The impact of EU development policy on the governance capability of peripheral regions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EEC.2022.002Abstract
The internal resource-based development of peripheral regions – which are still to be defined precisely and accepted universally – is a constant challenge for the European Union and the Member States, which is difficult to address in the form of a schematic recipe. An important aspect of this complex issue is the existence and success of local governance, which, based on its own internal characteristics alone, can mobilise a community, without which the chances of making further progres are bleak. Governance and the issue of peripheral regions together, at least at the EU level, are reflected in the EU’s development policy. This paper, based on the analysis of EU documents and the Hungarian local and regional experience, aims to investigate whether the European Union is able to assist peripheral regions to catch up, and if so, in what form and through what mechanisms, and what conditions and requirementsrelated to governance – may be necessary for successful catching up, which may at the same time lead to the success or failure of EU objectives.
References
Arribas, G. J. M. 2016 ‘Governance Dynamics and the Application of the Multi-level governance Approach in Vocational Education and Training (VET) in the European Neighbourhood Countries: the case of the ENPI Southregion’, European Journal of Education 4, DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12190.
Bance, P. & A. Chassy 2017 ‘The Rollout of the Multi-level governance System: A Source of Reworking the Contingent Valuation Method?’ Politics & Policy 45(6): 1080–1107. https://www.readcube.com/articles/10.1111%2Fpolp.12236
Börzel, T.A. 2020 ‘Multi-level governance or multilevel government?’ The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22(4): 776–783. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1369148120939872
Bosworth, G., Price, L., Anniba, I., Sellick, J., Carroll, T. & Shepherd, J. 2013 ‘LEADER as a vehicle for neo- endogenous rural development in England’ in: European Society for Rural Sociology (eds.) Rural resilience and vulnerability: the rural as locus of solidarity and conflict in times of crisis, XXVth Congress of the European Society for Rural Sociology 29.07.–01.08.2013 (e-proceedings, ISBN 978-8-8908-9600 2): 229-230 http://pierotortola.weebly.com/uploads/2/0/3/1/20314675/ejprmlg.pdf
Brown, D., Schucksmith, M. 2016 ‘A New Lens for Examining Rural Change’, European Countryside 8(2): 183–188.
Cejudo, E. and Navarro, F. (eds.) 2020 Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas: Results and Lessons.
Drechsler, D. 2004 ‘Governance, good governance, and government: The case forEstonian administrative capacity Trames’, Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 8(4).
Dvořáková-Lišková, Z., Pártlová, P., Krogmann, A. 2018 Multi-level Governance Towards Regional Development in Postcommunist Countries’,Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management 13(2): 5–20 https://www.jstor.org/stable/26422066?seq=3#metadata_info_tab_contents
Furmankiewicz, M. 2012 ‘Leader+ Territorial Governance in Poland: Successes and Failures as a Rational Choice Effect’, Tijdschrift voor economische en socjale geografie 103(3): 261–275.
Jon, P. 2019 ‘Multi-level governance as a Strategy to Build Capacity in Cities: Evidence from Sweden’ Journal of Urban Affairs 41(1): 103–16 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07352166.2017.1310532
Kucler Dolinar, M. 2020 Multi-level governance within the European Union- European View (9)1: 97–103 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1007/s12290-010-0119-1
Nousiainen, M., Makinen K. 2015 ‘Multi-level governance and Participation’, Interpreting Democracy in EU-programmes, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 16(2): 208–223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2014.986970
Outhwaite, W. 2021 ‘Technocratic Planning and Political Strategies: Territorial Policy in the EU’ JCER 17(2) https://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/issue/view/67
Pazos-Vidal, S. 2019 Subsidiarity and EU Multi-level governanc: Actors, Networks and Agendas, Routledge https://books.google.hu/books?hl=hu&lr=&id=VpCKDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT9&dq=multi+level+governance&ots=dlxzEZL8Qp&sig=Y2W8I_EsTusGACZTqiAZBiNzJ0s&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=-multi%20level%20governance&f=false
Pollermann, K., Aubert, F., Berriet-Solliec, M., Laidin, C., Lépicier, D., Vu Pham, H., Raue, P. & G. Schnaut 2020 ‘LEADER as a European policy for rural development in a multi-level governance framework: a comparison of the implementaition in France, Germany and Italy’, European Countryside 12/2020(2): 156–178 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342903998_Leader_as_a_European_Policy_for_Rural_Development_in_a_Multilevel_Governance_Framework_A_Comparison_of_the_Implementation_in_France_Germany_and_Italy
Pollermann, K., Raue, P. & Schnaut, G. 2014 ‘Multi-level Governance in Rural Development: Analysing Experiences from LEADER for a Community-Led Local Development (CLLD)’, ERSA conference papers ersa14p1071, European Regional Science Association. http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa14/e140826aFinal01071.pdf
Stephenson, P. 2014 ‘Twenty years of multi-level governance: ’Where Does It Come From? What Is It? Where Is It Going?’, HAL ID: hal-01024837 https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01024837
Tortola, P. D. 2017 ‘Clarifying multi-level governance’, European Journal of Political Research 56: 234–250.
Trein, P., Thomann, E. and M. Maggetti 2019 Integration, functional differentiation and problem-solving in multi-level governance https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12595
van Popering-Verkerk, J., van Buuren, A. 2016 ‘Decision-making patterns in multi-level governance Public Management Review’, 18(7): 951–971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1028974
List of EU documents*
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) of 7 January 2014 (240/2014) on the European code of conduct on partnership in the framework of the European Structural and Investment Funds
REGULATION (EU) No 1303/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European
Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006
European Parliament Report A6-0356/2008 on governance and partnership at national and regional levels and a basis for projects in the sphere of regional policy
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION of 13 March 2018 (2019/C 162/03) on regions lagging behind in the EU (2017/2208(INI))
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION of 17 April 2018 (2019/C 390/07) on strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion in the European Union: the 7th report of the European Commission (2017/2279(INI))
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION of 13 March 2018 (2019/C 162/03) on lagging regions in the EU (2017/2208(INI))
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION of 24 November 2015 (2017/C 366/04) on cohesion policy and marginalised communities (2014/2247(INI))
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION of (2012/C 169 E/03) on good governance with regards to the EU regional policy
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION of (2010/C 15 E/02) on governance and partnership at national and regional levels and a basis for projects in the sphere of regional policy
INFORMATION REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE NAT/806
Evaluation on the CAP’s impact on territorial development of rural areas OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE (2018/C129/06) on the benefits of a community-led approach to local development for integrated local and rural development (Rapporteur: Roman Haken)
OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE (2015/C230/01) on community-led local development as an instrument of cohesion policy for local, rural, urban and peri-urban development in the period 2014-2020 (Rapporteur: Roman Haken)
OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE (2011/C376/03) on LEADER as a local development instrument (Rapporteur: Roman Haken)
OPINIONOF THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS on the EU strategy for rural regeneration (2021/C 37/03)
OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS (2020/C 141/07) Towards sustainable neighbourhoods and small communities – Environment policy below municipal level
OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS (2020/C 79/05) Improving administrative capacity of local and regional authorities to strengthen investments and structural reforms in 2021-2027
OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS (2019/C 275/01) The European semester and cohesion policy: aligning structural reforms with long-term investments
OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONSON ‘Revitalisation of rural areas through smart villages’ (2018/C 164/08)
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS (2013/C 17/04) on Code of Conduct on Partnership
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS (2009/C 211/01) on the white paper on multi-level governance
RESOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS (2020/C324/02) The European Committee of the Regions’ priorities for 2020–2025 – Europe closer to the people through its villages, cities and regions
RESOLUTION OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS (2014/C 174/01) on the Charter for Multi-level governance in Europe
Downloads
The publisher's shop:
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 István Finta

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 133
Number of citations: 0