Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Język Polski
    • Español (España)
    • Italiano
    • Français (Canada)
    • Čeština
    • Français (France)
    • Hrvatski
    • Srpski
    • Українська
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Forthcoming
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Ethics
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

REEXAMING THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY TAX ACT OF 1981: EVIDENCE FROM INNOVATIVE EFFICIENCY
  • Home
  • /
  • REEXAMING THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY TAX ACT OF 1981: EVIDENCE FROM INNOVATIVE EFFICIENCY
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021) /
  4. Articles

REEXAMING THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY TAX ACT OF 1981: EVIDENCE FROM INNOVATIVE EFFICIENCY

Authors

  • Zhaochu Li UM-Flint School of Management https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-9459
  • Iryna P. Lytvynenko https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8727-6066
  • Karl S. Philippoff https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7649-5068

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2021.006

Keywords

R&D, tax credit, innovation, policy evaluation

Abstract

The research objective of this article is to examine the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (ERTA) on innovative efficiency, which measures how effectively firms convert research spending and existing human capital into new patents and products. Research method- wise, this study measures innovative efficiency by dividing the number of new patents to average R&D expenses and analyses how innovative efficiency changed after the ERTA using regression. The main conclusion is that the ERTA tax credit decreased innovative efficiency and competitions for research resources could explain this reduction. These findings provide new insights on the effectiveness of R&D tax policies from the efficiency perspective. Policy makers should consider these findings when designing R&D tax policies in the future.

References

Aghion, P., Van Reenen, J., & Zingales, L. (2013). Innovation and institutional ownership. American Economic Review, 103(1), 277-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.1.277.

Almeida, H., Hsu, P., Li, D., & Tseng, K. (2021). More cash, less innovation: The effect of the American Jobs Creation Act on patent value. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(1), 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022109019000954.

Atanassov, J. (2013). Do hostile takeovers stifle innovation? Evidence from antitakeover legislation and corporate patenting. Journal of Finance, 68(3), 1097-1131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12019.

Berger, P. (1993). Explicit and implicit tax effects of the R&D tax credit. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 131-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2491268.

Cappelen, A., Raknerud, A., & Rybalka, M. (2011). The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations. Research Policy, 41(2), 334-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.001.

Cazrnitzki, D., Hanel, P., & Rosa, J.M. (2010). Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: a microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy, 49(2),217-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.017.

Chang, X., Hilary, G., Kang, H., & Zhang, W. (2015). Innovation, Managerial Myopia, and Financial Reporting. INSEAD Working Paper, 2013/35/AC. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2189938.

Chircop, J., Collins, D.W., Hass, L.H., & Nguyen, N.Q. (2020). Accounting comparability and corporate innovative efficiency. The Accounting Review, 95(4), 127-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr-52609.

Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001.

Eng, J.J., & Shackell, M. (2001). The implications of long-term performance plans and institutional ownership for firms’ research and development (R&D) investments. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, 16(2), 117-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0101600204.

Ernst and Young (2008). Supporting innovation and economic growth: the broad impact of the R&D tax credit in 2005. London: Ernst and Young.

Fang, V., Tian, X., & Tice, S. (2014). Does stock liquidity enhance or impede firm innovation? Journal of Finance, 69(5), 2085-2125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12187.

Francis, J., & Smith, A. (1995). Agency Costs and Innovation: Some Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2-3), 383-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)00389-M.

Gaessler, F., Hall, B.H., & Harhoff, D. (2021). Should there be lower taxes on patent income? Research Policy, 50(1), 104-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104129.

Griliches, Z., Pakes, A., & Hall, B.H. (1987). The value of patents as indicators of inventive activity. Economic policy and technological performance. In P. Dasgupta, P. Stoneman (Eds.). Economic Policy and Technological Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511559938.006.

Hall, B.H. (1993). R&D tax policy during the eighties: success or failure? In J. Poterba (Ed.). Tax Policy and the Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w4240.

Hall, B.H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. In B.H. Hall, N. Rosenberg (Eds.). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. New York: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2.

Hall, B.H., & Van Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 449-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00085-2.

Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper Series, 8498. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w8498.

Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16-38.

He, J., & Tian, X. (2013). The dark side of analyst coverage: the case of innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3), 856-878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.04.001.

Kahn, K. (2018). Understanding innovation. Business Horizons, 61(3), 453-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.011.

Manso, G. (2011). Motivating innovation. Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1823-1860. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01688.x.

McCutchen, W.M. (1993). Estimating the impact of the R&D tax credit on strategic groups in the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 22(4), 337-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)90004-2.

Merz, M. (2021). Innovative efficiency as a lever to overcome financial constraints in R&D contests. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 30(3), 284-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1695946.

Mohnen, P., Vankan, A., & Verspagen, B. (2017). Evaluating the innovation box tax policy instrument in the Netherlands, 2007-2013. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 141-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grw038.

Stewart, L.A., Warda, J., & Atkinson, R. (2012). We’re #27: the United States lags far behind in R&D tax incentive generosity, https://itif.org/publications/2012/07/19/we%E2%80%99re-27-united-states-lags-far-behind-rd-tax-incentive-generosity.

Szlęzak-Matusewicz, J. (2014). Models of Tax Incentives for R&D Activities of Enterprises in European Union Countries. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 3(1), 145-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2014.012.

Tillinger, J.W. (1991). An analysis of the effectiveness of the research and experimentation tax credit in a model of valuation. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 13(2), 1-29.

Ziółkowska, W. (2018). Innovativeness of the Polish economy in the context of sustainable development. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 7(3), 71-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/ CJFA.2018.016.

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2021-09-23 — Updated on 2021-12-12

How to Cite

1.
LI, Zhaochu, LYTVYNENKO, Iryna P. and PHILIPPOFF, Karl S. REEXAMING THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY TAX ACT OF 1981: EVIDENCE FROM INNOVATIVE EFFICIENCY. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting. Online. 12 December 2021. Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 27-43. [Accessed 10 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/CJFA.2021.006.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 525
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

R&D, tax credit, innovation, policy evaluation

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop