Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Język Polski
    • Español (España)
    • Italiano
    • Français (Canada)
    • Čeština
    • Français (France)
    • Hrvatski
    • Srpski
    • Українська
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Forthcoming
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Ethics
  • Submissions
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

An Empirical Analysis of Cost Efficiency in GCC Banking Sector: A Comparative Study between Islamic & Conventional Banks
  • Home
  • /
  • An Empirical Analysis of Cost Efficiency in GCC Banking Sector: A Comparative Study between Islamic & Conventional Banks
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026): Forthcoming /
  4. Articles

An Empirical Analysis of Cost Efficiency in GCC Banking Sector: A Comparative Study between Islamic & Conventional Banks

Authors

  • Youcef Benzid Setif1 University Ferhat Abbas https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6469-0460
  • Imad Chermat University Ferhat Abbas Setif1 https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2299-1992
  • Saida Khouatra University Ferhat Abbas Setif1 https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7728-5476

Keywords

cost efficiency, technical efficiency, allocative efficiency, banking sector, DEA, GCC area

Abstract

This study seeks to evaluate and contrast the efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks across multiple dimensions, including technical efficiency, resource allocation, and cost efficiency in the banking sector of GCC countries. To do that, we use non-parametric techniques “DEA” on 48 banks across 6 countries (2010-2024). we found that Islamic banks exhibit varying levels of technical efficiency across different countries. In some cases, they demonstrate high technical efficiency, particularly in Oman and the UAE. Conventional banks also vary in technical efficiency. Bahraini Conventional banks are considered the most technically efficient, while Omani Conventional banks face significant inefficiencies. Conventional banks, particularly in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, demonstrate higher efficiency in resource allocation and cost control compared to Islamic banks. However, there are variations among conventional banks, with Bahraini banks exhibiting the highest efficiency in resource allocation.

References

Akhtar, S. (2023). Measuring technical efficiency of banks vis-à-vis demonetization: An empirical analysis of Indian banking sector using CAMELS framework. Quality and Quantity, 57(2), 1739–1761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01431-8.

Al-Hussain, A., & Johnson, R. (2009). Relationship between Corporate Governance Efficiency and Saudi Banks’ Performance. The Business Review, Cambridge, 14, 111.

Al-Muharrami, S., & Matthews, K. (2009). Market power versus efficient-structure in Arab GCC banking. Applied Financial Economics, 19(18), 1487–1496. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603100902845478.

Alqahtani, F., Mayes, D.G., & Brown, K. (2017). Islamic bank efficiency compared to conventional banks during the global crisis in the GCC region. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 51, 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.08.010.

Antunes, J., Hadi-Vencheh, A., Jamshidi, A., Tan, Y., & Wanke, P. (2022). Bank efficiency estimation in China: DEA-RENNA approach. Annals of Operations Research, 315(2), 1373–1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04111-2.

Ashton, J. (1998). Cost efficiency, economies of scale and economies of scope in the British retail banking sector. School of Finance & Law Working Paper Series, (13).

Bahrini, R. (2017). Efficiency Analysis of Islamic Banks in the Middle East and North Africa Region: A Bootstrap DEA Approach. International Journal of Financial Studies, 5(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs5010007.

Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(2), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.09.016.

Ben Zeineb, G., & Mensi, S. (2018). Corporate governance, risk and efficiency: Evidence from GCC Islamic banks. Managerial Finance, 44(5), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-05-2017-0186.

Benzid, Y., & Bourakba, C. (2023). Market Structure and profit efficiency in Islamic Banks: An Empirical Study. Management & Economics Research Journal, 5(2), 68–85.

Berger, A.N., & Humphrey, D.B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 175–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00342-6.

Chaffai, M.E. (2022). New evidence on Islamic and conventional bank efficiency: A meta-regression analysis. Bulletin of Economic Research, 74(1), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12291.

Chupradit, S. (2021). Measuring technical efficiency associated with environmental investment: Does market competition and risk matters in banking sector. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(47), 66575–66588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14782-w.

Farah, A.A., Mohamed, M.A., Ali Farah, M., Yusuf, I.A., & Abdulle, M.S. (2025). Impact of Islamic banking on economic growth: A systematic review of SCOPUS-indexed studies (2009–2024). Cogent Economics & Finance, 13(1), 2490819. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2025.2490819.

Farrell, M.J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100.

Ghroubi, M. (2025). Technical and allocative efficiency, and the impact of competition: Islamic vs conventional banks. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2024-0290.

Islamic Financial Services Board. (2023). Islamic Financial Services Industry Stability Report 2023. IFSB. https://www.ifsb.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Islamic-Financial-Services-Industry-Stability-Report-2023_En.pdf (accessed: 05.12.2025).

Kamaruddin, M., Shafii, Z., Hanefah, M., Salleh, S., & Zakaria, N. (2024). Issues and Challenges in Shariah Audit Practices in Malaysian Shariah-Based Sectors. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 21(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.564.

Khokhar, I. (2020). Investigating the efficiency of GCC banking sector: An empirical comparison of Islamic and conventional banks. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(1), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.5430/IJFR.V11N1P220.

Klimberg, R., Lawrence, K., Yermish, I., Lal, T., & Mrazik, D. (2009). Using regression and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to forecast bank performance over time. Applications of Management Science, 13, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0276-8976(2009)0000013010.

Koopmans, T.C. (1951). Efficient Allocation of Resources. Econometrica, 19(4), 455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907467.

Mai, K.T., Phung, M.T., Tong, B.N., Cheng, P., & Le, S.T. (2021). Modelling a shared-resource network DEA with bad output in measuring technical efficiency of banking system. International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, 20(3), 432. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmor.2021.120010.

Mani, M. (2016). Efficiency of commercial banks in India: A DEA approach. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 24(1), 151–170.

Matthews, K. (2010). Banking efficiency in emerging market economies. Cardiff Economics Working Papers, (12).

Miah, M.D., & Uddin, H. (2017). Efficiency and stability: A comparative study between islamic and conventional banks in GCC countries. Future Business Journal, 3(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.11.001.

Mirzaei, A., Saad, M., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022). Bank stock performance during the COVID-19 crisis: does efficiency explain why Islamic banks fared relatively better? Annals of Operations Research, 334(1–3), 317–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04600-y.

Nawaz, T., Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2021). On intellectual capital efficiency and shariah governance in Islamic banking business model. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(3), 3770–3787. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1986.

Nouman, M., Hashim, M., Trifan, V.A., Spinu, A.E., Siddiqi, M.F., & Khan, F.U. (2022). Interest rate volatility and financing of Islamic banks. PLOS ONE, 17(7), e0268906. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268906.

OECD, European Union, & Joint Research Centre - European Commission. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en.

Othman, F.M., Mohd-Zamil, N.A., Rasid, S.Z.A., Vakilbashi, A., & Mokhber, M. (2016). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Tool of Measuring Efficiency in Banking Sector. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3), 911–916.

Parsa, M. (2022). Efficiency and stability of Islamic vs. conventional banking models: A meta frontier analysis. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(3), 849–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1803665.

Safiullah, M., & Shamsuddin, A. (2019). Risk-adjusted efficiency and corporate governance: Evidence from Islamic and conventional banks. Journal of Corporate Finance, 55, 105–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08.009.

Şahin, İ., Yılmaz, B., & Akgün, A. (2013). Measurement of Efficiency in The Turkish Banking Sector in the 2009-2011 Period: A DEA Approach. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(10). https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n10p744.

Sillah, B.M.S., & Harrathi, N. (2015). Bank Efficiency Analysis: Islamic Banks versus Conventional Banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries 2006 - 2012. International Journal of Financial Research, 6(4), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v6n4p143.

Simar, L., & Wilson, P.W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009.

Siraj, K.K., & Pillai, P.S. (2012). Comparative Study on Performance of Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks in GCC region. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 2(3), 1–6.

Slimen, R., Belhaj, F., Hadriche, M., & Ghroubi, M. (2022). Banking Efficiency: A Comparative Study Between Islamic And Conventional Banks In Gcc Countries. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 11, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2022.005.

Srairi, S. (2010). Cost and profit efficiency of conventional and Islamic banks in GCC countries. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-009-0161-7.

Thanassoulis, E. (1999). Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Use in Banking. Interfaces, 29(3), 1–13.

Weill, L. (2004). Measuring Cost Efficiency in European Banking: A Comparison of Frontier Techniques. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PROD.0000016869.09423.0c.

Zhu, N. (2021). Efficiency and productivity analysis of Pakistan’s banking industry: A DEA approach. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 26(4), 6362–6374. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2123.

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Published

2026-06-14

How to Cite

1.
BENZID, Youcef, CHERMAT, Imad and KHOUATRA, Saida. An Empirical Analysis of Cost Efficiency in GCC Banking Sector: A Comparative Study between Islamic & Conventional Banks. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting. Online. 14 June 2026. Vol. 15, no. 2. [Accessed 15 June 2026].
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026): Forthcoming

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 0
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

cost efficiency, technical efficiency, allocative efficiency, banking sector, DEA, GCC area

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop