The Creative Economy as a Driver of Rural Development: A Case Study of Szigetköz in the Hungarian-Slovak Border Region in North-Western Hungary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EEC.2023.003Keywords
creative class, creative economy, cultural and creative industry, rural area, Szigetköz, HungaryAbstract
Kevin Stolarick and Richard Florida (2006) argued that an agglomeration of those whose occupation is creative (or has a creative component) is responsible for regional innovation, using interaction and spillovers. Following this line of thought, this paper deals with the problem of cultural and creative industries (CCIs) in the Hungarian-Slovak cross-border area of Szigetköz, located in northwestern Hungary. In a strict sense, the aim is to explore the strengths and untapped potential of the region’s CCIs. The research methods adopted include statistical data analysis based on individual enterprises and firms and in-depth interviews (N=30). The study describes the micro-level CCI sector for the period 2015–2020, where the number of enterprises is steadily decreasing and the number of selfemployed is steadily increasing. However, most of the activities of the sector are less visible (and therefore less accessible) to the wider public. It also highlights the problems and gaps in the creative economy in the Szigetköz region, falling into four main categories: localisation of the creative economy, the ‘meeting points’ of supply and demand, cooperation and communication, and the operational and management issues of the creative economy.
References
Babbie, E. 2021 The basics of social research (15th ed.). Australia, Brazil, Mexico, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States: Cengage Learning.
Baji, P. 2014 Az internet, a tér és az új gazdaság Budapesten [The internet, space and the new economy in Budapest], Tér és Társadalom, 28(4), pp. 117–137. doi: 10.17649/TET.28.4.2628.
Blessi, G. T., Tremblay, G. T., Sandri M. & Pilati, T. 2012 New trajectories in urban regeneration processes: Cultural capital as source of human and social capital accumulation evidence from the case of Tohu in Montreal, Cities, 29. 397–407.
Borsi, Á. & Viszt, E. 2010 A kreatív és kulturális ágazatok (CCI) szerepe és növekedési lehetőségei a Budapest Metropolisz Régió gazdaságában. [The role and growth potential of the creative and cultural industries (CCI) in the economy of the Budapest Metropolitan Region], GKI Gazdaságkutató Zrt.Budapest. Available at: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache: mW40gG4A0CsJ:https://www.gki.hu/wpcontent/uploads/gki/CCI_GKI_V5.pdf+&cd=1&hl=hu&ct=clnk&gl=hu (Accessed on 22. September 2021).
Cuccia, T. & Santa Gata, W. 2002 Distretto culturale e gestione dei diritti diproprieta: la ceramica di Caltagirone. EB laWorking papers 06/2002, International Centre for Research on the Economics of Culture, Institutions, and Creativity, Universita di Torino, Torinó.
Design Terminal 2016 A kreatív ipar mint erőforrás. [The creative industries as resource] Available at: http://hetfa.hu/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/a_kreativipar_mint_eroforras.pdf. (Accessed on 22. January 2022).
Dun & Bradstreet Hungary Kft. Available online: http://www.dnbhungary.hu (Accessed on 20 September 2021).
Egedy, T. 2021 A kreatív gazdaság városföldrajza a budapesti agglomeráció példáján keresztül. [The urban geography of the creative economy through the example of the Budapest agglomeration]. Csillagászati és Földtudományi Kutatóközpont, Budapest ISBN: 978-963-8361-61-5
Egedy, T., Kovács, Z. & Szabó, B. 2014 A kreatív gazdaság helyzete Magyarországon a globális válságidőszakában [The situation of the creative economy in Hungary during the global crisis]. In: Tózsa István (szerk): Turizmus és településmarketing. Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Gazdaságföldrajz és Jövőkutatás Tanszék, Budapest.
European Commission 2018a Cultural and Creative Sectors. Available online: https://culture.ec.europa.eu/sectors/cultural-and-creative-sectors (Accessed 12. January 2021).
European Commission 2018b Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing the Creative Europe programme (2021 to 2027) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013.
Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:509e1bcb-63f0-11e8-ab9c-01aa75ed71a1.0003.02/DOC_1&format=PDF (Accessed 12. January 2021).
Fekete, D. 2022 Cross-border City Governance in the Danube Region–A Hungarian Case Study. Der Donauraum, 62(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.7767/dedo.2022.62.1.49
Florida, R. 2002: The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life.Basic Books, New York.
Florida, R. 2005 Cities and the creative class. Routledge, New York, London.
Richards, G. 2020. Designing creative places: The role of creative tourism. Annals of tourism research, 85, 102922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102922
Göcsei, I. 1979 A Szigetköz természetföldrajza [Natural Geography of the Szigetköz]. Földrajzi Tanulmányok 16, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
Grodach, C. & Loukaitou, A. 2007 Cultural Development Strategies and Urban Revitalization: A Survey of US Cities, Siderisforthcoming in the International
Journal of Cultural Policy; Available online: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/74438/1/ Cultural_Strategies_IJCP_prepub.pdf (Accessed on 1. November 2021).
Hall, P. 1998 Cities in Civilization. Pantheon, New York.
Hardi, T. 2008 Transborder Movements and Relations in the Slovakian-Hungarian Border Regions. Centre for Regional Studies of HAS, Pécs.
Hardi, T. 2012 Duna-stratégia és területi fejlődés: a folyó lehetséges szerepe a régió területi fejlődésében [Danube strategy and territorial development: the potential role of the river in the territorial development of the region]. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
Hardi, T., Hajdú, Z. & Mezei, I. 2009 Határok és városok a Kárpát-medencében [Borders and cities in the Carpathian Basin]. MTA Regionális Kutatások Központja, Győr, Pécs ISBN: 978-963-9899-08-7
Hardi, T., Kupi, M., Ocskay, Gy. & Szemerédi, E. 2021 Examining Cross-Border Cultural Tourism as an Indicator of Territorial Integration across the Slovak–Hungarian Border. Sustainability 13(7225). https://doi.org/10.3390/ su13137225
HSO 2021 Available online: https://www.ksh.hu/teaor_menu (Accessed on 11. October 2021).
Hungarian Statistic Office 2020 Magyarország állandó lakossága 2020. január 1-jén [Population in Hungary on the 1st of January 2020.] Available online: https:// nyilvantarto.hu › kozerdeku_lakossag_2020 (Accessed 12. December 2021).
Jóna, L., Henézi D. S., Döbrentei, B. & Gaál, B. 2021 A Szigetköz közlekedési kihívásai [Transport challenges in the Szigetköz]. Horváth B; Horváth G. (szerk.) XI. Nemzetközi Közlekedéstudományi Konferencia: “Közlekedés a Járvány után: folytatás vagy újrakezdés.” Széchenyi István Egyetem, Győr. pp. 210–221. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/11155/2454 (Accessed on 3. January 2022).
Keresnyei, K. & Egedy, T. 2016 A pécsi kreatív osztály helyzetének értékelése statisztikai és empirikus kutatások alapján [Analysis of the creative class in Pécs]. Tér és Társadalom, 30(1), o. 57–78. DOI: 10.17649/TET.30.1.2730.
Kézai, P. K., & Rechnitzer, J. 2023. Performance of enterprises in cultural and creative industries in large Hungarian cities between 2008 and 2018. Regional Statistics, 13(1), 167–198; DOI: 10.15196/RS130108
KIP 2010 Kreatív Iparágak Platformja – KIP Stratégia Kutatási Terv [Creative Industries Platform – KIP Strategy Research Plan] Available online: https://docplayer.hu/15951867-Kreativ-iparagak-platformja-kip-strategia-kutatasiterv-http-www-host-hu-projects-kip.html (Accessed 19 September 2021).
