG-It): a contribution to cross-national implementation of a screening test for dementia in general practice." International Psychogeriatrics 22.1 (2010): 82-90.

Hunt, Harriet A., et al. "The comparative diagnostic accuracy of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the General Practitioner assessment of Cognition (GPCOG) for identifying dementia in primary care: a systematic review protocol." Diagnostic and prognostic research 1 (2017): 1-6.

Li, Xia, et al. "Validation of the general practitioner assessment of cognition–Chinese version (GPCOG-C) in China." International psychogeriatrics 25.10 (2013): 1649-1657.

Seeher, Katrin M., and Henry Brodaty. "The general practitioner assessment of cognition (GPCOG)." Cognitive Screening Instruments: A Practical Approach (2017): 231-239.

Thomas, Philippe, et al. "The GPcog for detecting a population with a high risk of dementia." Psychologie & neuropsychiatrie du vieillissement 4.1 (2006): 69-77.

Rashedi, Vahid, et al. "Validity and reliability of the Persian version of general practitioner assessment of cognition (P-GPCOG)." Aging & mental health 23.8 (2019): 961-965.

Park, Jee-Won, and Yong-Soon Kim. "Validation of the Korean version of the general practitioner assessment of cognition (K-GPCog)." The Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Nursing 13.1 (2010): 5-12.

Ionova, T. I., et al. "The use of the Mini-Cog, MMSE, and GPCOG tests in domestic clinical practice for the evaluation of cognitive disorders in elderly and senile patients: the results of a survey of experts' opinions." Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii imeni SS Korsakova 123.7 (2023): 55-64.

Ionova, T. I., et al. "Linguistic and cultural adaptation of the Russian version of general practitioner assessment of cognition questionnaire-GPCOG in elderly and senile patients at the primary care level." Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii Imeni SS Korsakova 122.12 (2022): 117-127.

RANGE, AGE. "GENERAL PRACTITIONER ASSESSMENT OF COGNITION (GPCOG)| 233 GENERAL PRACTITIONER ASSESSMENT OF COGNITION (GPCOG)." A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Fundamentals of Neuropsychological Assessment and Test Reviews for Clinical Practice (2023): 233.

Machin, Abdulloh, et al. "Comparison of Cognitive Function in Covid-19 Survivors Treated in the Icu and Non-Icu by Assessment of Gpcog Score." Available at SSRN 4645334.

Patil, Mahesh Shrikishan. "Comparative Study of 3 Tests of Cognitive Impairment (MMSE, AD-8, GPCOG) in 200 Suspected Geriatric Cases Out of 3750 Screened for Cognitive Impairment." Journal of the Indian Academy of Geriatrics 15.4 (2019).

Brodaty, Henry. "PB-019 The GPCOG: A Screening Test for Dementia for Use in Primary Care." The Eleventh International Congress. 2003.

Brodaty, H., et al. "General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG)." J. Am. Geriatr. Soc 50.3 (2016): 530-534.

Griffiths, J., S. Putthinoi, and M. Pongsuksri. "General practitioner assessment of cognition (Thai version) validity and reliability." Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics 10.1 (2015): 62-62.

Brodaty, Henry, et al. "What is the best dementia screening instrument for general practitioners to use?." The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 14.5 (2006): 391-400.

Basic, David, et al. "Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale, Mini‐Mental State Examination and General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition in a multicultural cohort of community‐dwelling older persons with early dementia." Australian Psychologist 44.1 (2009): 40-53.

Wojtowicz, Alex, and Andrew Larner. "Scoring errors in cognitive screening instruments administered in primary care." (2016): e1-e1.

Brodaty, Henry, and Dimity Pond. "[P‐034]: The GPCOG: A new tool for primary care physicians to detect dementia." Alzheimer's & Dementia 1 (2005): S19-S19.

Tsai, Kang-Lin, Wolf Frances, and Elizabeth Suniega. "Dementia Screening at Hope Clinic." (2023).

Sit, L. M. K., et al. "PARO therapy for elderly with cognitive decline or dementia with behavioural and psychological symptoms in a Hong Kong geriatric day hospital: a preliminary evaluation." Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics 10.1 (2015): 62-63.

Sze, P. C., et al. "Development of an interactive functional screening tool for promoting healthy ageing in a primary healthcare setting in Hong Kong." Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics 10.1 (2015): 62-62.

Tsang, E. W. "Age-related effects on early visual attention." Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics 10.1 (2015): 62-62.

Gee, Erin, et al. "Evaluation of the General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG) in Paramedic Practice." (2013).

Smith, G., et al. "Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Patients Evaluated for Cardiac Surgery." Heart, Lung and Circulation 22.7 (2013): 579

Skybchyk, V. A., and O. S. Pylypiv. "Possibilities of antihypertensive therapy in correction of cognitive impairment in hypertensive patients." Journal of Education, Health and Sport 10.1 (2020): 150-157

Quality in Sport

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2025-05-12

How to Cite

1.
MĄKA, Magdalena, SIKORA, Dominik, OLEKSY, Piotr, ZAJĄC, Adam, ZIELIŃSKI, Karol, PAPIEŻ, Łukasz, GÓRALCZYK, Ewa, KAMIŃSKI, Jakub and BUCZKOWSKI, Bartosz. Two Approaches to Cognitive Evaluation: Assessing the Strengths and Limitations of GPCOG and ACE-III. Quality in Sport. Online. 12 May 2025. Vol. 41, p. 56680. [Accessed 28 June 2025]. DOI 10.12775/QS.2025.41.56680.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 41 (2025)

Section

Medical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Magdalena Mąka, Dominik Sikora, Piotr Oleksy, Adam Zając, Karol Zieliński, Łukasz Papież, Ewa Góralczyk, Jakub Kamiński, Bartosz Buczkowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 106
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Cognitive screening tools, Primary and specialized healthcare settings, Dementia diagnosis, ACE-III, GPCOG
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop