Bicuspid Aortic Valve – Therapeutic Options Today and Tomorrow
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2024.35.56278Keywords
bicuspid aortic valve, heart defect, cardiovascular surgeryAbstract
Bicuspid Aortic Valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect, characterized by the presence of two cusps of the valve instead of three. This defect leads to hemodynamic and morphological disturbances, potentially resulting in serious health complications. BAV often remains asymptomatic for a long time, with symptoms eventually arising from valve degeneration along with the remodeling of the heart and aortic root, which are consequences of the initial condition. The aim of this study is to compile information regarding the defect, current treatment options, and potential new therapeutic directions. The classical approach for treatment is surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), which involves replacing the abnormal valve with either a mechanical or biological prosthesis through access via sternotomy. Mechanical valves are characterized by their longer lifespan but require ongoing anticoagulant therapy, whereas biological valves do not necessitate anticoagulation, although they tend to have a shorter durability. An alternative to SAVR is minimally invasive transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), which offers a shorter recovery time but limited long-term durability data restricts its use in younger patients. Other treatment options include the Ross procedure and valvuloplasty procedures, which may serve as viable solutions for pediatric patients. Despite the availability of different treatment methods, the selection of an appropriate therapeutic strategy remains a challenge, as each option carries distinct benefits and risks. Patient education plays a crucial role in the decision-making process, helping to alleviate anxiety and improve treatment outcomes. Emerging fields such as medical bioengineering might offer promising solutions in the future for patients with BAV.
References
Siu SC, Silversides CK. Bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 22;55(25):2789–800.
Paladini D, Russo MG, Vassallo M, Tartaglione A, Pacileo G, Martinelli P, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of aortic valve anatomy in the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20(1):30–4.
Ertürk EB, Ünlü H. Effects of pre-operative individualized education on anxiety and pain severity in patients following open-heart surgery. Int J Health Sci. 2018 Aug;12(4):26.
Yaman Aktas Y, Gok Uğur H, Orak OS. Discharge Education Intervention to Reduce Anxiety and Depression in Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Perianesth Nurs. 2020 Apr 1;35(2):185–92.
Yıldız T, Malak A, Baltacı Göktaş S, Özen Y. Effect of Patient Education on Patient Anxiety Level Using “Scale of Patient Education Requirements” in Open Heart Surgery. Kosuyolu Heart J. 2015 Apr 20;18(1):1–5.
Kong WKF, Bax JJ, Michelena HI, Delgado V. Sex differences in bicuspid aortic valve disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jul 1;63(4):452–6.
Kong WKF, Regeer MV, Ng ACT, McCormack L, Poh KK, Yeo TC, et al. Sex Differences in Phenotypes of Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Aortopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Mar;10(3):e005155.
Michelena HI, Khanna AD, Mahoney D, Margaryan E, Topilsky Y, Suri RM, et al. Incidence of aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA. 2011 Sep 14;306(10):1104–12.
Michelena HI, Della Corte A, Evangelista A, Maleszewski JJ, Edwards WD, Roman MJ, et al. International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep 1;60(3):448–76.
Sievers HH, Schmidtke C. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 May 1;133(5):1226–33.
Sievers HH, Stierle U, Mohamed SA, Hanke T, Richardt D, Schmidtke C, et al. Toward individualized management of the ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic valve surgery: The role of valve phenotype in 1362 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov 1;148(5):2072-2080.e3.
1 Liu T, Xie M, Lv Q, Li Y, Fang L, Zhang L, Deng W, Wang J. Bicuspid Aortic Valve: An Update in Morphology, Genetics, Biomarker, Complications, Imaging Diagnosis and Treatment. Front Physiol. 2019 Jan 30;9:1921.
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2006 Aug 1;114(5):e84-231.
Beroukhim RS, Kruzick TL, Taylor AL, Gao D, Yetman AT. Progression of Aortic Dilation in Children With a Functionally Normal Bicuspid Aortic Valve. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 15;98(6):828–30.
Kim JB, Spotnitz M, Lindsay ME, MacGillivray TE, Isselbacher EM, Sundt TM. Risk of Aortic Dissection in the Moderately Dilated Ascending Aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 13;68(11):1209–19.
Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, O'Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM 3rd, Thompson A, Toly C. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227
Klein T, Bischoff R. Physiology and pathophysiology of matrix metalloproteases. Amino Acids. 2011 Jul 1;41(2):271–90.
Tzemos N, Lyseggen E, Silversides C, Jamorski M, Tong JH, Harvey P, et al. Endothelial Function, Carotid–Femoral Stiffness, and Plasma Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 in Men With Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Dilated Aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 16;55(7):660–8.
Stassano P, Di Tommaso L, Monaco M, Iorio F, Pepino P, Spampinato N, et al. Aortic Valve Replacement: A Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Versus Biological Valves in Patients Ages 55 to 70 Years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 10;54(20):1862–8.
Bouhout I, Stevens LM, Mazine A, Poirier N, Cartier R, Demers P, et al. Long-term outcomes after elective isolated mechanical aortic valve replacement in young adults. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct 1;148(4):1341-1346.e1.
Chan WS, Anand S, Ginsberg JS. Anticoagulation of Pregnant Women With Mechanical Heart Valves: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jan 24;160(2):191–6.
Schnittman SR, Adams DH, Itagaki S, Toyoda N, Egorova NN, Chikwe J. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Feb 1;155(2):539-547.e9.
Repack A, Ziganshin BA, Elefteriades JA, Mukherjee SK. Comparison of Quality of Life Perceived by Patients with Bioprosthetic versus Mechanical Valves after Composite Aortic Root Replacement. Cardiology. 2015 Sep 22;133(1):3–9.
Molero Junior JC, Raimundo, Amaral JAT do, Abreu LC de, Breda JR. Bioprosthesis versus Mechanical Valve Heart Prosthesis: Assessment of Quality of Life. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2019 Oct 24;33:36–42.
Vicchio M, Della Corte A, De Santo LS, De Feo M, Caianiello G, Scardone M, et al. Tissue Versus Mechanical Prostheses: Quality of Life in Octogenarians. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Apr 1;85(4):1290–5.
Mykén PSU, Caidahl K, Larsson P, Larsson S, Wallentin I, Berggren HE. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis: A ten-year comparison regarding function and quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Aug 1;60:S447–52.
Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: Developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 14;43(7):561–632.
1 Costa G, Barbanti M, Picci A, Todaro D, La Spina K, Di Simone E, et al. Predictors and safety of next-day discharge in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention. 2020 Aug 7;16(6).
Wood DA, Lauck SB, Cairns JA, Humphries KH, Cook R, Welsh R, et al. The Vancouver 3M (Multidisciplinary, Multimodality, But Minimalist) Clinical Pathway Facilitates Safe Next-Day Discharge Home at Low-, Medium-, and High-Volume Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Centers: The 3M TAVR Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 11;12(5):459–69.
Husso A, Airaksinen J, Juvonen T, Laine M, Dahlbacka S, Virtanen M, et al. Transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Mar 1;110(3):429–39.
Martin C, Sun W. Comparison of transcatheter aortic valve and surgical bioprosthetic valve durability: A fatigue simulation study. J Biomech. 2015 Sep 18;48(12):3026–34.
Foroutan F, Guyatt GH, Otto CM, Siemieniuk RA, Schandelmaier S, Agoritsas T, et al. Structural valve deterioration after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart Br Card Soc. 2017 Dec;103(23):1899–905.
Ross D. REPLACEMENT OF AORTIC AND MITRAL VALVES WITH A PULMONARY AUTOGRAFT. The Lancet. 1967 Nov 4;290(7523):956–8.
Rabkin-Aikawa E, Aikawa M, Farber M, Kratz JR, Garcia-Cardena G, Kouchoukos NT, et al. Clinical pulmonary autograft valves: Pathologic evidence of adaptive remodeling in the aortic site. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Oct 1;128(4):552–61.
Isaacs AJ, Shuhaiber J, Salemi A, Isom OW, Sedrakyan A. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 May 1;149(5):1262-1269.e3.
Zacek P, Holubec T, Vobornik M, Dominik J, Takkenberg J, Harrer J, et al. Quality of life after aortic valve repair is similar to Ross patients and superior to mechanical valve replacement: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Apr 2;16(1):63.
Mazine A, Rocha RV, El-Hamamsy I, Ouzounian M, Yanagawa B, Bhatt DL, et al. Ross Procedure vs Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;3(10):978–87.
Donald JS, Wallace FRO, Naimo PS, Fricke TA, Brink J, Brizard CP, et al. Ross Operation in Children: 23-Year Experience From a Single Institution. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Apr 1;109(4):1251–9.
David TE, David C, Woo A, Manlhiot C. The Ross procedure: outcomes at 20 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):85–93.
Spaziani G, Girolami F, Arcieri L, Calabri GB, Porcedda G, Di Filippo C, et al. Bicuspid Aortic Valve in Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Review. Diagnostics. 2022 Jul;12(7):1751.
Ewert P, Bertram H, Breuer J, Dähnert I, Dittrich S, Eicken A, et al. Balloon valvuloplasty in the treatment of congenital aortic valve stenosis — A retrospective multicenter survey of more than 1000 patients. Int J Cardiol. 2011 Jun 2;149(2):182–5.
Jarrar M, Betbout F, Farhat MB, Maatouk F, Gamra H, Addad F, et al. Long-term invasive and noninvasive results of percutaneous balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty in children, adolescents, and adults. Am Heart J. 1999 Nov 1;138(5):950–4.
Ren Q, Yu J, Chen T, Qiu H, Liu T, Cen J, et al. Surgical aortic valvuloplasty is a better primary intervention for isolated congenital aortic stenosis in children with bicuspid aortic valve than balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2024 May 1;77:54–62.
Lieberman EB, Bashore TM, Hermiller JB, Wilson JS, Pieper KS, Keeler GP, et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in adults: failure of procedure to improve long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Nov 15;26(6):1522–8.
Zeeshan A, Idrees JJ, Johnston DR, Rajeswaran J, Roselli EE, Soltesz EG, et al. Durability of Aortic Valve Cusp Repair With and Without Annular Support. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar 1;105(3):739–48.
Harken DE. Heart valves: ten commandments and still counting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989 Sep;48(3 Suppl):S18-19.
Jordan JE, Williams JK, Lee SJ, Raghavan D, Atala A, Yoo JJ. Bioengineered self-seeding heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jan 1;143(1):201–8.
Fioretta ES, Motta SE, Lintas V, Loerakker S, Parker KK, Baaijens FPT, et al. Next-generation tissue-engineered heart valves with repair, remodelling and regeneration capacity. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Feb;18(2):92–116.
Kheradvar A, Groves EM, Dasi LP, Alavi SH, Tranquillo R, Grande-Allen KJ, et al. Emerging Trends in Heart Valve Engineering: Part I. Solutions for Future. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 Apr 1;43(4):833–43.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Damian Grubski, Kacper Ziarnik, Filip Nadolny, Jędrzej Jabłoński, Martyna Kania, Agnieszka Adamowska, Alicja Śniatała, Hanna Bartkowiak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 21
Number of citations: 0