The Customary Identity of the Coppersmiths Clan in Oltenia: Between Tradition and Modernity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/eec-2015-0004Keywords
Roma, coppersmiths clan, customary identity, self-segregation, traditionalism.Abstract
The coppersmiths’ uniqueness as a Roma clan is given by their traditional crafting legacy, as they themselves acknowledge. They are one of the more conservative Roma clans. Encouraged by their previous nomadic lifestyle, it hasn’t allowed them to blend with other clans or populations. Mixed marriages are forbidden and marriages with members of other Roma clans are rare. The aim of this study is to identify the elements that define the ethnic identity of the coppersmiths clan, to analyse the features that make out the coppersmiths’ customary identity, and to measure the self-segregation tendencies within the coppersmiths ethnic group. The main research methods were: bibliographic documentation, direct observation, field inquiries (structured interviews), and digital mapping. The research concluded the following: the coppersmiths are one of the extreme conservative clans, which have maintained their customary identity. The tendency of self-segregation is a direct consequence of their resistance towards anything modern, and the members of the coppersmiths clan believe that acting like the majority of society will only lead to the loss of their own identity. The consequences are mostly negative, e.g. poor school enrolment, marrying at an early age, an absence from modern socio-economic activities, etc.
References
Achim, V. (1990), Țiganii în istoria României [Gypsies Throughout Romanian History] Bucharest: Enciclopedica Publishing House.
Anghel, I., Mihai, C., Fecheta, A. (2000), Rromii. Istorie și cultură. Aportul minorităților naționale în patrimoniul cultural românesc [Roma. History and Culture. The Contribution of National Minorities to Romania’s Cultural Heritage]. Bucharest: OPRE.
Bhopal, K., (2004), ‘Gypsy Travellers and Education: Changing Needs and Changing Perceptions’, Br. J. Educ. Stud. 52: 47–64.
Burawoy, M. (2003), ‘Revisits: An Outline of a Theory of Reflexive Ethnography’, American Sociological Review 68: 645–679.
Burtea, V. (1994), ‘Neamurile de rromi şi modul lor de viaţă’ [Roma groups and their way of life] Sociologie Românească 2–3.
Chelcea, I. (1944), ‘Ţiganii din România. Monografie etnografică, Bucureşti’ [Romania’s gypsies. An ethnographic monograph], p. 39.
Crowe, D. (1994), A History of the Gypsies of Eastern Europe and Russia, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Crowe, D. (2007), A History of the Gypsies of Eastern Europe and Russia, second ed. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Czepczynski, M. (2008), Cultural Landscapes of Post-Socialist Cities: Representation of Power and Needs. Ashgate, Aldershot.
Emigh, R., Fodor, E., Szelényi, I. (2001), ‘The racialization and feminization of poverty?’ in: R., Emigh, I., Szelényi (eds.), Poverty, Ethnicity, and Gender in Eastern Europe During the Market Transition. Praeger, Westport, pp. 1–32.
Emigh, R., Szelényi, I. (eds.), (2001), Poverty, Ethnicity, and Gender in Eastern Europe During the Market Transition. Praeger, Westport, pp. 1–32.
Falzon, M. A. (2009), Multi-sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research, Ashgate, Burlington.
Grill, J. (2011), ‘From street busking in Switzerland to meat factories in the UK: a comparative study of two Roma migration networks from Slovakia’, in: D., Kaneff, F.,Pine (eds.) Global Connections and Emerging Inequalities in Europe: Perspectives on Poverty and Transnational Migration, London: Anthem Press, pp. 79–102.
Kogălniceanu, M. (1976), ‘Esquisse sur l’istoire, les moreurs et la langue des Cigains’ [Sketches on the history, manners and language of gypsies] Editura Academiei, Bucureşti, Opere, Vol. II, p.13.
Kyuchukov, H. (2000), ‘Transformative education for Roma (Gypsy) children: An insider’s view’, Intercultural Education 11: 273–280.
Ladányi, J., Szelényi, I. (2006), Patterns of Exclusion: Constructing Gypsy Ethnicity and the Making of an Underclass in Transitional Societies of Europe, New York: Columbia University Press.
Liegeois, J.-P., Nicolae G. (1995), Roma/Gypsies: A European Minority, London: Minority Rights Group.
Manea, G., Matei, E., Tișcovschi, A. (2009), ‘Preliminary case study on the environmental quality and life quality in the Romanian rural rudimentary communities’, European Countryside, Versita Publisher, Warsaw, pp. 227–240. [DOI 10.2478/v10091-009-0018-0]
Martin, E., Gamella, J. (2005), ‘Marriage practices and ethnic differentiation: The case of Spanish Gypsies (1870–2000)’, The History of the Family 10 (1): 45–63.
Merfea, M. (1994), ‘Cu privire la istoria rromilor’ [Regarding the history of the Roma], Revista de Cercetări Sociale 4: 156–165.
Myers, M., Bhopal, K., 2009. ‘Gypsy, Roma and traveller children in schools: understandings of community and safety’, Br. J. Educ. Stud. 57: 417–434.
O’Reilly, K. (2005), Ethnographic Methods, New York: Routledge.
Ozkan, A.R. (2000), Türkiye Cingeneleri [Turkey’s gypsies]. Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları.
Ozkan, A.R. (2006), ‘Marriage among the Gypsies of Turkey’, The Social Science Journal 43: 461–470.
Pasieka, A. (2012), ‘Resurrected pigs, dyed foxes and beloved cows: religious diversity and nostalgia for socialism in rural Poland’, Journal of Rural Studies 28 (2): 72–80.
Pine, F., Keneff, D., Haukanes, H. (eds.), (2004), Memory, Politics and Religion: The Past Meets the Present in Europe, Münster: Lit Verlag.
Potra, G. (2002), Contribuţiuni la istoricul ţiganilor din România [Contributions to the history of Gypsies in Romania], Bucureşti: Mihai Dascăl, p. 27.
Preda, M. (2010), ‘Demographic behavior of the Roma population between tradition and modernity. Case study: Oltenia region, Romania’, HUMAN GEOGRAPHIES – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography 4.1: 105–119.
Preda, M. (2010), Etnia rromă din Oltenia între tradiţie şi modernitate. Geografie umană [The roma in Oltenia between tradition and modernity. A human geography study]. Editura Universității din București.
Roman, I. (2013), Gypsies integration – Education for all. 5th International Conference EDU-WORLD 2012 – Education Facing Contemporary World Issues.
Ruzicka, M. (2011), ‘Casoprostorové a infrastrukturní aspekty procesu sociální exkluze’ [Space-time and infrastructural aspects of social exclusion], Czech Sociological Review 47 (2): 73–295.
Schwarcz, G. (2012), ‘Ethnicising poverty through social security provision in rural Hungary’, Journal of Rural Studies 28 (2): 99–107.
Spradley, J. (1980), Participant Observation, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Victoria.
Şerboianu-Pop, C. J. (1930), Les tsiganes. Histoire. Ethnographie. Linguistique. Grammaire. Dictionnaire [Gypsies. History. Ethnography. Linguistics. Grammar. Dictionary], Paris: Payot, pp. 53–57.
Tamaș, C. (2001), Istoria țiganilor din Țara Românească [A history of roma in Walachia], Bucharest: Oscar.
Watson, R. (ed.), (1994), Memory, History, and Opposition Under State Socialism, Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Preda Preda, Iuliana Vijulie, Gabriela Manea, Alina Mareci
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 0
Number of citations: 0
