Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Eastern European Countryside

50 years of rural labor productivity: A systematic review of economic literature
  • Home
  • /
  • 50 years of rural labor productivity: A systematic review of economic literature
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 31 No. 31 (2025): Eastern European Countryside /
  4. Articles and Studies

50 years of rural labor productivity: A systematic review of economic literature

Authors

  • Mariusz-Jan Radło SGH Warsaw School of Economics https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7756-1613
  • Artur F. Tomeczek SGH Warsaw School of Economics https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4888-2535

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775.002

Keywords

labor productivity, rural areas, systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, network analysis

Abstract

This study presents a systematic review of the economic literature on rural labor productivity over the past fifty years, utilizing bibliometric and network analysis to identify prevailing themes and research patterns. The review addresses three central questions: (1) What are the main research threads in rural labor productivity? (2) Which countries, journals, and publications are pivotal in this field? (3) How does rural labor productivity research remain relevant to modern economic analysis and policy? Drawing from 207 scientific articles indexed in the Scopus database, our analysis reveals five primary research themes: [1] Economic structure, policy, and labor dynamics; [2] Social, cultural, and human capital factors; [3] Land use and agricultural practices; [4] Infrastructure, urbanization, and economic growth; and [5] Environmental sustainability and technological support. Additionally, the network analysis identifies the United States, China, India, and several European countries as key collaborators in advancing rural productivity research, with prominent journals including World Development and Journal of Development Economics. The findings underscore the field’s relevance in addressing ongoing rural-urban disparities, gender and social equity issues, and sustainable development challenges. This review highlights future research opportunities, particularly in underrepresented regions and in exploring longitudinal impacts of rural labor productivity on economic growth.

References

Arthi, V., Beegle, K., De Weerdt, J., & Palacios-López, A. (2018). Not your average job: Measuring farm labor in Tanzania. Journal of Development Economics, 130, 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2017.10.005

Barbosa, M. W., & Ferreira-Lopes, L. (2021). Emerging trends in telecollaboration and virtual exchange: A bibliometric study. Educational Review, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1907314

Begum Sadaquat, M., & Sheikh, Q. A. (2011). Employment situation of women in Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 38(2), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068291111091981

Binswanger-Mkhize, H. P. (2013). The stunted structural transformation of the Indian economy agriculture, manufacturing and the rural non-farm sector. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(26–27), 5–13.

Bu, D., & Liao, Y. (2022). Land property rights and rural enterprise growth: Evidence from land titling reform in China. Journal of Development Economics, 157, 102853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102853

Cai, F. (2018). The Great Exodus: How agricultural surplus laborers have been transferred and reallocated in China’s reform period? China Agricultural Economic Review, 10(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-10-2017-0178

Cai, F., & Wang, M. (2008). A counterfactual analysis on unlimited surplus labor in rural China. China & World Economy, 16(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2008.00099.x

Collier, P., & Dercon, S. (2014). African agriculture in 50 years: Smallholders in a rapidly changing world? World Development, 63, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.10.001

Cornia, G. A. (1985). Farm size, land yields and the agricultural production function: An analysis for fifteen developing countries. World Development, 13(4), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(85)90054-3

De Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2010). Agricultural growth and poverty reduction: Additional evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 25(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkp015

Deolalikar, A. B. (1988). Nutrition and labor producvivity in agriculture: Estimates for rural South India. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3), 406. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926778

Dercon, S., & Gollin, D. (2014). Agriculture in African development: Theories and strategies. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 6(1), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012706

Diao, X., Harttgen, K., & McMillan, M. (2017). The changing structure of Africa’s economies. The World Bank Economic Review, 31(2), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhw070

Djido, A. I., & Shiferaw, B. A. (2018). Patterns of labor productivity and income diversification – Empirical evidence from Uganda and Nigeria. World Development, 105, 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.026

Dubbert, C. (2019). Participation in contract farming and farm performance: Insights from cashew farmers in Ghana. Agricultural Economics, 50(6), 749–763. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12522

Elsevier. (2024). Scopus database. https://www.scopus.com

Emran, S., & Shilpi, F. (2018). Agricultural productivity, hired labor, wages, and poverty: Evidence from Bangladesh. World Development, 109, 470–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.009

Fafchamps, M., & Quisumbing, A. R. (1999). Human capital, productivity, and labor allocation in rural Pakistan. The Journal of Human Resources, 34(2), 369. https://doi.org/10.2307/146350

Glaeser, E. L., & Xiong, W. (2017). Urban productivity in the developing world. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(3), 373–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx034

Glaser, M., & Diele, K. (2004). Asymmetric outcomes: Assessing central aspects of the biological, economic and social sustainability of a mangrove crab fishery, Ucides cordatus (Ocypodidae), in North Brazil. Ecological Economics, 49(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.017

Hamory, J., Kleemans, M., Li, N. Y., & Miguel, E. (2021). Reevaluating agricultural productivity gaps with longitudinal microdata. Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(3), 1522–1555. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvaa043

Imbert, C., Seror, M., Zhang, Y., & Zylberberg, Y. (2022). Migrants and firms: Evidence from China. American Economic Review, 112(6), 1885–1914. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191234

Jacoby, H. G. (1995). The economics of polygyny in sub-Saharan Africa: Female productivity and the demand for wives in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Political Economy, 103(5), 938–971. https://doi.org/10.1086/262009

Jha, R., Gaiha, R., & Sharma, A. (2009). Calorie and micronutrient deprivation and poverty nutrition traps in rural India. World Development, 37(5), 982–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.09.008

Jia, L., & Petrick, M. (2014). How does land fragmentation affect off-farm labor supply: Panel data evidence from China. Agricultural Economics, 45(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12071

Kaczan, D. J. (2020). Can roads contribute to forest transitions? World Development, 129, 104898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104898

Kessler, M. M. (1963). An experimental study of bibliographic coupling between technical papers. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 9(1), 49–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1963.1057800

Krey, V., O’Neill, B. C., Van Ruijven, B., Chaturvedi, V., Daioglou, V., Eom, J., Jiang, L., Nagai, Y., Pachauri, S., & Ren, X. (2012). Urban and rural energy use and carbon dioxide emissions in Asia. Energy Economics, 34, S272–S283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.04.013

Kuijs, L., & Wang, T. (2006). China’s pattern of growth: Moving to sustainability and reducing inequality. China & World Economy, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2006.00003.x

LaFave, D., & Thomas, D. (2017). Height and cognition at work: Labor market productivity in a low income setting. Economics & Human Biology, 25, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2016.10.008

Lanjouw, P. (2001). Nonfarm employment and poverty in rural El Salvador. World Development, 29(3), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00105-4

Lee, P.-C., & Su, H.-N. (2010). Investigating the structure of regional innovation system research through keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis. Innovation, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.1.26

Lipton, M. (1980). Migration from rural areas of poor countries: The impact on rural productivity and income distribution. World Development, 8(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(80)90047-9

Liu, S., Wang, R., & Shi, G. (2018). Historical transformation of China’s agriculture: Productivity changes and other key features. China & World Economy, 26(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12228

Liu, Y., Barrett, C. B., Pham, T., & Violette, W. (2020). The intertemporal evolution of agriculture and labor over a rapid structural transformation: Lessons from Vietnam. Food Policy, 94, 101913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101913

Mahadevan, R., Amir, H., & Nugroho, A. (2017). Regional impacts of tourism-led growth on poverty and income inequality: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis for Indonesia. Tourism Economics, 23(3), 614–631. https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2015.0534

Maji, P., Mehrabi, Z., & Kandlikar, M. (2021). Incomplete transitions to clean household energy reinforce gender inequality by lowering women’s respiratory health and household labour productivity. World Development, 139, 105309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105309

McCullough, E. B. (2017). Labor productivity and employment gaps in sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy, 67, 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.013

Minale, L. (2018). Agricultural productivity shocks, labour reallocation and rural–urban migration in China. Journal of Economic Geography. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lby013

Minami, R., & Ma, X. (2010). The Lewis turning point of Chinese economy: Comparison with Japanese experience. China Economic Journal, 3(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2010.511912

Nagler, P., & Naudé, W. (2017). Non-farm entrepreneurship in rural sub-Saharan Africa: New empirical evidence. Food Policy, 67, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.019

Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404

Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl_1), 5200–5205. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100

Nguyen, D. L., Grote, U., & Nguyen, T. T. (2019). Migration, crop production and non-farm labor diversification in rural Vietnam. Economic Analysis and Policy, 63, 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2019.06.003

