Systematic Review on Cesarean Scar Pregnancy (CSP) Diagnosis, Treatment and Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2024.20.53983Keywords
Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), CSP treatment, Cesarean cut, Ectopic Pregnancy, Methotrexate (MTX),Abstract
IntroductionCesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare but increasingly recognized complication where an embryo implants on the cesarean section scar. The incidence of CSP is rising in parallel with increasing global cesarean rates, posing significant health risks such as severe bleeding and uterine rupture. Early and accurate identification using criteria like the gestational sac's position within the scar and specific ultrasound features is crucial for preventing severe outcomes.
Aim of the StudyTo evaluate the diagnostic criteria and various treatment strategies for CSP, assessing their effectiveness and challenges.
Materials and MethodsA review of the literature collected in the PubMed database was performed to gather information found under the key words cesarean scar pregnancy," “ectopic pregnancy,” "CSP treatment," "uterine artery embolization," "methotrexate," "hysteroscopy," "dilation and curettage," and "chemoembolization."
Summary
The review discusses various treatment strategies, including methotrexate administration, UAE, and surgical options like hysteroscopy and laparoscopy, highlighting their effectiveness and associated challenges. It emphasizes the importance of tailoring treatments to individual patient conditions, with newer methods like chemoembolization showing promise in minimizing complications. The findings underscore the need for a personalized treatment approach, considering patient-specific factors and health goals. Further research is needed to refine these strategies and improve outcomes for those affected by CSP.
References
Alur-Gupta S, Cooney LG, Senapati S, Sammel MD, Barnhart KT. Two-dose versus single-dose methotrexate for treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(2):95-108.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.002
Bobdiwala S, Saso S, Verbakel JY, et al. Diagnostic protocols for the management of pregnancy of unknown location: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2019;126(2):190-198. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15442
Jiang Y, Liu Y, Liu N, Qin S, Zhong S, Huang X. Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis. Int J Hyperthermia. 2024;41(1):2310019. doi:10.1080/02656736.2024.2310019
Silva B, Viana Pinto P, Costa MA. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A systematic review on expectant management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;288:36-43. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.030
Calì G, Timor-Tritsch IE, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, et al. Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(2):169-175. doi:10.1002/uog.17568
Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):e005671. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671
Timor-Tritsch I, Buca D, Di Mascio D, et al. Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy according to gestational age at diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;258:53-59. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.036
Birch Petersen K, Hoffmann E, Rifbjerg Larsen C, Svarre Nielsen H. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):958-967. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.130
Marchand GJ, Masoud AT, Coriell C, et al. Treatment of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy in China with Uterine Artery Embolization-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(24):7393. Published 2022 Dec 13. doi:10.3390/jcm11247393
Gonzalez N, Tulandi T. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(5):731-738. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2017.02.020
Qiao B, Zhang Z, Li Y. Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Methotrexate for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in a Chinese Population: A Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(7):1040-1048. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.819
Glenn TL, Bembry J, Findley AD, et al. Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: Current Management Strategies. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2018;73(5):293-302. doi:10.1097/OGX.0000000000000561
Cok T, Kalayci H, Ozdemir H, Haydardedeoglu B, Parlakgumus AH, Tarim E. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided local methotrexate administration as the first-line treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy: Follow-up of 18 cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(5):803-808. doi:10.1111/jog.12627
Van X, Bui T, Dinh HT, Van T, Tran A. The Effectiveness of Combined Local and Systemic Methotrexate Treatment in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Weeks 8 to 14. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023;12(3):170-174. Published 2023 Aug 10. doi:10.4103/gmit.gmit_135_22
Hameed MSS, Wright A, Chern BSM. Scope and Suction: Hysteroscopic-guided Suction Evacuation of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy - A Safe and Efficacious Treatment for Selected Patients. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023;12(2):72-76. Published 2023 May 18. doi:10.4103/gmit.gmit_87_22
Long Y, Zhu H, Hu Y, Shen L, Fu J, Huang W. Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7(7):CD011174. Published 2020 Jul 1. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011174.pub2
Fylstra DL. Hysteroscopy and suction evacuation of cesarean scar pregnancies: a case report and review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(3):853-857. doi:10.1111/jog.12260
Qian ZD, Huang LL, Zhu XM. Curettage or operative hysteroscopy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(5):1055-1061. doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3730-1
Di Spiezio Sardo A, Zizolfi B, Saccone G, et al. Hysteroscopic resection vs ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation for treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;229(4):437.e1-437.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.038
Pyra K, Szmygin M, Bérczi V, et al. Clinical outcome and analysis of procedural failure during uterine artery chemoembolisation as a treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021;16(1):243-248. doi:10.5114/wiitm.2020.100713
Kłobuszewski B, Szmygin M, Nieoczym K, Kłobuszewska O, Woźniak S, Pyra KK. Advances in Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Fertility Preservation. Med Sci
Monit. 2024;30:e943550. Published 2024 Apr 3. doi:10.12659/MSM.943550
Stępniak A, Paszkowski T, Jargiełło T, Czuczwar P. Effectiveness, complications and reproductive outcome of selective chemoembolization with methotrexate followed by suction curettage for caesarean scar pregnancy - A prospective observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;241:56-59. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.08.004
Liu Y, Wang L, Zhu X. Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Compared with Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Section Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023;30(6):446-454. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2023.02.021
Xiao X, Feng Z, Li T, Yi B, Zhang S, Wang W. Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization in Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis. Adv Ther. 2019;36(6):1314-1325. doi:10.1007/s12325-019-00959-w
Wan X, Liao Y, Hu T, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors in the conservative treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(10):10434-10443. doi:10.21037/apm-21-2169
Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Liu X, Zhang L, Hong F, Lu M. Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303(2):321-328. doi:10.1007/s00404-020-05877-9
Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Calì G, D'Antonio F, Kaelin Agten A. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Diagnosis and Pathogenesis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2019;46(4):797-811. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2019.07.009
Weerasinghe K, Rishard M, Brabaharan S, Walpita Y. Physiotherapy training and education prior to elective Caesarean section and its impact on post-natal quality of life: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Res Notes. 2023;16(1):270. Published 2023 Oct 13. doi:10.1186/s13104-023-06550-5
Weerasinghe K, Rishard M, Brabaharan S, Mohamed A. Effectiveness of face-to-face physiotherapy training and education for women who are undergoing elective caesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Physiother. 2022;12(1):4. Published 2022 Feb 3. doi:10.1186/s40945-021-00128-9
Morlando M, Buca D, Timor-Tritsch I, et al. Reproductive outcome after cesarean scar pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(10):1278-1289. doi:10.1111/aogs.13918
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marcelina Teresa Marzec, Aleksandra Łakoma, Weronika Zofia Marzec, Maciej Choiński, Paulina Wasiewicz-Ciach, Piotr Kuczyński, Anna Marszałek, Aleksandra Wydra-Rojek, Katarzyna Kutyła, Wojciech Jan Mokot
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 180
Number of citations: 0