Klein, M., Gutowski, P., Gerlitz, L. & Gutowska, E. 2021 Creative and Culture Industry in Baltic Sea Region Condition and Future. Sustainability 13(8): 4239. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084239
Kovács, Z., Egedy, T. & Szabó, B. 2011 A kreatív gazdaság földrajzi jellemzői Magyarországon [Geographical aspects of creative economy in Hungary]. Tér és Társadalom, 25(1), 42–62. doi: 10.17649/TET.25.1.1772
Miszlivetz, F. & Márkus, E. 2013 A Kraft-index – Kreatív város – Fenntartható vidék. [KRAFT-index, creative cities, sustainable rural region, (in Hungarian)]. Vezetéstudomány. 44(9). 1–21. DOI 10.14267/VEZTUD.2013.09.01
Mizzau, L. & Montanari, F. 2008 Cultural districts and the challenge of authenticity: the case of Piedmont, Italy, Journal of Economic Geography. 8 (5), 651–673.
O’Connor, J. 2010 The cultural and creative industries: a literature review, [Creativity, Culture and Education Series]. Creativity, Culture and Education. United Kingdom. Available online: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/43835/1/Literature_review_second_edition.pdf (Accessed 28. March 2022).
Pécsi, M. 1975 A Kárpát-Balkán térség geomorfológiai térképéről (1: 1 000 000). MTA X. Osztályának Közleményei 8, no. 1–2. pp. 83–104. Available online: http://epa.oszk.hu/03200/03224/00015/pdf/EPA03224_geonomia_banyaszat_1975_01-02_083-104.pdf (Accessed on 22. September 2021).
Pratt, A. C. 1997 The cultural industries production system: a case study of employment change in Britain, 1984–91. Environment and Planning, No. 29, 1953–1974.
Ságvári, B. & Dessewffy, T. 2006 A kreatív gazdaságról – Európa és Magyarország a kreatív korban [On the creative economy – Europe and Hungary in the creative age] Demos Magyarország Kiadó, Budapest.
Scott, A. J. 2000 The Cultural Economy of Cities: Essays on the Geography of Image-producing Industries. Sage, London.
Scott, A. J. 2010 Cultural economy and the creative field of the city. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography. 92 (2). 115–130.
Stasiulis, N. 2017 The Idea of the Creative Society and the Development of Creative Industries, Economics and Sociology, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 217–226. DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-2/16
Stolarick, K., & Florida, R. 2006 Creativity, Connections and Innovation: A Study of Linkages in the Montréal Region. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 38 (10): 1799–1817. DOI:10.1068/a3874.
Szabó, M. 2005 Vizes élőhelyek tájökológiai jellemvonásai a Szigetköz példáján [Landscape ecological characteristics of wetlands in the Szigetköz. Doctoral dissertation]. Doktori disszertáció, Budapest: 2005. Available online: http://real-d.mtak.hu/268/2/Szabo_Maria_tezisek.pdf (Accessed on 12 December 2021).
Szara, K 2019 Women as Farm Operators in Contemporary Poland Uneven Distribution Possibilities of Creative Capital Development in Rural Areas (Case Study of the Podkarpackie Communes, Poland) Eastern Europen Countryside. 25 http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EEC.2019.006
UNESCO 2020 Section for the Diversity of Cultural Expressions Available online: https://en.unesco.org/creativity/sites/creativity/files/digital-library/What% 20Do%20We%20Mean%20by%20CCI.PDF (Accessed 12. January 2021).
UNESCO 2021 Cities Culture Creativity, Leveraging culture and creativity for sustainable urban development and inclusive growth. ISBN 978-92-3-100452-0 Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377427.locale =en (Accessed on 3. January 2022).
Wijngaarden, Y., Bhansing, P. V. & Hitters, E. 2021 Character trait, context or… create! Innovative practices among creative entrepreneurs, Industry and Innovation, 28:8, 1077–1097, DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2021.1949964
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Petra Kinga Szandra, Szandra Gombos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 86
Number of citations: 0