Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do stopki
  • Zarejestruj
  • Zaloguj
  • Język
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Język Polski
    • Español (España)
    • Italiano
    • Français (Canada)
    • Čeština
    • Français (France)
    • Hrvatski
    • Srpski
    • Українська
  • Menu
  • Strona domowa
  • Forthcoming
  • Aktualny numer
  • Archiwum
  • PUBLICATION ETHICS
  • Ogłoszenia
  • O czasopiśmie
    • O czasopiśmie
    • Przesyłanie tekstów
    • Zespół redakcyjny
    • Polityka prywatności
    • Kontakt
  • Zarejestruj
  • Zaloguj
  • Język:
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Comparison of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with respect to performance of food firms listed in BIST
  • Strona domowa
  • /
  • Comparison of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with respect to performance of food firms listed in BIST
  1. Strona domowa /
  2. Archiwum /
  3. Tom 5 Nr 1 (2016) /
  4. Artykuły

Comparison of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with respect to performance of food firms listed in BIST

Autor

  • Namık Kemal Erdoğan Anadolu University
  • Serpil Altınırmak Anadolu University
  • Çağlar Karamaşa Anadolu University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2016.004

Słowa kluczowe

performance analysis, fuzzy ranking, TOPSIS, VIKOR, ELECTRE

Abstrakt

Analyzing firms’ performance appropriately is core topic for decision makers working in financial sector under the conditions of imprecise and incomplete information. Purpose of this study is to assess firms’ performance by taking financial ratios and financial experts’ into the account. Therefore firstly weights of criteria and sub criteria related to financial ratios are obtained by using one of the fuzzy ranking methods namely Buckley’s Column Geometric Mean Method. Following to this firms’ final rankings are determined by means of TOPSIS, VIKOR and ELECTRE methods. Also ranking performance of these three methods is interpreted. According to this purpose financial ratios of twenty one food firms listed in BIST for four years period (2011–2014) are acquired and analyzed via these methods.

Bibliografia

Altman, E.I. (1968). Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis And The Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.tb00843.x.

Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S.K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A State of Art Survey of TOPSIS Applications, Expert Sytems with Applications, 39, 13051-13069. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056.

Bhushan, N., & Rai, K. (2004). Strategic Decision Making Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b97668.

Buckley, J.J. (1985). Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15(1), 21-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90013-2.

Bülbül, S., & Köse, A. (2011). Türk Gıda Şirketlerinin Finansal Performansının Çok Amaçlı Karar Verme Yöntemleriyle Değerlendirilmesi, Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi 10.Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu Özel Sayısı, 71-97.

Büyüközkan, G., & Ruan, D. (2008). Evaluation of Software Development Projects Using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Approach. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 77, 464-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2007.11.015.

Chen, L.Y., & Wang, T. (2009). Optimizing Partners’ Choice in IS/IT Outsourcing Process: The Strategic Decision for Fuzzy VIKOR, International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 233-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.022.

Chen, S.C., Hwang, C., & Hwang, F. (1992). Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer- Verlag: New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 642-46768-4_5.

Dumanoğlu, S. (2010). İMKB’de İşlem Gören Çimento Şirketlerinin Mali Performansının TOPSIS Yöntemi İle Değerlendirilmesi, Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 29(2), 323-339.

Ertuğrul, İ., & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2008). Banka Şube Performanslarının VIKOR Yöntemi İle Değerlendirilmesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi YA/EM 2008 Özel Sayısı, 20(1), 19-28.

Ertuğrul, İ., & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2009). Performance Evaluation of Turkish Cement Firms with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS Methods, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 702-715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.014.

Feng, C.M., & Wang, R.T. (2000). Performance Evaluation for Airlines Including the Consideration of Financial Ratios, Journal of Air Transport Management, 6(3), 133-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(00)00003-X.

Huang, H.C., & Ho, C.C. (2013). Applying the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to Consumer Decision-Making Regarding Home Stays. International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, 5(4), 981-990. http://dx.doi.org/10.4156/ijact. vol5.issue4.119.

Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi Criteria Decision Analysis Methods and Software. John Wiley & Sons. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118644898.

İç, Y., Tekin, M., Pamukoğlu, Z. & Yıldırım, E. (2015) Kurumsal Firmalar İçin Bir Finansal Performans Karşılaştırma Modelinin Geliştirilmesi, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(1), 71-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.17341/gummfd. 03450.

Jie, L.H., Meng, M.C., & Cheong, C.W. (2006). Web Based Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Tool. International Journal of The Computer, the Internet and Management, 14(2), 1-14.

Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 382-394. http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/09576050310503367.

Kaptanoğlu, D., & Özok, A.F. (2006). Akademik Performans Değerlendirmesi İçin Bir Bulanık Model. İTÜ Dergisi/d mühendislik, 5(1), 193-204.

Lixin, D., Ying, L., & Zhiguang, Z. (2008). Selection of Logistics Service Provider Based on Analytic Network Process and VIKOR Algorithm, Networking, Sensing and Control, ICNSC 2008-IEEE International Conference Proceedings, 1207-1210.

Mahmoodzadeh, S., Shahrabi, J., Pariazar, M., & Zaeri, S. (2007). Project Selection by Using Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Technique, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 1(6), 270-275.

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2004). The Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research, 178(1), 445-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2007). Extended VIKOR Method in Comparison with Other Outranking Methods, European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514-529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020.

Pohekar, S.D., & Ramachandran, M. (2004). Application of multi criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning- A review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8, 365-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007.

Sevkli, M. (2010). An Application of the Fuzzy ELECTRE Method for Supplier Selection, International Journal of Production Research, 48(12), 3393-3405. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/00207540902814355.

Tsaur, R.C. (2011). Decision Risk Analysis For an Interval TOPSIS Method, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218, pp. 4295-4304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. amc.2011.10.001.

Uyguntürk, H., & Korkmaz, T. (2012). Finansal Performansın TOPSIS Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi İle Belirlenmesi: Ana Metal Sanayi İşletmeleri Üzerine Bir Uygulama, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 7(2), 95-115.

Velasquez, M., & Hester, P.T. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods, International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56-66.

Wu, H.Y., Tzeng, G.H., & Chen, Y.H. (2009). A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 10135-10147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.005.

Yoon, K.P., & Hwang, C.L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage University Paper.

Yurdakul, M., & İç, Y.T. (2003). Türk Otomotiv Firmalarının Performans Ölçümü ve Analizine Yönelik TOPSIS Yöntemini Kullanan Bir Ölçek Çalışma, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 1-18.

Yüreğir, O.H., & Nakıboğlu, G. (2007). Performans Ölçümü ve Ölçüm Sistemleri: Genel Bir Bakış, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(2), 545-562.

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Pobrania

  • PDF (English)

Opublikowane

2016-08-03

Jak cytować

1.
ERDOĞAN, Namık Kemal, ALTINIRMAK, Serpil & KARAMAŞA, Çağlar. Comparison of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with respect to performance of food firms listed in BIST. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting [online]. 3 sierpień 2016, T. 5, nr 1, s. 67–90. [udostępniono 6.7.2025]. DOI 10.12775/CJFA.2016.004.
  • PN-ISO 690 (Polski)
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Pobierz cytowania
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Numer

Tom 5 Nr 1 (2016)

Dział

Artykuły

Statystyki

Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 1128
Liczba cytowań: 0

Wyszukiwanie

Wyszukiwanie

Przeglądaj

  • Indeks autorów
  • Lista archiwalnych numerów

Użytkownik

Użytkownik

Aktualny numer

  • Logo Atom
  • Logo RSS2
  • Logo RSS1

Informacje

  • dla czytelników
  • dla autorów
  • dla bibliotekarzy

Newsletter

Zapisz się Wypisz się

Język / Language

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Tagi

Szukaj przy pomocy tagu:

performance analysis, fuzzy ranking, TOPSIS, VIKOR, ELECTRE

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

W górę

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partnerzy platformy czasopism

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu Deklaracja dostępności Sklep wydawnictwa