Oliveira, A., Carvalho, F., & Reis, N. R. (2022). Institutions and firms’ performance: A bibliometric analysis and future research avenues. Publications, 10(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10010008

Quevedo, J. M. D., Uchiyama, Y., & Kohsaka, R. (2023). Progress of blue carbon research: 12 years of global trends based on content analysis of peer-reviewed and ‘gray literature’ documents. Ocean & Coastal Management, 236, 106495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106495

Radło, M.-J., & Tomeczek, A. F. (2022). Factors influencing labor productivity in modern economies: A review and qualitative text analysis. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 18, 291–314. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2022.18.30

Radło, M.-J., & Tomeczek, A. F. (2024). 50 years of rural labor productivity: A systematic review of economic literature (data and graphs) [Dataset]. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/54RFB5V4MC.1

Rathi, S. S., & Vermaak, C. (2018). Rural electrification, gender and the labor market: A cross-country study of India and South Africa. World Development, 109, 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.016

Ruben, R., & Van Den Berg, M. (2001). Nonfarm employment and poverty alleviation of rural farm households in Honduras. World Development, 29(3), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00107-8

Salvati, L., & Carlucci, M. (2011). The economic and environmental performances of rural districts in Italy: Are competitiveness and sustainability compatible targets? Ecological Economics, 70(12), 2446–2453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.030

Serrano-Cinca, C., & Gutiérrez-Nieto, B. (2014). Microfinance, the long tail and mission drift. International Business Review, 23(1), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.03.006

Shi, X. (2018). Heterogeneous effects of rural-urban migration on agricultural productivity: Evidence from China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 10(3), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-10-2017-0193

Szczech-Pietkiewicz, E., Radło, M.-J., & Tomeczek, A. F. (2023). Smart and sustainable city management in Asia and Europe: A bibliometric analysis. In R. Dygas & P. K. Biswas (Eds.), Smart Cities in Europe and Asia (1st ed., pp. 1–15). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003365174-1

Tomeczek, A. F. (2023). The rise of the chaebol: A bibliometric analysis of business groups in South Korea (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2306.08743

Uddin, S., Hossain, L., Abbasi, A., & Rasmussen, K. (2012). Trend and efficiency analysis of co-authorship network. Scientometrics, 90(2), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0511-x

Van Den Broeck, G., Mardulier, M., & Maertens, M. (2021). All that is gold does not glitter: Income and nutrition in Tanzania. Food Policy, 99, 101975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101975

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1109.2058

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer manual. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.20.pdf

Vandercasteelen, J., Beyene, S. T., Minten, B., & Swinnen, J. (2018). Cities and agricultural transformation in Africa: Evidence from Ethiopia. World Development, 105, 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.032

Wen, G. J. (1993). Total factor productivity change in China’s farming sector: 1952-1989. Economic Development & Cultural Change, 42(1), 1–41.

Whalley, J., & Zhang, S. (2007). A numerical simulation analysis of (Hukou) labour mobility restrictions in China. Journal of Development Economics, 83(2), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.08.003

Yadav, N., Kumar, R., & Malik, A. (2022). Global developments in coopetition research: A bibliometric analysis of research articles published between 2010 and 2020. Journal of Business Research, 145, 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.005

Zhang, J., Mishra, A. K., & Zhu, P. (2021). Land rental markets and labor productivity: Evidence from rural China. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d’agroeconomie, 69(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12247

Zhang, J., Mishra, A. K., Zhu, P., & Li, X. (2020). Land rental market and agricultural labor productivity in rural China: A mediation analysis. World Development, 135, 105089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105089

Zhu, N., & Luo, X. (2010). The impact of migration on rural poverty and inequality: A case study in China. Agricultural Economics, 41(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00434.x

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-10-12

How to Cite

1.
RADŁO, Mariusz-Jan and TOMECZEK, Artur F. 50 years of rural labor productivity: A systematic review of economic literature. Eastern European Countryside. Online. 12 October 2026. Vol. 31, no. 31, pp. 31-55. [Accessed 13 October 2026]. DOI 10.12775.002.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 31 No. 31 (2025): Eastern European Countryside

Section

Articles and Studies

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Mariusz-Jan Radło, Artur F. Tomeczek

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 2
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

labor productivity, rural areas, systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, network analysis
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop