Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Eastern European Countryside

Homo Economicus and the Shepherd: the Traditional Sheep Farmer Facing the Modernisation (or Intensification) of European Livestock
  • Home
  • /
  • Homo Economicus and the Shepherd: the Traditional Sheep Farmer Facing the Modernisation (or Intensification) of European Livestock
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. No. 24 (2018): Eastern European Countryside /
  4. Research Reports and Materials

Homo Economicus and the Shepherd: the Traditional Sheep Farmer Facing the Modernisation (or Intensification) of European Livestock

Authors

  • Raul de Arriba University of Valencia ...
  • Maja Barac University of Valencia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/eec-2018-0009

Keywords

sheep farming, sustainability, microeconomy vs. personal motivations

Abstract

The economic importance of sheep farming is somewhat reduced from a macro- economic point of view and only makes up a small part of agrarian income and employment. The quantitative macroeconomic evidence shows that the activity of traditional sheep farming is not profitable enough, while the trends seem to be moving toward a reduction in the number of farms, in their concentration and in their intensification. The paper presents the research results with the focus on voactional motiations of farmer.

References

Agrosynergie 2011 Evaluation of Income Effects of Direct Support. Final Report. Agrosynergie, Brussels.

Becker, G.1976 The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bernués, A., Ruiz, R., Olaizola, A., Villalba, D., and I. Casasús 2011 Sustainability of pasture-based livestock farming systems in the European Mediterranean context: Synergies and trade-offs. Livestock Science 139(1): 44–57, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.018

Bertaglia, M., Joost, S., Roosen, J. and Econogene Consortium 2007 Identifying European marginal areas in the context of local sheep and goat breeds con- servation: A geographic information system approach. Agricultural Systems 94(3): 657–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2007.02.006

Brandth, B., Overrein, G. 2013 Resourcing children in a changing rural context: fathering and farm succession in two generations of farmers. Sociologia Ruralis 53(1): 95–111, https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12003

Caballero, R. 2002 Policy schemes and targeted technologies in an extensive cereal–sheep farming system. Agriculture and Human Values 19(1): 63–74. Caballero, R. 2009 Stakeholder interactions in Castile-La Mancha, Spain’s cereal-sheep system. Agriculture and Human Values 26(3): 219–31.

Caballero, R., Gil, Á., and X. Fernández-Santos 2008 An expert’s survey on sus- tainability across twenty-seven extensive European systems of grassland man- agement. Environmental Management 42(2): 190–9.

Cingolani, A. M., Noy-Meir, I., Renison, D. D., and M. Cabido 2008 La ganadería extensiva: ¿es compatible con la conservación de la biodiversidad y de los suelos? Ecología austral 18(3): 253–71.

De Arriba, R. 2011 Mutaciones en la Europa rural y límites de la política económica de desarrollo rural en la actualidad. Cuadernos de desarrollo rural 8(66): 177–92.

De Arriba, R. 2013 Rural Economy Based on Sheep Farming, Valencia: Repro- express.

De Ripoll, R., et al. 2012 An integrated sustainability assessment of Mediterranean sheep farms with different degrees of intensification. Agricultural Systems 105(1): 46–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2011.10.003

Ellis, F. 2000 Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries, Oxford: Oxford Development Press.

European Commission 2010 Rural Development in the European Union. Statistical and Economic Information. Report 2010. Brussels: Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development.

European Commission 2013 EU Farm Economics Overview. FADN 2009. Brussels: European Commission.

Eurostat 2014 Agriculture Statistics. Available: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/ portal/page/portal/agriculture/introduction (15.07.2014).

FADN 2013 Farm Accountancy Data Network. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/ agriculture/rica/ (15.11.2013).

Fischer, H., and R. J. Burton 2014 Understanding farm succession as socially constructed endogenous cycles. Sociologia Ruralis 54(4): 417–38, https:// doi.org/10.1111/soru.12055

Galanopoulos, K., Abasa, Z., Lagab, V., Hatziminaoglouc, I., Boyazoglu, J. 2011 The technical efficiency of transhumance sheep and goat farms and the effect of EU subsidies: Do small farms benefit more than large farms? Small Ruminant Research 100(1): 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.05.008

Hodgson, G. M. 1998 The approach of institutional economics. Journal of Eco- nomic Literature 36(1): 166–92.

Howley, P., Dillon, E. and T. Hennessy 2014 It’s not all about the money: under- standing farmers’ labor allocation choices. Agriculture and Human Values 31(2): 261–71.

Lund, V., Hemlin, S. and W. Lockeretz 2002 Organic livestock production as viewed by Swedish farmers and organic initiators. Agriculture and Human Values 19(3): 255–268.

MacDonald D, et al. 2000 Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy response. Journal of Environmental Management 59(1): 47–69, https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0335

Marshall, C., and G. B. Rossman 2014 Designing Qualitative Research, Sage publications.

Mills, A. J., Durepos, G. and E. Wiebe (eds.) 2009 Encyclopedia of Case Study Research (Vol. 2). Sage Publications.

Murrell, P. 1992 Evolutionary and Radical Approaches to Economic Reforms. Economics of Planning 25(1): 79–95.

OECD 2001 Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework. Paris: Organ- isation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Persson, L.O. and Westholm, E. 1994 Towards the new mosaic of rural regions. European Review of Agricultural Economics 21(3–4): 409–27, https://doi. org/10.1093/erae/21.3-4.409

Rancourt M., Fois N., Lavin M. P., Tchakerian E and F. Vallerand 2006 Mediter- ranean sheep and goats’ production: An uncertain future. Small Ruminant Research 62(3): 167–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.08.012 Risgaard, M. L., Frederiksen, P., and P. Kaltoft 2007 Socio-cultural processes behind the differential distribution of organic farming in Denmark: a case study. Agriculture and Human Values 24(4): 445–59.

Sen, A. 1997 Development as Freedom, New York: Anchor Books.

Sierra, I. 2002 Evolución y cambio en el sector ovino-caprino en España durante la última década, Madrid: MAPA.

Simon, H. 1955 A Behavioral Theory of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–188, https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P. and M. Larkin 2009 Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research London: Sage.

Strijker, D. 2005 Marginal lands in Europe – causes of decline. Basic and Applied Ecology 6(2): 99–106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2005.01.001

Taylor, S. J., and R. Bogdan 1987 Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación.

Yin, R. K. 2013 Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage publications.

Downloads

  • pdf

Published

2024-05-15

How to Cite

1.
DE ARRIBA, Raul and BARAC, Maja. Homo Economicus and the Shepherd: the Traditional Sheep Farmer Facing the Modernisation (or Intensification) of European Livestock. Eastern European Countryside. Online. 15 May 2024. No. 24, p. 171 – 187. [Accessed 3 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/eec-2018-0009.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

No. 24 (2018): Eastern European Countryside

Section

Research Reports and Materials

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Raul de Arriba, Maja Barac

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 65
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

sheep farming, sustainability, microeconomy vs. personal motivations
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop