Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do stopki
  • Zarejestruj
  • Zaloguj
  • Język
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Język Polski
    • Español (España)
    • Italiano
    • Français (Canada)
    • Čeština
    • Français (France)
    • Hrvatski
    • Srpski
    • Українська
  • Menu
  • Strona domowa
  • Forthcoming
  • Aktualny numer
  • Archiwum
  • PUBLICATION ETHICS
  • Ogłoszenia
  • O czasopiśmie
    • O czasopiśmie
    • Przesyłanie tekstów
    • Zespół redakcyjny
    • Polityka prywatności
    • Kontakt
  • Zarejestruj
  • Zaloguj
  • Język:
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Does Blockholders’ Concentration Influence Spending on Corporate Social Responsibility? – Evidence from the Indian Firms
  • Strona domowa
  • /
  • Does Blockholders’ Concentration Influence Spending on Corporate Social Responsibility? – Evidence from the Indian Firms
  1. Strona domowa /
  2. Archiwum /
  3. Tom 13 Nr 2 (2024) /
  4. Artykuły

Does Blockholders’ Concentration Influence Spending on Corporate Social Responsibility? – Evidence from the Indian Firms

Autor

  • Srikanth Potharla Assistant Professor, ICFAI Business School(IBS) Hyderabad (Under IFHE- A Deemed to-be University u/s 3 of The UGC Act 1956) Donthanapalli, Shankerpalli Road, Hyderabad Telangana- 501203.India. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3176-9675

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2024.009

Słowa kluczowe

blockholder concentration, CSR spending, stakeholder salience, group firms

Abstrakt

This study investigates the relationship between blockholder concentrationand corporate social responsibility (CSR) spending in Indian firms, using stakeholderidentification and salience theory. This study aims to fill a gap in the literature byexamining how the concentration of blockholders, particularly external Blockholdersand promoters, influences CSR activities. The analysis covers 1,918 firms from 2014to 2023, using data from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) database. Empirical methods, including four regression models, are employed to examine the significanceof blockholder attributes on CSR spending. The results demonstrate the significantpositive impact of blockholder concentration on CSR activities. Specifically, theinfluence of external blockholders on CSR spending is greater than that of promoters. Furthermore, the study finds that single promoters with large investments are more inclinedtowards CSR spending, while interest in CSR diminishes when multiple promotershold significant shares. This study uniquely contributes to the literature by providingan insightful analysis of blockholder concentration’s impact on CSR, highlighting the differential effects between external blockholders and promoters, and underscoringthe importance of strategic blockholder alliances in enhancing CSR efforts. Thesefindings offer valuable insights for corporate managers and policymakers in emergingeconomies such as India.

Bibliografia

Ali Shah, S.Z., Akbar, S., & Zhu, X. (2023). Mandatory CSR disclosure, institutional ownership, and firm value: Evidence from China. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2908.

Almeida, H.V., & Wolfenzon, D. (2006). A theory of pyramidal ownership and family business groups. Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2637–2680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01001.x.

Baek, J.S., Kang, J.K., & Suh Park, K. (2004). Corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from the Korean financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 71(2), 265–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00167-3.

Carroll, G.R., & Hannan, M.T. (1989). Density delay in the evolution of organizational populations: A model and five empirical tests. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393151.

Cheng, X., Wang, H., & Wang, X. (2022). Common institutional ownership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 136, 106218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106218.

Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L.H.P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2.

Desai, R., & Raval, A. (2022). Examining the relation between market value and CO2 emission: Study of Indian firms. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 11(3), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2022.011.

Freeman, R.E., & David, L.R. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165018.

John, S.W. (2003). Corporate governance and firm profitability: Evidence from Korea before the economic crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), 287–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00068–0.

Lamont, O. (1997). Cash flow and investment: Evidence from internal capital markets. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03809.x.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world, Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115.

Lee, W.J., & Choi, S.U. (2018). Effects of corporate life cycle on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3794. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103794.

Manogna, R.L., & Mishra, A.K. (2021). Does institutional ownership and internationalization affect corporate social responsibility in emerging economy firms? An empirical evidence from India. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 15(2), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-12-2019-0361.

Miceikienė, A., Rimkuvienė, D., & Gesevičienė, K. (2020). Assessment of the environmental pollution determinants in the economy sectors of Lithuania. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 8(4), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2019.023.

Mitton, T. (2002). A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(2), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00076–4.

Nuvaid, V., Sardar, S., & Chakravarty, S. (2018). CSR as investment: An analysis of ownership structure and firm performance. Current Issues in Economics and Finance. Springer, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5810-3_8.

Ozdemir, O., Erkmen, E., & Han, W. (2023). EPU and financial performance in the hospitality and tourism industry: Moderating effect of CSR, institutional ownership and cash holding. Tourism Management, 98, 104769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104769.

Panicker, V.S. (2017). Ownership and corporate social responsibility in Indian firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(4), 714–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2017-0030.

Salancik, G.R., Pfeffer, J., & Kelly, J.P. (1978). A Contingency Model of Influence in Organizational Decision-Making. Pacific Sociological Review, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/1388862.

Savage, G.T., Nix, T.W., Whitehead, C.J., & Blair, J.D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Perspectives, 5(2), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1991.4274682.

Scharfstein, D.S., & Stein, J.C. (2000). The dark side of internal capital markets: Divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment. Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2537–2564. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00299.

Shin, H.H.,& Stulz, R.M. (1998). Are internal capital markets efficient?. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 530–552. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555676.

Tarighi, H., Appolloni, A., Shirzad, A., & Azad, A. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (CSRD) and Financial Distressed Risk (FDR): Does Institutional Ownership Matter? Sustainability, 14(2), 742. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020742.

Tokas, K., & Yadav, K. (2020). Foreign Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of an Emerging Market. Global Business Review, 24(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920920444.

Zhou, T., Liu, M., Zhang, X., Qi, Z., & Qin, N. (2024). Does institutional ownership affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 84-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.017.

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Pobrania

  • PDF (English)

Opublikowane

2024-12-07

Jak cytować

1.
POTHARLA, Srikanth. Does Blockholders’ Concentration Influence Spending on Corporate Social Responsibility? – Evidence from the Indian Firms. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting [online]. 7 grudzień 2024, T. 13, nr 2, s. 89–108. [udostępniono 28.6.2025]. DOI 10.12775/CJFA.2024.009.
  • PN-ISO 690 (Polski)
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Pobierz cytowania
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Numer

Tom 13 Nr 2 (2024)

Dział

Artykuły

Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Statystyki

Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 180
Liczba cytowań: 0

Wyszukiwanie

Wyszukiwanie

Przeglądaj

  • Indeks autorów
  • Lista archiwalnych numerów

Użytkownik

Użytkownik

Aktualny numer

  • Logo Atom
  • Logo RSS2
  • Logo RSS1

Informacje

  • dla czytelników
  • dla autorów
  • dla bibliotekarzy

Newsletter

Zapisz się Wypisz się

Język / Language

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Tagi

Szukaj przy pomocy tagu:

blockholder concentration, CSR spending, stakeholder salience, group firms

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

W górę

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partnerzy platformy czasopism

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu Deklaracja dostępności Sklep wydawnictwa